Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurology and Therapy 2/2023

Open Access 10-02-2023 | Multiple Sclerosis | ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Real-World Effectiveness of Natalizumab Extended Interval Dosing in a French Cohort

Authors: Juliette Pelle, Anais R. Briant, Pierre Branger, Nathalie Derache, Charlotte Arnaud, Christine Lebrun-Frenay, Mikael Cohen, Lydiane Mondot, Jerome De Seze, Kevin Bigaut, Nicolas Collongues, Laurent Kremer, Damien Ricard, Flavie Bompaire, Charlotte Ohlmann, Magali Sallansonnet-Froment, Jonathan Ciron, Damien Biotti, Beatrice Pignolet, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Gilles Defer

Published in: Neurology and Therapy | Issue 2/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Natalizumab, a therapy for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), is associated with a risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Over the last several years, practitioners have used off-label extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab to reduce PML risk, despite the absence of a large-scale efficacy evaluation.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study among adults with RRMS receiving stable standard interval dosing (SID), defined as a ≥ 12-month consecutive period of ≥ 11 natalizumab infusions/year in France. We compared the 12-month risk difference of remaining relapse-free (primary endpoint) between patients who switched to EID (≤ 9 natalizumab infusions) and those who remained on SID, with a noninferiority margin of − 11%. We used propensity score methods such as inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Secondary endpoints were annualized relapse rate, disease progression, and safety.

Results

Baseline characteristics were similar between patients receiving EID (n = 147) and SID (n = 156). The proportion of relapse-free patients 12 months postbaseline was 142/147 in the EID (96.6%) and 144/156 in the SID group (92.3%); risk difference (95% CI) 4.3% (− 1.3 to 9.8%); p < 0.001 for non-inferiority. There were no significant differences between relapse rates (0.043 vs. 0.083 per year, respectively; p = 0.14) or Expanded Disability Status Scale mean scores (2.43 vs. 2.72, respectively; p = 0.18); anti-JC virus index values were similar (p = 0.23); and no instances of PML were reported. The comparisons using IPTW (n = 306) and PSM (n = 204) were consistent.

Conclusion

These results support the pertinence of using an EID strategy for RRMS patients treated with natalizumab.

Clinical Trials

gov identifier (NCT04580381).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Havrdova E, Galetta S, Hutchinson M, et al. Effect of natalizumab on clinical and radiological disease activity in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of the Natalizumab Safety and Efficacy in Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (AFFIRM) study. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:254–60.CrossRefPubMed Havrdova E, Galetta S, Hutchinson M, et al. Effect of natalizumab on clinical and radiological disease activity in multiple sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of the Natalizumab Safety and Efficacy in Relapsing–Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (AFFIRM) study. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:254–60.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Miller DH, Khan OA, Sheremata WA, et al. A controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:15–23.CrossRefPubMed Miller DH, Khan OA, Sheremata WA, et al. A controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:15–23.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Polman CH, O’Connor PW, Havrdova E, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:899–910.CrossRefPubMed Polman CH, O’Connor PW, Havrdova E, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:899–910.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Butzkueven H, Kappos L, Wiendl H, et al. Long-term safety and effectiveness of natalizumab treatment in clinical practice: 10 years of real-world data from the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91:660–8. Butzkueven H, Kappos L, Wiendl H, et al. Long-term safety and effectiveness of natalizumab treatment in clinical practice: 10 years of real-world data from the Tysabri Observational Program (TOP). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91:660–8.
5.
go back to reference Horakova D, Uher T, Krasensky J, et al. Long-term effectiveness of natalizumab on MRI outcomes and no evidence of disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated in a Czech Republic real-world setting: a longitudinal, retrospective study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;46:102543. Horakova D, Uher T, Krasensky J, et al. Long-term effectiveness of natalizumab on MRI outcomes and no evidence of disease activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients treated in a Czech Republic real-world setting: a longitudinal, retrospective study. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;46:102543.
6.
go back to reference Perumal J, Fox RJ, Balabanov R, et al. Outcomes of natalizumab treatment within 3 years of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis diagnosis: a prespecified 2-year interim analysis of STRIVE. BMC Neurol. 2019;19:116–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Perumal J, Fox RJ, Balabanov R, et al. Outcomes of natalizumab treatment within 3 years of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis diagnosis: a prespecified 2-year interim analysis of STRIVE. BMC Neurol. 2019;19:116–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Bloomgren G, Richman S, Hotermans C, et al. Risk of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1870–80.CrossRefPubMed Bloomgren G, Richman S, Hotermans C, et al. Risk of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1870–80.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ho P-R, Koendgen H, Campbell N, Haddock B, Richman S, Chang I. Risk of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of data from four clinical studies. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:925–33.CrossRefPubMed Ho P-R, Koendgen H, Campbell N, Haddock B, Richman S, Chang I. Risk of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of data from four clinical studies. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:925–33.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference McGuigan C, Craner M, Guadagno J, et al. Stratification and monitoring of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk: recommendations from an expert group. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:117–25.PubMed McGuigan C, Craner M, Guadagno J, et al. Stratification and monitoring of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk: recommendations from an expert group. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:117–25.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Biogen. Tysabri® (natalizumab): prescribing information. Cambridge: Biogen, Inc; 2021. Biogen. Tysabri® (natalizumab): prescribing information. Cambridge: Biogen, Inc; 2021.
11.
go back to reference Sheremata WA, Vollmer TL, Stone LA, Willmer-Hulme AJ, Koller M. A safety and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous natalizumab in patients with MS. Neurology. 1999;52:1072.CrossRefPubMed Sheremata WA, Vollmer TL, Stone LA, Willmer-Hulme AJ, Koller M. A safety and pharmacokinetic study of intravenous natalizumab in patients with MS. Neurology. 1999;52:1072.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Defer G, Mariotte D, Derache N, et al. Increase of infusion interval do not impair natalizumab efficacy in RR-MS patients: a pilot study based on monthly monitoring of CD49d. Neurology. 2012;78:P06.166.CrossRef Defer G, Mariotte D, Derache N, et al. Increase of infusion interval do not impair natalizumab efficacy in RR-MS patients: a pilot study based on monthly monitoring of CD49d. Neurology. 2012;78:P06.166.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Khoy K, Mariotte D, Defer G, Petit G, Toutirais O, Le Mauff B. Natalizumab in multiple sclerosis treatment: from biological effects to immune monitoring. Front Immunol. 2020;11:549842.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Khoy K, Mariotte D, Defer G, Petit G, Toutirais O, Le Mauff B. Natalizumab in multiple sclerosis treatment: from biological effects to immune monitoring. Front Immunol. 2020;11:549842.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Defer G, Mariotte D, Derache N, et al. CD49d expression as a promising biomarker to monitor natalizumab efficacy. J Neurol Sci. 2012;314:138–42.CrossRefPubMed Defer G, Mariotte D, Derache N, et al. CD49d expression as a promising biomarker to monitor natalizumab efficacy. J Neurol Sci. 2012;314:138–42.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference van Kempen ZL, Leurs CE, Witte BI, et al. The majority of natalizumab-treated MS patients have high natalizumab concentrations at time of re-dosing. Mult Scler. 2018;24:805–10.CrossRefPubMed van Kempen ZL, Leurs CE, Witte BI, et al. The majority of natalizumab-treated MS patients have high natalizumab concentrations at time of re-dosing. Mult Scler. 2018;24:805–10.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Zhovtis Ryerson L, Li X, Goldberg JD, et al. Pharmacodynamics of natalizumab extended interval dosing in MS. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020;7:e672.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhovtis Ryerson L, Li X, Goldberg JD, et al. Pharmacodynamics of natalizumab extended interval dosing in MS. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020;7:e672.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Killestein J, Vennegoor A, Strijbis EM, et al. Natalizumab drug holiday in multiple sclerosis: poorly tolerated. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:392–5.CrossRefPubMed Killestein J, Vennegoor A, Strijbis EM, et al. Natalizumab drug holiday in multiple sclerosis: poorly tolerated. Ann Neurol. 2010;68:392–5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Borriello G, Prosperini L, Marinelli F, Fubelli F, Pozzilli C. Observations during an elective interruption of natalizumab treatment: a post-marketing study. Mult Scler. 2011;17:372–5.CrossRefPubMed Borriello G, Prosperini L, Marinelli F, Fubelli F, Pozzilli C. Observations during an elective interruption of natalizumab treatment: a post-marketing study. Mult Scler. 2011;17:372–5.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Zhovtis Ryerson L, Foley J, Chang I, et al. Risk of natalizumab-associated PML in patients with MS is reduced with extended interval dosing. Neurology. 2019;93:e1452–62. Zhovtis Ryerson L, Foley J, Chang I, et al. Risk of natalizumab-associated PML in patients with MS is reduced with extended interval dosing. Neurology. 2019;93:e1452–62.
21.
go back to reference Chisari CG, Grimaldi LM, Salemi G, et al. Clinical effectiveness of different natalizumab interval dosing schedules in a large Italian population of patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91:1297–303.CrossRefPubMed Chisari CG, Grimaldi LM, Salemi G, et al. Clinical effectiveness of different natalizumab interval dosing schedules in a large Italian population of patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020;91:1297–303.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Clerico M, De Mercanti SF, Signori A, et al. Extending the interval of natalizumab dosing: is efficacy preserved? Neurotherapeutics. 2020;17:200–7.CrossRefPubMed Clerico M, De Mercanti SF, Signori A, et al. Extending the interval of natalizumab dosing: is efficacy preserved? Neurotherapeutics. 2020;17:200–7.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kaufman M, Cree BAC, De Sèze J, et al. Radiologic MS disease activity during natalizumab treatment interruption: findings from RESTORE. J Neurol. 2015;262:326–36.CrossRefPubMed Kaufman M, Cree BAC, De Sèze J, et al. Radiologic MS disease activity during natalizumab treatment interruption: findings from RESTORE. J Neurol. 2015;262:326–36.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Zhovtis Ryerson L, Frohman TC, Foley J, et al. Extended interval dosing of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:885–9.CrossRefPubMed Zhovtis Ryerson L, Frohman TC, Foley J, et al. Extended interval dosing of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:885–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Trojano M, Ramió-Torrentà L, Grimaldi LME, et al. A randomized study of natalizumab dosing regimens for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2021;27:2240–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Trojano M, Ramió-Torrentà L, Grimaldi LME, et al. A randomized study of natalizumab dosing regimens for relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2021;27:2240–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Chang I, Muralidharan KK, Campbell N, Ho PR. Modeling the efficacy of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients who switch from every-4-week dosing to extended-interval dosing. J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;61:339–48.CrossRefPubMed Chang I, Muralidharan KK, Campbell N, Ho PR. Modeling the efficacy of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients who switch from every-4-week dosing to extended-interval dosing. J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;61:339–48.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Foley J, Defer G, Zhovtis Ryerson L, et al. Comparison of switching to 6-week dosing of natalizumab versus continuing with 4-week dosing in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (NOVA): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21:608–19. Foley J, Defer G, Zhovtis Ryerson L, et al. Comparison of switching to 6-week dosing of natalizumab versus continuing with 4-week dosing in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (NOVA): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21:608–19.
28.
go back to reference Kalincik T, Horakova D, Spelman T, et al. Switch to natalizumab versus fingolimod in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2015;77:425–35.CrossRefPubMed Kalincik T, Horakova D, Spelman T, et al. Switch to natalizumab versus fingolimod in active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2015;77:425–35.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Commowick O, Istace A, Kain M, et al. Objective evaluation of multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation using a data management and processing infrastructure. Sci Rep. 2018;8:13650.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Commowick O, Istace A, Kain M, et al. Objective evaluation of multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation using a data management and processing infrastructure. Sci Rep. 2018;8:13650.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference van Kempen ZLE, Hoogervorst ELJ, Wattjes MP, et al. Personalized extended interval dosing of natalizumab in MS: a prospective multicenter trial. Neurology. 2020;95:e745–54.CrossRefPubMed van Kempen ZLE, Hoogervorst ELJ, Wattjes MP, et al. Personalized extended interval dosing of natalizumab in MS: a prospective multicenter trial. Neurology. 2020;95:e745–54.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Real-World Effectiveness of Natalizumab Extended Interval Dosing in a French Cohort
Authors
Juliette Pelle
Anais R. Briant
Pierre Branger
Nathalie Derache
Charlotte Arnaud
Christine Lebrun-Frenay
Mikael Cohen
Lydiane Mondot
Jerome De Seze
Kevin Bigaut
Nicolas Collongues
Laurent Kremer
Damien Ricard
Flavie Bompaire
Charlotte Ohlmann
Magali Sallansonnet-Froment
Jonathan Ciron
Damien Biotti
Beatrice Pignolet
Jean-Jacques Parienti
Gilles Defer
Publication date
10-02-2023
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Neurology and Therapy / Issue 2/2023
Print ISSN: 2193-8253
Electronic ISSN: 2193-6536
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40120-023-00440-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2023

Neurology and Therapy 2/2023 Go to the issue