Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2016

01-08-2016 | Original Article

Outcome of Diabetic Pregnancies in a Tertiary Referral Centre, Varanasi

Authors: Uma Pandey, Neeraj Kumar Agrawal, Shilpa Agrawal, Shuchita Batra

Published in: The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

The study was done to determine the maternal and fetal outcome of pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes either Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) or preexisting (type 1 or type 2) diabetes over a period from March 2011 to Feb 2013 in a tertiary care hospital, Varanasi.

Methods

This is a retrospective audit of the maternal and fetal outcome of women who presented to the Sir Sundar Lal Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India from March 2011 to Feb 2013, with GDM or pre-existing type 1 or type 2 Diabetes with pregnancy. The audit group comprised 65 pregnancies (67 babies), of whom 27 had preexisting diabetes and 38 cases developed gestational diabetes. Pregnant women who were found to be diabetic preconceptionally or in the first trimester were classified as ‘pre-existing diabetes’.

Results

There were total of 65 diabetic women in this retrospective study, 39 women were GDM (60 %) while 26 women (40 %) were having pre-existing diabetes (24 type 1 diabetes and 2 women were in type 2 diabetes group). There were 35 multigravid women (53.85 %) and 30 primigravid women (46.15 %). There were 39 (60 %) women on Insulin. There were 42 Lower Segment Caesarean Section (64.62 %) and 23 Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery (35.38 %). In fetal and neonatal complications, there were three still births, one case of intrapartum death, and one case of shoulder dystocia. Fetal anomalies were less frequent, one case of Gastroschisis with Hydrocephalus associated with Menigomyelocoele, there was one case of isolated Hydrocephalus, and there was also one case of Truncus arteriosus.

Conclusions

The study analyses maternal and fetal complication in the GDM group and also preexisting diabetes group. In our centre, the 60 % women were GDM while 40 % were having pre-existing diabetes. Total rate of fetal/neonatal complication rate was 7.69 % and of congenital anomaly rate it was 9.23 %. Proportion of still birth, Intrauterine death, and congenital malformations was higher in the pre-existing diabetes group although the data are not large enough to draw a statistically significant conclusion. LSCS rate was little higher in the GDM group (69.23 %) in comparison to the preexisting diabetes group where it was 57.69 %. SVD (Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery) rate was 30.77 % in GDM and 42.31 % in the pre-existing diabetes group. HbA1c was within normal range 84.62 % of GDM group while in 15.38 % it was raised >6 %. In the pre-existing diabetes group, only 19.23 % of women had HbA1c within acceptable range and 80.77 % had it >6. The aim of St Vincent Declaration is to ‘achieve pregnancy outcome in the diabetic woman that is similar to that of the non-diabetic woman.’ But, so far we have not been able to achieve this. Our HbA1c level is remarkably high in the pre-existing diabetes group. Only 3 out of 65 patients’ women took Folic Acid periconceptionally. We need to work to achieve it our best. It is well known that insulin treatment during pregnancy results in reduction in the rate of macrosomia, fetal/neonatal, and maternal complications. Therefore, we need to use insulin judiciously and advocate its usage in the situations where it is needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dornhorst A, Paterson CM, Nicholls JS, et al. High prevalence of gestational diabetes in women from ethnic minority groups. Diabet Med. 1992;9:820–5.CrossRefPubMed Dornhorst A, Paterson CM, Nicholls JS, et al. High prevalence of gestational diabetes in women from ethnic minority groups. Diabet Med. 1992;9:820–5.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Yue DK, Molyneaux LM, Rss GP, et al. Why does ethnicity affect prevalence of gestational diabetes? The underwater volcano theory. Diabet Med. 1996;13:748–52.CrossRefPubMed Yue DK, Molyneaux LM, Rss GP, et al. Why does ethnicity affect prevalence of gestational diabetes? The underwater volcano theory. Diabet Med. 1996;13:748–52.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference WHO. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Geneva: WHO; 1999. WHO. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Geneva: WHO; 1999.
4.
go back to reference Seshiah V, Balaji V, Balaji MS, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus in India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004;52:707–11.PubMed Seshiah V, Balaji V, Balaji MS, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus in India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004;52:707–11.PubMed
5.
go back to reference International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:676–82.CrossRefPubMedCentral International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups Consensus Panel. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycaemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:676–82.CrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guideline for obstetricians-gynaecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:525–38.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guideline for obstetricians-gynaecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:525–38.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Naylor CD, Sermer M, Chen E, Toronto Trihospital Gestational Diabetes Project Investigators, et al. Selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1591–6.CrossRefPubMed Naylor CD, Sermer M, Chen E, Toronto Trihospital Gestational Diabetes Project Investigators, et al. Selective screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1591–6.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ballard JL, Rosenn B, Khoury JC, et al. Diabetic fetal macrosomia: significance of disproportionate growth. J Pediatr. 1993;122:115–9.CrossRefPubMed Ballard JL, Rosenn B, Khoury JC, et al. Diabetic fetal macrosomia: significance of disproportionate growth. J Pediatr. 1993;122:115–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Smith CV, et al. Amniotic fluid index measurements during pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 1987;32:601–4.PubMed Phelan JP, Ahn MO, Smith CV, et al. Amniotic fluid index measurements during pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 1987;32:601–4.PubMed
10.
go back to reference National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes. 1979;28:1039–57.CrossRef National Diabetes Data Group. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. Diabetes. 1979;28:1039–57.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shefali AK, Kavitha M, Deepa R, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in pre-gestational and gestational diabetic women in comparison to non-diabetic women. A prospective study in Asian Indian mothers. J Assoc Physicians India. 2006;54:613–8.PubMed Shefali AK, Kavitha M, Deepa R, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in pre-gestational and gestational diabetic women in comparison to non-diabetic women. A prospective study in Asian Indian mothers. J Assoc Physicians India. 2006;54:613–8.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Saxena P, Tyagi S, Prakash A, et al. Pregnancy outcome of women with gestational diabetes in a tertiary level hospital of North India. Indian J Community Med. 2011;36(2):120–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Saxena P, Tyagi S, Prakash A, et al. Pregnancy outcome of women with gestational diabetes in a tertiary level hospital of North India. Indian J Community Med. 2011;36(2):120–3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Farell PM, Engle MJ, Frantz ID, et al. Complications of pregnancy and fetal development. Diabetes. 1982;31:89–94.CrossRef Farell PM, Engle MJ, Frantz ID, et al. Complications of pregnancy and fetal development. Diabetes. 1982;31:89–94.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ylinen K, Aula P, Steinman UH, et al. Risk of minor and major fetal malformation in diabetics with high HbA1c values early in pregnancy. Br Med J. 1984;289:345–6.CrossRef Ylinen K, Aula P, Steinman UH, et al. Risk of minor and major fetal malformation in diabetics with high HbA1c values early in pregnancy. Br Med J. 1984;289:345–6.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sermer M, Naylor CD, Farine D, et al. The Toronto Tri-hospital Gestational Diabetes Project. A preliminary review. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(suppl 2):B33–42.PubMed Sermer M, Naylor CD, Farine D, et al. The Toronto Tri-hospital Gestational Diabetes Project. A preliminary review. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(suppl 2):B33–42.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Outcome of Diabetic Pregnancies in a Tertiary Referral Centre, Varanasi
Authors
Uma Pandey
Neeraj Kumar Agrawal
Shilpa Agrawal
Shuchita Batra
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0971-9202
Electronic ISSN: 0975-6434
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-014-0667-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India 4/2016 Go to the issue