Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 5/2018

Open Access 01-10-2018 | Show and Tell

Lessons learned from a student-driven initiative to design and implement an Organ and Tissue Donation course across Canadian medical schools

Authors: Alexandra Fletcher, Bing Yu Chen, David Benrimoh, Sam Shemie, Stuart Lubarsky

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The competencies required of the well-trained physician are constantly evolving, and medical education must adapt accordingly. In response, a growing number of influential medical education licensing and accreditation bodies have proposed frameworks that outline society’s expectations of physician competencies. In Canada, undergraduate and graduate curricula have undergone major changes to meet the specifications of the CanMEDS framework, and similar efforts are underway internationally. Nonetheless, ensuring the values enshrined within such frameworks become integral to a physician’s identity remains challenging. We believe that student-led curricular initiatives represent a novel way of approaching this shifting medical education landscape.
In this article, we reflect on lessons we learned as medical students spearheading an initiative to change how organ and tissue donation is taught in Canadian medical schools. Citing relevant medical education literature where applicable, we include a detailed description of our approach as a roadmap for students contemplating their own curricular innovations. By outlining the factors influencing this project’s implementation, as well as the benefits and limitations of student participation in curriculum reform, we offer educators a fresh perspective on optimizing the student role in this important process. Ultimately, the authors argue that not only can student participation render curricular content more accessible to learners, but that the responsibilities students take on in this role naturally lead to the development of CanMEDs-based competencies such as advocacy, scholarship, and inter-professionalism.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Furmedge DS, Iwata K, Gill D. Peer-assisted learning—beyond teaching: How can medical students contribute to the undergraduate curriculum? Med Teach. 2014;36:812–7.CrossRef Furmedge DS, Iwata K, Gill D. Peer-assisted learning—beyond teaching: How can medical students contribute to the undergraduate curriculum? Med Teach. 2014;36:812–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ross MT, Cameron HS. Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMEE guide no. 30. Med Teach. 2007;29:527–45.CrossRef Ross MT, Cameron HS. Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMEE guide no. 30. Med Teach. 2007;29:527–45.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Albanese MA, Mejicano G, Mullan P, et al. Defining characteristics of educational competencies. Med Educ. 2008;42:248–55.CrossRef Albanese MA, Mejicano G, Mullan P, et al. Defining characteristics of educational competencies. Med Educ. 2008;42:248–55.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Frank J, Snell L, Sherbino J. CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015. Frank J, Snell L, Sherbino J. CanMEDS 2015 physician competency framework. Ottawa: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2015.
5.
go back to reference Medical Council of Canada. Objectives for the qualifying examination. Head trauma / brain death / transplant donations. 2017. apps.mcc.ca. Accessed 4 Nov 2017. Medical Council of Canada. Objectives for the qualifying examination. Head trauma / brain death / transplant donations. 2017. apps.mcc.ca. Accessed 4 Nov 2017.
6.
go back to reference Praslova L. Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in higher education. Educ Assess Eval Account. 2010;22:215–215.CrossRef Praslova L. Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in higher education. Educ Assess Eval Account. 2010;22:215–215.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Moss PA, Girard BJ, Haniford LC. Validity in educational assessment. Rev Res Educ. 2006;30:109–62.CrossRef Moss PA, Girard BJ, Haniford LC. Validity in educational assessment. Rev Res Educ. 2006;30:109–62.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lather P. Issues of validity in openly ideological research: between a rock and a soft place. Interchange. 1986;17:63–84.CrossRef Lather P. Issues of validity in openly ideological research: between a rock and a soft place. Interchange. 1986;17:63–84.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chen BY, Fletcher A, Damji AN, et al. Resolution 20: organ and tissue donation in Canadian undergraduate medical education. 2016 Canadian Federation of Medical Students Spring General Meeting; April 15–16; Montreal. 2015. Position paper. Chen BY, Fletcher A, Damji AN, et al. Resolution 20: organ and tissue donation in Canadian undergraduate medical education. 2016 Canadian Federation of Medical Students Spring General Meeting; April 15–16; Montreal. 2015. Position paper.
10.
go back to reference Katchikian A. Delegate motion 5‑1: mandatory training on organ donation for medical students and residents at all Canadian medical schools. 148th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Medical Association Meeting; 2015 Aug 24–26; Halifax. 2015. Katchikian A. Delegate motion 5‑1: mandatory training on organ donation for medical students and residents at all Canadian medical schools. 148th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Medical Association Meeting; 2015 Aug 24–26; Halifax. 2015.
11.
go back to reference Kotter JP. Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harv Bus Rev. 1995;73:259–67. Kotter JP. Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harv Bus Rev. 1995;73:259–67.
12.
go back to reference Jarvis-Selinger S, Pratt DD, Regehr G. Competency is not enough. Acad Med. 2012;87:1185–90.CrossRef Jarvis-Selinger S, Pratt DD, Regehr G. Competency is not enough. Acad Med. 2012;87:1185–90.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Earnest MA, Wong SL, Federico SG. Perspective: physician advocacy: What is it and how do we do it? Acad Med. 2010;85:63–7.CrossRef Earnest MA, Wong SL, Federico SG. Perspective: physician advocacy: What is it and how do we do it? Acad Med. 2010;85:63–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dobson S, Voyer S, Hubinette M, et al. From the clinic to the community. Acad Med. 2015;90:214–20.CrossRef Dobson S, Voyer S, Hubinette M, et al. From the clinic to the community. Acad Med. 2015;90:214–20.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Stafford S, Sedlak T, Fok MC, et al. Evaluation of resident attitudes and self-reported competencies in health advocacy. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:82.CrossRef Stafford S, Sedlak T, Fok MC, et al. Evaluation of resident attitudes and self-reported competencies in health advocacy. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:82.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Stewart T, Wubbena ZC. A systematic review of service-learning in medical education: 1998–2012. Teach Learn Med. 2015;27:115–22.CrossRef Stewart T, Wubbena ZC. A systematic review of service-learning in medical education: 1998–2012. Teach Learn Med. 2015;27:115–22.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chew D, Jaworsky D, Thorne J, et al. Development, implementation, and evaluation of a student-initiated undergraduate medical education elective in HIV care. Med Teach. 2012;34:398–403.CrossRef Chew D, Jaworsky D, Thorne J, et al. Development, implementation, and evaluation of a student-initiated undergraduate medical education elective in HIV care. Med Teach. 2012;34:398–403.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Leeper H, Chang E, Cotter G, et al. A student-designed and student-led sexual-history-taking module for second-year medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2007;19:293–301.CrossRef Leeper H, Chang E, Cotter G, et al. A student-designed and student-led sexual-history-taking module for second-year medical students. Teach Learn Med. 2007;19:293–301.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Leung LB, Simmons JE, Ho J, et al. A five-year evolution of a student-led elective on health disparities at the Alpert Medical School. R I Med J. 2016;99:43–7. Leung LB, Simmons JE, Ho J, et al. A five-year evolution of a student-led elective on health disparities at the Alpert Medical School. R I Med J. 2016;99:43–7.
21.
go back to reference Merridew N, Wilkinson D. Expanded partnerships between medical faculty and medical students: developing a global health curriculum as an example of ‘student-led learning’ at the University of Queensland, Australia. Med Teach. 2010;32:919–25.CrossRef Merridew N, Wilkinson D. Expanded partnerships between medical faculty and medical students: developing a global health curriculum as an example of ‘student-led learning’ at the University of Queensland, Australia. Med Teach. 2010;32:919–25.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zee M, de Boer M, Jaarsma ADC. Acquiring evidence-based medicine and research skills in the undergraduate medical curriculum: three different didactical formats compared. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3:357–70. Zee M, de Boer M, Jaarsma ADC. Acquiring evidence-based medicine and research skills in the undergraduate medical curriculum: three different didactical formats compared. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3:357–70.
23.
go back to reference Green EP, Borkan JM, Pross SH, et al. Encouraging scholarship: medical school programs to promote student inquiry beyond the traditional medical curriculum. Acad Med. 2010;85:409–18.CrossRef Green EP, Borkan JM, Pross SH, et al. Encouraging scholarship: medical school programs to promote student inquiry beyond the traditional medical curriculum. Acad Med. 2010;85:409–18.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Amgad M, Man Kin Tsui M, Liptrott SJ, et al. Medical student research: an integrated mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e127470.CrossRef Amgad M, Man Kin Tsui M, Liptrott SJ, et al. Medical student research: an integrated mixed-methods systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e127470.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lockspeiser TM, O’Sullivan P, Teherani A, et al. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13:361–72.CrossRef Lockspeiser TM, O’Sullivan P, Teherani A, et al. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008;13:361–72.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Lessons learned from a student-driven initiative to design and implement an Organ and Tissue Donation course across Canadian medical schools
Authors
Alexandra Fletcher
Bing Yu Chen
David Benrimoh
Sam Shemie
Stuart Lubarsky
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0454-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Perspectives on Medical Education 5/2018 Go to the issue