Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 2/2019

01-04-2019

Quality of Online Resources for Pancreatic Cancer Patients

Authors: Lauren De Groot, Ilene Harris, Glenn Regehr, Ara Tekian, Paris-Ann Ingledew

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

The Internet is increasingly a source of information for pancreatic cancer patients. This disease is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage; therefore, timely access to high-quality information is critical. Our purpose is to systematically evaluate the information available to pancreatic cancer patients on the internet. An internet search using the term “pancreatic cancer” was performed, with the meta-search engines “Dogpile”, “Yippy” and “Google”. The top 100 websites returned by the search engines were evaluated using a validated structured rating tool. Inter-rater reliability was evaluated using kappa statistics and results were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Amongst the 100 websites evaluated, etiology/risk factors and symptoms were the most accurately covered (70 and 67% of websites). Prevention, treatment and prognosis were the least accurate sections (55, 55 and 43% of websites). Prevention and prognosis were also the least likely to be covered with 63 and 51 websites covering these, respectively. Only 40% of websites identified an author. Twenty-two percent of websites were at a university reading level. The majority of online information is accurate but incomplete. Websites may lack information on prognosis. Many websites are outdated and lacked author information, and readability levels are inappropriate. This knowledge can inform the dialogue between healthcare providers and patients.
Literature
3.
8.
go back to reference Canadian Cancer Society’s Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics (2015) Canadian cancer statistics 2015. Toronto, ON Canadian Cancer Society’s Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics (2015) Canadian cancer statistics 2015. Toronto, ON
15.
go back to reference Silberg B (1997) Assessing , controlling , and assuring the of medical information on the internet quality. JAMA 277:1244–1245CrossRefPubMed Silberg B (1997) Assessing , controlling , and assuring the of medical information on the internet quality. JAMA 277:1244–1245CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R (1999) DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 53:105–111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R (1999) DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 53:105–111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Abbott VP (2000) Web page quality: can we measure it and what do we find? A report of exploratory findings. J Public Health Med 22:191–197CrossRefPubMed Abbott VP (2000) Web page quality: can we measure it and what do we find? A report of exploratory findings. J Public Health Med 22:191–197CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kisely S, Ong G, Takyar A (2003) A survey of the quality of web based information on the treatment of schizophrenia and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 37:85–91CrossRefPubMed Kisely S, Ong G, Takyar A (2003) A survey of the quality of web based information on the treatment of schizophrenia and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 37:85–91CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Griffiths KM, Christensen H (2002) The quality and accessibility of Australian depression sites on the World Wide Web. Med J Aust 176S:S97–104 Griffiths KM, Christensen H (2002) The quality and accessibility of Australian depression sites on the World Wide Web. Med J Aust 176S:S97–104
23.
go back to reference Williamson JML, Hocken DB (2011) Assessing the internet prevalence of cancer. Int J Clin Pract 65:178–181CrossRefPubMed Williamson JML, Hocken DB (2011) Assessing the internet prevalence of cancer. Int J Clin Pract 65:178–181CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Walsh TM, Volsko TA (2008) Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information. Respir Care 53:1310–1315PubMed Walsh TM, Volsko TA (2008) Readability assessment of internet-based consumer health information. Respir Care 53:1310–1315PubMed
Metadata
Title
Quality of Online Resources for Pancreatic Cancer Patients
Authors
Lauren De Groot
Ilene Harris
Glenn Regehr
Ara Tekian
Paris-Ann Ingledew
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-017-1290-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Journal of Cancer Education 2/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine