Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurologica Belgica 6/2021

01-12-2021 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Original article

Comparison of non-invasive imaging modalities in presurgical evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy patients: a multicenter study

Authors: Jafar Mehvari Habibabadi, Abtin Doroudinia, Abbas Yousefi Koma, Sayed Sohrab Hashemi Fesharaki, Sobhan Aarabi

Published in: Acta Neurologica Belgica | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Intractable drug-resistant magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) negative epilepsy in one of the complicated issues in neurology. Epilepsy surgery is beneficial treatment of intractable seizures, but precise localization of epileptogenic zone is a major concern. Thirty-four MRI negative drug-resistant epilepsy patients underwent video electroencephalography (EEG), positron emission tomography (PET) scan, and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) MRI from 2014 to 2019. Then, the findings of PET scan and VBM were compared with semiology and long-term electrophysiology. Cohen’s kappa-coefficient (k) test was utilized to measure the agreement between our modalities. Among 34 patients with age ranging from 8 to 49 (mean: 29.00 ± standard deviation: 10.35), 19 were male (55.9%) and 15 were female (44.1%). Twenty-one patients (61.76%) had right temporal, 12 patients (35.3%) had left and one patient had bilateral temporal ictal focus according to video EEG. Inter-rater agreement analysis showed that the kappa index between video EEG and PET scan was of almost acceptable (more than 0.4) and there was poor agreement between video EEG and VBM (kappa index = 0.099). PET is highly concordant with video EEG in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) and has a considerable agreement in localizing epileptogenic zone while VBM is less.
Literature
1.
go back to reference GBDE Collaborators (2019) Global, regional, and national burden of epilepsy, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 18(4):357–375CrossRef GBDE Collaborators (2019) Global, regional, and national burden of epilepsy, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 18(4):357–375CrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Tellez-Zenteno JF, Ronquillo LH, Wiebe S (2005) Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: evidence-based analysis of incidence and risk factors. Epilepsy Res 65(1–2):101–115CrossRef Tellez-Zenteno JF, Ronquillo LH, Wiebe S (2005) Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: evidence-based analysis of incidence and risk factors. Epilepsy Res 65(1–2):101–115CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Spencer SS et al (2003) Initial outcomes in the multicenter study of epilepsy surgery. Neurology 61(12):1680–1685CrossRef Spencer SS et al (2003) Initial outcomes in the multicenter study of epilepsy surgery. Neurology 61(12):1680–1685CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lee SK et al (2005) Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of cryptogenic neocortical epilepsy. Ann Neurol 58(4):525–532CrossRef Lee SK et al (2005) Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of cryptogenic neocortical epilepsy. Ann Neurol 58(4):525–532CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bien CG et al (2009) Characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients with refractory magnetic resonance imaging-negative epilepsies. Arch Neurol 66(12):1491–1499CrossRef Bien CG et al (2009) Characteristics and surgical outcomes of patients with refractory magnetic resonance imaging-negative epilepsies. Arch Neurol 66(12):1491–1499CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jeha LE et al (2007) Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of frontal lobe epilepsy surgery. Brain 130(Pt 2):574–584CrossRef Jeha LE et al (2007) Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of frontal lobe epilepsy surgery. Brain 130(Pt 2):574–584CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tellez-Zenteno JF et al (2010) Surgical outcomes in lesional and non-lesional epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res 89(2–3):310–318CrossRef Tellez-Zenteno JF et al (2010) Surgical outcomes in lesional and non-lesional epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res 89(2–3):310–318CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Burneo JG et al (2015) The utility of positron emission tomography in epilepsy. Can J Neurol Sci 42(6):360–371CrossRef Burneo JG et al (2015) The utility of positron emission tomography in epilepsy. Can J Neurol Sci 42(6):360–371CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Zhang J et al (2014) Multimodal neuroimaging in presurgical evaluation of drug-resistant epilepsy. Neuroimage Clin 4:35–44CrossRef Zhang J et al (2014) Multimodal neuroimaging in presurgical evaluation of drug-resistant epilepsy. Neuroimage Clin 4:35–44CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shah AK, Mittal S (2014) Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-negative drug-resistant epilepsy. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 17(Suppl 1):S80–S88CrossRef Shah AK, Mittal S (2014) Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-negative drug-resistant epilepsy. Ann Indian Acad Neurol 17(Suppl 1):S80–S88CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Focke NK et al (2009) Automated normalized FLAIR imaging in MRI-negative patients with refractory focal epilepsy. Epilepsia 50(6):1484–1490CrossRef Focke NK et al (2009) Automated normalized FLAIR imaging in MRI-negative patients with refractory focal epilepsy. Epilepsia 50(6):1484–1490CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Riney CJ et al (2012) Voxel based morphometry of FLAIR MRI in children with intractable focal epilepsy: implications for surgical intervention. Eur J Radiol 81(6):1299–1305CrossRef Riney CJ et al (2012) Voxel based morphometry of FLAIR MRI in children with intractable focal epilepsy: implications for surgical intervention. Eur J Radiol 81(6):1299–1305CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Pail M et al (2012) The role of voxel-based morphometry in the detection of cortical dysplasia within the temporal pole in patients with intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 53(6):1004–1012CrossRef Pail M et al (2012) The role of voxel-based morphometry in the detection of cortical dysplasia within the temporal pole in patients with intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia 53(6):1004–1012CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wang W et al (2019) Voxel-based morphometric magnetic resonance imaging postprocessing in non-lesional pediatric epilepsy patients using pediatric normal databases. Eur J Neurol 26(7):969-e71PubMed Wang W et al (2019) Voxel-based morphometric magnetic resonance imaging postprocessing in non-lesional pediatric epilepsy patients using pediatric normal databases. Eur J Neurol 26(7):969-e71PubMed
16.
go back to reference Ingvar DH (1984) Epilepsy related to cerebral blood flow and metabolism. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 313:21–6CrossRef Ingvar DH (1984) Epilepsy related to cerebral blood flow and metabolism. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 313:21–6CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Willmann O et al (2007) The contribution of 18F-FDG PET in preoperative epilepsy surgery evaluation for patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: a meta-analysis. Seizure 16(6):509–20CrossRef Willmann O et al (2007) The contribution of 18F-FDG PET in preoperative epilepsy surgery evaluation for patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: a meta-analysis. Seizure 16(6):509–20CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Helveston W et al (1996) Intractable temporal lobe epilepsy: comparison of positron emission tomography with qualitative and quantitative MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17(8):1515–21PubMedPubMedCentral Helveston W et al (1996) Intractable temporal lobe epilepsy: comparison of positron emission tomography with qualitative and quantitative MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17(8):1515–21PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference da Silva EA et al (1997) Identification of frontal lobe epileptic foci in children using positron emission tomography. Epilepsia 38(11):1198–208CrossRef da Silva EA et al (1997) Identification of frontal lobe epileptic foci in children using positron emission tomography. Epilepsia 38(11):1198–208CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kim YK et al (2002) (18)F-FDG PET in localization of frontal lobe epilepsy: comparison of visual and SPM analysis. J Nucl Med 43(9):1167–74PubMed Kim YK et al (2002) (18)F-FDG PET in localization of frontal lobe epilepsy: comparison of visual and SPM analysis. J Nucl Med 43(9):1167–74PubMed
23.
go back to reference Muhlhofer W et al (2017) MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy-what do we know? Epilepsia 58(5):727–742CrossRef Muhlhofer W et al (2017) MRI-negative temporal lobe epilepsy-what do we know? Epilepsia 58(5):727–742CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Wang GB et al (2017) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) combined with positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and video-electroencephalography (VEEG) have excellent diagnostic value in preoperative localization of epileptic foci in children with epilepsy. Med Sci Monit 23:1–10CrossRef Wang GB et al (2017) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) combined with positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and video-electroencephalography (VEEG) have excellent diagnostic value in preoperative localization of epileptic foci in children with epilepsy. Med Sci Monit 23:1–10CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Doelken MT et al (2012) Multimodality approach in cryptogenic epilepsy with focus on morphometric 3T MRI. J Neuroradiol 39(2):87–96CrossRef Doelken MT et al (2012) Multimodality approach in cryptogenic epilepsy with focus on morphometric 3T MRI. J Neuroradiol 39(2):87–96CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Salmenpera TM et al (2007) Evaluation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging contrasts in MRI-negative refractory focal epilepsy. Epilepsia 48(2):229–37CrossRef Salmenpera TM et al (2007) Evaluation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging contrasts in MRI-negative refractory focal epilepsy. Epilepsia 48(2):229–37CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of non-invasive imaging modalities in presurgical evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy patients: a multicenter study
Authors
Jafar Mehvari Habibabadi
Abtin Doroudinia
Abbas Yousefi Koma
Sayed Sohrab Hashemi Fesharaki
Sobhan Aarabi
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Acta Neurologica Belgica / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0300-9009
Electronic ISSN: 2240-2993
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-020-01550-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

Acta Neurologica Belgica 6/2021 Go to the issue