Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 4/2021

01-08-2021 | Colonoscopy

Stakeholder Perspectives on Colonoscopy Navigation and Colorectal Cancer Screening Inequities

Authors: Deeonna E. Farr, Venice E. Haynes, Cheryl A. Armstead, Heather M. Brandt

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Black adults complete colonoscopies at lower rates than other groups despite increased colorectal cancer risk. Patient navigation represents a strategy to address the varied factors that influence colonoscopy completion, but few reports describe how navigation reduces racial disparities in colorectal cancer screening rates. The purpose of this study was to understand how a statewide colonoscopy navigation program addressed the challenges faced by low-income Black adults attempting to complete screening colonoscopy. A qualitative case study analysis was conducted at a participating clinical site of a statewide colonoscopy navigation program. Clinical observations, document reviews, and semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients, patient navigators, and clinical staff. Patient participants were recruited to ensure maximum variation related to gender and colonoscopy completion. Thematic coding allowed researchers to examine experiences, perceptions, and emotions related to patient navigation. In total, 31 interviews were completed between October 2014 and February 2015. Patients and patient navigators reported logistical, psychosocial, and knowledge-related barriers to colonoscopy completion. Clinical staff reports focused mostly on logistical barriers. Benefits of patient navigation also varied by participant type with clinical staff revealing positive effects on the clinic's relationships with referring specialty practices. Patient navigators address barriers that are important to patients, but often unseen by clinical staff/providers. New information about the benefits different stakeholders derive from this strategy was revealed. Together these findings provide insight into the processes associated with this strategy and novel information about the appeal of patient navigation to various stakeholders.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2015) BRFSS prevalance and trends data [online]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (2015) BRFSS prevalance and trends data [online]. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
7.
go back to reference Paskett ED, Harrop J, Wells KJ (2011) Patient navigation: an update on the state of the science. CA Cancer J Clin 61:237–249CrossRef Paskett ED, Harrop J, Wells KJ (2011) Patient navigation: an update on the state of the science. CA Cancer J Clin 61:237–249CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, Schoenfeld PS, Burke CA, Inadomi JM, American College of Gastroenterology (2009) American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2008. Am J Gastroenterol 104:739–750CrossRef Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC, Schoenfeld PS, Burke CA, Inadomi JM, American College of Gastroenterology (2009) American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2008. Am J Gastroenterol 104:739–750CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif
17.
go back to reference QSR International (2012) NVivo qualitative data analysis software verison 10. QSR International Pty Ltd. QSR International (2012) NVivo qualitative data analysis software verison 10. QSR International Pty Ltd.
19.
20.
go back to reference Jean-Pierre P, Hendren S, Fiscella K, Loader S, Rousseau S, Schwartzbauer B, Sanders M, Carroll J, Epstein R (2010) Understanding the processes of patient navigation to reduce disparities in cancer care: perspectives of trained navigators from the field. J Cancer Educ 26:111–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-010-0122-xCrossRef Jean-Pierre P, Hendren S, Fiscella K, Loader S, Rousseau S, Schwartzbauer B, Sanders M, Carroll J, Epstein R (2010) Understanding the processes of patient navigation to reduce disparities in cancer care: perspectives of trained navigators from the field. J Cancer Educ 26:111–120. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s13187-010-0122-xCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Stakeholder Perspectives on Colonoscopy Navigation and Colorectal Cancer Screening Inequities
Authors
Deeonna E. Farr
Venice E. Haynes
Cheryl A. Armstead
Heather M. Brandt
Publication date
01-08-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01684-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Journal of Cancer Education 4/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine