Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pain and Therapy 2/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Spinal Cord Stimulation | Original Research

Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience

Authors: Gernot Surges, Joachim Paulus, Theresa Blaß, Kerstin Mendryscha, Martin Bettag, Anand Rotte

Published in: Pain and Therapy | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with lower thoracic leads has been studied extensively. However, the evidence base for cervical SCS is less well developed, and reports of multiarea SCS lead placement are uncommon. Therefore, this single-center retrospective study evaluated outcomes from 10-kHz SCS with cervical or combined cervical and thoracic lead placement.

Method

All patients that underwent a 10-kHz SCS trial with either cervical or combined cervical and thoracic lead placement between 2015 and 2020 were included in our study. We reviewed patient’s charts for demographic information, lead placement, and pain scores up to 48 months after implantation.

Results

Of the 105 patients that underwent a 10-kHz SCS trial during the review period, 92 (88%) had back/neck or extremity pain that responded to therapy (≥ 50% pain relief from baseline) and received a permanent system. Sixty-two of these patients (67%) were implanted with combined cervical and thoracic leads, while 30 (33%) received cervical-only leads. Pain relief in both regions exceeded 60% at most visits throughout the 48-month study period. Throughout follow-up, the responder rate in both pain areas was consistently ≥ 70%. No unexpected adverse events occurred.

