Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 1/2021

01-01-2021 | Hypoxemia | Reports of Original Investigations

Tolerability and safety of awake prone positioning COVID-19 patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure

Authors: Kevin Solverson, MD, MSc, Jason Weatherald, MD, MSc, Ken Kuljit S. Parhar, MD, MSc

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Prone positioning of non-intubated patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and hypoxemic respiratory failure may prevent intubation and improve outcomes. Nevertheless, there are limited data on its feasibility, safety, and physiologic effects. The objective of our study was to assess the tolerability and safety of awake prone positioning in COVID-19 patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure.

Methods

This historical cohort study was performed across four hospitals in Calgary, Canada. Included patients had suspected COVID-19 and hypoxic respiratory failure requiring intensive care unit (ICU) consultation, and underwent awake prone positioning. The duration, frequency, tolerability, and adverse events from prone positioning were recorded. Respiratory parameters were assessed before, during, and after prone positioning. The primary outcome was the tolerability and safety of prone positioning.

Results

Seventeen patients (n = 12 ICU, n = 5 hospital ward) were included between April and May 2020. The median (range) number of prone positioning days was 1 (1–7) and the median number of sessions was 2 (1–6) per day. The duration of prone positioning was 75 (30–480) min, and the peripheral oxygen saturation was 91% (84–95) supine and 98% (92–100) prone. Limitations to prone position duration were pain/general discomfort (47%) and delirium (6%); 47% of patients had no limitations. Seven patients (41%) required intubation and two patients (12%) died.

Conclusions

In a small sample, prone positioning non-intubated COVID-19 patients with severe hypoxemia was safe; however, many patients did not tolerate prolonged durations. Although patients had improved oxygenation and respiratory rate in the prone position, many still required intubation. Future studies are required to determine methods to improve the tolerability of awake prone positioning and whether there is an impact on clinical outcomes.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, et al. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 2159-68.CrossRef Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, et al. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013; 368: 2159-68.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Caputo ND, Strayer RJ, Levitan R. Early self-proning in awake, non-intubated patients in the emergency department: a single ED’s experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Emerg Med 2020; 27: 375-8.CrossRef Caputo ND, Strayer RJ, Levitan R. Early self-proning in awake, non-intubated patients in the emergency department: a single ED’s experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Acad Emerg Med 2020; 27: 375-8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wagstaff TA, Soni N. Performance of six types of oxygen delivery devices at varying respiratory rates. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 492-503.CrossRef Wagstaff TA, Soni N. Performance of six types of oxygen delivery devices at varying respiratory rates. Anaesthesia 2007; 62: 492-503.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. Chest 2007; 132: 410-7.CrossRef Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, et al. Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. Chest 2007; 132: 410-7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370: 1453-7.CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2007; 370: 1453-7.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Munshi L, Del Sorbo L, Adhikari NK, et al. Prone position for acute respiratory distress syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017; 14(Supplement_4): S280-8. Munshi L, Del Sorbo L, Adhikari NK, et al. Prone position for acute respiratory distress syndrome. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017; 14(Supplement_4): S280-8.
13.
go back to reference Hanley JA, Lippman-Hand A. If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators. JAMA 1983; 249: 1743-5.PubMed Hanley JA, Lippman-Hand A. If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators. JAMA 1983; 249: 1743-5.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Alberda C, Gramlich L, Jones N, et al. The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1728-37.CrossRef Alberda C, Gramlich L, Jones N, et al. The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 1728-37.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Tolerability and safety of awake prone positioning COVID-19 patients with severe hypoxemic respiratory failure
Authors
Kevin Solverson, MD, MSc
Jason Weatherald, MD, MSc
Ken Kuljit S. Parhar, MD, MSc
Publication date
01-01-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01787-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 1/2021 Go to the issue