Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation 4/2022

Open Access 01-04-2022 | Multiple Sclerosis | Original Research Article

Multiple Sclerosis Relapses Following Cessation of Fingolimod

Authors: Charles B. Malpas, Izanne Roos, Sifat Sharmin, Katherine Buzzard, Olga Skibina, Helmut Butzkueven, Ludwig Kappos, Francesco Patti, Raed Alroughani, Dana Horakova, Eva Kubala Havrdova, Guillermo Izquierdo, Sara Eichau, Suzanne Hodgkinson, Pierre Grammond, Jeannette Lechner-Scott, Tomas Kalincik, the MSBase Study Group

Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Issue 4/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is growing interest in the issue of disease reactivation in multiple sclerosis following fingolimod cessation. Relatively little is known about modifiers of the risk of post-cessation relapse, including the delay to commencement of new therapy and prior disease activity.

Objective

We aimed to determine the rate of relapse following cessation of fingolimod and to identify predictors of relapse following cessation.

Methods

Data were extracted from the MSBase registry in March 2019. Inclusion criteria were (a) clinically definite relapsing multiple sclerosis, (b) treatment with fingolimod for ≥ 12 months, (c) follow-up after cessation for ≥ 12 months, and (d) at least one Expanded Disability Status Scale score recorded in the 12 months before cessation.

Results

A total of 685 patients were identified who met criteria. The mean annualised relapse rate was 1.71 (95% CI 1.59, 1.85) in the year prior to fingolimod, 0.50 (95% CI 0.44, 0.55) on fingolimod and 0.43 (95% CI 0.38, 0.49) after fingolimod. Of these, 218 (32%) patients experienced a relapse in the first 12 months. Predictors of a higher relapse rate in the first year were: younger age at fingolimod cessation, higher relapse rate in the year prior to cessation, delaying commencement of new therapy and switching to low-efficacy therapy.

Conclusions

Disease reactivation following fingolimod cessation is more common in younger patients, those with greater disease activity prior to cessation and in those who switch to a low-efficacy therapy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Subei AM, Cohen JA. Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators in multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2015;29(7):565–75.CrossRef Subei AM, Cohen JA. Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators in multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2015;29(7):565–75.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hunter SF, Bowen JD, Reder AT. The direct effects of fingolimod in the central nervous system: implications for relapsing multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2016;30(2):135–47.CrossRef Hunter SF, Bowen JD, Reder AT. The direct effects of fingolimod in the central nervous system: implications for relapsing multiple sclerosis. CNS Drugs. 2016;30(2):135–47.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Khatri BO. Fingolimod in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: long-term experience and an update on the clinical evidence. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016;9(2):130–47.CrossRef Khatri BO. Fingolimod in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: long-term experience and an update on the clinical evidence. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016;9(2):130–47.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ziemssen T, Medin J, Couto CA-M, Mitchell CR. Multiple sclerosis in the real world: a systematic review of fingolimod as a case study. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16(4):355–76.CrossRef Ziemssen T, Medin J, Couto CA-M, Mitchell CR. Multiple sclerosis in the real world: a systematic review of fingolimod as a case study. Autoimmun Rev. 2017;16(4):355–76.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Koch-Henriksen N, Magyari M, Sellebjerg F, Soelberg SP. A comparison of multiple sclerosis clinical disease activity between patients treated with natalizumab and fingolimod. Mult Scler. 2017;23(2):234–41.CrossRef Koch-Henriksen N, Magyari M, Sellebjerg F, Soelberg SP. A comparison of multiple sclerosis clinical disease activity between patients treated with natalizumab and fingolimod. Mult Scler. 2017;23(2):234–41.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kalincik T, Horakova D, Spelman T, Jokubaitis V, Trojano M, Lugaresi A, et al. Switch to natalizumab versus fingolimod in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2015;77(3):425–35.CrossRef Kalincik T, Horakova D, Spelman T, Jokubaitis V, Trojano M, Lugaresi A, et al. Switch to natalizumab versus fingolimod in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2015;77(3):425–35.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lorscheider J, Benkert P, Lienert C, Hänni P, Derfuss T, Kuhle J, et al. Comparative analysis of natalizumab versus fingolimod as second-line treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2018;24(6):777–85.CrossRef Lorscheider J, Benkert P, Lienert C, Hänni P, Derfuss T, Kuhle J, et al. Comparative analysis of natalizumab versus fingolimod as second-line treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2018;24(6):777–85.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Prosperini L, Saccà F, Cordioli C, Cortese A, Buttari F, Pontecorvo S, et al. Real-world effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod compared with self-injectable drugs in non-responders and in treatment-naïve patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2017;264(2):284–94.CrossRef Prosperini L, Saccà F, Cordioli C, Cortese A, Buttari F, Pontecorvo S, et al. Real-world effectiveness of natalizumab and fingolimod compared with self-injectable drugs in non-responders and in treatment-naïve patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2017;264(2):284–94.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference He A, Spelman T, Jokubaitis V, Havrdova E, Horakova D, Trojano M, et al. Comparison of switch to fingolimod or interferon beta/glatiramer acetate in active multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(4):405–13.CrossRef He A, Spelman T, Jokubaitis V, Havrdova E, Horakova D, Trojano M, et al. Comparison of switch to fingolimod or interferon beta/glatiramer acetate in active multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(4):405–13.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Barbin L, Rousseau C, Jousset N, Casey R, Debouverie M, Vukusic S, et al. Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: a French multicenter observational study. Neurology. 2016;86(8):771–8.CrossRef Barbin L, Rousseau C, Jousset N, Casey R, Debouverie M, Vukusic S, et al. Comparative efficacy of fingolimod vs natalizumab: a French multicenter observational study. Neurology. 2016;86(8):771–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Barry B, Erwin AA, Stevens J, Tornatore C. Fingolimod rebound: a review of the clinical experience and management considerations. Neurol Ther. 2019;8(2):241–50.CrossRef Barry B, Erwin AA, Stevens J, Tornatore C. Fingolimod rebound: a review of the clinical experience and management considerations. Neurol Ther. 2019;8(2):241–50.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fragoso YD, Adoni T, Gomes S, Goncalves MV, Parolin LF, Rosa G, et al. Severe exacerbation of multiple sclerosis following withdrawal of fingolimod. Clin Drug Invest. 2019;39(9):909–13.CrossRef Fragoso YD, Adoni T, Gomes S, Goncalves MV, Parolin LF, Rosa G, et al. Severe exacerbation of multiple sclerosis following withdrawal of fingolimod. Clin Drug Invest. 2019;39(9):909–13.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Frau J, Sormani M, Signori A, Realmuto S, Baroncini D, Annovazzi P, et al. Clinical activity after fingolimod cessation: disease reactivation or rebound? Eur J Neurol. 2018;25(10):1270–5.CrossRef Frau J, Sormani M, Signori A, Realmuto S, Baroncini D, Annovazzi P, et al. Clinical activity after fingolimod cessation: disease reactivation or rebound? Eur J Neurol. 2018;25(10):1270–5.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yoshii F, Moriya Y, Ohnuki T, Ryo M, Takahashi W. Neurological safety of fingolimod: an updated review. Clin Exp Neuroimmunol. 2017;8(3):233–43.CrossRef Yoshii F, Moriya Y, Ohnuki T, Ryo M, Takahashi W. Neurological safety of fingolimod: an updated review. Clin Exp Neuroimmunol. 2017;8(3):233–43.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Berger B, Baumgartner A, Rauer S, Mader I, Luetzen N, Farenkopf U, et al. Severe disease reactivation in four patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis after fingolimod cessation. J Neuroimmunol. 2015;282:118–22.CrossRef Berger B, Baumgartner A, Rauer S, Mader I, Luetzen N, Farenkopf U, et al. Severe disease reactivation in four patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis after fingolimod cessation. J Neuroimmunol. 2015;282:118–22.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Faissner S, Hoepner R, Lukas C, Chan A, Gold R, Ellrichmann G. Tumefactive multiple sclerosis lesions in two patients after cessation of fingolimod treatment. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2015;8(5):233–8.CrossRef Faissner S, Hoepner R, Lukas C, Chan A, Gold R, Ellrichmann G. Tumefactive multiple sclerosis lesions in two patients after cessation of fingolimod treatment. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2015;8(5):233–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(2):292–302.CrossRef Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69(2):292–302.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kalincik T, Kuhle J, Pucci E, Rojas JI, Tsolaki M, Sirbu C-A, et al. Data quality evaluation for observational multiple sclerosis registries. Mult Scler. 2017;23(5):647–55.CrossRef Kalincik T, Kuhle J, Pucci E, Rojas JI, Tsolaki M, Sirbu C-A, et al. Data quality evaluation for observational multiple sclerosis registries. Mult Scler. 2017;23(5):647–55.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Butzkueven H, Chapman J, Cristiano E, Grand-Maison F, Hoffmann M, Izquierdo G, et al. MSBase: an international, online registry and platform for collaborative outcomes research in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2006;12(6):769–74.CrossRef Butzkueven H, Chapman J, Cristiano E, Grand-Maison F, Hoffmann M, Izquierdo G, et al. MSBase: an international, online registry and platform for collaborative outcomes research in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2006;12(6):769–74.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tramacere I, Del-Giovane C, Salanti G, D’Amico R, Filippini G. Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9:CD011381. Tramacere I, Del-Giovane C, Salanti G, D’Amico R, Filippini G. Immunomodulators and immunosuppressants for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9:CD011381.
21.
go back to reference Landi D, Signori A, Cellerino M, Fenu G, Nicoletti CG, Ponzano M, et al. What happens after fingolimod discontinuation? A multicentre real-life experience. J Neurol. 2022;269(2):796–804.CrossRef Landi D, Signori A, Cellerino M, Fenu G, Nicoletti CG, Ponzano M, et al. What happens after fingolimod discontinuation? A multicentre real-life experience. J Neurol. 2022;269(2):796–804.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Jokubaitis VG, Li V, Kalincik T, Izquierdo G, Hodgkinson S, Alroughani R, et al. Fingolimod after natalizumab and the risk of short-term relapse. Neurology. 2014;82(14):1204–11.CrossRef Jokubaitis VG, Li V, Kalincik T, Izquierdo G, Hodgkinson S, Alroughani R, et al. Fingolimod after natalizumab and the risk of short-term relapse. Neurology. 2014;82(14):1204–11.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Multiple Sclerosis Relapses Following Cessation of Fingolimod
Authors
Charles B. Malpas
Izanne Roos
Sifat Sharmin
Katherine Buzzard
Olga Skibina
Helmut Butzkueven
Ludwig Kappos
Francesco Patti
Raed Alroughani
Dana Horakova
Eva Kubala Havrdova
Guillermo Izquierdo
Sara Eichau
Suzanne Hodgkinson
Pierre Grammond
Jeannette Lechner-Scott
Tomas Kalincik
the MSBase Study Group
Publication date
01-04-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-022-01129-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Clinical Drug Investigation 4/2022 Go to the issue