Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 2/2014

01-06-2014

Patient Navigators’ Reflections on the Navigator-Patient Relationship

Authors: Sara Phillips, Narissa Nonzee, Laura Tom, Kara Murphy, Nadia Hajjar, Charito Bularzik, Xinqi Dong, Melissa A. Simon

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Patient navigation emerged as a strategy to reduce cancer disparities among low-income and minority patients and has demonstrated efficacy in improving clinical outcomes. Observational studies have contributed valuable evaluations of navigation processes and tasks; however, few have offered in-depth reflections about the relationship between patient and navigator from the navigators’ perspective. These approaches have addressed the emotional and relational components of patient navigation through the lens of process factors, relegating the navigator-patient relationship to a siloed, compartmentalized functionality. To expand upon existing task-oriented definitions of navigation, we conducted qualitative interviews among community-based patient navigators who coordinated care for uninsured, predominantly Hispanic, women receiving cancer screening and follow-up care in a county outside Chicago. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for themes within the navigator-patient relationship domain. The main themes that emerged centered on relational roles, relational boundaries, and ideal navigator relational qualities. While patient navigators described engaging with patients in a manner similar to a friend, they stressed the importance of maintaining professional boundaries. Navigators’ support assisted patients in bridging their hospital and community lives, a result of navigators’ investment in both hemispheres. We conclude that the navigator-patient relationship is not a self-contained utility, but rather the medium through which all other navigator functions are enabled. These insights further characterize the navigator-patient relationship, which will help shape the development of future navigation programs and support the need for further research on the impact of relationship factors on clinical and psychosocial outcome measures.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Freeman HP (2013) The history, principles, and future of patient navigation: commentary. Semin Oncol Nurs 29(2):72–75CrossRefPubMed Freeman HP (2013) The history, principles, and future of patient navigation: commentary. Semin Oncol Nurs 29(2):72–75CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dohan D, Schrag D (2005) Using navigators to improve care of underserved patients: current practices and approaches. Cancer 104(4):848–855CrossRefPubMed Dohan D, Schrag D (2005) Using navigators to improve care of underserved patients: current practices and approaches. Cancer 104(4):848–855CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Jean-Pierre P, Hendren S, Fiscella K et al (2011) Understanding the processes of patient navigation to reduce disparities in cancer care: perspectives of trained navigators from the field. J Cancer Educ 26:111–120PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jean-Pierre P, Hendren S, Fiscella K et al (2011) Understanding the processes of patient navigation to reduce disparities in cancer care: perspectives of trained navigators from the field. J Cancer Educ 26:111–120PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Parker VA, Clark JA, Leyson J et al (2010) Patient navigation: development of a protocol for describing what navigators do. Health Serv Res 45(2):514–531PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Parker VA, Clark JA, Leyson J et al (2010) Patient navigation: development of a protocol for describing what navigators do. Health Serv Res 45(2):514–531PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Yosha AM, Carroll JK, Hendren S et al (2011) Patient navigation from the paired perspectives of cancer patients and navigators: a qualitative analysis. Patient Educ Couns 82:396–401PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Yosha AM, Carroll JK, Hendren S et al (2011) Patient navigation from the paired perspectives of cancer patients and navigators: a qualitative analysis. Patient Educ Couns 82:396–401PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Adler NE, Rehkopf DH (2008) U.S. disparities in health: descriptions, causes, and mechanisms. Annu Rev Public Health 29:235–252CrossRefPubMed Adler NE, Rehkopf DH (2008) U.S. disparities in health: descriptions, causes, and mechanisms. Annu Rev Public Health 29:235–252CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference DiMatteo MR (2004) Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment. American Psychol Assoc Inc 23(2):207–218 DiMatteo MR (2004) Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment. American Psychol Assoc Inc 23(2):207–218
10.
go back to reference Clark JA, Parker VA, Battaglia TA, et al. (2013). Patterns of task and network actions performed by navigators to facilitate cancer care. Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Mar 8 Clark JA, Parker VA, Battaglia TA, et al. (2013). Patterns of task and network actions performed by navigators to facilitate cancer care. Health Care Manage Rev. 2013 Mar 8
11.
go back to reference Wagner EH, Aiello Bowles EJ, Greene SM et al (2010) The quality of cancer patient experience: perspectives of patients, family members, providers and experts. Qual Safety Health Care 19(6):484–489 Wagner EH, Aiello Bowles EJ, Greene SM et al (2010) The quality of cancer patient experience: perspectives of patients, family members, providers and experts. Qual Safety Health Care 19(6):484–489
12.
go back to reference Schlueter DF, Thompson WW, Mason TA et al (2010) A qualitative evaluation of the Avon Foundation community education and outreach initiative patient navigation program. J Cancer Educ 25:571–576CrossRefPubMed Schlueter DF, Thompson WW, Mason TA et al (2010) A qualitative evaluation of the Avon Foundation community education and outreach initiative patient navigation program. J Cancer Educ 25:571–576CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Williams DR, Collins C (1995) US socioeconomic and racial differences in health: patterns and explanations. Annu Rev Sociol 21:349–386CrossRef Williams DR, Collins C (1995) US socioeconomic and racial differences in health: patterns and explanations. Annu Rev Sociol 21:349–386CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cooper LA, Powe NR (2004). Disparities in patient experiences, health care processes, and outcomes: the role of patient-provider racial, ethnic, and language concordance. The Commonwealth Fund, July 2004 Cooper LA, Powe NR (2004). Disparities in patient experiences, health care processes, and outcomes: the role of patient-provider racial, ethnic, and language concordance. The Commonwealth Fund, July 2004
15.
go back to reference Williams JD, Pang D, Delgado B et al (2009) A model of gene-environment interaction reveals altered mammary gland gene expression and increased tumor growth following social isolation. Cancer Prev Res 2:850CrossRef Williams JD, Pang D, Delgado B et al (2009) A model of gene-environment interaction reveals altered mammary gland gene expression and increased tumor growth following social isolation. Cancer Prev Res 2:850CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Uchino BN, Cacioppo JT, Keicolt-Glaser JK (1996) The relationship between social support and physiological processes: a review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Physchol Bull 119(3):488–531CrossRef Uchino BN, Cacioppo JT, Keicolt-Glaser JK (1996) The relationship between social support and physiological processes: a review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Physchol Bull 119(3):488–531CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Jandorf L, Cooperman JL, Stossel LM et al (2013) Implementation of culturally targeted patient navigation system for screening colonoscopy in a direct referral system. Health Educ Res 10:1093 Jandorf L, Cooperman JL, Stossel LM et al (2013) Implementation of culturally targeted patient navigation system for screening colonoscopy in a direct referral system. Health Educ Res 10:1093
Metadata
Title
Patient Navigators’ Reflections on the Navigator-Patient Relationship
Authors
Sara Phillips
Narissa Nonzee
Laura Tom
Kara Murphy
Nadia Hajjar
Charito Bularzik
Xinqi Dong
Melissa A. Simon
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0612-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Journal of Cancer Education 2/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine