Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Updates in Surgery 3/2011

01-09-2011 | Review Article

Should esophageal resections for cancer be performed in high-volume centers only?

Authors: Carlo V. Feo, Victoria M. Villaflor, Marco G. Patti

Published in: Updates in Surgery | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Esophageal resection remains the only curative option for esophageal cancer, and therefore, improving the outcome of surgery is the best method of reducing mortality. Several studies have evaluated the postoperative morbidity and mortality after esophageal resection, analyzing the relationship between volume or surgical experience and operative mortality. In this article, the evidence supporting the referral of esophageal surgery to centers with a greater experience (i.e., high-volume centers) is reviewed in order to establish the best practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference AIRTUM Working Group. Italian cancer figures–Report 2009 (2009) Epidemiol Rev 33:34-35 AIRTUM Working Group. Italian cancer figures–Report 2009 (2009) Epidemiol Rev 33:34-35
2.
go back to reference Swisher SG, Hunt KK L, Holmes EC, Zinner MJ, McFadden DW (1995) Changes in the surgical management of esophageal cancer from 1970 to 1993. Am J Surg 169:609–614PubMedCrossRef Swisher SG, Hunt KK L, Holmes EC, Zinner MJ, McFadden DW (1995) Changes in the surgical management of esophageal cancer from 1970 to 1993. Am J Surg 169:609–614PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Herbella FA, Patti MG (2010) Minimally invasive esophagectomy. World J Gastroenterol 16:3811–3815PubMedCrossRef Herbella FA, Patti MG (2010) Minimally invasive esophagectomy. World J Gastroenterol 16:3811–3815PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Patti MG, Corvera CU, Glasgow RE, Way LWW (1998) A hospital’s annual rate of esophagectomy influences the operative mortality rate. J Gastrointest Surg 2:186–192PubMedCrossRef Patti MG, Corvera CU, Glasgow RE, Way LWW (1998) A hospital’s annual rate of esophagectomy influences the operative mortality rate. J Gastrointest Surg 2:186–192PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Swisher SG, DeFord L, Merriman KW, Walsh GL, Smythe R, Vaporicyan A, Ajani JA, Brown T, Komaki R, Roth J, Putman JB (2000) Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:1126–1134PubMedCrossRef Swisher SG, DeFord L, Merriman KW, Walsh GL, Smythe R, Vaporicyan A, Ajani JA, Brown T, Komaki R, Roth J, Putman JB (2000) Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119:1126–1134PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gillison EW, Powell J, McConkey CC, Spychal RT (2002) Surgical workload and outcome after resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia. Br J Surg 89:344–348PubMedCrossRef Gillison EW, Powell J, McConkey CC, Spychal RT (2002) Surgical workload and outcome after resection for carcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia. Br J Surg 89:344–348PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wouters MW, Wijnhoven BP, Karim-Kos HE, Blaauwgeers HG, Stassen LP, Steup WH, Tilanus HW, Tollenaar RA (2008) High-volume versus low-volume for esophageal resections for cancer: the essential role of case-mix adjustments based on clinical data. Ann Surg Oncol 15:80–87PubMedCrossRef Wouters MW, Wijnhoven BP, Karim-Kos HE, Blaauwgeers HG, Stassen LP, Steup WH, Tilanus HW, Tollenaar RA (2008) High-volume versus low-volume for esophageal resections for cancer: the essential role of case-mix adjustments based on clinical data. Ann Surg Oncol 15:80–87PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Courrech Staal EFW, van Coevorden F, Cats A, Aleman BMP, van Velthuysen MLF, Boot H, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, van Sandick JW (2009) Outcome of low-volume surgery for esophageal cancer in a high-volume referral center. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3219–3226PubMedCrossRef Courrech Staal EFW, van Coevorden F, Cats A, Aleman BMP, van Velthuysen MLF, Boot H, Vrancken Peeters MJTFD, van Sandick JW (2009) Outcome of low-volume surgery for esophageal cancer in a high-volume referral center. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3219–3226PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Verhoef C, van de Weyer R, Schaapveld M, Bastiaannet E, Plukker JTM (2007) Better survival in patients with esophageal cancer after surgical treatment in university hospitals: a plea for performance by surgical oncologists. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1678–1687PubMedCrossRef Verhoef C, van de Weyer R, Schaapveld M, Bastiaannet E, Plukker JTM (2007) Better survival in patients with esophageal cancer after surgical treatment in university hospitals: a plea for performance by surgical oncologists. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1678–1687PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, Rennie DJ, Milstein A (2000) Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA 283:1159–1166PubMedCrossRef Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, Rennie DJ, Milstein A (2000) Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA 283:1159–1166PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer CM (2001) Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. Surgery 130:415–422PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer CM (2001) Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. Surgery 130:415–422PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2004) Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery 135:569–575PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2004) Potential benefits of the new Leapfrog standards: effect of process and outcomes measures. Surgery 135:569–575PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gasper WJ, Glidden DV, Jin C, Way LW, Patti MG (2009) Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: a follow-up analysis of another decade. Ann Surg 250:472–483PubMed Gasper WJ, Glidden DV, Jin C, Way LW, Patti MG (2009) Has recognition of the relationship between mortality rates and hospital volume for major cancer surgery in California made a difference?: a follow-up analysis of another decade. Ann Surg 250:472–483PubMed
