Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 1/2023

30-01-2023 | Endoscopy | Original Article

Role of artificial intelligence–guided esophagogastroduodenoscopy in assessing the procedural completeness and quality

Authors: Mahesh Kumar Goenka, Shivaraj Afzalpurkar, Saurabh Jejurikar, Gajanan Ashokrao Rodge, Awanish Tiwari

Published in: Indian Journal of Gastroenterology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Aims

The quality of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) can have great impact on the detection of esophageal and gastric lesions, including malignancies. The aim of the study is to investigate the use of artificial intelligence (AI) during EGD by the  endoscopists-in-training so that a real-time feedback can be provided, ensuring compliance to a pre-decided protocol for examination.

Methods

This is an observational pilot study. The videos of the EGD procedure performed between August 1, 2021, and September 30, 2021, were prospectively analyzed using AI system. The assessment of completeness of the procedure was done based on the visualizsation of pre-defined 29 locations. Endoscopists were divided into two categories — whether they are in the training period (category A) or have competed their endoscopy training (category B).

Results

A total of 277 procedures, which included 114 category-A and 163 category-B endoscopists, respectively, were included. Most commonly covered areas by the endoscopists were greater curvature of antrum (97.47%), second part of duodenum (96.75%), other parts of antrum such as the anterior, lesser curvature and the posterior aspect (96.75%, 94.95%, and 94.22%, respectively). Commonly missed or inadequately seen areas were vocal cords (99.28%), epiglottis (93.14%) and posterior, anterior, and lateral aspect of incisura (78.70%, 73.65%, and 73.53%, respectively). The good quality procedures were done predominantly by categoryB endoscopists (88.68% vs. 11.32%, p < 0.00001).

Conclusion

AI can play an important role in assessing the quality and completeness of EGD and can be a part of training of endoscopy in future.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beg S, Ragunath K, Wyman A, et al. Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS). Gut. 2017;66:1886–99. Beg S, Ragunath K, Wyman A, et al. Quality standards in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a position statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS). Gut. 2017;66:1886–99.
2.
go back to reference Ragunath K. Counting on quality in endoscopy globally: all that matters now. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:105. Ragunath K. Counting on quality in endoscopy globally: all that matters now. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3:105.
3.
go back to reference Rees CJ, Koo S, Anderson J, et al. British Society of gastroenterology endoscopy quality improvement programme (EQIP): overview and progress. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019;10:148–53. Rees CJ, Koo S, Anderson J, et al. British Society of gastroenterology endoscopy quality improvement programme (EQIP): overview and progress. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019;10:148–53.
4.
go back to reference McClure P, Kriegeskorte N. Representational distance learning for deep neural networks. Front Comput Neurosci. 2016;10:131. McClure P, Kriegeskorte N. Representational distance learning for deep neural networks. Front Comput Neurosci. 2016;10:131.
5.
go back to reference Alagappan M, Brown JR, Mori Y, Berzin TM. Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: the future is almost here. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;10:239–49. Alagappan M, Brown JR, Mori Y, Berzin TM. Artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy: the future is almost here. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;10:239–49.
6.
go back to reference Mitchell TM. Machine Learning. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 1997. Mitchell TM. Machine Learning. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.; 1997.
7.
go back to reference Russell SJ, Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach Upper Saddle River. 3rd ed: Prentice Hall; 2010. Russell SJ, Norvig P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach Upper Saddle River. 3rd ed: Prentice Hall; 2010.
8.
go back to reference Arribas J, Antonelli G, Frazzoni L, et al. Standalone performance of artificial intelligence for upper GI neoplasia: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2020;70:1458–68. Arribas J, Antonelli G, Frazzoni L, et al. Standalone performance of artificial intelligence for upper GI neoplasia: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2020;70:1458–68.
9.
go back to reference Frazzoni L, Arribas J, Antonelli G, et al. Endoscopists’ diagnostic accuracy in detecting upper gastrointestinal neoplasia in the framework of artificial intelligence studies. Endoscopy. 2021;54:403–11. Frazzoni L, Arribas J, Antonelli G, et al. Endoscopists’ diagnostic accuracy in detecting upper gastrointestinal neoplasia in the framework of artificial intelligence studies. Endoscopy. 2021;54:403–11. 
10.
go back to reference Zhu Y, Wang QC, Xu MD, et al. Application of convolutional neural network in the diagnosis of the invasion depth of gastric cancer based on conventional endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:806–15. Zhu Y, Wang QC, Xu MD, et al. Application of convolutional neural network in the diagnosis of the invasion depth of gastric cancer based on conventional endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:806–15.
11.
go back to reference Rey JF, Lambert R, Committee EQA. ESGE recommendations for quality control in gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for image documentation in upper and lower GI endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2001;33:901–3. Rey JF, Lambert R, Committee EQA. ESGE recommendations for quality control in gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for image documentation in upper and lower GI endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2001;33:901–3.
12.
go back to reference Yao K. The endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol. 2013;26:11–22. Yao K. The endoscopic diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol. 2013;26:11–22.
13.
go back to reference Zhang Q, Chen Z-y, Chen C-d, et al. Training in early gastric cancer diagnosis improves the detection rate of early gastric cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e384. Zhang Q, Chen Z-y, Chen C-d, et al. Training in early gastric cancer diagnosis improves the detection rate of early gastric cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e384.
14.
go back to reference Chiu PW, Uedo N, Singh R, et al. An Asian consensus on standards of diagnostic upper endoscopy for neoplasia. Gut. 2019;68:186–97. Chiu PW, Uedo N, Singh R, et al. An Asian consensus on standards of diagnostic upper endoscopy for neoplasia. Gut. 2019;68:186–97.
15.
go back to reference Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Chatzimavroudis G, et al. Should inspection of the laryngopharyngeal area be part of routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy? A prospective study. Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41:283–8. Katsinelos P, Kountouras J, Chatzimavroudis G, et al. Should inspection of the laryngopharyngeal area be part of routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy? A prospective study. Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41:283–8.
16.
go back to reference Yarze JC, Chase MP, Herlihy KJ. Laryngopharyngeal examination: an important but not-so-new role of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:314–5. Yarze JC, Chase MP, Herlihy KJ. Laryngopharyngeal examination: an important but not-so-new role of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:314–5.
17.
go back to reference Cammarota G, Galli J, Agostino S, et al. Accuracy of laryngeal examination during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for premalignancy screening: prospective study in patients with and without reflux symptoms. Endoscopy. 2006;38:376–81. Cammarota G, Galli J, Agostino S, et al. Accuracy of laryngeal examination during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for premalignancy screening: prospective study in patients with and without reflux symptoms. Endoscopy. 2006;38:376–81.
18.
go back to reference Lehman G, Compton M, Meadows J, Elmore M. Screening examination of the larynx and pharynx during upper gastrointestinal panendoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1982;28:176–8. Lehman G, Compton M, Meadows J, Elmore M. Screening examination of the larynx and pharynx during upper gastrointestinal panendoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1982;28:176–8.
19.
go back to reference Mullhaupt B, Jenny D, Albert S, et al. Controlled prospective evaluation of the diagnostic yield of a laryngopharyngeal screening examination during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut. 2004;53:1232–4. Mullhaupt B, Jenny D, Albert S, et al. Controlled prospective evaluation of the diagnostic yield of a laryngopharyngeal screening examination during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gut. 2004;53:1232–4.
20.
go back to reference Cohen J, Safdi MA, Deal SE, et al. Quality indicators for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:886–91. Cohen J, Safdi MA, Deal SE, et al. Quality indicators for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:886–91.
21.
go back to reference Park WG, Shaheen NJ, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for EGD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:17–30. Park WG, Shaheen NJ, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for EGD. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:17–30.
22.
go back to reference Bisschops R, Areia M, Coron E, et al. Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. Endoscopy. 2016;48:843–64. Bisschops R, Areia M, Coron E, et al. Performance measures for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. Endoscopy. 2016;48:843–64.
23.
go back to reference Mori Y, Kudo S-E, Mohmed HEN, et al. Artificial intelligence and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: current status and future perspective. Dig Endosc. 2019;31:378–88. Mori Y, Kudo S-E, Mohmed HEN, et al. Artificial intelligence and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: current status and future perspective. Dig Endosc. 2019;31:378–88.
24.
go back to reference de Groof J, van der Sommen F, van der Putten J, et al. The Argos project: the development of a computer-aided detection system to improve detection of Barrett’s neoplasia on white light endoscopy. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2019;7:538–47. de Groof J, van der Sommen F, van der Putten J, et al. The Argos project: the development of a computer-aided detection system to improve detection of Barrett’s neoplasia on white light endoscopy. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2019;7:538–47.
25.
go back to reference Cai SL, Li B, Tan WM, et al. Using a deep learning system in endoscopy for screening of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90: 745–753.e2. Cai SL, Li B, Tan WM, et al. Using a deep learning system in endoscopy for screening of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90: 745–753.e2.
26.
go back to reference Januszewicz W, Wieszczy P, Bialek A, et al. Endoscopist biopsy rate as a quality indicator for outpatient gastroscopy: a multicenter cohort study with validation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:1141–9. Januszewicz W, Wieszczy P, Bialek A, et al. Endoscopist biopsy rate as a quality indicator for outpatient gastroscopy: a multicenter cohort study with validation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019;89:1141–9.
27.
go back to reference Luo D, Kuang F, Du J, et al. Artificial intelligence–assisted endoscopic diagnosis of early upper gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2022;12:855175. Luo D, Kuang F, Du J, et al. Artificial intelligence–assisted endoscopic diagnosis of early upper gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2022;12:855175.
28.
go back to reference Liang H, Tsui BY, Ni H, et al. Evaluation and accurate diagnoses of pediatric diseases using artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25:433–8. Liang H, Tsui BY, Ni H, et al. Evaluation and accurate diagnoses of pediatric diseases using artificial intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25:433–8. 
29.
go back to reference Tang Y, Zheng Y, Chen X, et al. Identifying periampullary regions in MRI images using deep learning. Front Oncol. 2021;11:674579. Tang Y, Zheng Y, Chen X, et al. Identifying periampullary regions in MRI images using deep learning. Front Oncol. 2021;11:674579.
30.
go back to reference Orrù G, Pettersson-Yeo W, Marquand AF, et al. Using support vector machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: a critical review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36:1140–52. Orrù G, Pettersson-Yeo W, Marquand AF, et al. Using support vector machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: a critical review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36:1140–52.
31.
go back to reference Quea NR, Emura F, Bolaños FB, et al. Effectiveness of systematic alphanumeric coded endoscopy for diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia in a low socioeconomic population. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E1083–9. Quea NR, Emura F, Bolaños FB, et al. Effectiveness of systematic alphanumeric coded endoscopy for diagnosis of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia in a low socioeconomic population. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E1083–9.
Metadata
Title
Role of artificial intelligence–guided esophagogastroduodenoscopy in assessing the procedural completeness and quality
Authors
Mahesh Kumar Goenka
Shivaraj Afzalpurkar
Saurabh Jejurikar
Gajanan Ashokrao Rodge
Awanish Tiwari
Publication date
30-01-2023
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0254-8860
Electronic ISSN: 0975-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-022-01294-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 1/2023 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine