Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 2/2010

Open Access 01-05-2010 | Statement

White paper on imaging biomarkers

Author: European Society of Radiology (ESR)

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Because of the importance of biomarkers within medicine as a whole and the increasing realisation that imaging can safely provide biomarkers, the ESR executive commissioned this report by experts in the field. It is hoped that further awareness amongst our community will contibute to further exploitation of the enormous wealth of biomaker information available in our day to day imaging. The all important issues surrounding validation and standardisation are discussed, together with proposals for a European Network on Imaging Biomarkers to oversee such aspects.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Biomarkers definitions working group (2001) Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther 69:89–95CrossRef Biomarkers definitions working group (2001) Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clin Pharmacol Ther 69:89–95CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Altar CA (2008) The biomarkers consortium: on the critical path of drug discovery. Clin Pharmacol Ther 83:361–364PubMedCrossRef Altar CA (2008) The biomarkers consortium: on the critical path of drug discovery. Clin Pharmacol Ther 83:361–364PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Newell D (2003) The drug development process: from target discovery to the clinic. Clin Med 3:323–326CrossRef Newell D (2003) The drug development process: from target discovery to the clinic. Clin Med 3:323–326CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pepe M, Etzioni R, Feng Z, Potter J, Lou M (2001) Phases of biomarkers development for early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1054–1061PubMedCrossRef Pepe M, Etzioni R, Feng Z, Potter J, Lou M (2001) Phases of biomarkers development for early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1054–1061PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Workman P, Aboagye E, Chung YL et al (2006) Minimally invasive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic technologies in hypothesis-testing clinical trials of innovative therapies. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:580–598PubMedCrossRef Workman P, Aboagye E, Chung YL et al (2006) Minimally invasive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic technologies in hypothesis-testing clinical trials of innovative therapies. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:580–598PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kelloff G, Sigman C (2005) New science-based endpoints to accelerate oncology drug development. Eur J Cancer 41:491–501PubMedCrossRef Kelloff G, Sigman C (2005) New science-based endpoints to accelerate oncology drug development. Eur J Cancer 41:491–501PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Carden CP, Banerji U, Kaye SB, Workman P, De Bono JS (2009) From darkness to light with biomarkers in early clinical trials of cancer drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 85:131–133PubMedCrossRef Carden CP, Banerji U, Kaye SB, Workman P, De Bono JS (2009) From darkness to light with biomarkers in early clinical trials of cancer drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 85:131–133PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ritcher W (2006) Imaging biomarkers as surrogate endpoints for drug development. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:S6–S10 Ritcher W (2006) Imaging biomarkers as surrogate endpoints for drug development. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33:S6–S10
11.
go back to reference Sargent DJ, Rubinstein L, Schwartz L et al (2009) Validation of novel imaging methodologies for use as cancer clinical trial end-points. Eur J Cancer 45:290–299PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sargent DJ, Rubinstein L, Schwartz L et al (2009) Validation of novel imaging methodologies for use as cancer clinical trial end-points. Eur J Cancer 45:290–299PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL et al (1999) Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:223–232PubMedCrossRef Tofts PS, Brix G, Buckley DL et al (1999) Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:223–232PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Leach MO, Brindle KM, Evelhoch JL et al (2005) The assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapies in early-stage clinical trials using magnetic resonance imaging: issues and recommendations. Brit J Cancer 92:1599–1610PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Leach MO, Brindle KM, Evelhoch JL et al (2005) The assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapies in early-stage clinical trials using magnetic resonance imaging: issues and recommendations. Brit J Cancer 92:1599–1610PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Padhani AR, Liu G, Mu-Koh D et al (2009) Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11:102–125PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Padhani AR, Liu G, Mu-Koh D et al (2009) Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11:102–125PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
16.
go back to reference Buckler AJ, Mozley PD, Schwartz L et al (2010) Volumetric CT in lung cancer: an example for the qualification of imaging as a biomarker. Acad Radiol 17:107–115PubMedCrossRef Buckler AJ, Mozley PD, Schwartz L et al (2010) Volumetric CT in lung cancer: an example for the qualification of imaging as a biomarker. Acad Radiol 17:107–115PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Eisenhauser EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRef Eisenhauser EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Llovet JM, Di Bisceglie A, Bruix J et al (2008) Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:698–711PubMedCrossRef Llovet JM, Di Bisceglie A, Bruix J et al (2008) Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 100:698–711PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
White paper on imaging biomarkers
Author
European Society of Radiology (ESR)
Publication date
01-05-2010
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 2/2010
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0025-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Insights into Imaging 2/2010 Go to the issue