Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Echocardiography 1/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Investigation

Three-dimensional echocardiography in various types of heart disease: a comparison study of magnetic resonance imaging and 64-slice computed tomography in a real-world population

Authors: Angelo Squeri, Stefano Censi, Claudio Reverberi, Nicola Gaibazzi, Marco Baldelli, Simone Maurizio Binno, Enrico Properzi, Stefano Bosi

Published in: Journal of Echocardiography | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Accurate quantification of left ventricular (LV) volumes [end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV)] and ejection fraction (EF) is of critical importance. The development of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) has shown better correlation than two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. The aim of our study was to assess the accuracy of RT3DE and 64-slice computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of LV volumes and function using MRI as the reference standard in a real-world population with various types of heart disease with different chamber geometry.

Methods

The study population consisted of 66 patients referred for cardiac MRI for various pathologies. All patients underwent cardiac MRI, and RT3DE and 64 slices CT were then performed on a subsequent day. The study population was then divided into 5 clinical groups depending on the underlying heart disease.

Results

RT3DE volumes correlated well with MRI values (R 2 values: 0.90 for EDV and 0.94 for ESV). RT3DE measurements of EF correlated well with MRI values (R 2 = 0.86). RT3DE measurements resulted in slightly underestimated values of both EDV and ESV, as reflected by biases of −9.18 and −4.50 mL, respectively. Comparison of RT3DE and MRI in various types of cardiomyopathies showed no statistical difference between different LV geometrical patterns.

Conclusion

These results confirm that RT3DE has good accuracy in everyday clinical practice and can be of clinical utility in all types of cardiomyopathy independently of LV geometric pattern, LV diameter or wall thickness, taking into account a slight underestimation of LV volumes and EF compared to MRI.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gopal AS, Schnellbaecher MJ, Shen Z, et al. Freehand three-dimensional echocardiography for determination of left ventricular volume and mass in patients with abnormal ventricles: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997;10:853–61.CrossRefPubMed Gopal AS, Schnellbaecher MJ, Shen Z, et al. Freehand three-dimensional echocardiography for determination of left ventricular volume and mass in patients with abnormal ventricles: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997;10:853–61.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference King DL, Gopal AS, Sapin PM, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Card Imaging. 1993;7:209–20.PubMed King DL, Gopal AS, Sapin PM, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Card Imaging. 1993;7:209–20.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Jiang L, Vazquez de Prada JA, Handschumacher MD, et al. Quantitative three-dimensional reconstruction of aneurysmal left ventricles: in vitro and in vivo validation. Circulation. 1995;91:222–30.CrossRefPubMed Jiang L, Vazquez de Prada JA, Handschumacher MD, et al. Quantitative three-dimensional reconstruction of aneurysmal left ventricles: in vitro and in vivo validation. Circulation. 1995;91:222–30.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hozumi T, Yoshikawa J, Yoshida K, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using a multiplane transesophageal probe in patients. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:1077–80.CrossRefPubMed Hozumi T, Yoshikawa J, Yoshida K, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiographic measurement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using a multiplane transesophageal probe in patients. Am J Cardiol. 1996;78:1077–80.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mele D, Maehle J, Pedini I, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction: description and applications of a simplified technique for quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:107G–10G.CrossRefPubMed Mele D, Maehle J, Pedini I, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction: description and applications of a simplified technique for quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:107G–10G.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sugeng L, Weinert L, Lang RM. Left ventricular assessment using real time three dimensional echocardiography. Heart. 2003;89(Suppl 3):iii29–36.PubMedPubMedCentral Sugeng L, Weinert L, Lang RM. Left ventricular assessment using real time three dimensional echocardiography. Heart. 2003;89(Suppl 3):iii29–36.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Zeidan Z, Erbel R, Barkhausen J, et al. Analysis of global systolic and diastolic left ventricular performance using volume-time curves by real time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:29–37.CrossRefPubMed Zeidan Z, Erbel R, Barkhausen J, et al. Analysis of global systolic and diastolic left ventricular performance using volume-time curves by real time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003;16:29–37.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Collins M, Hsieh A, Ohazama CJ, et al. Assessment of regional wall motion abnormalities with real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12:7–14.CrossRefPubMed Collins M, Hsieh A, Ohazama CJ, et al. Assessment of regional wall motion abnormalities with real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1999;12:7–14.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jenkins C, Bricknell K, Hanekom L, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular parameters using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:878–86.CrossRefPubMed Jenkins C, Bricknell K, Hanekom L, et al. Reproducibility and accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular parameters using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:878–86.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Picard MH, Popp RL, Weymann AE. Assessment of left ventricular function by echocardiography: a technique in evolution. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;21(1):14–21.CrossRef Picard MH, Popp RL, Weymann AE. Assessment of left ventricular function by echocardiography: a technique in evolution. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;21(1):14–21.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L, et al. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Circulation. 2006;114:654–61.CrossRefPubMed Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L, et al. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Circulation. 2006;114:654–61.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nesser HJ, Sugeng L, Corsi C, et al. Volumetric analysis of regional left ventricular function with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: validation by magnetic resonance and clinical utility testing. Heart. 2007;93:572–8.CrossRef Nesser HJ, Sugeng L, Corsi C, et al. Volumetric analysis of regional left ventricular function with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: validation by magnetic resonance and clinical utility testing. Heart. 2007;93:572–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Grude M, Juergens KU, Wichter T, et al. Evaluation of global left ventricular function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Investig Radiol. 2003;38:653–61.CrossRef Grude M, Juergens KU, Wichter T, et al. Evaluation of global left ventricular function with electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Investig Radiol. 2003;38:653–61.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, et al. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2004;230:403–10.CrossRefPubMed Juergens KU, Grude M, Maintz D, et al. Multi-detector row CT of left ventricular function with dedicated analysis software versus MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2004;230:403–10.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Mahnken AH, Katoh M, Bruners P, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: assessment of left ventricular function with 16-detector row spiral CT versus MR imaging: study in pigs. Radiology. 2005;236:112–7.CrossRefPubMed Mahnken AH, Katoh M, Bruners P, et al. Acute myocardial infarction: assessment of left ventricular function with 16-detector row spiral CT versus MR imaging: study in pigs. Radiology. 2005;236:112–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, et al. Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:714–20.CrossRefPubMed Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M, et al. Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:714–20.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Salm LP, Schuijff JD, de Roose A, et al. Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2005;7:308–14.CrossRefPubMed Salm LP, Schuijff JD, de Roose A, et al. Global and regional left ventricular function assessment with 16-detector row CT: comparison with echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2005;7:308–14.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ray SG, Metcalfe MJ, Oldroyd KG, et al. Do radionuclide and echocardiographic techniques give a universal cutoff value for left ventricular ejection fraction that can be used to select patients for treatment with ACE inhibitors after myocardial infarction? Br Heart J. 1995;73:466–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ray SG, Metcalfe MJ, Oldroyd KG, et al. Do radionuclide and echocardiographic techniques give a universal cutoff value for left ventricular ejection fraction that can be used to select patients for treatment with ACE inhibitors after myocardial infarction? Br Heart J. 1995;73:466–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J. 2000;21(16):1387–96.CrossRefPubMed Bellenger NG, Burgess MI, Ray SG, et al. Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Are they interchangeable? Eur Heart J. 2000;21(16):1387–96.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Jenkins C, Moir S, Chan J, et al. Left ventricular volume measurement with echocardiography: a comparison of left ventricular opacification, three-dimensional echocardiography, or both with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(1):98–106.CrossRefPubMed Jenkins C, Moir S, Chan J, et al. Left ventricular volume measurement with echocardiography: a comparison of left ventricular opacification, three-dimensional echocardiography, or both with magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(1):98–106.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Greupner J, Zimmermann E, Grohmann A, et al. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left cineventriculography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(21):1897–907.CrossRefPubMed Greupner J, Zimmermann E, Grohmann A, et al. Head-to-head comparison of left ventricular function assessment with 64-row computed tomography, biplane left cineventriculography, and both 2- and 3-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging as the reference standard. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(21):1897–907.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kuhl HP, Schreckenberg M, Rulands D, et al. High-resolution transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: quantitation of cardiac volumes and function using semi-automated border detection and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2083–90.CrossRefPubMed Kuhl HP, Schreckenberg M, Rulands D, et al. High-resolution transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: quantitation of cardiac volumes and function using semi-automated border detection and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2083–90.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Mor-Avi V, Sugeng L, Weinert L, et al. Fast measurement of left ventricular mass with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2004;110:1814–8.CrossRefPubMed Mor-Avi V, Sugeng L, Weinert L, et al. Fast measurement of left ventricular mass with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2004;110:1814–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Caiani EG, Corsi C, Zamorano J, et al. Improved semi-automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using high-resolution real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with MRI. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:779–88.CrossRefPubMed Caiani EG, Corsi C, Zamorano J, et al. Improved semi-automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using high-resolution real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with MRI. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18:779–88.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Chuang ML, Hibberd MG, Salton CJ, et al. Importance of imaging method over imaging modality in noninvasive determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: assessment by two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:477–84.CrossRefPubMed Chuang ML, Hibberd MG, Salton CJ, et al. Importance of imaging method over imaging modality in noninvasive determination of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction: assessment by two- and three-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:477–84.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Three-dimensional echocardiography in various types of heart disease: a comparison study of magnetic resonance imaging and 64-slice computed tomography in a real-world population
Authors
Angelo Squeri
Stefano Censi
Claudio Reverberi
Nicola Gaibazzi
Marco Baldelli
Simone Maurizio Binno
Enrico Properzi
Stefano Bosi
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Echocardiography / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 1349-0222
Electronic ISSN: 1880-344X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12574-016-0315-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Journal of Echocardiography 1/2017 Go to the issue