Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 4/2011

01-12-2011

Attitudes to Colorectal Cancer Screening After Reading the Prevention Information

Authors: Chiung-ju Liu, Tara Fleck, Joan Goldfarb, Casey Green, Elizabeth Porter

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Some of the biggest barriers to increase colorectal cancer screening are negative attitudes to screening tests. These negative attitudes might be evoked through reading cancer prevention information and impede the decision to get screened. Forty-two adults aged ≥50 years completed a 12-item attitude questionnaire after reading colorectal cancer prevention information. African-Americans perceived that others had higher cancer risk than themselves whereas Caucasians did not show the difference. Regardless of ethnicity and adherence to screening guidelines, no participants had strong feelings of fear and embarrassment. However, non-adherent Caucasians had higher anxiety than adherent Caucasians. The degree of negativity was not associated with intention to get screened in non-adherent participants. Adequate health literacy of participants may account for flat responses in negative attitudes. Further research in individuals with limited health literacy is recommended. Moreover, additional education about self-relevance of cancer risk is considered necessary to increase cancer awareness in African-Americans.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mandel JS, Church TR, Ederer F, Bond JH (1999) Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:434–437PubMedCrossRef Mandel JS, Church TR, Ederer F, Bond JH (1999) Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:434–437PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J, Langmark F, Majak BM, Vatn MH (1999) Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I. Scand J Gastroenterol 34:414–420PubMedCrossRef Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J, Langmark F, Majak BM, Vatn MH (1999) Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Telemark Polyp Study I. Scand J Gastroenterol 34:414–420PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mitka M (2008) Colorectal cancer screening rates still fall far short of recommended levels. J Am Med Assoc 299:622CrossRef Mitka M (2008) Colorectal cancer screening rates still fall far short of recommended levels. J Am Med Assoc 299:622CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59:225–249PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ (2009) Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 59:225–249PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Greiner KA, Born W, Nollen N, Ahluwalia JS (2005) Knowledge and perceptions of colorectal cancer screening among urban African Americans. J Gen Intern Med 20:977–983PubMedCrossRef Greiner KA, Born W, Nollen N, Ahluwalia JS (2005) Knowledge and perceptions of colorectal cancer screening among urban African Americans. J Gen Intern Med 20:977–983PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Etzioni DA, Ponce NA, Babey SH, Spencer BA, Brown ER, Ko CY, Chawla N, Breen N, Klabunde CN (2004) A population-based study of colorectal cancer test use: results from the 2001 California health interview survey. Cancer 101:2523–2532PubMedCrossRef Etzioni DA, Ponce NA, Babey SH, Spencer BA, Brown ER, Ko CY, Chawla N, Breen N, Klabunde CN (2004) A population-based study of colorectal cancer test use: results from the 2001 California health interview survey. Cancer 101:2523–2532PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Berkowitz Z, Hawkins NA, Peipins LA, White MC, Nadel MR (2008) Beliefs, risk perceptions, and gaps in knowledge as barriers to colorectal cancer screening in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:307–314PubMedCrossRef Berkowitz Z, Hawkins NA, Peipins LA, White MC, Nadel MR (2008) Beliefs, risk perceptions, and gaps in knowledge as barriers to colorectal cancer screening in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:307–314PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stacy R, Torrence W, Mitchell C (2008) Perceptions of knowledge, beliefs, and barriers to colorectal cancer screening. J Cancer Educ 23:238–240PubMedCrossRef Stacy R, Torrence W, Mitchell C (2008) Perceptions of knowledge, beliefs, and barriers to colorectal cancer screening. J Cancer Educ 23:238–240PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Coronado G, Farias A, Thompson B, Godina R, Oderkirk W (2006) Attitudes and beliefs about colorectal cancer among Mexican Americans in communities along the US–Mexico border. Ethn Dis 6:421–427 Coronado G, Farias A, Thompson B, Godina R, Oderkirk W (2006) Attitudes and beliefs about colorectal cancer among Mexican Americans in communities along the US–Mexico border. Ethn Dis 6:421–427
10.
go back to reference Beeker C, Kraft JM, Southwell BG, Jorgensen CM (2000) Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention. J Community Health Nurs 25:263–278 Beeker C, Kraft JM, Southwell BG, Jorgensen CM (2000) Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention. J Community Health Nurs 25:263–278
11.
go back to reference Committee on Health Literacy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health (2004) What is health literacy? In: Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA (eds) Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Washington, D. C Committee on Health Literacy, Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health (2004) What is health literacy? In: Nielsen-Bohlman L, Panzer AM, Kindig DA (eds) Health literacy: a prescription to end confusion. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies, Washington, D. C
12.
go back to reference Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L (2006) A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Educ Behav 33:352–373PubMedCrossRef Friedman DB, Hoffman-Goetz L (2006) A systematic review of readability and comprehension instruments used for print and web-based cancer information. Health Educ Behav 33:352–373PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kaphingst KA, Zanfini CJ, Emmons KM (2006) Accessibility of web sites containing colorectal cancer information to adults with limited literacy (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17:147–151PubMedCrossRef Kaphingst KA, Zanfini CJ, Emmons KM (2006) Accessibility of web sites containing colorectal cancer information to adults with limited literacy (United States). Cancer Causes Control 17:147–151PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Flesch R (1943) Marks of readable style: a study in adult education. Teachers College, Columbia University. Contributions to education, no. 897. Bureau of Publications, New York. Flesch R (1943) Marks of readable style: a study in adult education. Teachers College, Columbia University. Contributions to education, no. 897. Bureau of Publications, New York.
15.
go back to reference Weinberg D, Miller S, Rodoletz M, Egleston B, Fleisher L, Buzaglo J, Keenan E, Marks J, Bieber E (2009) Colorectal cancer knowledge is not associated with screening compliance or intention. J Cancer Educ 24:225–232PubMedCrossRef Weinberg D, Miller S, Rodoletz M, Egleston B, Fleisher L, Buzaglo J, Keenan E, Marks J, Bieber E (2009) Colorectal cancer knowledge is not associated with screening compliance or intention. J Cancer Educ 24:225–232PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Khankari K, Eder M, Osborn CY, Makoul G, Clayman M, Skripkauskas S, Diamond-Shapiro L, Makundan D, Wolf MS (2007) Improving colorectal cancer screening among the medically underserved: a pilot study within a federally qualified health center. J Gen Intern Med 22:1410–1414PubMedCrossRef Khankari K, Eder M, Osborn CY, Makoul G, Clayman M, Skripkauskas S, Diamond-Shapiro L, Makundan D, Wolf MS (2007) Improving colorectal cancer screening among the medically underserved: a pilot study within a federally qualified health center. J Gen Intern Med 22:1410–1414PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Janz N, Wren P, Schottenfeld D, Guire K (2003) Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study. Prev Med 37:627–634PubMedCrossRef Janz N, Wren P, Schottenfeld D, Guire K (2003) Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study. Prev Med 37:627–634PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Deshpande A, Sanders Thompson V, Vaughn K, Kreuter M (2010) The use of sociocultural constructs in cancer screening research among African Americans. Cancer Control 16:256–265 Deshpande A, Sanders Thompson V, Vaughn K, Kreuter M (2010) The use of sociocultural constructs in cancer screening research among African Americans. Cancer Control 16:256–265
19.
go back to reference Ecaxx Inc (1981) Black Americans' attitudes toward cancer and cancer tests: highlights of a study. CA Cancer J Clin 31:212–218CrossRef Ecaxx Inc (1981) Black Americans' attitudes toward cancer and cancer tests: highlights of a study. CA Cancer J Clin 31:212–218CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Purnell J, Katz M, Andersen B, Palesh O, Figueroa-Moseley C, Jean-Pierre P, Bennett N (2010) Social and cultural factors are related to perceived colorectal cancer screening benefits and intentions in African Americans. J Behav Med 33:24–34PubMedCrossRef Purnell J, Katz M, Andersen B, Palesh O, Figueroa-Moseley C, Jean-Pierre P, Bennett N (2010) Social and cultural factors are related to perceived colorectal cancer screening benefits and intentions in African Americans. J Behav Med 33:24–34PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nurss JR, Parker R, Williams M, Baker D (2001) Test of functional health literacy in adults. Peppercorn Books & Press, Snow Camp Nurss JR, Parker R, Williams M, Baker D (2001) Test of functional health literacy in adults. Peppercorn Books & Press, Snow Camp
22.
