Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 5/2019

01-10-2019

Factors Influencing Adherence to Recommended Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: Experiences and Behaviors of Colorectal Cancer Survivors

Authors: Marvella E. Ford, Katherine R. Sterba, Kent Armeson, Angela M. Malek, Kendrea D. Knight, Jane Zapka

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

The number of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors in the USA is increasing and factors associated with CRC surveillance require attention. This study examined the role of personal, provider, and practice-level factors on CRC survivor care surveillance experiences and outcomes. A telephone survey, informed by the Chronic Care Model, was conducted over a 1-year period with 150 CRC survivors identified via the South Carolina Central Cancer Registry. Participants were ages ≥ 21 years and diagnosed with stages I–III CRC within 1.5 years of study enrollment. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Adherence was defined as receipt of surveillance colonoscopy at 13 months post-CRC surgery, as recommended by evidence-based guidelines. The majority of participants were male (55%) and white (86%), with a median age of 65 years (range 25–89). Almost half (43%) had attained a high school degree or less. Cancer stage was fairly evenly distributed, and 58% had received treatment by surgery alone (provider-level factor). Few participants (56%) received a survivorship care plan (practice-level factor), and adherence to surveillance colonoscopy was lowest (36%) among participants with more than one comorbidity (personal-level factor). Logistic regression models showed that the only significant effect of personal, provider, or practice-level factors on CRC surveillance adherence was related to type of health insurance coverage (private/HMO vs. other; p = 0.04). This is one of the first studies to evaluate CRC surveillance in a socioeconomically diverse sample. The only associations found among the examined factors and adherence were related to type of health insurance coverage. Participants with private/HMO health insurance were significantly more likely than participants with “other” health insurance coverage types (i.e., none, Medicare without supplement, Medicare with supplement) to be adherent to the 13-month colonoscopy. Therefore, future education strategies and patient navigation interventions could focus on identifying and overcoming multi-level barriers to CRC surveillance services.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Paulson EC, Veenstra CM, Vachani A, Ciunci CA, Epstein AJ (2015) Trends in surveillance for resected colorectal cancer, 2001-2009. Cancer 121(19):3525–3533CrossRef Paulson EC, Veenstra CM, Vachani A, Ciunci CA, Epstein AJ (2015) Trends in surveillance for resected colorectal cancer, 2001-2009. Cancer 121(19):3525–3533CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hu CY, Delclos GL, Chan W, Du XL (2011) Post-treatment surveillance in a large cohort of patients with colon cancer. Am J Manag Care 17(5):329–336PubMed Hu CY, Delclos GL, Chan W, Du XL (2011) Post-treatment surveillance in a large cohort of patients with colon cancer. Am J Manag Care 17(5):329–336PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kunitake H, Zheng P, Yothers G, Land SR, Fehrenbacher L, Giguere JK, Wickerham DL, Ganz PA, Ko CY (2010) Routine preventive care and cancer surveillance in long-term survivors of colorectal cancer: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and bowel project protocol LTS-01. J Clin Oncol 28(36):5274–5279CrossRef Kunitake H, Zheng P, Yothers G, Land SR, Fehrenbacher L, Giguere JK, Wickerham DL, Ganz PA, Ko CY (2010) Routine preventive care and cancer surveillance in long-term survivors of colorectal cancer: results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and bowel project protocol LTS-01. J Clin Oncol 28(36):5274–5279CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pisu M, Holt CL, Brown-Galvan A, Fairley T, Smith JL, White A, Hall IJ, Oster RA, Martin MY (2014) Surveillance instructions and knowledge among African American colorectal cancer survivors. J Oncol Pract 10(2):e45–e50CrossRef Pisu M, Holt CL, Brown-Galvan A, Fairley T, Smith JL, White A, Hall IJ, Oster RA, Martin MY (2014) Surveillance instructions and knowledge among African American colorectal cancer survivors. J Oncol Pract 10(2):e45–e50CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cooper GS, Kou TD, Reynolds HL Jr (2008) Receipt of guideline-recommended follow-up in older colorectal cancer survivors : a population-based analysis. Cancer 113(8):2029–2037CrossRef Cooper GS, Kou TD, Reynolds HL Jr (2008) Receipt of guideline-recommended follow-up in older colorectal cancer survivors : a population-based analysis. Cancer 113(8):2029–2037CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Carpentier MY, Vernon SW, Bartholomew LK, Murphy CC, Bluethmann SM (2013) Receipt of recommended surveillance among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 7(3):464–483CrossRef Carpentier MY, Vernon SW, Bartholomew LK, Murphy CC, Bluethmann SM (2013) Receipt of recommended surveillance among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 7(3):464–483CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M (1996) Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q 74(4):511–544CrossRef Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M (1996) Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q 74(4):511–544CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wagner EH (1998) Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract 1(1):2–4PubMed Wagner EH (1998) Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract 1(1):2–4PubMed
10.
go back to reference Becker M (1974) The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr 2:324–508CrossRef Becker M (1974) The health belief model and personal health behavior. Health Educ Monogr 2:324–508CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211CrossRef Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs
13.
go back to reference Wagner PJ, Kenrick JB, Rojas T, Woodward LD (1995) Psychological considerations in colonoscopy. Prim Care 22(3):479–489PubMed Wagner PJ, Kenrick JB, Rojas T, Woodward LD (1995) Psychological considerations in colonoscopy. Prim Care 22(3):479–489PubMed
14.
go back to reference Vernon SW, Meissner H, Klabunde C, Rimer BK, Ahnen DJ, Bastani R, Mandelson MT, Nadel MR, Sheinfeld-Gorin S, Zapka J (2004) Measures for ascertaining use of colorectal cancer screening in behavioral, health services, and epidemiologic research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13(6):898–905 Vernon SW, Meissner H, Klabunde C, Rimer BK, Ahnen DJ, Bastani R, Mandelson MT, Nadel MR, Sheinfeld-Gorin S, Zapka J (2004) Measures for ascertaining use of colorectal cancer screening in behavioral, health services, and epidemiologic research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 13(6):898–905
15.
go back to reference Legislature SC (2013) South Carolina code of Laws: title 44 Legislature SC (2013) South Carolina code of Laws: title 44
16.
go back to reference Ford ME, Sterba KR, Bearden JD 3rd, Gansauer L, Moore LA, Zapka J (2017) Recruiting colorectal cancer survivors to a surveillance study: barriers and successful strategies. Patient Educ Couns 100(3):526–533CrossRef Ford ME, Sterba KR, Bearden JD 3rd, Gansauer L, Moore LA, Zapka J (2017) Recruiting colorectal cancer survivors to a surveillance study: barriers and successful strategies. Patient Educ Couns 100(3):526–533CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ford ME, Havstad S, Vernon SW, Davis SD, Kroll D, Lamerato L, Swanson GM (2006) Enhancing adherence among older African American men enrolled in a longitudinal cancer screening trial. Gerontologist 46(4):545–550CrossRef Ford ME, Havstad S, Vernon SW, Davis SD, Kroll D, Lamerato L, Swanson GM (2006) Enhancing adherence among older African American men enrolled in a longitudinal cancer screening trial. Gerontologist 46(4):545–550CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381CrossRef Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42(2):377–381CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Green LW, Kreuter MW (2005) Health program planning: an educational and ecological approach, 4th edn. McGraw Hill, Boston Green LW, Kreuter MW (2005) Health program planning: an educational and ecological approach, 4th edn. McGraw Hill, Boston
20.
go back to reference Smedley BD, Syme SL (2001) Promoting health: intervention strategies from social and behavioral research. Am J Health Promot 15(3):149–166CrossRef Smedley BD, Syme SL (2001) Promoting health: intervention strategies from social and behavioral research. Am J Health Promot 15(3):149–166CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Sisler JJ, Seo B, Katz A, Shu E, Chateau D, Czaykowski P, Wirtzfeld D, Singh H, Turner D, Martens P (2012) Concordance with ASCO guidelines for surveillance after colorectal cancer treatment: a population-based analysis. J Oncol Pract 8(4):e69–e79CrossRef Sisler JJ, Seo B, Katz A, Shu E, Chateau D, Czaykowski P, Wirtzfeld D, Singh H, Turner D, Martens P (2012) Concordance with ASCO guidelines for surveillance after colorectal cancer treatment: a population-based analysis. J Oncol Pract 8(4):e69–e79CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Mollica MA, Enewold LR, Lines LM, Halpern MT, Schumacher JR, Hays RD, Gibson JT, Schussler N, Kent EE (2017) Examining colorectal cancer survivors' surveillance patterns and experiences of care: a SEER-CAHPS study. Cancer Causes Control 28:1133–1141CrossRef Mollica MA, Enewold LR, Lines LM, Halpern MT, Schumacher JR, Hays RD, Gibson JT, Schussler N, Kent EE (2017) Examining colorectal cancer survivors' surveillance patterns and experiences of care: a SEER-CAHPS study. Cancer Causes Control 28:1133–1141CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Parikh AA, Robinson J, Zaydfudim VM, Penson D, Whiteside MA (2014) The effect of health insurance status on the treatment and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 110(3):227–232CrossRef Parikh AA, Robinson J, Zaydfudim VM, Penson D, Whiteside MA (2014) The effect of health insurance status on the treatment and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 110(3):227–232CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Chagpar R, Xing Y, Chiang YJ, Feig BW, Chang GJ, You YN, Cormier JN (2012) Adherence to stage-specific treatment guidelines for patients with colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(9):972–979CrossRef Chagpar R, Xing Y, Chiang YJ, Feig BW, Chang GJ, You YN, Cormier JN (2012) Adherence to stage-specific treatment guidelines for patients with colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(9):972–979CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Salloum RG, Hornbrook MC, Fishman PA, Ritzwoller DP, O'Keeffe Rossetti MC, Elston Lafata J (2012) Adherence to surveillance care guidelines after breast and colorectal cancer treatment with curative intent. Cancer 118(22):5644–5651CrossRef Salloum RG, Hornbrook MC, Fishman PA, Ritzwoller DP, O'Keeffe Rossetti MC, Elston Lafata J (2012) Adherence to surveillance care guidelines after breast and colorectal cancer treatment with curative intent. Cancer 118(22):5644–5651CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lord PA, Willis TA, Carder P, West RM, Foy R (2016) Optimizing primary care research participation: a comparison of three recruitment methods in data-sharing studies. Fam Pract 33(2):200–204CrossRef Lord PA, Willis TA, Carder P, West RM, Foy R (2016) Optimizing primary care research participation: a comparison of three recruitment methods in data-sharing studies. Fam Pract 33(2):200–204CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sygna K, Johansen S, Ruland CM (2015) Recruitment challenges in clinical research including cancer patients and their caregivers. A randomized controlled trial study and lessons learned. Trials 16:428CrossRef Sygna K, Johansen S, Ruland CM (2015) Recruitment challenges in clinical research including cancer patients and their caregivers. A randomized controlled trial study and lessons learned. Trials 16:428CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds) (2016) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2013. Bethesda, MD Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds) (2016) SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2013. Bethesda, MD
30.
go back to reference Dolan NC, Ramirez-Zohfeld V, Rademaker AW, Ferreira MR, Galanter WL, Radosta J, Eder MM, Cameron KA (2015) The effectiveness of a physician-only and physician-patient intervention on colorectal Cancer screening discussions between providers and African American and Latino patients. J Gen Intern Med 30(12):1780–1787CrossRef Dolan NC, Ramirez-Zohfeld V, Rademaker AW, Ferreira MR, Galanter WL, Radosta J, Eder MM, Cameron KA (2015) The effectiveness of a physician-only and physician-patient intervention on colorectal Cancer screening discussions between providers and African American and Latino patients. J Gen Intern Med 30(12):1780–1787CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors Influencing Adherence to Recommended Colorectal Cancer Surveillance: Experiences and Behaviors of Colorectal Cancer Survivors
Authors
Marvella E. Ford
Katherine R. Sterba
Kent Armeson
Angela M. Malek
Kendrea D. Knight
Jane Zapka
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-018-1398-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Journal of Cancer Education 5/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine