Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 3/2017

01-09-2017 | Original Article

Development of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of the first 120 consecutive cases from a university hospital

Authors: Antonio Brescia, Federico Tomassini, Giammauro Berardi, Carola Sebastiani, Massimo Pezzatini, Anna Dall’Oglio, Giovanni Guglielmo Laracca, Fabrizio Apponi, Marcello Gasparrini

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The ERAS® represents a dynamic culmination of upon perioperative care elements, successfully applied to different surgical specialties with shorter hospital stay and lower morbidity rates. The aim of this study is to describe the introduction of the ERAS protocol in colorectal surgery in our hospital analysing our first series. Between September 2014 and June 2016, 120 patients suffering from colorectal diseases were included in the study. Laparoscopic approach was used in all patients if not contraindicated. Patients were discharged when adequate mobilization, canalization, and pain control were obtained. Analysed outcomes were: length of hospital stay, readmission rate, perioperative morbidity, and mortality. Malignant lesions were the most common indication (84.2%; 101/120). Laparoscopic approach was performed in the 95.8% of cases (115/120) with a conversion rate of 4.4% (5/115). Surgical procedures performed were: 36 rectal resections (30%), 36 left colonic resections (30%), 42 right hemicolectomy (35%), and 6 Miles (5%). The median hospital stay was of 4 (3–34) days in the whole series with a morbidity rate of 10% (12/120); four patients experienced Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa complications; and only one anastomotic leak was observed. No 30-day readmission and no perioperative mortality were recorded. At the univariate analysis, the presence of complications was the only predictive factor for prolonged hospital stay (p < 0.001). In our experience, implementation of ERAS protocol for colorectal surgery allows a significant reduction of hospital stay improving perioperative management and postoperative outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kehlet H, Mogensen T (1999) Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg 86(2):227–230CrossRefPubMed Kehlet H, Mogensen T (1999) Hospital stay of 2 days after open sigmoidectomy with a multimodal rehabilitation programme. Br J Surg 86(2):227–230CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37(2):240–258CrossRefPubMed Lassen K, Coolsen MM, Slim K et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37(2):240–258CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K et al (2014) Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Br J Surg 101(10):1209–1229CrossRefPubMed Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K et al (2014) Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Br J Surg 101(10):1209–1229CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations. Clin Nutr 32(6):879–887CrossRefPubMed Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations. Clin Nutr 32(6):879–887CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Varadhan KK, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O (2010) Enhanced recovery after surgery: the future of improving surgical care. Crit Care Clin 26(3):527–547, x Varadhan KK, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O (2010) Enhanced recovery after surgery: the future of improving surgical care. Crit Care Clin 26(3):527–547, x
6.
go back to reference Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A et al (2016) Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations–Part II. Gynecol Oncol 140(2):323–332CrossRefPubMed Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A et al (2016) Guidelines for postoperative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations–Part II. Gynecol Oncol 140(2):323–332CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A et al (2016) Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations–Part I. Gynecol Oncol 140(2):313–322CrossRefPubMed Nelson G, Altman AD, Nick A et al (2016) Guidelines for pre- and intra-operative care in gynecologic/oncology surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations–Part I. Gynecol Oncol 140(2):313–322CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Liang X, Ying H, Wang H et al (2016) Enhanced recovery program versus traditional care in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(8):e2835CrossRef Liang X, Ying H, Wang H et al (2016) Enhanced recovery program versus traditional care in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Medicine (Baltimore) 95(8):e2835CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37(2):285–305CrossRefPubMed Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F et al (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg 37(2):285–305CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2012) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31(6):783–800CrossRefPubMed Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W et al (2012) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31(6):783–800CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Bona S, Molteni M, Rosati R et al (2014) Introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery program in colorectal surgery: a single center experience. World J Gastroenterol 20(46):17578–17587CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bona S, Molteni M, Rosati R et al (2014) Introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery program in colorectal surgery: a single center experience. World J Gastroenterol 20(46):17578–17587CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A et al (2011) Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146(5):571–577CrossRefPubMed Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A et al (2011) Adherence to the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Arch Surg 146(5):571–577CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Spanjersberg WR, van Sambeeck JD, Bremers A et al (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme. Surg Endosc 29(12):3443–3453CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Spanjersberg WR, van Sambeeck JD, Bremers A et al (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme. Surg Endosc 29(12):3443–3453CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH et al (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29(4):434–440CrossRefPubMed Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH et al (2010) The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr 29(4):434–440CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH et al (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93(7):800–809CrossRefPubMed Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH et al (2006) Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg 93(7):800–809CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang XD et al (2013) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 56(5):667–678CrossRefPubMed Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang XD et al (2013) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 56(5):667–678CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254(6):868–875CrossRefPubMed Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW et al (2011) Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254(6):868–875CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wind J, Hofland J, Preckel B et al (2006) Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial). BMC Surg 6:16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wind J, Hofland J, Preckel B et al (2006) Perioperative strategy in colonic surgery; LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care (LAFA trial). BMC Surg 6:16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94(2):224–231CrossRefPubMed Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94(2):224–231CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Pedrazzani C, Menestrina N, Moro M et al (2016) Local wound infiltration plus transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local wound infiltration in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and ERAS program. Surg Endosc Pedrazzani C, Menestrina N, Moro M et al (2016) Local wound infiltration plus transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block versus local wound infiltration in laparoscopic colorectal surgery and ERAS program. Surg Endosc
