Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 8/2016

01-08-2016 | Reports of Original Investigations

A deliberately restricted laryngeal view with the GlideScope® video laryngoscope is associated with faster and easier tracheal intubation when compared with a full glottic view: a randomized clinical trial

Authors: Yuqi Gu, MD, Joshua Robert, MD, George Kovacs, MD, Andrew D. Milne, MD, Ian Morris, MD, Orlando Hung, MD, Kirk MacQuarrie, MD, Sean Mackinnon, MD, J. Adam Law, MD

Published in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Issue 8/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

During video laryngoscopy (VL) with angulated or hyper-curved blades, it is sometimes difficult to complete tracheal intubation despite a full view of the larynx. When using indirect VL, it has been suggested that it may be preferable to obtain a deliberately restricted view of the larynx to facilitate passage of the endotracheal tube. We used the GlideScope® GVL video laryngoscope (GVL) to test whether deliberately obtaining a restricted view would result in faster and easier tracheal intubation than with a full view of the larynx.

Methods

We recruited 163 elective surgical patients and randomly allocated the participants to one of two groups: Group F, where a full view of the larynx was obtained and held during GVL-facilitated tracheal intubation, and Group R, with a restricted view of the larynx (< 50% of glottic opening visible). Study investigators experienced in indirect VL performed the intubations. The intubations were recorded and the video recordings were subsequently assessed for total time to intubation, ease of intubation using a visual analogue scale (VAS; where 0 = easy and 100 = difficult), first-attempt success rate, and oxygen saturation after intubation. Complications were also assessed.

Results

The median [interquartile range (IQR)] time to intubation was faster in Group R than in Group F (27 [22-36] sec vs 36 [27-48] sec, respectively; median difference, 9 sec; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5 to 13; P < 0.001). The median [IQR] VAS rating for ease of intubation was also better in Group R than in Group F (14 [6-42) mm vs 50 mm [17-65], respectively; median difference, 20 mm; 95% CI, 10 to 31; P < 0.001). There was no difference between groups regarding the first-attempt success rate, oxygen saturation immediately after intubation, or complications.

Conclusions

Using the GVL with a deliberately restricted view of the larynx resulted in faster and easier tracheal intubation than with a full view and with no additional complications. Our study suggests that obtaining a full or Cormack-Lehane grade 1 view may not be desirable when using the GVL. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02144207.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 251-70.CrossRefPubMed Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, et al. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2013; 118: 251-70.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, et al. The difficult airway with recommendations for management—part 1—difficult tracheal intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 1089-118.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, et al. The difficult airway with recommendations for management—part 1—difficult tracheal intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 1089-118.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, et al. The difficult airway with recommendations for management—part 2—the anticipated difficult airway. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 1119-38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, et al. The difficult airway with recommendations for management—part 2—the anticipated difficult airway. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 1119-38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope(R) video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth 2012; 59: 41-52.CrossRefPubMed Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope(R) video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth 2012; 59: 41-52.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Healy DW, Maties O, Hovord D, Kheterpal S. A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation. BMC Anesthesiol 2012; 12: 32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Healy DW, Maties O, Hovord D, Kheterpal S. A systematic review of the role of videolaryngoscopy in successful orotracheal intubation. BMC Anesthesiol 2012; 12: 32.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Sun DA, Warriner CB, Parsons DG, Klein R, Umedaly HS, Moult M. The GlideScope video laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 381-4.CrossRefPubMed Sun DA, Warriner CB, Parsons DG, Klein R, Umedaly HS, Moult M. The GlideScope video laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 2005; 94: 381-4.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Walker L, Brampton W, Halai M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 440-5.CrossRefPubMed Walker L, Brampton W, Halai M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of intubation with the McGrath Series 5 videolaryngoscope by inexperienced anaesthetists. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103: 440-5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cortellazzi P, Caldiroli D, Byrne A, Sommariva A, Orena EF, Tramacere I. Defining and developing expertise in tracheal intubation using a GlideScope((R)) for anaesthetists with expertise in Macintosh direct laryngoscopy: an in-vivo longitudinal study. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 290-5.CrossRefPubMed Cortellazzi P, Caldiroli D, Byrne A, Sommariva A, Orena EF, Tramacere I. Defining and developing expertise in tracheal intubation using a GlideScope((R)) for anaesthetists with expertise in Macintosh direct laryngoscopy: an in-vivo longitudinal study. Anaesthesia 2015; 70: 290-5.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, Fu RF, Dillman D, Brambrink AM. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 34-41.CrossRefPubMed Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, Fu RF, Dillman D, Brambrink AM. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology 2011; 114: 34-41.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 191-8.CrossRefPubMed Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anesth 2005; 52: 191-8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Dupanovic M, Jensen R. Optimizing GlideScope laryngoscopy: an in vitro study on an airway model. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 886-8.CrossRefPubMed Dupanovic M, Jensen R. Optimizing GlideScope laryngoscopy: an in vitro study on an airway model. Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 886-8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Cooper R, Law JA. Rigid and semi-rigid fiberoptic and video laryngoscopy and intubation. In: Hung O, Murhpy MF (Eds). Management of the Difficult and Failed Airway, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill; 2011. Cooper R, Law JA. Rigid and semi-rigid fiberoptic and video laryngoscopy and intubation. In: Hung O, Murhpy MF (Eds). Management of the Difficult and Failed Airway, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill; 2011.
15.
go back to reference Levitan RM, Heitz JW, Sweeney M, Cooper RM. The complexities of tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices. Ann Emerg Med 2011; 57: 240-7.CrossRefPubMed Levitan RM, Heitz JW, Sweeney M, Cooper RM. The complexities of tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices. Ann Emerg Med 2011; 57: 240-7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tremblay MH, Williams S, Robitaille A, Drolet P. Poor visualization during direct laryngoscopy and high upper lip bite test score are predictors of difficult intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1495-500.CrossRefPubMed Tremblay MH, Williams S, Robitaille A, Drolet P. Poor visualization during direct laryngoscopy and high upper lip bite test score are predictors of difficult intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. Anesth Analg 2008; 106: 1495-500.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Samsoon GL, Young JR. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 487-90.CrossRefPubMed Samsoon GL, Young JR. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia 1987; 42: 487-90.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Levitan RM, Ochroch EA, Kush S, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5: 919-23.CrossRefPubMed Levitan RM, Ochroch EA, Kush S, Shofer FS, Hollander JE. Assessment of airway visualization: validation of the percentage of glottic opening (POGO) scale. Acad Emerg Med 1998; 5: 919-23.CrossRefPubMed
19.
23.
go back to reference Siu LW, Mathieson E, Naik VN, Chandra D, Joo HS. Patient- and operator-related factors associated with successful Glidescope intubations: a prospective observational study in 742 patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 70-5.PubMed Siu LW, Mathieson E, Naik VN, Chandra D, Joo HS. Patient- and operator-related factors associated with successful Glidescope intubations: a prospective observational study in 742 patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 2010; 38: 70-5.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Aziz MF, Abrons RO, Cattano D, et al. First-attempt intubation success of video laryngoscopy in patients with anticipated difficult direct laryngoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the C-MAC D-blade versus the GlideScope in a mixed provider and diverse patient population. Anesth Analg 2016; 122: 740-50.CrossRefPubMed Aziz MF, Abrons RO, Cattano D, et al. First-attempt intubation success of video laryngoscopy in patients with anticipated difficult direct laryngoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the C-MAC D-blade versus the GlideScope in a mixed provider and diverse patient population. Anesth Analg 2016; 122: 740-50.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Radesic BP, Winkelman C, Einsporn R, Kless J. Ease of intubation with the Parker Flex-Tip or a standard Mallinckrodt endotracheal tube using a video laryngoscope (GlideScope). AANA J 2012; 80: 363-72.PubMed Radesic BP, Winkelman C, Einsporn R, Kless J. Ease of intubation with the Parker Flex-Tip or a standard Mallinckrodt endotracheal tube using a video laryngoscope (GlideScope). AANA J 2012; 80: 363-72.PubMed
Metadata
Title
A deliberately restricted laryngeal view with the GlideScope® video laryngoscope is associated with faster and easier tracheal intubation when compared with a full glottic view: a randomized clinical trial
Authors
Yuqi Gu, MD
Joshua Robert, MD
George Kovacs, MD
Andrew D. Milne, MD
Ian Morris, MD
Orlando Hung, MD
Kirk MacQuarrie, MD
Sean Mackinnon, MD
J. Adam Law, MD
Publication date
01-08-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 8/2016
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-016-0654-6

Other articles of this Issue 8/2016

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 8/2016 Go to the issue