Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 7/2023

11-07-2023 | Breast Cancer | Original Article

Is a soft tissue reinforcing mesh necessary in immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction for early breast cancer in patients with low-volume breast? A single-center, retrospective Chinese clinical study

Authors: Chengcai Yao, Huangyun Yang, Ziyun Guan, Changchun Liu, Jiayi Xian, Ming Chen, Wenjian Huang

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 7/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

It is controversial as to whether soft tissue reinforcement mesh should be used for immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy for low-volume breast early breast cancer (LVBEBC) in Chinese adult women. We collected data on 89 patients with LVBEBC who underwent such a surgery and divided them into two groups: 39 patients in the totally subpectoral prosthesis-only breast reconstruction group (simple group) and 50 patients in the prosthesis-combined titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TCPM) group (or the so-called "dual plane" or "mesh-assisted partially subpectoral breast reconstruction group") (combined group). The results demonstrated no difference in operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative complications between the two groups; however, total drainage volume and extubation time were less and shorter, respectively, in the combined group. The median follow-up time was 18.6 months without local recurrence or distant metastasis in both groups. At 24 months after surgery, the excellent and good rates of breast reconstruction were higher in the combined group. However, patients' BMI, breast morphology, and breast volume of 300 mL or more had an effect on the shape of the reconstructed breast; in addition, in patients with higher BMI, conical breast morphology, and breast volume over 300 mL, the shape of the breast was more perfect with the prosthesis combined with TCPM reconstruction.
Trial registration: This retrospective study was "retrospectively registered" in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of South China University of Technology of China on March 15, 2022 (No. 2022018) and in the National Medical Research Registry filing system of China (https://​www.​medicalresearch.​org.​cn) (No. MR-44-22-003618).

Graphical Abstract

Literature
5.
go back to reference China Anti-Cancer Association Breast Cancer Professional Committee (2019) Guidelines and specifications for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment of the China Anti-Cancer Association (2019 edition). Chin J Cancer 29:609–680 China Anti-Cancer Association Breast Cancer Professional Committee (2019) Guidelines and specifications for breast cancer diagnosis and treatment of the China Anti-Cancer Association (2019 edition). Chin J Cancer 29:609–680
6.
go back to reference China Breast Cancer Committee of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Society (CBCS), Special Committee of Breast Surgeons of the Chinese Physicians Association Branch of Surgeons (CSBS) (2018) Expert consensus on plastic surgery and breast reconstruction for breast tumors. Chin J Cancer 28:439–480 China Breast Cancer Committee of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Society (CBCS), Special Committee of Breast Surgeons of the Chinese Physicians Association Branch of Surgeons (CSBS) (2018) Expert consensus on plastic surgery and breast reconstruction for breast tumors. Chin J Cancer 28:439–480
7.
go back to reference Henan Provincial Cancer Hospital Breast Cancer Treatment Consensus Expert Team, Zhenzhen L, Lianfang Li, Chongjian Z (2019) Expert consensus on the surgical treatment of clinical early breast cancer in Henan Provincial Cancer Hospital. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat 24:1833–1837 Henan Provincial Cancer Hospital Breast Cancer Treatment Consensus Expert Team, Zhenzhen L, Lianfang Li, Chongjian Z (2019) Expert consensus on the surgical treatment of clinical early breast cancer in Henan Provincial Cancer Hospital. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat 24:1833–1837
8.
go back to reference Lohmander F, Lagergren J, Johansson H et al (2021) Effect of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy with and without acellular dermal matrix among women with breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 4:e2127806CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lohmander F, Lagergren J, Johansson H et al (2021) Effect of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy with and without acellular dermal matrix among women with breast cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 4:e2127806CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Hallberg H, Rafnsdottir S, Selvaggi G et al (2018) Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix(ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 52:130–147CrossRefPubMed Hallberg H, Rafnsdottir S, Selvaggi G et al (2018) Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix(ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 52:130–147CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Li Y, Yang C, Liu YN, Zhou SH (2018) Clinical effect study of prosthesis combined with biofilm repair for reconstruction of breast morphology after radical mastectomy for breast cancer. Chin Aesthet Med 27:56–57 Li Y, Yang C, Liu YN, Zhou SH (2018) Clinical effect study of prosthesis combined with biofilm repair for reconstruction of breast morphology after radical mastectomy for breast cancer. Chin Aesthet Med 27:56–57
11.
go back to reference Yang QM, Chen WL, Chen SL et al (2019) Application of titaniumized polypropylene mesh in immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction with silicone gel prosthesis after breast cancer surgery. Chin J Gen Surg 28:1393–1399 Yang QM, Chen WL, Chen SL et al (2019) Application of titaniumized polypropylene mesh in immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction with silicone gel prosthesis after breast cancer surgery. Chin J Gen Surg 28:1393–1399
12.
go back to reference Wang YN, Zhang AQ, Lian ZQ et al (2020) A retrospective controlled clinical study of mastectomy with nipple areola preservation plus one-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction. Chin J Breast Dis (electronic version) 14:156–161 Wang YN, Zhang AQ, Lian ZQ et al (2020) A retrospective controlled clinical study of mastectomy with nipple areola preservation plus one-stage prosthetic breast reconstruction. Chin J Breast Dis (electronic version) 14:156–161
13.
go back to reference Du L, Feng JC, Wu T et al (2018) Evaluation of the effect of decellularized allograft dermis-supported breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery with preserved nipple-areola complex. Chin Lit Gen Surg (electronic version) 12:354–358 Du L, Feng JC, Wu T et al (2018) Evaluation of the effect of decellularized allograft dermis-supported breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery with preserved nipple-areola complex. Chin Lit Gen Surg (electronic version) 12:354–358
14.
go back to reference Yao CC, Chen M, Liu CC et al (2022) Application of silicone gel breast prosthesis combined with titanium mesh patch in immediate breast reconstruction for early breast cancer. Tissue Eng Reconstr Surg 18:247–251 Yao CC, Chen M, Liu CC et al (2022) Application of silicone gel breast prosthesis combined with titanium mesh patch in immediate breast reconstruction for early breast cancer. Tissue Eng Reconstr Surg 18:247–251
15.
go back to reference Nahabedian MY (2018) Innovations and advancements with prosthetic breast reconstruction. Breast J 24:586–591CrossRefPubMed Nahabedian MY (2018) Innovations and advancements with prosthetic breast reconstruction. Breast J 24:586–591CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Grieco MP, Simonacci F, Bertozzi N et al (2019) Breast reconstruction with breast implants. Acta Biomed 89:457–462PubMed Grieco MP, Simonacci F, Bertozzi N et al (2019) Breast reconstruction with breast implants. Acta Biomed 89:457–462PubMed
19.
go back to reference Lei C, Xu L, Xu F et al (2020) Patient satisfaction in one-stage immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A multicenter comparative patient evaluation of prosthesis, LDMF, and TRAM techniques. Medicine (Baltimore) 99:e19991CrossRefPubMed Lei C, Xu L, Xu F et al (2020) Patient satisfaction in one-stage immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A multicenter comparative patient evaluation of prosthesis, LDMF, and TRAM techniques. Medicine (Baltimore) 99:e19991CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Meshulam-Derazon S, Shay T, Lewis S, Adler N (2018) Immediate breast reconstruction: comparative outcome study of one-stage direct-to-implant and two-stage/tissue expander techniques. Isr Med Assoc J 20:340–344PubMed Meshulam-Derazon S, Shay T, Lewis S, Adler N (2018) Immediate breast reconstruction: comparative outcome study of one-stage direct-to-implant and two-stage/tissue expander techniques. Isr Med Assoc J 20:340–344PubMed
21.
go back to reference Wu K, Yang B-L (2019) Timing and selection of breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery. Chin J Pract Surg 39:1151–1155 Wu K, Yang B-L (2019) Timing and selection of breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery. Chin J Pract Surg 39:1151–1155
22.
go back to reference Lai HW, Chen ST, Tai CM et al (2020) Robotic—versus endoscopic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction in the management of breast cancer: a case-control comparison study with analysis of clinical outcomes, learning curve, patient-reported aesthetic results, and medical cost. Ann Surg Oncol 27:2255–2268CrossRefPubMed Lai HW, Chen ST, Tai CM et al (2020) Robotic—versus endoscopic-assisted nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthesis breast reconstruction in the management of breast cancer: a case-control comparison study with analysis of clinical outcomes, learning curve, patient-reported aesthetic results, and medical cost. Ann Surg Oncol 27:2255–2268CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kappos EA, Schulz A, Regan MM et al (2021) Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy (OPBC-02/PREPEC): a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, superiority trial. BMJ Open 11:e045239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kappos EA, Schulz A, Regan MM et al (2021) Prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy (OPBC-02/PREPEC): a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized, superiority trial. BMJ Open 11:e045239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Zhu LL, Chen K, Li SHR (2020) Hotspot discussion on breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery. Chin J Cancer Control 12:527–531 Zhu LL, Chen K, Li SHR (2020) Hotspot discussion on breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery. Chin J Cancer Control 12:527–531
26.
go back to reference Dent BL, Small K, Swistel A, Talmor M (2014) Nipple-areolar complex ischemia after nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction: risk factors and the success of conservative treatment. Aesthet Surg J 34:560–570CrossRefPubMed Dent BL, Small K, Swistel A, Talmor M (2014) Nipple-areolar complex ischemia after nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant-based reconstruction: risk factors and the success of conservative treatment. Aesthet Surg J 34:560–570CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Radu MA, Blidaru A (2021) Persistent seroma, a threat to implant-based breast reconstruction? Chirurgia (Bucur) 116:201–208CrossRefPubMed Radu MA, Blidaru A (2021) Persistent seroma, a threat to implant-based breast reconstruction? Chirurgia (Bucur) 116:201–208CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Sarfati B, Struk S, Leymarie N et al (2018) Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol 25:2579–2586CrossRefPubMed Sarfati B, Struk S, Leymarie N et al (2018) Nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Ann Surg Oncol 25:2579–2586CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Li FC, Jiang HC, Li J (2010) Immediate breast reconstruction with implants after skin-sparing mastectomy: a report of 96 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:705–710CrossRefPubMed Li FC, Jiang HC, Li J (2010) Immediate breast reconstruction with implants after skin-sparing mastectomy: a report of 96 cases. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:705–710CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Toh U, Takenaka M, Iwakuma N, Akagi Y (2021) Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique. Surg Today 51:862–871CrossRefPubMed Toh U, Takenaka M, Iwakuma N, Akagi Y (2021) Clinical outcomes of patients after nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction based on the expander/implant technique. Surg Today 51:862–871CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Radovanovic Z, Ranisavljevic M, Radovanovic D et al (2018) Nipple-sparing mastectomy with primary implant reconstruction: surgical and oncological outcome of 435 breast cancer patients. Breast Care (Basel) 13:373–378CrossRefPubMed Radovanovic Z, Ranisavljevic M, Radovanovic D et al (2018) Nipple-sparing mastectomy with primary implant reconstruction: surgical and oncological outcome of 435 breast cancer patients. Breast Care (Basel) 13:373–378CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Chen J, Lu Q, Wang X et al (2013) Breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 27:872–875PubMed Chen J, Lu Q, Wang X et al (2013) Breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy or nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 27:872–875PubMed
Metadata
Title
Is a soft tissue reinforcing mesh necessary in immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction for early breast cancer in patients with low-volume breast? A single-center, retrospective Chinese clinical study
Authors
Chengcai Yao
Huangyun Yang
Ziyun Guan
Changchun Liu
Jiayi Xian
Ming Chen
Wenjian Huang
Publication date
11-07-2023
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 7/2023
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-023-01585-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2023

Updates in Surgery 7/2023 Go to the issue