Skip to main content
Top
Footnotes
1
Kotter J. Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, March-April 1995.
 
2
Kotter J. Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, March-April 1995
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996; 312: 71-2.PubMed Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 1996; 312: 71-2.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Cohen AM, Stavri PZ, Hersh WR. A categorization and analysis of the criticism of evidence-based medicine. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73: 35-43.PubMedCrossRef Cohen AM, Stavri PZ, Hersh WR. A categorization and analysis of the criticism of evidence-based medicine. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73: 35-43.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Straus SE, McAlister FA. Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticisms. CMAJ 2000; 163: 837-41.PubMed Straus SE, McAlister FA. Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticisms. CMAJ 2000; 163: 837-41.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Ioannidis JP. Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. JAMA 2005; 294: 218-28.PubMedCrossRef Ioannidis JP. Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. JAMA 2005; 294: 218-28.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bangalore S, Wetterslev J, Pranesh S, Sawhney S, Gluud C, Messerli FH. Perioperative beta blockers in patients having non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2008; 372: 1962-76. Erratum in: Lancet 2009; 373: 1764.PubMedCrossRef Bangalore S, Wetterslev J, Pranesh S, Sawhney S, Gluud C, Messerli FH. Perioperative beta blockers in patients having non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2008; 372: 1962-76. Erratum in: Lancet 2009; 373: 1764.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sedrakyan A, Treasure T, Elefteriades JA. Effect of aprotinin on clinical outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 128: 442-8.PubMedCrossRef Sedrakyan A, Treasure T, Elefteriades JA. Effect of aprotinin on clinical outcomes in coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 128: 442-8.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fergusson DA, Hebert PC, Mazer CD, et al. BART Investigators. A comparison of aprotinin, lysine analogues in high-risk cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2319-31. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1290.PubMedCrossRef Fergusson DA, Hebert PC, Mazer CD, et al. BART Investigators. A comparison of aprotinin, lysine analogues in high-risk cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2319-31. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1290.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Henry D, Carless P, Fergusson D, Laupacis A. The safety of aprotinin and lysine-derived antifibrinolytic drugs in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2009; 180: 183-93.PubMed Henry D, Carless P, Fergusson D, Laupacis A. The safety of aprotinin and lysine-derived antifibrinolytic drugs in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2009; 180: 183-93.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Velasco M, Perleth M, Drummond M, et al. Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments. Working Group 4 report. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2002; 18: 361-422.PubMed Velasco M, Perleth M, Drummond M, et al. Best practice in undertaking and reporting health technology assessments. Working Group 4 report. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2002; 18: 361-422.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery): developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation 2007; 116: e418-99.PubMedCrossRef Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery): developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation 2007; 116: e418-99.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Austin PC, Hux JE, Laupacis A. Non-invasive cardiac stress testing before elective major non-cardiac surgery: population based cohort study. BMJ 2010; 340: b5526.PubMedCrossRef Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Austin PC, Hux JE, Laupacis A. Non-invasive cardiac stress testing before elective major non-cardiac surgery: population based cohort study. BMJ 2010; 340: b5526.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al. Effeciveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8: iii-iv, 1-72 Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al. Effeciveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 2004; 8: iii-iv, 1-72
15.
go back to reference Grimshaw J, McAuley LM, Bero LA, et al. Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 298-303.PubMedCrossRef Grimshaw J, McAuley LM, Bero LA, et al. Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies and programmes. Qual Saf Health Care 2003; 12: 298-303.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Grindrod KA, Patel P, Martin JE. What interventions should pharmacists employ to impact health practitioners’ prescribing practices? Ann Pharmacother 2006; 40: 1546-57.PubMedCrossRef Grindrod KA, Patel P, Martin JE. What interventions should pharmacists employ to impact health practitioners’ prescribing practices? Ann Pharmacother 2006; 40: 1546-57.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 17: CD005470. Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 17: CD005470.
19.
go back to reference McGregor M, Brophy JM. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: a way to increase impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005; 21: 263-7.PubMed McGregor M, Brophy JM. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: a way to increase impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005; 21: 263-7.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Evidence-based practice and health technology assessment: a call for anesthesiologists to engage in knowledge translation
Authors
Davy Cheng, MD
Janet Martin, MSc (HTA)
Publication date
01-04-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Electronic ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-011-9463-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 4/2011 Go to the issue