Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 1/2015

01-02-2015 | Original Research Article

Development and Use of New Therapeutics for Rare Diseases: Views from Patients, Caregivers, and Advocates

Authors: Aaron S. Kesselheim, Sarah McGraw, Lauren Thompson, Kelly O’Keefe, Joshua J. Gagne

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients with rare diseases experience the health care system differently than patients with more common conditions. They can therefore provide important perspectives on the process of developing therapeutics for their conditions.

Methods

We conducted three in-person focus groups involving rare disease patients (n = 9), caregivers (n = 8), and advocates (n = 9). Focus group participants were asked to describe their experiences with a rare disease, what they would want to know about a new drug for the disease, what outcomes they believe should be assessed in drug testing, perceptions of off-label use of a drug for treating a rare disease, views on participation in clinical trials, and opinions of the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) function. The coding structure was populated from the transcripts of the sessions, using Atlas.ti qualitative analysis software, and then analyzed for common themes.

Results

Participants described the challenges of learning to live with a poorly understood condition for which treatment is limited. Rare disease patients were willing to accept certain risks in their care in the hopes of finding some benefit, but also expressed frustrations with the costs of their care and the lack of scientific data about their treatments. They were concerned that the development and testing of therapies should, as quickly as possible, yield effective treatments to advance their quality of life.

