Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 1/2017

Open Access 01-02-2017 | Commentary

Addressing the theory-practice gap in assessment

Authors: Sarah R. Wright, Matt Homer

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

This issue of Perspectives on Medical Education contains a thought-provoking article by Young, Cummings & St-Onge, looking specifically at the stability of difficulty and discrimination indices when calculated for small samples of students. They concluded that difficulty and discrimination scores calculated based upon small samples are not stable across cohorts and therefore should be interpreted with caution [1]. Given our mutual experiences in roles that seek to implement theoretically-based and research-informed assessment practices, this article prompted us to think about assessment processes as a whole. We believe holistic review of assessment processes and practices is foundational to generating meaningful interpretations of individual metrics, such as difficulty and discrimination indices. In this commentary, we argue that assessment research would benefit from improved integration of theory and practice. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Young M, Cummings BA, St-Onge C. Ensuring the quality of multiple-choice exams administered to small cohorts: a cautionary tale. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6. Young M, Cummings BA, St-Onge C. Ensuring the quality of multiple-choice exams administered to small cohorts: a cautionary tale. Perspect Med Educ. 2017;6.
2.
go back to reference Cizek GJ, Bunch MB. Standard Setting: a guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2007.CrossRef Cizek GJ, Bunch MB. Standard Setting: a guide to establishing and evaluating performance standards on tests. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2007.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Homer M, Darling JC. Setting standards in knowledge assessments: comparing Ebel and Cohen vis Rasch. Med Teach. 2016;38:1267–77.CrossRef Homer M, Darling JC. Setting standards in knowledge assessments: comparing Ebel and Cohen vis Rasch. Med Teach. 2016;38:1267–77.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mckinley DW, Norcini JJ. How to set standards on performance-based examinations: AMEE Guide No. 85. Med Teach. 2014;36:97–110.CrossRef Mckinley DW, Norcini JJ. How to set standards on performance-based examinations: AMEE Guide No. 85. Med Teach. 2014;36:97–110.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pell G, Roberts TE. Setting standards for student assessment. Int J Res Meth Educ. 2006;29:91–103.CrossRef Pell G, Roberts TE. Setting standards for student assessment. Int J Res Meth Educ. 2006;29:91–103.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Albert M, Hodges B, Regehr G. Research in medical education: balancing service and science. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2007;12:103–15.CrossRef Albert M, Hodges B, Regehr G. Research in medical education: balancing service and science. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2007;12:103–15.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CPM. General overview of the theories used in assessment: AMEE Guide No. 57. Med Teach. 2011;33:783–97.CrossRef Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CPM. General overview of the theories used in assessment: AMEE Guide No. 57. Med Teach. 2011;33:783–97.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CPM. Programmatic assessment and Kane’s validity perspective. Med Educ. 2012;46:38–48.CrossRef Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CPM. Programmatic assessment and Kane’s validity perspective. Med Educ. 2012;46:38–48.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Medical Council of Canada. Guidelines for the development of multiple-choice questions. Ottawa: Medical Council of Canada; 2010. Medical Council of Canada. Guidelines for the development of multiple-choice questions. Ottawa: Medical Council of Canada; 2010.
10.
go back to reference Pell G, Fuller R, Homer M, Roberts T. How to measure the quality of the OSCE: A review of metrics – AMEE guide no. 49. Med Teach. 2010;32:802–11.CrossRef Pell G, Fuller R, Homer M, Roberts T. How to measure the quality of the OSCE: A review of metrics – AMEE guide no. 49. Med Teach. 2010;32:802–11.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Addressing the theory-practice gap in assessment
Authors
Sarah R. Wright
Matt Homer
Publication date
01-02-2017
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-016-0323-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Perspectives on Medical Education 1/2017 Go to the issue

The Writer’s Craft

Mastering the sentence