Conclusion

The 10-kHz SCS provided effective and durable pain relief with either cervical or combined cervical and thoracic leads. The efficacy and safety profile of both applications appears to be comparable to lower thoracic SCS. Our results suggest that 10-kHz SCS is a useful paresthesia-free therapeutic option for chronic neuropathic pain originating in the cervical area, as well as more complex multiarea pain presentations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gharibo C, Laux G, Forzani BR, Sellars C, Kim E, Zou S. State of the field survey: spinal cord stimulator use by academic pain medicine practices. Pain Med. 2014;15(2):188–95.CrossRef Gharibo C, Laux G, Forzani BR, Sellars C, Kim E, Zou S. State of the field survey: spinal cord stimulator use by academic pain medicine practices. Pain Med. 2014;15(2):188–95.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Deer TR, Grider JS, Lamer TJ, Pope JE, Falowski S, Hunter CW, et al. A systematic literature review of spine neurostimulation therapies for the treatment of pain. Pain Med. 2020;21(7):1421–32.CrossRef Deer TR, Grider JS, Lamer TJ, Pope JE, Falowski S, Hunter CW, et al. A systematic literature review of spine neurostimulation therapies for the treatment of pain. Pain Med. 2020;21(7):1421–32.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Eldabe S, Buchser E, Duarte RV. Complications of spinal cord stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation techniques: a review of the literature. Pain Med. 2015;17(2):325–36. Eldabe S, Buchser E, Duarte RV. Complications of spinal cord stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation techniques: a review of the literature. Pain Med. 2015;17(2):325–36.
4.
go back to reference Deer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, Pope J, Krames E, Thomson S, et al. The appropriate use of neurostimulation: avoidance and treatment of complications of neurostimulation therapies for the treatment of chronic pain. Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(6):571–97 (Discussion 97-8).CrossRef Deer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, Pope J, Krames E, Thomson S, et al. The appropriate use of neurostimulation: avoidance and treatment of complications of neurostimulation therapies for the treatment of chronic pain. Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(6):571–97 (Discussion 97-8).CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Deer TR, Lamer TJ, Pope JE, Falowski SM, Provenzano DA, Slavin K, et al. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) safety guidelines for the reduction of severe neurological injury. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(1):15–30.CrossRef Deer TR, Lamer TJ, Pope JE, Falowski SM, Provenzano DA, Slavin K, et al. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) safety guidelines for the reduction of severe neurological injury. Neuromodulation. 2017;20(1):15–30.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Provenzano DA, Amirdelfan K, Kapural L, Sitzman BT. Evidence gaps in the use of spinal cord stimulation for treating chronic spine conditions. Spine. 2017;42(Suppl 14):S80–92.CrossRef Provenzano DA, Amirdelfan K, Kapural L, Sitzman BT. Evidence gaps in the use of spinal cord stimulation for treating chronic spine conditions. Spine. 2017;42(Suppl 14):S80–92.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Barolat G, Massaro F, He J, Zeme S, Ketcik B. Mapping of sensory responses to epidural stimulation of the intraspinal neural structures in man. J Neurosurg. 1993;78(2):233–9.CrossRef Barolat G, Massaro F, He J, Zeme S, Ketcik B. Mapping of sensory responses to epidural stimulation of the intraspinal neural structures in man. J Neurosurg. 1993;78(2):233–9.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Al-Kaisy A, Royds J, Al-Kaisy O, Palmisani S, Pang D, Smith T, et al. Explant rates of electrical neuromodulation devices in 1177 patients in a single center over an 11-year period. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020;45(11):883–90.CrossRef Al-Kaisy A, Royds J, Al-Kaisy O, Palmisani S, Pang D, Smith T, et al. Explant rates of electrical neuromodulation devices in 1177 patients in a single center over an 11-year period. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020;45(11):883–90.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Deer TR, Skaribas IM, Haider N, Salmon J, Kim C, Nelson C, et al. Effectiveness of cervical spinal cord stimulation for the management of chronic pain. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(3):265–71 (Discussion 71).CrossRef Deer TR, Skaribas IM, Haider N, Salmon J, Kim C, Nelson C, et al. Effectiveness of cervical spinal cord stimulation for the management of chronic pain. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(3):265–71 (Discussion 71).CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Slyer J, Scott S, Sheldon B, Hancu M, Bridger C, Pilitsis JG. Less pain relief, more depression, and female sex correlate with spinal cord stimulation explants. Neuromodulation. 2020;23(5):673–9.CrossRef Slyer J, Scott S, Sheldon B, Hancu M, Bridger C, Pilitsis JG. Less pain relief, more depression, and female sex correlate with spinal cord stimulation explants. Neuromodulation. 