Conclusion

With limited therapeutic options, rare disease patients often considered off-label treatments or novel drugs that posed substantial risk. Nonetheless, rare disease patients generally appreciated the rigor of the research underlying the drugs and supported the FDA’s gatekeeping role.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Selby JV. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute seeks to find out what works best by involving ‘end-users’ from the beginning. J Comp Eff Res. 2014;3(2):125–9.PubMedCrossRef Selby JV. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute seeks to find out what works best by involving ‘end-users’ from the beginning. J Comp Eff Res. 2014;3(2):125–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fleurence R, Selby JV, Odom-Walker K, Hunt G, Meltzer D, Slutsky JR, Yancy C. How the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute is engaging patients and others in shaping its research agenda. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):393–400.CrossRef Fleurence R, Selby JV, Odom-Walker K, Hunt G, Meltzer D, Slutsky JR, Yancy C. How the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute is engaging patients and others in shaping its research agenda. Health Aff. 2013;32(2):393–400.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mirzaei M, Aspin C, Essue B, Jeon YH, Dugdale P, Usherwood T, Leeder S. A patient-centred approach to health service delivery: improving health outcomes for people with chronic illness. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:251.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Mirzaei M, Aspin C, Essue B, Jeon YH, Dugdale P, Usherwood T, Leeder S. A patient-centred approach to health service delivery: improving health outcomes for people with chronic illness. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:251.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kesselheim AS. Off-label drug use and promotion: balancing public health goals and commercial speech. Am J Law Med. 2011;37:225–57.PubMed Kesselheim AS. Off-label drug use and promotion: balancing public health goals and commercial speech. Am J Law Med. 2011;37:225–57.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Kesselheim AS, Myers JA, Avorn J. Characteristics of clinical trials to support approval of orphan vs nonorphan drugs for cancer. JAMA. 2011;305:2320–6.PubMedCrossRef Kesselheim AS, Myers JA, Avorn J. Characteristics of clinical trials to support approval of orphan vs nonorphan drugs for cancer. JAMA. 2011;305:2320–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.
10.
go back to reference Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1999. Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1999.
11.
go back to reference Rives Bogart K, Tickle-Degnen L, Joffe MS. Social interaction experiences of adults with Moebius syndrome: a focus group. J Health Psychol. 2012;17(8):1212–22.CrossRef Rives Bogart K, Tickle-Degnen L, Joffe MS. Social interaction experiences of adults with Moebius syndrome: a focus group. J Health Psychol. 2012;17(8):1212–22.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Joachim G, Acorn S. Life with a rare chronic disease: the scleroderma experience. J Adv Nurs. 2003;42(6):598–606.PubMedCrossRef Joachim G, Acorn S. Life with a rare chronic disease: the scleroderma experience. J Adv Nurs. 2003;42(6):598–606.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Packman W, Wilson Crosbie T, Behnken M, Eudy K, Packman S. Living with Gaucher disease: emotional health, psychosocial needs and concerns of individuals with Gaucher disease. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2010;152A:2002–10.PubMedCrossRef Packman W, Wilson Crosbie T, Behnken M, Eudy K, Packman S. Living with Gaucher disease: emotional health, psychosocial needs and concerns of individuals with Gaucher disease. Am J Med Genet Part A. 2010;152A:2002–10.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Packman W, Mehta I, Rafie S, Mehta J, Naldi M, Hart Mooney K. Young adults with MSUD and their transition to adulthood: psychosocial issues. J Genet Counsel. 2012;21:692–703.CrossRef Packman W, Mehta I, Rafie S, Mehta J, Naldi M, Hart Mooney K. Young adults with MSUD and their transition to adulthood: psychosocial issues. J Genet Counsel. 2012;21:692–703.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Raina P, O’Donnell M, Rosenbaum P, Brehaut J, Walter SD, Russell D, Swinton M, Zhu B, Wood E. The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy. Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):e626–36.PubMedCrossRef Raina P, O’Donnell M, Rosenbaum P, Brehaut J, Walter SD, Russell D, Swinton M, Zhu B, Wood E. The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy. Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):e626–36.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hughes RA, Sinha A, Higginson I, Down K, Leigh PN. Living with motor neurone disease: lives, experiences of services and suggestions for change. Health Soc Care Community. 2005;13(1):64–74.PubMedCrossRef Hughes RA, Sinha A, Higginson I, Down K, Leigh PN. Living with motor neurone disease: lives, experiences of services and suggestions for change. Health Soc Care Community. 2005;13(1):64–74.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Midtgaard J, Hansen MJ, Grandjean B. Modesty and recognition—a qualitative study of the lived experience of recovery from anal cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(9):1213–22.PubMedCrossRef Midtgaard J, Hansen MJ, Grandjean B. Modesty and recognition—a qualitative study of the lived experience of recovery from anal cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2009;17(9):1213–22.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Corbin J, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. 3rd ed. New York: Sage; 2008. Corbin J, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. 3rd ed. New York: Sage; 2008.
19.
go back to reference Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:1758–72.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:1758–72.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Curry LA, Nembhard IM, Bradley EH. Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation. 2009;119(10):1442–52.PubMedCrossRef Curry LA, Nembhard IM, Bradley EH. Qualitative and mixed methods provide unique contributions to outcomes research. Circulation. 2009;119(10):1442–52.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Richards T, Montori VM, Godlee F, Lapsley P, Paul D. Let the patient revolution begin. BMJ. 2013;346:f2614.PubMedCrossRef Richards T, Montori VM, Godlee F, Lapsley P, Paul D. Let the patient revolution begin. BMJ. 2013;346:f2614.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference van der Lee JH, Wesseling J, Tanck MW, Offringa M. Efficient ways exist to obtain the optimal sample size in clinical trials in rare diseases. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:324–30.PubMedCrossRef van der Lee JH, Wesseling J, Tanck MW, Offringa M. Efficient ways exist to obtain the optimal sample size in clinical trials in rare diseases. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:324–30.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kesselheim AS, Gagne JJ. Strategies for post-market surveillance of drugs for rare diseases. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95(3):265–8.PubMedCrossRef Kesselheim AS, Gagne JJ. Strategies for post-market surveillance of drugs for rare diseases. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;95(3):265–8.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gupta S, Faughnan ME, Tomlinson GA, Bayoumi AM. A framework for applying unfamiliar trial designs in studies of rare diseases. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(10):1085–94.PubMedCrossRef Gupta S, Faughnan ME, Tomlinson GA, Bayoumi AM. A framework for applying unfamiliar trial designs in studies of rare diseases. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(10):1085–94.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Boström J, Yacoub A, Schramm J. Prospective collection and analysis of error data in a neurosurgical clinic. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010;112(4):314–9.PubMedCrossRef Boström J, Yacoub A, Schramm J. Prospective collection and analysis of error data in a neurosurgical clinic. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010;112(4):314–9.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Berry DL, Hong F, Halpenny B, Partridge AH, Fann JR, Wolpin S, Lober WB, Bush NE, Parvathaneni U, Back AL, Amtmann D, Ford R. Electronic self-report assessment for cancer and self-care support: results of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(3):199–205.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Berry DL, Hong F, Halpenny B, Partridge AH, Fann JR, Wolpin S, Lober WB, Bush NE, Parvathaneni U, Back AL, Amtmann D, Ford R. Electronic self-report assessment for cancer and self-care support: results of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(3):199–205.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Dagher R, Johnson J, Williams G, Keegan P, Pazdur R. Accelerated approval of oncology products: a decade of experience. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(20):1500–9.PubMedCrossRef Dagher R, Johnson J, Williams G, Keegan P, Pazdur R. Accelerated approval of oncology products: a decade of experience. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(20):1500–9.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Gater A, Thomson TA, Strandberg-Larsen M, Haemophilia B. impact on patients and economic burden of disease. Thromb Haemost. 2011;106(3):398–404.PubMedCrossRef Gater A, Thomson TA, Strandberg-Larsen M, Haemophilia B. impact on patients and economic burden of disease. Thromb Haemost. 2011;106(3):398–404.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Daniel GW, Rubens EK, McClellan M. Coverage with evidence developmentfor Medicare beneficiaries: challenges and next steps. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(14):1281–2.PubMedCrossRef Daniel GW, Rubens EK, McClellan M. Coverage with evidence developmentfor Medicare beneficiaries: challenges and next steps. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(14):1281–2.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18:59–82.CrossRef Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 2006;18:59–82.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development and Use of New Therapeutics for Rare Diseases: Views from Patients, Caregivers, and Advocates
Authors
Aaron S. Kesselheim
Sarah McGraw
Lauren Thompson
Kelly O’Keefe
Joshua J. Gagne
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-014-0096-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 1/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine