Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 4/2014

01-12-2014 | Original Article

A Comparative Study on the Relationship Between Inter Alar Width, and Inter Commissural Width on Circumferential Arc Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth in Different Age Groups

Authors: Anjana Kurien, K. P. Cherian, Shirley Mhatre, Renji George Tharakan

Published in: The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

This study was done to determine the relationship between interalar width and inter commissural width on circumferential arc width of maxillary anterior teeth in dentulous subjects between the age groups of 20–50 years. The study involved 300 subjects, in whom measurements were made from the distal aspect of each maxillary canine, across the facial surfaces of the six anterior teeth, using brass wire and a Vernier calliper. Interalar and inter commissural width were recorded after placing two points and measured with a Vernier calliper. Results were statistically analyzed using unpaired t test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Pearson’s correlation coefficient test. This study confirmed the reliability of interalar width to determine the circumferential arc width which can be used as a reference in edentulous patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Owens EG, Goodacre JC, Loh PL, Hanke G, Okamura M, Jo K et al (2002) A multicenter interracial study of facial appearance. Part 1: a comparison of intraoral parameters. Int J Prosthodont 15:273–282PubMed Owens EG, Goodacre JC, Loh PL, Hanke G, Okamura M, Jo K et al (2002) A multicenter interracial study of facial appearance. Part 1: a comparison of intraoral parameters. Int J Prosthodont 15:273–282PubMed
2.
go back to reference Pound E (1954) Lost fine arts in the fallacy of ridges. J Prosthet Dent 4:6–16CrossRef Pound E (1954) Lost fine arts in the fallacy of ridges. J Prosthet Dent 4:6–16CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Philip Schiffman (1964) Relation of the maxillary canines to the incisive papilla. J Prosthet Dent 14:469–472CrossRef Philip Schiffman (1964) Relation of the maxillary canines to the incisive papilla. J Prosthet Dent 14:469–472CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ricketts, Robert M (1968) Esthetics environment and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthodontics 54:272–289CrossRef Ricketts, Robert M (1968) Esthetics environment and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthodontics 54:272–289CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shillingburg HT, Kalpan MJ (1972) Grace SC. Tooth dimensions—A comparative study. J South Calif Dent Assistants Assoc 40:830–839 Shillingburg HT, Kalpan MJ (1972) Grace SC. Tooth dimensions—A comparative study. J South Calif Dent Assistants Assoc 40:830–839
6.
go back to reference Sidney I, Silverman (1967) Complete denture esthetics and its relation to facial esthetics. Dent Clin North Am 75:89–100 Sidney I, Silverman (1967) Complete denture esthetics and its relation to facial esthetics. Dent Clin North Am 75:89–100
8.
go back to reference Hasanreisoglu U et al (2005) An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent 94:530–538PubMedCrossRef Hasanreisoglu U et al (2005) An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent 94:530–538PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gomes VL et al (2009) Interalar distance to estimate the combined width of the six maxillary anterior teeth in oral rehabilitation treatment. J Esthet Restor Dent 21:26–36PubMedCrossRef Gomes VL et al (2009) Interalar distance to estimate the combined width of the six maxillary anterior teeth in oral rehabilitation treatment. J Esthet Restor Dent 21:26–36PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Puri M, Bhalla LR, Khanna VK (1972) Relationship of intercanine distance with the distance between the alae of nose. J Indiana Dent Assoc 4:46–49 Puri M, Bhalla LR, Khanna VK (1972) Relationship of intercanine distance with the distance between the alae of nose. J Indiana Dent Assoc 4:46–49
11.
go back to reference Keng SB (1986) Nasal width dimensions and anterior teeth in prosthodontics. Ann Acad Med Singap 15:311PubMed Keng SB (1986) Nasal width dimensions and anterior teeth in prosthodontics. Ann Acad Med Singap 15:311PubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Lee HJ (1964) The appearance of artificial dentures. Aust Dent J 9:304–308CrossRef Lee HJ (1964) The appearance of artificial dentures. Aust Dent J 9:304–308CrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Mavroskoufis F (1981) Ritchie G.M. Nasal width and incisive papilla as guides for the selection and arrangement of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 6:592–597CrossRef Mavroskoufis F (1981) Ritchie G.M. Nasal width and incisive papilla as guides for the selection and arrangement of the maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 6:592–597CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Scandrett RF, Kerber EP, Umrigar RA (1982) A clinical evaluation of techniques to determine the combined width of the maxillary anterior teeth and the maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 48:15–22PubMedCrossRef Scandrett RF, Kerber EP, Umrigar RA (1982) A clinical evaluation of techniques to determine the combined width of the maxillary anterior teeth and the maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 48:15–22PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hoffman W, Bomberg TJ (1986) Interalar width as a guide in denture tooth selection. J Prosthet Dent 55:219–221PubMedCrossRef Hoffman W, Bomberg TJ (1986) Interalar width as a guide in denture tooth selection. J Prosthet Dent 55:219–221PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Smith BJ (1975) The value of the nose width as an esthetic guide in prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 34:562–573PubMedCrossRef Smith BJ (1975) The value of the nose width as an esthetic guide in prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 34:562–573PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Latta GH Jr et al (1991) The relationship between the width of the mouth, interalar width, bizygomatic width, and interpupillary distance in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 65:250–254PubMedCrossRef Latta GH Jr et al (1991) The relationship between the width of the mouth, interalar width, bizygomatic width, and interpupillary distance in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 65:250–254PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fariaby J et al (2005) Photographic analysis of faces of 20-year-old students in Iran. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:393–396PubMedCrossRef Fariaby J et al (2005) Photographic analysis of faces of 20-year-old students in Iran. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:393–396PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference McArthur DR (1985) Determining approximate size of maxillary anterior artificial teeth when mandibular teeth are present. Part I: size relationship. J Prosthet Dent 53:216–218PubMedCrossRef McArthur DR (1985) Determining approximate size of maxillary anterior artificial teeth when mandibular teeth are present. Part I: size relationship. J Prosthet Dent 53:216–218PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Comparative Study on the Relationship Between Inter Alar Width, and Inter Commissural Width on Circumferential Arc Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth in Different Age Groups
Authors
Anjana Kurien
K. P. Cherian
Shirley Mhatre
Renji George Tharakan
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 0972-4052
Electronic ISSN: 1998-4057
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-013-0329-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society 4/2014 Go to the issue