2020;23(5):673–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Joosten EA, Franken G. Spinal cord stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain: mechanisms of action, new locations, new paradigms. Pain. 2020;161(Suppl 1):S104–13.CrossRef Joosten EA, Franken G. Spinal cord stimulation in chronic neuropathic pain: mechanisms of action, new locations, new paradigms. Pain. 2020;161(Suppl 1):S104–13.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lee KY, Bae C, Lee D, Kagan Z, Bradley K, Chung JM, et al. Low-intensity, kilohertz frequency spinal cord stimulation differently affects excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the rodent superficial dorsal horn. Neuroscience. 2020;428:132–9.CrossRef Lee KY, Bae C, Lee D, Kagan Z, Bradley K, Chung JM, et al. Low-intensity, kilohertz frequency spinal cord stimulation differently affects excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the rodent superficial dorsal horn. Neuroscience. 2020;428:132–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lee KY, Lee D, Kagan ZB, Wang D, Bradley K. Differential modulation of dorsal horn neurons by various spinal cord stimulation strategies. Biomedicines. 2021;9(5):568.CrossRef Lee KY, Lee D, Kagan ZB, Wang D, Bradley K. Differential modulation of dorsal horn neurons by various spinal cord stimulation strategies. Biomedicines. 2021;9(5):568.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference De Carolis G, Paroli M, Tollapi L, Doust MW, Burgher AH, Yu C, et al. Paresthesia-independence: an assessment of technical factors related to 10 kHz paresthesia-free spinal cord stimulation. Pain Phys. 2017;20(4):331–41. De Carolis G, Paroli M, Tollapi L, Doust MW, Burgher AH, Yu C, et al. Paresthesia-independence: an assessment of technical factors related to 10 kHz paresthesia-free spinal cord stimulation. Pain Phys. 2017;20(4):331–41.
15.
go back to reference Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Vallejo R, Sitzman BT, et al. Novel 10-kHz high-frequency therapy (HF10 Therapy) is superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: the SENZA-RCT randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(4):851–60.CrossRef Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Vallejo R, Sitzman BT, et al. Novel 10-kHz high-frequency therapy (HF10 Therapy) is superior to traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: the SENZA-RCT randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(4):851–60.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Vallejo R, Sitzman BT, et al. Comparison of 10-kHz high-frequency and traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: 24-month results from a multicenter, randomized. Controll Pivotal Trial Neurosurg. 2016;79(5):667–77. Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Vallejo R, Sitzman BT, et al. Comparison of 10-kHz high-frequency and traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: 24-month results from a multicenter, randomized. Controll Pivotal Trial Neurosurg. 2016;79(5):667–77.
17.
go back to reference Van Buyten JP, Al-Kaisy A, Smet I, Palmisani S, Smith T. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back pain patients: results of a prospective multicenter European clinical study. Neuromodulation. 2013;16(1):59–65 (Discussion -6).CrossRef Van Buyten JP, Al-Kaisy A, Smet I, Palmisani S, Smith T. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back pain patients: results of a prospective multicenter European clinical study. Neuromodulation. 2013;16(1):59–65 (Discussion -6).CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Al-Kaisy A, Van Buyten JP, Smet I, Palmisani S, Pang D, Smith T. Sustained effectiveness of 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for patients with chronic, low back pain: 24-month results of a prospective multicenter study. Pain Med. 2014;15(3):347–54.CrossRef Al-Kaisy A, Van Buyten JP, Smet I, Palmisani S, Pang D, Smith T. Sustained effectiveness of 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for patients with chronic, low back pain: 24-month results of a prospective multicenter study. Pain Med. 2014;15(3):347–54.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rapcan R, Mlaka J, Venglarcik M, Vinklerova V, Gajdos M, Illes R. High-frequency—spinal cord stimulation. Bratisl Med J. 2015;116(06):354–6.CrossRef Rapcan R, Mlaka J, Venglarcik M, Vinklerova V, Gajdos M, Illes R. High-frequency—spinal cord stimulation. Bratisl Med J. 2015;116(06):354–6.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Smith TE, Pang D, Lam K, Burgoyne W, et al. 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic axial low back pain in patients with no history of spinal surgery: a preliminary, prospective. Open Label Proof Concept Study Neuromodulation. 2017;20(1):63–70.PubMed Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Smith TE, Pang D, Lam K, Burgoyne W, et al. 10 kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation for chronic axial low back pain in patients with no history of spinal surgery: a preliminary, prospective. Open Label Proof Concept Study Neuromodulation. 2017;20(1):63–70.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Smith TE, Carganillo R, Houghton R, Pang D, et al. Long-term improvements in chronic axial low back pain patients without previous spinal surgery: a cohort analysis of 10-kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation over 36 months. Pain Med. 2018;19(6):1219–26.CrossRef Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Smith TE, Carganillo R, Houghton R, Pang D, et al. Long-term improvements in chronic axial low back pain patients without previous spinal surgery: a cohort analysis of 10-kHz high-frequency spinal cord stimulation over 36 months. Pain Med. 2018;19(6):1219–26.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference DiBenedetto DJ, Wawrzyniak KM, Schatman ME, Kulich RJ, Finkelman M. 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation: a retrospective analysis of real-world data from a community-based, interdisciplinary pain facility. J Pain Res. 2018;11:2929–41.CrossRef DiBenedetto DJ, Wawrzyniak KM, Schatman ME, Kulich RJ, Finkelman M. 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation: a retrospective analysis of real-world data from a community-based, interdisciplinary pain facility. J Pain Res. 2018;11:2929–41.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Stauss T, El Majdoub F, Sayed D, Surges G, Rosenberg WS, Kapural L, et al. A multicenter real-world review of 10 kHz SCS outcomes for treatment of chronic trunk and/or limb pain. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019;6(3):496–507.CrossRef Stauss T, El Majdoub F, Sayed D, Surges G, Rosenberg WS, Kapural L, et al. A multicenter real-world review of 10 kHz SCS outcomes for treatment of chronic trunk and/or limb pain. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019;6(3):496–507.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Baranidharan G, Edgar D, Bretherton B, Crowther T, Lalkhen AG, Fritz AK, et al. Efficacy and safety of 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of real-world retrospective studies. Biomedicines. 2021;9(2):180.CrossRef Baranidharan G, Edgar D, Bretherton B, Crowther T, Lalkhen AG, Fritz AK, et al. Efficacy and safety of 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of real-world retrospective studies. Biomedicines. 2021;9(2):180.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gupta M, Knezevic NN, Abd-Elsayed A, Ray M, Patel K, Chowdhury B. Treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy—a narrative review of pharmacological and interventional approaches. Biomedicines. 2021;9(5):573.CrossRef Gupta M, Knezevic NN, Abd-Elsayed A, Ray M, Patel K, Chowdhury B. Treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy—a narrative review of pharmacological and interventional approaches. Biomedicines. 2021;9(5):573.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Francio VT, Polston KF, Murphy MT, Hagedorn J, Sayed D. Management of chronic and neuropathic pain with 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation technology: summary of findings from preclinical and clinical studies. Biomedicines. 2021;9(6):644.CrossRef Francio VT, Polston KF, Murphy MT, Hagedorn J, Sayed D. Management of chronic and neuropathic pain with 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation technology: summary of findings from preclinical and clinical studies. Biomedicines. 2021;9(6):644.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Burgher A, Kosek P, Surrett S, Rosen SM, Bromberg T, Gulve A, et al. Ten kilohertz SCS for treatment of chronic upper extremity pain (UEP): results from prospective observational study. J Pain Res. 2020;13:2837–51.CrossRef Burgher A, Kosek P, Surrett S, Rosen SM, Bromberg T, Gulve A, et al. Ten kilohertz SCS for treatment of chronic upper extremity pain (UEP): results from prospective observational study. J Pain Res. 2020;13:2837–51.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Amirdelfan K, Vallejo R, Benyamin R, Yu C, Yang T, Bundschu R, et al. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz for the treatment of combined neck and arm pain: results from a prospective multicenter study. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(2):176–85.CrossRef Amirdelfan K, Vallejo R, Benyamin R, Yu C, Yang T, Bundschu R, et al. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz for the treatment of combined neck and arm pain: results from a prospective multicenter study. Neurosurgery. 2020;87(2):176–85.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Verrills P, Salmon J, Russo M, Gliner B, Barnard A, Caraway D. 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for chronic upper limb and neck pain: Australian experience. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(11):2786–94.CrossRef Verrills P, Salmon J, Russo M, Gliner B, Barnard A, Caraway D. 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation for chronic upper limb and neck pain: Australian experience. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(11):2786–94.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference El Majdoub F, Neudorfer C, Richter R, Schieferdecker S, Maarouf M. 10 kHz cervical SCS for chronic neck and upper limb pain: 12 months’ results. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019;6(11):2223–9.CrossRef El Majdoub F, Neudorfer C, Richter R, Schieferdecker S, Maarouf M. 10 kHz cervical SCS for chronic neck and upper limb pain: 12 months’ results. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019;6(11):2223–9.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Sayed D, Salmon J, Khan TW, Sack AM, Braun T, Barnard A, et al. Retrospective analysis of real-world outcomes of 10 kHz SCS in patients with upper limb and neck pain. J Pain Res. 2020;13:1441–8.CrossRef Sayed D, Salmon J, Khan TW, Sack AM, Braun T, Barnard A, et al. Retrospective analysis of real-world outcomes of 10 kHz SCS in patients with upper limb and neck pain. J Pain Res. 2020;13:1441–8.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Salmon J. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz for widespread pain: a retrospective survey of outcomes from combined cervical and thoracic electrode placements. Postgrad Med. 2019;131(3):230–8.CrossRef Salmon J. High-frequency spinal cord stimulation at 10 kHz for widespread pain: a retrospective survey of outcomes from combined cervical and thoracic electrode placements. Postgrad Med. 2019;131(3):230–8.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Cameron T. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(3 Suppl Spine):254–67.PubMed Cameron T. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(3 Suppl Spine):254–67.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Turner JA, Loeser JD, Deyo RA, Sanders SB. Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain. 2004;108(1–2):137–47.CrossRef Turner JA, Loeser JD, Deyo RA, Sanders SB. Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications. Pain. 2004;108(1–2):137–47.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Taylor RS, Van Buyten JP, Buchser E. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain and failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review and analysis of prognostic factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(1):152–60.CrossRef Taylor RS, Van Buyten JP, Buchser E. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain and failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review and analysis of prognostic factors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(1):152–60.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Kumar K, Hunter G, Demeria D. Spinal cord stimulation in treatment of chronic benign pain: challenges in treatment planning and present status, a 22-year experience. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(3):481–96 (Discussion -96).CrossRef Kumar K, Hunter G, Demeria D. Spinal cord stimulation in treatment of chronic benign pain: challenges in treatment planning and present status, a 22-year experience. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(3):481–96 (Discussion -96).CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Mekhail NA, Mathews M, Nageeb F, Guirguis M, Mekhail MN, Cheng J. Retrospective review of 707 cases of spinal cord stimulation: indications and complications. Pain Pract. 2011;11(2):148–53.CrossRef Mekhail NA, Mathews M, Nageeb F, Guirguis M, Mekhail MN, Cheng J. Retrospective review of 707 cases of spinal cord stimulation: indications and complications. Pain Pract. 2011;11(2):148–53.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Kleiber JC, Marlier B, Bannwarth M, Theret E, Peruzzi P, Litre F. Is spinal cord stimulation safe? A review of 13 years of implantations and complications. Rev Neurol. 2016;172(11):689–95.CrossRef Kleiber JC, Marlier B, Bannwarth M, Theret E, Peruzzi P, Litre F. Is spinal cord stimulation safe? A review of 13 years of implantations and complications. Rev Neurol. 2016;172(11):689–95.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Hoelzer BC, Bendel MA, Deer TR, Eldrige JS, Walega DR, Wang Z, et al. Spinal cord stimulator implant infection rates and risk factors: a multicenter retrospective study. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface. 2017;20(6):558–62.CrossRef Hoelzer BC, Bendel MA, Deer TR, Eldrige JS, Walega DR, Wang Z, et al. Spinal cord stimulator implant infection rates and risk factors: a multicenter retrospective study. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface. 2017;20(6):558–62.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Gupta M, Scowcroft J, Kloster D, Guirguis M, Carlson J, McJunkin T, et al. 10-kHz Spinal cord stimulation for chronic postsurgical pain: results from a 12-month prospective, multicenter study. Pain Pract. 2020;20(8):908–18.CrossRef Gupta M, Scowcroft J, Kloster D, Guirguis M, Carlson J, McJunkin T, et al. 10-kHz Spinal cord stimulation for chronic postsurgical pain: results from a 12-month prospective, multicenter study. Pain Pract. 2020;20(8):908–18.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Verrills P, Salmon J, Russo M. A multi-center, prospective, clinical trial of high frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS) at 10 kHz in the treatment of chronic upper limb and neck pain: australian experience—quality of life outcomes. Poster presented at: 23nd annual meeting of the North American Neuromodulation Society (NANS); January 23–26, 2020. Verrills P, Salmon J, Russo M. A multi-center, prospective, clinical trial of high frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF-SCS) at 10 kHz in the treatment of chronic upper limb and neck pain: australian experience—quality of life outcomes. Poster presented at: 23nd annual meeting of the North American Neuromodulation Society (NANS); January 23–26, 2020.
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and Safety of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Using Cervical and Thoracic Leads: A Single-Center Retrospective Experience
Authors
Gernot Surges
Joachim Paulus
Theresa Blaß
Kerstin Mendryscha
Martin Bettag
Anand Rotte
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Pain and Therapy / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2193-8237
Electronic ISSN: 2193-651X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-021-00287-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Pain and Therapy 2/2021 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine