Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 2/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Article

Pancreatico-duodenectomy and postoperative pancreatic fistula: risk factors and technical considerations in a specialized HPB center

Authors: Luciano De Carlis, Fabio Ferla, Stefano Di Sandro, Alessandro Giacomoni, Riccardo De Carlis, Raffaella Sguinzi

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a common complication of pancreatic resection. Aim of this study is to identify variables related to the development of POPF, analyze their clinical significance and discuss our current approach to the pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis. A series of 129 patients undergoing pancreatico-duodenectomy (PD) have been analyzed. Patients were divided in two groups: group F, 26 patients who have developed POPF; group NF, 103 patients who have not developed POPF. Demographic, clinical and intraoperative data were compared. Seventy-six patients had an end-to-side (ES) pancreatico-jejuno anastomosis, 53 an end-to-end (EE) anastomosis. Fifteen patients developed grade A fistulas, seven grade B, and four grade C; two patients with grade C fistula died from septic shock. Preoperative bile duct lithiasis, diameter of the pancreatic duct and consistency of the pancreatic stump were significantly different between F and NF groups at multivariate analysis. POPF has been related to clinical and biological parameters: preoperative bile duct lithiasis and challenging pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis (with small pancreatic duct and friable pancreatic stump) are the most prominent according to our experience. As the incidence of POPF seems to be related to technically demanding surgery, we presently reserve the EE anastomosis to the cases in which a friable gland or a very small duct will make a direct anastomosis on the pancreatic duct unreliable. In case of grade C fistulas a total spleen-preserving pancreatectomy should be considered an adequate treatment to prevent the onset of a multi-organ failure or a septic shock if no other treatment seems suitable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kollmar O, Moussavian MR, Bolli M et al (2007) Pancreatojejunal leakage after pancreas head resection: anatomic and surgeon-related factors. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1699–1703PubMedCrossRef Kollmar O, Moussavian MR, Bolli M et al (2007) Pancreatojejunal leakage after pancreas head resection: anatomic and surgeon-related factors. J Gastrointest Surg 11:1699–1703PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
go back to reference Tseng WH, Canter RJ, Bold RJ (2011) Perioperative outcomes for open distal pancreatectomy: current benchmarks for comparison. J Gastrointest Surg 15(11):2053–2058PubMedCrossRef Tseng WH, Canter RJ, Bold RJ (2011) Perioperative outcomes for open distal pancreatectomy: current benchmarks for comparison. J Gastrointest Surg 15(11):2053–2058PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Nathan H, Cameron JL, Goodwin CR et al (2009) Risk factors for pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 250:277–281PubMedCrossRef Nathan H, Cameron JL, Goodwin CR et al (2009) Risk factors for pancreatic leak after distal pancreatectomy. Ann Surg 250:277–281PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S et al (2006) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139:591–598PubMedCrossRef Muscari F, Suc B, Kirzin S et al (2006) Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients. Surgery 139:591–598PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Aranha GV, Hodul PJ, Creech S et al (2003) Zero mortality after 152 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies with pancreaticogastrostomy. J Am Coll Surg 197:223–231 discussion 231–2PubMedCrossRef Aranha GV, Hodul PJ, Creech S et al (2003) Zero mortality after 152 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies with pancreaticogastrostomy. J Am Coll Surg 197:223–231 discussion 231–2PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lermite E, Sommacale D, Piardi T, Arnaud JP, Sauvanet A, Dejong CH, Pessaux P (2013) Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 37(3):230–239PubMedCrossRef Lermite E, Sommacale D, Piardi T, Arnaud JP, Sauvanet A, Dejong CH, Pessaux P (2013) Complications after pancreatic resection: diagnosis, prevention and management. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 37(3):230–239PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM et al (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232:786–795PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Gouma DJ, van Geenen RC, van Gulik TM et al (2000) Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume. Ann Surg 232:786–795PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Assifi MM, Lindenmeyer J, Leiby BE, Grunwald Z, Rosato EL, Kennedy EP, Yeo CJ, Berger AC (2012) Surgical Apgar score predicts perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high-volume center. J Gastrointest Surg 16(2):275–281PubMedCrossRef Assifi MM, Lindenmeyer J, Leiby BE, Grunwald Z, Rosato EL, Kennedy EP, Yeo CJ, Berger AC (2012) Surgical Apgar score predicts perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high-volume center. J Gastrointest Surg 16(2):275–281PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Soper NJ (1997) Evolution and current status of the Whipple procedure: an update for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology 113:983–994PubMedCrossRef Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Soper NJ (1997) Evolution and current status of the Whipple procedure: an update for gastroenterologists. Gastroenterology 113:983–994PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lerut JP, Gianello PR, Otte JB, Kestens PJ (1984) Pancreaticoduodenal resection. Surgical experience and evaluation of risk factors in 103 patients. Ann Surg 199(4):432–437PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lerut JP, Gianello PR, Otte JB, Kestens PJ (1984) Pancreaticoduodenal resection. Surgical experience and evaluation of risk factors in 103 patients. Ann Surg 199(4):432–437PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Matsusue S, Takeda H, Nakamura Y et al (1998) A prospective analysis of the factors influencing pancreaticojejunostomy performed using a single method, in 100 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Surg Today 28:719–726PubMedCrossRef Matsusue S, Takeda H, Nakamura Y et al (1998) A prospective analysis of the factors influencing pancreaticojejunostomy performed using a single method, in 100 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Surg Today 28:719–726PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference El Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, El Hemaly M, Askr W, Ezzat H, Hamdy E, Atef E, El Hanafy E, El-Geidie A, Abdel Wahab M, Abdallah T (2013) Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. riskfactors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience). World J Surg 37(6):1405–1418PubMedCrossRef El Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, El Hemaly M, Askr W, Ezzat H, Hamdy E, Atef E, El Hanafy E, El-Geidie A, Abdel Wahab M, Abdallah T (2013) Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. riskfactors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience). World J Surg 37(6):1405–1418PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Marcus SG, Cohen H, Ranson JH (1995) Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 221:635–645 discussion 645–8PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Marcus SG, Cohen H, Ranson JH (1995) Optimal management of the pancreatic remnant after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 221:635–645 discussion 645–8PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schmidt CM, Choi J, Powell ES et al (2009) Pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical predictors and patient outcomes. HPB Surg 2009:404520PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Schmidt CM, Choi J, Powell ES et al (2009) Pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: clinical predictors and patient outcomes. HPB Surg 2009:404520PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A et al (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148:15–23PubMedCrossRef Gaujoux S, Cortes A, Couvelard A et al (2010) Fatty pancreas and increased body mass index are risk factors of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 148:15–23PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Srivastava S, Sikora SS, Pandey CM et al (2001) Determinants of pancreaticoenteric anastomotic leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg 71:511–515PubMedCrossRef Srivastava S, Sikora SS, Pandey CM et al (2001) Determinants of pancreaticoenteric anastomotic leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy. ANZ J Surg 71:511–515PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Chu CK, Mazo AE, Sarmiento JM et al (2010) Impact of diabetes mellitus on perioperative outcomes after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 210:463–473PubMedCrossRef Chu CK, Mazo AE, Sarmiento JM et al (2010) Impact of diabetes mellitus on perioperative outcomes after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg 210:463–473PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Malleo G, Mazzarella F, Malpaga A, Marchegiani G, Salvia R, Bassi C, Butturini G (2013) Diabetes mellitus does not impact on clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after partial pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. Surgery 153(5):641–650PubMedCrossRef Malleo G, Mazzarella F, Malpaga A, Marchegiani G, Salvia R, Bassi C, Butturini G (2013) Diabetes mellitus does not impact on clinically relevant pancreatic fistula after partial pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. Surgery 153(5):641–650PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Peng SY, Wang JW, Lau WY et al (2007) Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 245:692–698PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Peng SY, Wang JW, Lau WY et al (2007) Conventional versus binding pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 245:692–698PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Pisters PW, Hudec WA, Hess KR et al (2001) Effect of preoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomy-associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234:47–55PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pisters PW, Hudec WA, Hess KR et al (2001) Effect of preoperative biliary decompression on pancreaticoduodenectomy-associated morbidity in 300 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 234:47–55PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Barnett SA, Collier NA (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: does preoperative biliary drainage, method of pancreatic reconstruction or age influence perioperative outcome? A retrospective study of 104 consecutive cases. ANZ J Surg 76:563–568PubMedCrossRef Barnett SA, Collier NA (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy: does preoperative biliary drainage, method of pancreatic reconstruction or age influence perioperative outcome? A retrospective study of 104 consecutive cases. ANZ J Surg 76:563–568PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Watanabe F, Noda H, Kamiyama H, Kato T, Kakizawa N, Ichida K, Toyama N, Konishi F (2012) Risk factors for intra-abdominal infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy a retrospective analysis to evaluate the significance of preoperative biliary drainage and postoperative pancreatic fistula. Hepatogastroenterology 59(116):1270–1273PubMed Watanabe F, Noda H, Kamiyama H, Kato T, Kakizawa N, Ichida K, Toyama N, Konishi F (2012) Risk factors for intra-abdominal infection after pancreaticoduodenectomy a retrospective analysis to evaluate the significance of preoperative biliary drainage and postoperative pancreatic fistula. Hepatogastroenterology 59(116):1270–1273PubMed
25.
go back to reference You D, Jung K, Lee H, Heo J, Choi S, Choi D (2009) Comparison of different pancreatic anastomosis techniques using the definitions of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery: a single surgeon’s experience. Pancreas 38(8):896–902PubMedCrossRef You D, Jung K, Lee H, Heo J, Choi S, Choi D (2009) Comparison of different pancreatic anastomosis techniques using the definitions of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery: a single surgeon’s experience. Pancreas 38(8):896–902PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Miedema BW, Sarr MG, van Heerden JA et al (1992) Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: current management. Arch Surg 127:945–949PubMedCrossRef Miedema BW, Sarr MG, van Heerden JA et al (1992) Complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy: current management. Arch Surg 127:945–949PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Wu CC, Hwang CR, Yeh DC, Hwang YC, Liu TJ, P’eng FK (1996) Treatment for dehiscence of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: is resection of the residual pancreas necessary? Hepatogastroenterology 43(7):271–274PubMed Wu CC, Hwang CR, Yeh DC, Hwang YC, Liu TJ, P’eng FK (1996) Treatment for dehiscence of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: is resection of the residual pancreas necessary? Hepatogastroenterology 43(7):271–274PubMed
28.
go back to reference De Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2005) Incidence and management of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 92:1117–1123PubMedCrossRef De Castro SM, Busch OR, van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ (2005) Incidence and management of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 92:1117–1123PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E, Scurtu R, Lucescu I, Oshita A et al (2008) Pancreatogastrostomy as a salvage procedure to treat severe postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 143:966–970PubMedCrossRef Bachellier P, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E, Scurtu R, Lucescu I, Oshita A et al (2008) Pancreatogastrostomy as a salvage procedure to treat severe postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy. Arch Surg 143:966–970PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pancreatico-duodenectomy and postoperative pancreatic fistula: risk factors and technical considerations in a specialized HPB center
Authors
Luciano De Carlis
Fabio Ferla
Stefano Di Sandro
Alessandro Giacomoni
Riccardo De Carlis
Raffaella Sguinzi
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-014-0253-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Updates in Surgery 2/2014 Go to the issue