go back to reference Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Bond J, Dash C, Giardiello FM, Glick S, Johnson D, Johnson CD, Levin TR, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK, Smith RA, Thorson A, Winawer SJ, American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory G, Force USM-ST, American College of Radiology Colon Cancer C (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 134:1570–95PubMedCrossRef Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Bond J, Dash C, Giardiello FM, Glick S, Johnson D, Johnson CD, Levin TR, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK, Smith RA, Thorson A, Winawer SJ, American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory G, Force USM-ST, American College of Radiology Colon Cancer C (2008) Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 134:1570–95PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lipkus I, Rimer B, Lyna P, Pradhan A, Conaway M, Woods-Powell C (1996) Colorectal screening patterns and perceptions of risk among African-American users of a community health center. J Community Health 21:409–427PubMedCrossRef Lipkus I, Rimer B, Lyna P, Pradhan A, Conaway M, Woods-Powell C (1996) Colorectal screening patterns and perceptions of risk among African-American users of a community health center. J Community Health 21:409–427PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Orom H, Kiviniemi M, Underwood W, Ross L, Shavers V (2010) Perceived cancer risk: why is it lower among nonwhites than whites? Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19:746–754CrossRef Orom H, Kiviniemi M, Underwood W, Ross L, Shavers V (2010) Perceived cancer risk: why is it lower among nonwhites than whites? Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19:746–754CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lipkus I, Lyna P, Rimer B (2000) Colorectal cancer risk perceptions and screening intentions in a minority population. J Natl Med Assoc 92:492–500PubMed Lipkus I, Lyna P, Rimer B (2000) Colorectal cancer risk perceptions and screening intentions in a minority population. J Natl Med Assoc 92:492–500PubMed
26.
27.
go back to reference Nabi R, Roskos-Ewoldsen D, Carpentier F (2008) Subjective knowledge and fear appeal effectiveness: implications for message design. Health Commun 23:191–201PubMedCrossRef Nabi R, Roskos-Ewoldsen D, Carpentier F (2008) Subjective knowledge and fear appeal effectiveness: implications for message design. Health Commun 23:191–201PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference McAlearney AS, Reeves KW, Dickinson SL, Kelly KM, Tatum C, Katz ML, Paskett ED (2008) Racial differences in colorectal cancer screening practices and knowledge within a low-income population. Cancer 112:391–398PubMedCrossRef McAlearney AS, Reeves KW, Dickinson SL, Kelly KM, Tatum C, Katz ML, Paskett ED (2008) Racial differences in colorectal cancer screening practices and knowledge within a low-income population. Cancer 112:391–398PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Sharp L, Zurawski J, Roland P, O Toole C, Hines J (2002) Health literacy, cervical cancer risk factors, and distress in low-income African-American women seeking colposcopy. Ethn Dis 12:541–546PubMed Sharp L, Zurawski J, Roland P, O Toole C, Hines J (2002) Health literacy, cervical cancer risk factors, and distress in low-income African-American women seeking colposcopy. Ethn Dis 12:541–546PubMed
30.
go back to reference Dillard J, Nabi R (2006) The persuasive influence of emotion in cancer prevention and detection messages. J Commun 56:S123–S139CrossRef Dillard J, Nabi R (2006) The persuasive influence of emotion in cancer prevention and detection messages. J Commun 56:S123–S139CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Attitudes to Colorectal Cancer Screening After Reading the Prevention Information
Authors
Chiung-ju Liu
Tara Fleck
Joan Goldfarb
Casey Green
Elizabeth Porter
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-011-0210-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Journal of Cancer Education 4/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine