Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Echocardiography 1/2024

29-08-2023 | Transesophageal Echocardiography | Original Investigation

Validation study of new left atrial appendage closure device measurement by two-dimensional and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

Authors: Sachiyo Ono, Takeshi Maruo, Shunsuke Kubo, Kazushige Kadota

Published in: Journal of Echocardiography | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX, accurate device measurement by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is important. We aimed to experimentally validate appropriate methods of device measurement with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) TEE compared with actual size.

Methods

We prepared a full range of device sizes (20, 24, 27, 31, 35 mm), each with five different compression rates. Each device was measured by 2D and 3D TEE at depths of 2, 4, and 6 cm in vitro using inner, outer, and middle line methods. We compared the difference between the actual size by caliper and measurements at each compression rate and depth by the three methods in 2D and 3D TEE.

Results

A total of 450 patterns of measurements were analyzed. The differences using the middle line method were much less than those using the inner and outer line methods in 2D and 3D TEE (2D TEE: 0.45 ± 0.36 vs. 2.55 ± 0.99 vs. 2.59 ± 0.72 mm, p < 0.01; 3D TEE: 0.34 ± 0.27 vs. 2.38 ± 0.69 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77 mm, p < 0.01). Moreover, the differences in measurements by 3D TEE were more accurate than those of 2D TEE in the inner (2.47 ± 1.86 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77 mm, p < 0.01) and middle (0.58 ± 0.37 vs. 0.34 ± 0.27 mm, p < 0.01) line methods.

Conclusions

Middle line method by 3D TEE is the most reliable approach for device measurement at left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX device.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2893–962.CrossRefPubMed Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2893–962.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Glikson M, Wolff R, Hindricks G, et al. EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheterbased left atrial appendage occlusion—an update. EuroIntervention. 2020;15:1133–80.CrossRefPubMed Glikson M, Wolff R, Hindricks G, et al. EHRA/EAPCI expert consensus statement on catheterbased left atrial appendage occlusion—an update. EuroIntervention. 2020;15:1133–80.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009;374:534–42.CrossRefPubMed Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009;374:534–42.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Holmes DR Jr, Kar S, Price MJ, et al. Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman left atrial appendage closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1–12.CrossRefPubMed Holmes DR Jr, Kar S, Price MJ, et al. Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman left atrial appendage closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1–12.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Holmes DR Jr, Reddy VY, Gordon NT, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy in continued access left atrial appendage closure registries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:2878–89.CrossRefPubMed Holmes DR Jr, Reddy VY, Gordon NT, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy in continued access left atrial appendage closure registries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:2878–89.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cruz-González I, Korsholm K, Trejo-Velasco B, et al. Procedural and short-term results with the new Watchman FLX left atrial appendage occlusion device. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:2732–41.CrossRefPubMed Cruz-González I, Korsholm K, Trejo-Velasco B, et al. Procedural and short-term results with the new Watchman FLX left atrial appendage occlusion device. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:2732–41.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wunderlich NC, Beigel R, Swaans MJ, et al. Percutaneous interventions for left atrial appendage exclusion: options, assessment, and imaging using 2D and 3D echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:472–88.CrossRefPubMed Wunderlich NC, Beigel R, Swaans MJ, et al. Percutaneous interventions for left atrial appendage exclusion: options, assessment, and imaging using 2D and 3D echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:472–88.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rajiah P, Alkhouli M, Thaden J, et al. Pre- and postprocedural CT of transcatheter left atrial appendage closure devices. Radiographics. 2021;41:680–98.CrossRefPubMed Rajiah P, Alkhouli M, Thaden J, et al. Pre- and postprocedural CT of transcatheter left atrial appendage closure devices. Radiographics. 2021;41:680–98.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nucifora G, Faletra FF, Regoli F, et al. Evaluation of the left atrial appendage with real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: implications for catheter-based left atrial appendage closure. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:514–23.CrossRefPubMed Nucifora G, Faletra FF, Regoli F, et al. Evaluation of the left atrial appendage with real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: implications for catheter-based left atrial appendage closure. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:514–23.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Masahiko A, OCEAN-SHD Investigators. Computed tomography measurement for left atrial appendage closure. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022;37:440–9.CrossRef Masahiko A, OCEAN-SHD Investigators. Computed tomography measurement for left atrial appendage closure. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022;37:440–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Alli O, David H Jr. Evaluation of the WATCHMAN left atrial appendage closure device. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014;11:541–51.CrossRefPubMed Alli O, David H Jr. Evaluation of the WATCHMAN left atrial appendage closure device. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2014;11:541–51.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wang Y, Di Biase L, Horton RP, et al. Left atrial appendage studied by computed tomography to help planning for appendage closure device placement. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:973–82.CrossRefPubMed Wang Y, Di Biase L, Horton RP, et al. Left atrial appendage studied by computed tomography to help planning for appendage closure device placement. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21:973–82.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Alkhouli M, Sievert H, Rihal CS. Device embolization in structural heart interventions: incidence, outcomes, and retrieval techniques. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:113–26.CrossRefPubMed Alkhouli M, Sievert H, Rihal CS. Device embolization in structural heart interventions: incidence, outcomes, and retrieval techniques. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:113–26.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Ellis CR, Piccini JP. Left atrial appendage closure: two steps forward, one step back. Circulation. 2018;138:886–8.CrossRefPubMed Ellis CR, Piccini JP. Left atrial appendage closure: two steps forward, one step back. Circulation. 2018;138:886–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Validation study of new left atrial appendage closure device measurement by two-dimensional and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography
Authors
Sachiyo Ono
Takeshi Maruo
Shunsuke Kubo
Kazushige Kadota
Publication date
29-08-2023
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Journal of Echocardiography / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 1349-0222
Electronic ISSN: 1880-344X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-023-00619-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Journal of Echocardiography 1/2024 Go to the issue