21.
22.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Masoni L, Mari FS, Nigri G et al (2013) Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery via laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy performed for diverticular disease: real benefit or technical challenge: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27(1):199–206CrossRefPubMed Masoni L, Mari FS, Nigri G et al (2013) Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery via laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy performed for diverticular disease: real benefit or technical challenge: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Surg Endosc 27(1):199–206CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Brescia A, Mari FS, Favi F et al (2013) Laparoscopic lower anterior rectal resection using a curved stapler: original technique and preliminary experience. Am Surg 79(3):253–256PubMed Brescia A, Mari FS, Favi F et al (2013) Laparoscopic lower anterior rectal resection using a curved stapler: original technique and preliminary experience. Am Surg 79(3):253–256PubMed
25.
go back to reference Mari FS, Gasparrini M, Nigri G et al (2013) Can a curved stapler made for open surgery be useful in laparoscopic lower rectal resections? Technique and experience of a single centre. Surgeon 11(Suppl 1):S23–S26CrossRefPubMed Mari FS, Gasparrini M, Nigri G et al (2013) Can a curved stapler made for open surgery be useful in laparoscopic lower rectal resections? Technique and experience of a single centre. Surgeon 11(Suppl 1):S23–S26CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Mari FS, Nigri G, Pancaldi A et al (2013) Role of CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction of mesenteric vessels in laparoscopic colorectal resections: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 27(6):2058–2067CrossRefPubMed Mari FS, Nigri G, Pancaldi A et al (2013) Role of CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction of mesenteric vessels in laparoscopic colorectal resections: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 27(6):2058–2067CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Masoni L, Mari FS, Nigri G et al (2013) Total laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Am Surg 79(1):67–71PubMed Masoni L, Mari FS, Nigri G et al (2013) Total laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure. Am Surg 79(1):67–71PubMed
28.
go back to reference Mari FS, Nigri G, Berardi G et al (2012) Sigmoidectomy syndrome? Patients’ perspectives on the functional outcomes following surgery for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 55(12):e380 (author reply e380) Mari FS, Nigri G, Berardi G et al (2012) Sigmoidectomy syndrome? Patients’ perspectives on the functional outcomes following surgery for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 55(12):e380 (author reply e380)
29.
go back to reference Nicholson A, Lowe MC, Parker J et al (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. Br J Surg 101(3):172–188CrossRefPubMed Nicholson A, Lowe MC, Parker J et al (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery programmes in surgical patients. Br J Surg 101(3):172–188CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Lee J, Jeon H (2014) The clinical indication and feasibility of the enhanced recovery protocol for curative gastric cancer surgery: analysis of 147 consecutive experiences. Dig Surg 31(4–5):318–323CrossRefPubMed Lee J, Jeon H (2014) The clinical indication and feasibility of the enhanced recovery protocol for curative gastric cancer surgery: analysis of 147 consecutive experiences. Dig Surg 31(4–5):318–323CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Keane C, Savage S, McFarlane K et al (2012) Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional care in colonic and rectal surgery. ANZ J Surg 82(10):697–703CrossRefPubMed Keane C, Savage S, McFarlane K et al (2012) Enhanced recovery after surgery versus conventional care in colonic and rectal surgery. ANZ J Surg 82(10):697–703CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Rawlinson A, Kang P, Evans J et al (2011) A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93(8):583–588CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rawlinson A, Kang P, Evans J et al (2011) A systematic review of enhanced recovery protocols in colorectal surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 93(8):583–588CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Stone AB, Grant MC, Pio Roda C et al (2016) Implementation Costs of an enhanced recovery after Surgery Program in the United States: a financial model and sensitivity analysis based on Experiences at a Quaternary Academic Medical Center. J Am Coll Surg 222(3):219–225CrossRefPubMed Stone AB, Grant MC, Pio Roda C et al (2016) Implementation Costs of an enhanced recovery after Surgery Program in the United States: a financial model and sensitivity analysis based on Experiences at a Quaternary Academic Medical Center. J Am Coll Surg 222(3):219–225CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Nelson G, Kiyang LN, Crumley ET et al (2016) Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) across a provincial healthcare system: the ERAS alberta colorectal surgery experience. World J Surg 40(5):1092–1103CrossRefPubMed Nelson G, Kiyang LN, Crumley ET et al (2016) Implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) across a provincial healthcare system: the ERAS alberta colorectal surgery experience. World J Surg 40(5):1092–1103CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Lee L, Mata J, Ghitulescu GA et al (2015) Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery versus conventional perioperative management for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 262(6):1026–1033CrossRefPubMed Lee L, Mata J, Ghitulescu GA et al (2015) Cost-effectiveness of enhanced recovery versus conventional perioperative management for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 262(6):1026–1033CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Lee L, Li C, Landry T et al (2014) A systematic review of economic evaluations of enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 259(4):670–676CrossRefPubMed Lee L, Li C, Landry T et al (2014) A systematic review of economic evaluations of enhanced recovery pathways for colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 259(4):670–676CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Pogatschnik C, Steiger E (2015) Review of preoperative carbohydrate loading. Nutr Clin Pract 30(5):660–664CrossRefPubMed Pogatschnik C, Steiger E (2015) Review of preoperative carbohydrate loading. Nutr Clin Pract 30(5):660–664CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Vlug MS, Bartels SA, Wind J et al (2012) Which fast track elements predict early recovery after colon cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 14(8):1001–1008CrossRefPubMed Vlug MS, Bartels SA, Wind J et al (2012) Which fast track elements predict early recovery after colon cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 14(8):1001–1008CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Development of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of the first 120 consecutive cases from a university hospital
Authors
Antonio Brescia
Federico Tomassini
Giammauro Berardi
Carola Sebastiani
Massimo Pezzatini
Anna Dall’Oglio
Giovanni Guglielmo Laracca
Fabrizio Apponi
Marcello Gasparrini
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-017-0432-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Updates in Surgery 3/2017 Go to the issue