Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 3/2011

01-09-2011

A Randomized Controlled Calendar Mail-Out to Increase Cancer Screening Among Urban American Indian and Alaska Native Patients

Authors: Ardith Z. Doorenbos, Clemma Jacobsen, Rebecca Corpuz, Ralph Forquera, Dedra Buchwald

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

This study seeks to ascertain whether a culturally tailored art calendar could improve participation in cancer screening activities. We conducted a randomized, controlled calendar mail-out in which a Native art calendar was sent by first class mail to 5,633 patients seen at an urban American Indian clinic during the prior 2 years. Using random assignment, half of the patients were mailed a “message” calendar with screening information and reminders on breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer; the other half received a calendar without messages. The receipt of cancer screening services was ascertained through chart abstraction in the following 15 months. In total, 5,363 observations (health messages n = 2,695; no messages n = 2,668) were analyzed. The calendar with health messages did not result in increased receipt of any cancer-related prevention outcome compared to the calendar without health messages. We solicited clinic input to create a culturally appropriate visual intervention to increase cancer screening in a vulnerable, underserved urban population. Our results suggest that printed materials with health messages are likely too weak an intervention to produce the desired behavioral outcomes in cancer screening.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Aspy CB, Mold JW, Thompson DM, Blondell RD, Landers PS, Reilly KE, Wright-Eakers L (2008) Integrating screening and interventions for unhealthy behaviors into primary care practices. Am J Prev Med 35(5):S373PubMedCrossRef Aspy CB, Mold JW, Thompson DM, Blondell RD, Landers PS, Reilly KE, Wright-Eakers L (2008) Integrating screening and interventions for unhealthy behaviors into primary care practices. Am J Prev Med 35(5):S373PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Steele CB, Cardinez CJ, Richardson LC, Tom-Orme L, Shaw KM (2008) Surveillance for health behaviors of American Indians and Alaska Natives—findings from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2000–2006. Cancer 113(5):1131–1141PubMedCrossRef Steele CB, Cardinez CJ, Richardson LC, Tom-Orme L, Shaw KM (2008) Surveillance for health behaviors of American Indians and Alaska Natives—findings from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2000–2006. Cancer 113(5):1131–1141PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. The American Indian and Alaska Native population 2000: Census 2000 Brief. Washington D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census U.S. Census Bureau. 2002. The American Indian and Alaska Native population 2000: Census 2000 Brief. Washington D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census
4.
go back to reference Kolb B, Wallace AM, Hill D, Royce M (2006) Disparities in cancer care among racial and ethnic minorities. Oncology 20(10):1256–1270PubMed Kolb B, Wallace AM, Hill D, Royce M (2006) Disparities in cancer care among racial and ethnic minorities. Oncology 20(10):1256–1270PubMed
5.
go back to reference Indian Health Service (2001) Trends in Indian health. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Indian Health Service (2001) Trends in Indian health. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
7.
go back to reference Schumacher M, Slattery M, Lanier A, Ma Khe-Ni, Edwards S, Ferucci E, Tom-Orme L (2008) Prevalence and predictors of cancer screening among American Indian and Alaska native people: the EARTH study. Cancer Causes Control 19(7):725–737PubMedCrossRef Schumacher M, Slattery M, Lanier A, Ma Khe-Ni, Edwards S, Ferucci E, Tom-Orme L (2008) Prevalence and predictors of cancer screening among American Indian and Alaska native people: the EARTH study. Cancer Causes Control 19(7):725–737PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Katz M, Kauffman R, Tatum C, Paskett E (2008) Influence of church attendance and spirituality in a randomized controlled trial to increase mammography use among a low-income, tri-racial, rural community. J Relig Health 47(2):227–236PubMedCrossRef Katz M, Kauffman R, Tatum C, Paskett E (2008) Influence of church attendance and spirituality in a randomized controlled trial to increase mammography use among a low-income, tri-racial, rural community. J Relig Health 47(2):227–236PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dignan MB, Robert Michielutte H, Wells B, Sharp P, Karen Blinson L, Case D, Bell R, Konen J, Davis S, McQuellon RP (1998) Health education to increase screening for cervical cancer among Lumbee Indian Women in North Carolina. Health Educ Res 13(4):545–556PubMedCrossRef Dignan MB, Robert Michielutte H, Wells B, Sharp P, Karen Blinson L, Case D, Bell R, Konen J, Davis S, McQuellon RP (1998) Health education to increase screening for cervical cancer among Lumbee Indian Women in North Carolina. Health Educ Res 13(4):545–556PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Roppolo K (2007) Vision, voice, and intertribal metanarrative: the American Indian visual-rhetorical tradition and Leslie Marmon Silko’s Almanac of the Dead. Am Indian Q 31(4):534–558CrossRef Roppolo K (2007) Vision, voice, and intertribal metanarrative: the American Indian visual-rhetorical tradition and Leslie Marmon Silko’s Almanac of the Dead. Am Indian Q 31(4):534–558CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Maglione MA, Stone EG, Shekelle PG (2002) Mass mailings have little effect on utilization of influenza vaccine among Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Prev Med 23(1):43–46PubMedCrossRef Maglione MA, Stone EG, Shekelle PG (2002) Mass mailings have little effect on utilization of influenza vaccine among Medicare beneficiaries. Am J Prev Med 23(1):43–46PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference McCaul KD, Wold KS (2002) The effects of mailed reminders and tailored messages on mammography screening. J Community Health 27(3):181–190PubMedCrossRef McCaul KD, Wold KS (2002) The effects of mailed reminders and tailored messages on mammography screening. J Community Health 27(3):181–190PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hodge FS, Fredericks L, Rodriguez B (1996) American Indian women’s talking circle: a cervical cancer screening and prevention project. Cancer 78(7):1592–1597PubMed Hodge FS, Fredericks L, Rodriguez B (1996) American Indian women’s talking circle: a cervical cancer screening and prevention project. Cancer 78(7):1592–1597PubMed
17.
go back to reference Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2009) Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, New York Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2009) Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, New York
18.
go back to reference Garrett SK, Thomas AP, Cicuttini F, Silagy C, Taylor HR, McNeil JJ (2000) Community-based recruitment strategies for a longitudinal interventional study. J Clin Epidemiol 53(5):541–548PubMedCrossRef Garrett SK, Thomas AP, Cicuttini F, Silagy C, Taylor HR, McNeil JJ (2000) Community-based recruitment strategies for a longitudinal interventional study. J Clin Epidemiol 53(5):541–548PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Duffy D, Goldberg J, Buchwald D (2006) Using mail to reach patients seen at an urban health care facility. J Health Care Poor Underserved 17(3):522–531PubMedCrossRef Duffy D, Goldberg J, Buchwald D (2006) Using mail to reach patients seen at an urban health care facility. J Health Care Poor Underserved 17(3):522–531PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG (2001) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 134(8):657–662PubMed Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG (2001) The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 134(8):657–662PubMed
Metadata
Title
A Randomized Controlled Calendar Mail-Out to Increase Cancer Screening Among Urban American Indian and Alaska Native Patients
Authors
Ardith Z. Doorenbos
Clemma Jacobsen
Rebecca Corpuz
Ralph Forquera
Dedra Buchwald
Publication date
01-09-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0217-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Journal of Cancer Education 3/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine