Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education 2/2015

Open Access 01-04-2015 | Original Article

On causality and mechanisms in medical education research: an example of path analysis

Author: Jimmie Leppink

Published in: Perspectives on Medical Education | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Studies in medical education can serve a variety of purposes. Studies that have a predominantly quantitative orientation may focus on estimating relations between variables, on estimating effects of one or more variables on some other variable(s), or on series of causal relations or mechanisms. Which is the focus of a particular study depends on the theoretical framework and research questions of that study. However, theory is of fundamental importance to medical education research, and studies focusing on series of causal relations or mechanisms can contribute greatly to the advancement of medical education research. This paper presents the potential benefits which result from adopting a path analysis perspective on the estimation of causal relations and conceptualization of mechanisms in medical education research.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82.CrossRefPubMed Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–82.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Rucker DD, Preacher KJ, Tormala ZL, Petty RE. Mediation analysis in social psychology: current practices and new recommendations. Soc Pers Psychol Compass. 2011;5:359–71.CrossRef Rucker DD, Preacher KJ, Tormala ZL, Petty RE. Mediation analysis in social psychology: current practices and new recommendations. Soc Pers Psychol Compass. 2011;5:359–71.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Edwards JR, Lambert LS. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychol Meth. 2007;12:1–22.CrossRef Edwards JR, Lambert LS. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychol Meth. 2007;12:1–22.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Frazier PA, Tix AP, Barron KE. Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol. 2004;51:115–34.CrossRef Frazier PA, Tix AP, Barron KE. Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol. 2004;51:115–34.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Judd CM, Kenny DA, McClelland GH. Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-participant designs. Psychol Meth. 2001;6:115–34.CrossRef Judd CM, Kenny DA, McClelland GH. Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-participant designs. Psychol Meth. 2001;6:115–34.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kraemer HC, Stice E, Kazdin A, Offord D, Kupfer D. How do risk factors work together? Moderators, mediators, independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. Am J Psychiat. 2001;158:848–56.CrossRefPubMed Kraemer HC, Stice E, Kazdin A, Offord D, Kupfer D. How do risk factors work together? Moderators, mediators, independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. Am J Psychiat. 2001;158:848–56.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Muller D, Judd CM, Yzerbyt VY. When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;89:852–63.CrossRefPubMed Muller D, Judd CM, Yzerbyt VY. When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005;89:852–63.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Huitema BE. The analysis of covariance and alternatives: statistical methods for experiments, quasi-experiments, and single-case studies. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2011.CrossRef Huitema BE. The analysis of covariance and alternatives: statistical methods for experiments, quasi-experiments, and single-case studies. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2011.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Van Loon MH, Kok EM, Kamp RJA, et al. AM Last Page: avoiding five common pitfalls of experimental research in medical education. Acad Med. 2013;88:1588.CrossRefPubMed Van Loon MH, Kok EM, Kamp RJA, et al. AM Last Page: avoiding five common pitfalls of experimental research in medical education. Acad Med. 2013;88:1588.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Leppink J, Kok EM, Bergman EM, Van Loon MH, De Bruin ABH. AM Last Page: four common pitfalls of quantitative analysis in experimental research. Acad Med. (in press). Leppink J, Kok EM, Bergman EM, Van Loon MH, De Bruin ABH. AM Last Page: four common pitfalls of quantitative analysis in experimental research. Acad Med. (in press).
11.
go back to reference Hox J. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2011. Hox J. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2011.
12.
go back to reference Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2011. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications; 2011.
13.
go back to reference Tan FES. Best practices in analysis of longitudinal data: a multilevel approach. In: JW Osborne, editor. Best practices in quantitative methods. London: Sage Publications; 2010. pp. 451–70 Tan FES. Best practices in analysis of longitudinal data: a multilevel approach. In: JW Osborne, editor. Best practices in quantitative methods. London: Sage Publications; 2010. pp. 451–70
14.
go back to reference Leppink J. Data analysis in medical education research: a multilevel perspective. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:14–24. Leppink J. Data analysis in medical education research: a multilevel perspective. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4:14–24.
15.
go back to reference Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley; 1989.CrossRef Bollen KA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley; 1989.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with Mplus: basic concepts, applications, and programming. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2012. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with Mplus: basic concepts, applications, and programming. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 2012.
17.
go back to reference Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2011. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2011.
18.
go back to reference Cilliers FJ, Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CPM. Modelling the pre-assessment learning effects of assessment: evidence in the validity chain. Med Educ. 2012;46:1087–98.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Cilliers FJ, Schuwirth LW, Van der Vleuten CPM. Modelling the pre-assessment learning effects of assessment: evidence in the validity chain. Med Educ. 2012;46:1087–98.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2001. Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2001.
Metadata
Title
On causality and mechanisms in medical education research: an example of path analysis
Author
Jimmie Leppink
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Perspectives on Medical Education / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 2212-2761
Electronic ISSN: 2212-277X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0174-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Perspectives on Medical Education 2/2015 Go to the issue

Health Care and the Arts

Saying no to drugs