Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Tumor Biology 6/2013

01-12-2013 | Research Article

Association between vitamin D receptor gene Cdx2 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility

Authors: Zhu-Chao Zhou, Jie Wang, Zi-Hao Cai, Qun-hua Zhang, Zhen-Xin Cai, Jian-Hua Wu

Published in: Tumor Biology | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms have been reported to influence susceptibility to breast cancer. However, published findings on the association between VDR Cdx2 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility are conflicting. To get a precise estimation of the association between VDR Cdx2 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility, we conducted a meta-analysis of four case–control studies with a total of 8,880 subjects (3,841 cases and 5,039 controls). The results showed that VDR Cdx2 polymorphism was not associated with risk of breast cancer (A versus G: OR = 0.96, 95 % CI 0.84–1.09; AA versus GG: OR = 0.97, 95 % CI 0.64–1.45; AA/GA versus GG: OR = 0.94, 95 % CI 0.80–1.10; AA versus GG/GA: OR = 0.99, 95 % CI 0.65–1.51). Subgroup analysis in Caucasians also showed that VDR Cdx2 polymorphism was not associated with risk of breast cancer in Caucasians. However, there was a significant association in Africans (A versus G: OR = 0.75, 95 % CI 0.60–0.94; AA versus GG: OR = 0.53, 95 % CI 0.29–0.99; AA/GA versus GG: OR = 0.75, 95 % CI 0.57–0.97). Therefore, the association between VDR Cdx2 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility is only found in Africans. More studies are needed to further assess the association in Asians or Africans.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Warner E. Clinical practice. Breast-cancer screening N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1025–32. Warner E. Clinical practice. Breast-cancer screening N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1025–32.
2.
go back to reference Amir E, Freedman OC, Seruga B, Evans DG. Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:680–91.PubMedCrossRef Amir E, Freedman OC, Seruga B, Evans DG. Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:680–91.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1224–37.PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S. Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:1224–37.PubMedCrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Dong LM, Potter JD, White E, Ulrich CM, Cardon LR, Peters U. Genetic susceptibility to cancer: the role of polymorphisms in candidate genes. JAMA. 2008;299:2423–36.PubMedCrossRef Dong LM, Potter JD, White E, Ulrich CM, Cardon LR, Peters U. Genetic susceptibility to cancer: the role of polymorphisms in candidate genes. JAMA. 2008;299:2423–36.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Deeb KK, Trump DL, Johnson CS. Vitamin D signalling pathways in cancer: potential for anticancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:684–700.PubMedCrossRef Deeb KK, Trump DL, Johnson CS. Vitamin D signalling pathways in cancer: potential for anticancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:684–700.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Plum LA, DeLuca HF. Vitamin D, disease and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:941–55.PubMedCrossRef Plum LA, DeLuca HF. Vitamin D, disease and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9:941–55.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kostner K, Denzer N, Muller CS, Klein R, Tilgen W, Reichrath J. The relevance of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms for cancer: a review of the literature. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:3511–36.PubMed Kostner K, Denzer N, Muller CS, Klein R, Tilgen W, Reichrath J. The relevance of vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms for cancer: a review of the literature. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:3511–36.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Tang C, Chen N, Wu M, Yuan H, Du Y. Fok1 polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene contributes to breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117:391–9.PubMedCrossRef Tang C, Chen N, Wu M, Yuan H, Du Y. Fok1 polymorphism of vitamin D receptor gene contributes to breast cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117:391–9.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Abbas S, Nieters A, Linseisen J, Slanger T, Kropp S, Mutschelknauss EJ, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and haplotypes and postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:R31.PubMedCrossRef Abbas S, Nieters A, Linseisen J, Slanger T, Kropp S, Mutschelknauss EJ, et al. Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms and haplotypes and postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:R31.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Anderson LN, Cotterchio M, Cole DE, Knight JA. Vitamin D-related genetic variants, interactions with vitamin D exposure, and breast cancer risk among caucasian women in ontario. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1708–17.PubMedCrossRef Anderson LN, Cotterchio M, Cole DE, Knight JA. Vitamin D-related genetic variants, interactions with vitamin D exposure, and breast cancer risk among caucasian women in ontario. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1708–17.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yao S, Zirpoli G, Bovbjerg DH, Jandorf L, Hong CC, Zhao H, et al. Variants in the vitamin D pathway, serum levels of vitamin D, and estrogen receptor negative breast cancer among African–American women: a case–control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R58.PubMedCrossRef Yao S, Zirpoli G, Bovbjerg DH, Jandorf L, Hong CC, Zhao H, et al. Variants in the vitamin D pathway, serum levels of vitamin D, and estrogen receptor negative breast cancer among African–American women: a case–control study. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R58.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.PubMedCrossRef Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–48.PubMed Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–48.PubMed
16.
17.
go back to reference Egger M. Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.PubMedCrossRef Egger M. Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C: Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chung M, Lee J, Terasawa T, Lau J, Trikalinos TA. Vitamin D with or without calcium supplementation for prevention of cancer and fractures: an updated meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:827–38.PubMedCrossRef Chung M, Lee J, Terasawa T, Lau J, Trikalinos TA. Vitamin D with or without calcium supplementation for prevention of cancer and fractures: an updated meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:827–38.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mondul AM, Weinstein SJ, Horst RL, Purdue M, Albanes D. Serum vitamin D and risk of bladder cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21:1222–5.PubMedCrossRef Mondul AM, Weinstein SJ, Horst RL, Purdue M, Albanes D. Serum vitamin D and risk of bladder cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21:1222–5.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chen L. Davey Smith G, Evans DM, Cox A, Lawlor DA, Donovan J, Yuan W, Day IN, Martin RM, Lane A, Rodriguez S, Davis M, Zuccolo L, Collin SM, Hamdy F, Neal D, Lewis SJ: Genetic variants in the vitamin D receptor are associated with advanced prostate cancer at diagnosis: findings from the prostate testing for cancer and treatment study and a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:2874–81.PubMedCrossRef Chen L. Davey Smith G, Evans DM, Cox A, Lawlor DA, Donovan J, Yuan W, Day IN, Martin RM, Lane A, Rodriguez S, Davis M, Zuccolo L, Collin SM, Hamdy F, Neal D, Lewis SJ: Genetic variants in the vitamin D receptor are associated with advanced prostate cancer at diagnosis: findings from the prostate testing for cancer and treatment study and a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:2874–81.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Touvier M, Chan DS, Lau R, Aune D, Vieira R, Greenwood DC, et al. Meta-analyses of vitamin D intake, 25-hydroxyvitamin D status, vitamin D receptor polymorphisms, and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1003–16.PubMedCrossRef Touvier M, Chan DS, Lau R, Aune D, Vieira R, Greenwood DC, et al. Meta-analyses of vitamin D intake, 25-hydroxyvitamin D status, vitamin D receptor polymorphisms, and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20:1003–16.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Levin GP, Robinson-Cohen C, de Boer IH, Houston DK, Lohman K, Liu Y, et al. Genetic variants and associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations with major clinical outcomes. JAMA. 2012;308:1898–905.PubMedCrossRef Levin GP, Robinson-Cohen C, de Boer IH, Houston DK, Lohman K, Liu Y, et al. Genetic variants and associations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations with major clinical outcomes. JAMA. 2012;308:1898–905.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Orlow I, Roy P, Reiner AS, Yoo S, Patel H, Paine S, et al. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:405–18.PubMedCrossRef Orlow I, Roy P, Reiner AS, Yoo S, Patel H, Paine S, et al. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Int J Cancer. 2012;130:405–18.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Jiao Z, Li D. Lack of association between MHTFR Glu429Ala polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 research studies. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:1225–33.PubMedCrossRef Jiao Z, Li D. Lack of association between MHTFR Glu429Ala polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 29 research studies. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:1225–33.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Dai G, Guo Z, Yang X, Yu B, Li L. Association of 8q24 rs13281615A > G polymorphism with breast cancer risk: evidence from 40,762 cases and 50,380 controls. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40:4065–73.PubMedCrossRef Dai G, Guo Z, Yang X, Yu B, Li L. Association of 8q24 rs13281615A > G polymorphism with breast cancer risk: evidence from 40,762 cases and 50,380 controls. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40:4065–73.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Liu JJ, Liu JL, Zhang X, Xie L, Zeng J. A meta-analysis of the association of glutathione S-transferase P1 gene polymorphism with the susceptibility of breast cancer. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40:3203–12.PubMedCrossRef Liu JJ, Liu JL, Zhang X, Xie L, Zeng J. A meta-analysis of the association of glutathione S-transferase P1 gene polymorphism with the susceptibility of breast cancer. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40:3203–12.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yao F, Fang Y, Chen B, Jin F, Wang S. Association between the NBS1 Glu185Gln polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:1255–62.PubMedCrossRef Yao F, Fang Y, Chen B, Jin F, Wang S. Association between the NBS1 Glu185Gln polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2013;34:1255–62.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Association between vitamin D receptor gene Cdx2 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility
Authors
Zhu-Chao Zhou
Jie Wang
Zi-Hao Cai
Qun-hua Zhang
Zhen-Xin Cai
Jian-Hua Wu
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Tumor Biology / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 1010-4283
Electronic ISSN: 1423-0380
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-013-0919-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Tumor Biology 6/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine