Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 1/2023

13-12-2022 | Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Original Article

A Novel Cephalometric Approach Aiming to Quantify a Normal Range of Bony Chin Protrusion

Authors: Jonathan Chu, Shadi Basyuni, Samuel Moore, Ashley Ferro, Cherry Chang, Krishna Patel, Huw Jeremiah, Cecilia Brassett, Vijay Santhanam

Published in: Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Cephalometric analysis is an essential tool in the diagnostics and planning of orthognathic surgery. No objective criterion exists to facilitate decision making regarding genioplasties. Differing opinions amongst clinicians therefore leads to wide variability amongst treatment options offered to potentially suitable patients. This study has three aims. The first was to quantify the distribution of chin morphology amongst the average population using cephalometric analysis. Secondly, we sought to determine whether cephalometric parameters could be used to predict overlying soft tissue changes. Lastly, we consider the use of a new cephalometric angle, BNPg, for pre- and post-operative assessment of genioplasty patients.

Methods

This study retrospectively analysed 231 lateral cephalograms. The angle between the landmarks: B point, Nasion and Pogonion was measured to generate ‘BNPg’ a novel unit to quantify bony chin protrusion.

Results

The mean BNPg from all 231 samples was 1.12 degrees with a standard deviation of ± 1.35. Comparison between sexes showed no significant differences between male and females (P = 0.108). Furthermore, bony chin protrusion was found to strongly positively correlate with soft tissue chin appearance (r = 0.731), however, BNPg was found not to correlate with skeletal malocclusion (ANB, r = 0.085).

Conclusion

The novel unit BNPg may serve as a useful tool in contributing to the determination of treatment thresholds in osseous genioplasty for desirable aesthetic outcomes and may be used post-operatively to assess outcomes also. As this is a pilot study, further clinical studies would be required to validate this parameter in genioplasty patients, both pre- and post-operatively.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pampush JD, Daegling DJ (2016) The enduring puzzle of the human chin. Evol Anthropol 25:20–35CrossRef Pampush JD, Daegling DJ (2016) The enduring puzzle of the human chin. Evol Anthropol 25:20–35CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gröning F, Liu J, Fagan MJ, O’Higgins P (2011) Why do humans have chins? Testing the mechanical significance of modern human symphyseal morphology with finite element analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 144:593–606CrossRef Gröning F, Liu J, Fagan MJ, O’Higgins P (2011) Why do humans have chins? Testing the mechanical significance of modern human symphyseal morphology with finite element analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 144:593–606CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Carrier DR, Morgan MH (2015) Protective buttressing of the hominin face. Biol Rev 90:330–346CrossRef Carrier DR, Morgan MH (2015) Protective buttressing of the hominin face. Biol Rev 90:330–346CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thayer ZM, Dobson SD (2010) Sexual dimorphism in chin shape: implications for adaptive hypotheses. Am J Phys Anthropol 143:417–425CrossRef Thayer ZM, Dobson SD (2010) Sexual dimorphism in chin shape: implications for adaptive hypotheses. Am J Phys Anthropol 143:417–425CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM (2011) Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 366:1638–1659CrossRef Little AC, Jones BC, DeBruine LM (2011) Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 366:1638–1659CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hehman E, Flake JK, Freeman JB (2015) Static and dynamic facial cues differentially affect the consistency of social evaluations. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 41:1123–1134CrossRef Hehman E, Flake JK, Freeman JB (2015) Static and dynamic facial cues differentially affect the consistency of social evaluations. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 41:1123–1134CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Marshall SD et al (2011) Chin development as a result of differential jaw growth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 139:456–464CrossRef Marshall SD et al (2011) Chin development as a result of differential jaw growth. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 139:456–464CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chamberland S, Proffit WR, Chamberland P-E (2015) Functional genioplasty in growing patients. Angle Orthod 85:360–373CrossRef Chamberland S, Proffit WR, Chamberland P-E (2015) Functional genioplasty in growing patients. Angle Orthod 85:360–373CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hookey SR, Goodday RH (1989) New developments in genioplasty: functional versus cosmetic. Aust Orthod J 11:3–6 Hookey SR, Goodday RH (1989) New developments in genioplasty: functional versus cosmetic. Aust Orthod J 11:3–6
10.
go back to reference Hoenig JF (2007) Sliding osteotomy genioplasty for facial aesthetic balance: 10 years of experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:384–391CrossRef Hoenig JF (2007) Sliding osteotomy genioplasty for facial aesthetic balance: 10 years of experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 31:384–391CrossRef
11.
12.
go back to reference Reddy PS, Kashyap B, Hallur N, Sikkerimath BC (2011) Advancement genioplasty––cephalometric analysis of osseous and soft tissue changes. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 10:288–295CrossRef Reddy PS, Kashyap B, Hallur N, Sikkerimath BC (2011) Advancement genioplasty––cephalometric analysis of osseous and soft tissue changes. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 10:288–295CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nanda SK (1992) Differential growth of the female face in the anteroposterior dimension. Angle Orthod 62:23–34 Nanda SK (1992) Differential growth of the female face in the anteroposterior dimension. Angle Orthod 62:23–34
14.
go back to reference Signorelli L, Patcas R, Peltomäki T, Schätzle M (2016) Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics. J Orofac Orthop 77:9–15CrossRef Signorelli L, Patcas R, Peltomäki T, Schätzle M (2016) Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics. J Orofac Orthop 77:9–15CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kumar BL et al (2015) Long term stability following genioplasty: a cephalometric study. J Int Oral Health 7:44–50 Kumar BL et al (2015) Long term stability following genioplasty: a cephalometric study. J Int Oral Health 7:44–50
16.
go back to reference Frapier L et al (2010) Impact of genioplasty on mandibular growth during puberty. Int Orthod 8:342–359 Frapier L et al (2010) Impact of genioplasty on mandibular growth during puberty. Int Orthod 8:342–359
17.
go back to reference Miloro M, Borba AM, Ribeiro-Junior O, Naclério-Homem MG, Jungner M (2014) Is there consistency in cephalometric landmark identification amongst oral and maxillofacial surgeons? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:445–453CrossRef Miloro M, Borba AM, Ribeiro-Junior O, Naclério-Homem MG, Jungner M (2014) Is there consistency in cephalometric landmark identification amongst oral and maxillofacial surgeons? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:445–453CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ferro A, Basyuni S, Brassett C, Santhanam V (2017) Study of anatomical variations of the zygomaticofacial foramen and calculation of reliable reference points for operation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:1035–1041CrossRef Ferro A, Basyuni S, Brassett C, Santhanam V (2017) Study of anatomical variations of the zygomaticofacial foramen and calculation of reliable reference points for operation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55:1035–1041CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lundström A, Cooke MS (1991) Proportional analysis of the facial profile in natural head position in Caucasian and Chinese children. Br J Orthod 18:43–49CrossRef Lundström A, Cooke MS (1991) Proportional analysis of the facial profile in natural head position in Caucasian and Chinese children. Br J Orthod 18:43–49CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bjork A (1963) Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res 42(1):400–411CrossRef Bjork A (1963) Variations in the growth pattern of the human mandible: longitudinal radiographic study by the implant method. J Dent Res 42(1):400–411CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Love RJ, Murray JM, Mamandras AH (1990) Facial growth in males 16 to 20 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 97:200–206CrossRef Love RJ, Murray JM, Mamandras AH (1990) Facial growth in males 16 to 20 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 97:200–206CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Foley TF, Mamandras AH (1992) Facial growth in females 14 to 20 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101:248–254CrossRef Foley TF, Mamandras AH (1992) Facial growth in females 14 to 20 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 101:248–254CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A Novel Cephalometric Approach Aiming to Quantify a Normal Range of Bony Chin Protrusion
Authors
Jonathan Chu
Shadi Basyuni
Samuel Moore
Ashley Ferro
Cherry Chang
Krishna Patel
Huw Jeremiah
Cecilia Brassett
Vijay Santhanam
Publication date
13-12-2022
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0972-8279
Electronic ISSN: 0974-942X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-022-01784-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery 1/2023 Go to the issue