Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Insights into Imaging
Published in: Insights into Imaging 6/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Original Article

Infection prevention and ultrasound probe decontamination practices in Europe: a survey of the European Society of Radiology

Authors: Christiane Marita Nyhsen, Hilary Humphreys, Carlos Nicolau, Gerhard Mostbeck, Michel Claudon

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Although ultrasound (US) is considered one of the safest imaging modalities, concerns have been raised regarding potential infection transmission risks through US procedures. A survey was undertaken by the European Society of Radiology (ESR) to establish infection prevention and control measures in US and to highlight the importance of good medical practice.

Methods

An online survey was sent to all 22,000 full ESR members.

Results

The response rate of completed surveys was 4.3 % (946 practitioners, 97 % of which were radiologists, mostly working in larger hospital settings). Among respondents, 29 %, 11 % and 6 % did not disinfect the US probe after every patient when performing standard surface US, endo-cavity US and interventional procedures, respectively. Eleven percent did not always use probe covers for endo-cavity US; for interventional procedures, the proportion was 23 %. A minority used sterile gel sachets in direct patient contact for endo-cavity scans (30 %), and 77.5 % used sterile gel for interventional procedures.

Conclusions

The survey results highlight a wide range of practices throughout Europe and the need to raise awareness amongst practitioners regarding the importance of infection prevention and control measures. The development of European recommendations encompassing all US examinations, together with education is a priority.

Main Messages

• Transmission of infection through ultrasound procedures is possible.
• There is a wide range of ultrasound probe decontamination practices in Europe.
• Not all practitioners use probe covers for endo-cavity or interventional ultrasound.
• Not all practitioners use sterile gel for internal and invasive procedures.
• Currently there are no European recommendations encompassing all US examinations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Wendorf KA, Kay M, Baliga C, Weissman SJ, Gluck M, Verma P et al (2015) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-associated AmpC Escherichia coli outbreak. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 36(6):634–642CrossRefPubMed
2.
Kola A, Piening B, Pape UF, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Kaase M, Geffers C et al (2015) An outbreak of carbapenem-resistant OXA-48 - producing Klebsiella pneumonia associated to duodenoscopy. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 4:8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
4.
Koo VS, O’Neill P, Elves A (2012) Multidrug-resistant NDM-1 Klebsiella outbreak and infection control in endoscopic urology. BJU Int 110(11 Pt C):E922–E926CrossRefPubMed
5.
Seki M, Machida H, Yamagishi Y, Yoshida H, Tomono K (2013) Nosocomial outbreak of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa caused by damaged transesophageal echocardiogram probe used in cardiovascular surgical operations. J Infect Chemother 19(4):677–681CrossRefPubMed
6.
7.
8.
Gray RA, Williams PL, Dubbins PA, Jenks PJ (2012) Decontamination of transvaginal ultrasound probes: review of national practice and need for national guidelines. Clin Radiol 67(11):1069–1077CrossRefPubMed
9.
Backhouse S (2003) Establishing a protocol for the cleaning and sterilisation/disinfection of ultrasound transducers. BMUS Bull 11(1)
10.
Lorentzen T, Nolsøe CP et al (2015) EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I. Ultraschall Med 36:E1–E14CrossRefPubMed
11.
Spencer P, Spencer RC (1988) Ultrasound scanning of postoperative wounds - the risks of cross-infection. Clin Radiol 39:245e6
12.
Lesourd F, Izopet J, Mervan C, Payen JL, Sandres K et al (2000) Transmissions of hepatitis C virus during the ancillary procedures for assisted conception. Hum Reprod 15:1083–1085CrossRefPubMed
13.
M’Zali F, Bounizra C, Leroy S, Mekki Y, Quentin-Noury C, Kann M (2014) Persistence of microbial contamination on transvaginal ultrasound probes despite low-level disinfection procedure. PLoS One 9(4):e93368CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Koibuchi H, Kotani K, Taniguchi N (2013) Ultrasound probes as a possible vector of bacterial transmission. Med Ultrason 15(1):41–44CrossRefPubMed
15.
Leroy S (2013) Infectious risk of endovaginal and transrectal ultrasonography: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect 83(2):99–106CrossRefPubMed
16.
Ma ST, Yeung AC, Chan PK, Graham CA (2012) Transvaginal ultrasound probe contamination by the human papillomavirus in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 30(6):472–475CrossRefPubMed
17.
Casalegno JS, Le Bail Carval K, Eibach D, Valdeyron ML, Lamblin G, Jacquemoud H et al (2012) High risk HPV contamination of endocavity vaginal ultrasound probes: an underestimated route of nosocomial infection? PLoS One 7(10):e48137CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Mullaney PJ, Munthali P et al (2007) How clean is your probe? microbiological assessment of ultrasound transducers in routine clinical use, and cost-effective ways to reduce contamination. Clin Radiol 62(7):694–698CrossRefPubMed
19.
Cervini P, Hesley GK, Thompson RL, Sampathkumar P, Knudsen JM (2010) Incidence of infectious complications after an ultrasound-guided intervention. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195(4):846–850CrossRefPubMed
20.
Asano F, Aoe M, Ohsaki Y, Okada Y, Sasada S, Sato S et al (2013) Complications associated with endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a nationwide survey by the Japan Society for Respiratory Endoscopy. Respir Res 14:50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
Lodeta B, Trkulja V (2014) Septic complications and hospital admissions after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: incidence rates and outcomes in 913 consecutive biopsies. Int Urol Nephrol 46(12):2335–2336CrossRefPubMed
22.
Leroy S, M’Zali F, Kann M, Weber D, Smith D (2014) Impact of vaginal-rectal ultrasound examinations with covered and low-level disinfected transducers on infectious transmissions in France. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 35(12):1497–1504CrossRefPubMed
23.
Bénet T, Ritter J, Vanhems P (2014) Risk of human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus infection related to endocavitary ultrasound probe exposure in France. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 35(11):1429–1431CrossRefPubMed
24.
Milki AA, Fisch JD (1998) Vaginal ultrasound probe cover leakage: implications for patient care. Fertil Steril 69(3):409–411CrossRefPubMed
25.
Masood J, Voulgaris S, Awogu O, Younis C, Ball AJ, Carr TW (2007) Condom perforation during transrectal ultrasound guided (TRUS) prostate biopsies: a potential infection risk. Int Urol Nephrol 39(4):1121–1124CrossRefPubMed
26.
Hignett M, Claman P (1995) High rates of perforation are found in endovaginal ultrasound probe covers before and after oocyte retrieval for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 12(9):606–609CrossRefPubMed
27.
Amis S, Ruddy M, Kibbler CC, Economides DL, MacLean AB (2000) Assessment of condoms as probe covers for transvaginal sonography. J Clin Ultrasond 28(6):295–298CrossRef
28.
Rooks VJ, Yancey MK, Elg SA, Brueske L (1996) Comparison of probe sheaths for endovaginal sonography. Obstet Gynecol 87(1):27–29CrossRefPubMed
29.
Storment JM, Monga M, Blanco JD (1997) Ineffectiveness of latex condoms in preventing contamination of the transvaginal ultrasound transducer head. South Med J 90(2):206–208CrossRefPubMed
30.
Muradali D, Gold WL, Phillips A, Wilson S (1995) Can ultrasound probes and coupling gel be a source of nosocomial infection in patients undergoing sonography? An in vivo and in vitro study. Am J Roentgenol 164:1521–1524CrossRef
31.
Ohara T, Itoh Y, Itoh K (1998) Ultrasound instruments as possible vectors of staphylococcal infection. J Hosp Infect 40:73–77CrossRefPubMed
32.
Chittick P, Russo V, Sims M et al (2012) Outbreak of Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory tract infections in cardiovascular surgery associated with contaminated ultrasound gel used for transesophageal echocardiography—Michigan, December 2011–January 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 61:262–264
33.
Olshtain-Pops K, Block C, Temper V et al (2011) An outbreak of Achromobacter xylosoxidans associated with ultrasound gel used during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 185:144–147CrossRefPubMed
34.
Jacobson M, Wray R, Kovach D, Henry D, Speert D, Matlow A (2006) Sustained endemicity of Burkholderia cepacia complex in a pediatric institution, associated with contaminated ultrasound gel. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 27:362–366CrossRefPubMed
35.
Weist K, Wendt C, Petersen L, Versmold H, Ruden H (2000) An outbreak of pyodermas among neonates caused by ultrasound gel contaminated with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 21:761–764CrossRefPubMed
36.
Oleszkowicz SC, Chittick P et al (2012) Infections associated with use of ultrasound transmission gel. proposed guidelines to minimize risk. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 33(12):1235–1237CrossRefPubMed
37.
Meyers J, Ryndock E, Conway MJ, Meyers C, Robison R (2014) Susceptibility of high-risk human papillomavirus type 16 to clinical disinfectants. J Antimicrob Chemother 69(6):1546–1550CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
Koibuchi H, Fujii Y, Kotani K et al (2011) Degradation of ultrasound probes caused by disinfection with alcohol. J Med Ultrason 38:97–100CrossRef
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
Chalouhi GE, Salomon LJ, Marelle P, Bernard JP, Ville Y (2009) Hygiène en échographie endocavitaire gynécologique et obstétricale en 2008 [Hygiene in endovaginal gynecologic and obstetrical ultrasound in 2008]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 38(1):43–50CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Infection prevention and ultrasound probe decontamination practices in Europe: a survey of the European Society of Radiology
Authors
Christiane Marita Nyhsen
Hilary Humphreys
Carlos Nicolau
Gerhard Mostbeck
Michel Claudon
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 6/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-016-0528-z

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Insights into Imaging 6/2016 Go to the issue

Pictorial Review

Lesions involving the outer surface of the bone in children: a pictorial review

Pictorial Review

Cinematic rendering – an alternative to volume rendering for 3D computed tomography imaging

Review

Multi-modal imaging of the subscapularis muscle

Pictorial Review

Secretin-stimulated MR cholangiopancreatography: spectrum of findings in pancreatic diseases

Pictorial Review

Hyperparathyroidism jaw tumour syndrome: a pictoral review

Pictorial Review

Causes of hepatic capsular retraction: a pictorial essay