14.
go back to reference Ruol A, Castoro C, Portale G, Cavallin F, Chiarion Sileni V, Cagol M, Alfieri R, Corti L, Boso C, Zaninotto G, Peracchia A, Ancona E (2009) Trends in management and prognosis for esophageal cancer surgery: twenty-five years of experience at a single institution. Arch Surg 144:247–254PubMedCrossRef Ruol A, Castoro C, Portale G, Cavallin F, Chiarion Sileni V, Cagol M, Alfieri R, Corti L, Boso C, Zaninotto G, Peracchia A, Ancona E (2009) Trends in management and prognosis for esophageal cancer surgery: twenty-five years of experience at a single institution. Arch Surg 144:247–254PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF (1998) Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 280:1747–1751PubMedCrossRef Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF (1998) Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 280:1747–1751PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE et al (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349:2117–2127PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE et al (2003) Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 349:2117–2127PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Migliore M, Choong CK, Lim E, Goldsmith KA, Ritchie A, Wells F (2007) A surgeon’s case volume of oesophagectomy for cancer strongly influences the operative mortality rate. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 32:375–380PubMedCrossRef Migliore M, Choong CK, Lim E, Goldsmith KA, Ritchie A, Wells F (2007) A surgeon’s case volume of oesophagectomy for cancer strongly influences the operative mortality rate. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 32:375–380PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hall BL, Hsiao EY, Majercik S, Hirbe M, Hamilton BH (2009) The impact of surgeon specialization on patient mortality: examination of a continuous Herfindahl–Hirschman index. Ann Surg 249:708–716PubMedCrossRef Hall BL, Hsiao EY, Majercik S, Hirbe M, Hamilton BH (2009) The impact of surgeon specialization on patient mortality: examination of a continuous Herfindahl–Hirschman index. Ann Surg 249:708–716PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Bartels H, Stein HJ, Siewert JR (1998) Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 85:840–844PubMedCrossRef Bartels H, Stein HJ, Siewert JR (1998) Preoperative risk analysis and postoperative mortality of oesophagectomy for resectable oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 85:840–844PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ferguson MK, Martin TR, Reeder LB, Olak J (1997) Mortality after esophagectomy: risk factor analysis. World J Surg 21:599–603PubMedCrossRef Ferguson MK, Martin TR, Reeder LB, Olak J (1997) Mortality after esophagectomy: risk factor analysis. World J Surg 21:599–603PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2009) Understanding and reducing variation in surgical mortality. Annu Rev Med 60:405–415PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2009) Understanding and reducing variation in surgical mortality. Annu Rev Med 60:405–415PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hannan EL, Kilburn H Jr, Racz M, Shields E, Chassin MR (1994) Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. JAMA 271:761–766PubMedCrossRef Hannan EL, Kilburn H Jr, Racz M, Shields E, Chassin MR (1994) Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State. JAMA 271:761–766PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Chassin MR (2002) Achieving and sustaining improved quality: lessons from New York State and cardiac surgery. Health Aff 21:40–51CrossRef Chassin MR (2002) Achieving and sustaining improved quality: lessons from New York State and cardiac surgery. Health Aff 21:40–51CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Dixon E, Bathe OF, McKay A, You I, Dowden S, Sadler D, Burak KW, McKinnon JG, Miller W, Sutherland FR (2009) Population-based review of the outcomes following hepatic resection in a Canadian health region. Can J Surg 52:12–17PubMed Dixon E, Bathe OF, McKay A, You I, Dowden S, Sadler D, Burak KW, McKinnon JG, Miller W, Sutherland FR (2009) Population-based review of the outcomes following hepatic resection in a Canadian health region. Can J Surg 52:12–17PubMed
25.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA (2007) Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg 245:777–783PubMedCrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL, Stukel TA (2007) Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg 245:777–783PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, Radzyner M, Brennan MF (2005) Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 242:540–547PubMed Fong Y, Gonen M, Rubin D, Radzyner M, Brennan MF (2005) Long-term survival is superior after resection for cancer in high-volume centers. Ann Surg 242:540–547PubMed
27.
go back to reference Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Feinglass JM, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Talamonti MS, Ko CY (2008) Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol 26:4626–4633PubMedCrossRef Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Feinglass JM, Stewart AK, Winchester DP, Talamonti MS, Ko CY (2008) Directing surgical quality improvement initiatives: comparison of perioperative mortality and long-term survival for cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol 26:4626–4633PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Should esophageal resections for cancer be performed in high-volume centers only?
Authors
Carlo V. Feo
Victoria M. Villaflor
Marco G. Patti
Publication date
01-09-2011
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Updates in Surgery / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Electronic ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-011-0090-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Updates in Surgery 3/2011 Go to the issue