Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 1/2013

01-03-2013

Predictors of Hearing Protection Behavior Among Firefighters in the United States

Authors: OiSaeng Hong, Dal Lae Chin, David L. Ronis

Published in: International Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a major occupational health problem that can be prevented through the use of hearing protection devices (HPDs).

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to identify significant factors related to firefighters’ use of HPDs.

Methods

A total of 404 firefighters from 35 fire departments in multiple states in the United States participated in an Internet-based survey from March 2010 to May 2011.

Results

Pearson correlations and multiple regression analysis suggested that several modifying and cognitive–perceptual factors were significantly related to HPD use, including noise exposure, interpersonal influences, organizational support, perceived barriers to HPD use, and perceived susceptibility to hearing loss. The multiple regression model explained 56% (R 2 = .56, adjusted R 2 = .54) of the variance in firefighters’ use of HPDs (F 13, 372 = 35.65, p < .001).

Conclusions

Future research should focus on incorporating these significant predictors into effective behavioral interventions designed to promote the use of HPDs in this population.
Literature
1.
World Health Organization (WHO). Occupational and community noise. Fact sheet No. 258. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
2.
WHO. Occupational noise: assessing the burden of disease from work-related hearing impairment at national and local levels. Environmental Burden of Disease Series, No. 9. Geneva: WHO; 2004.
3.
Nelson DI, Nelson RY, Concha-Barrientos M, Fingerhut M. The global burden of occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48(6):446–58.PubMedCrossRef
4.
National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety. Preventing occupational hearing loss: a practical guide. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996.
5.
National Institutes of Health. Consensus development conference statement: noise and hearing loss. Bethesda: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 1990.
6.
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Healthy people 2000: National health promotion and disease prevention objectives (Publication No. PHS91-50212). Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1990.
7.
American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) Noise and Hearing Conservation Committee. ACOEM evidence-based statement: noise-induced hearing loss. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45(6):579–81.CrossRef
8.
Brink LL, Talbott EO, Burks JA, Palmer CV. Changes over time in audiometric thresholds in a group of automobile stamping and assembly workers with a hearing conservation program. AIHA J (Fairfax, Va). 2002;63(4):482–7.CrossRef
9.
Hong OS, Kim MJ. Factors associated with hearing loss among workers of the airline industry in Korea. ORL Head Neck Nurs. 2001;19(1):7–13.PubMed
10.
Hessel PA. Hearing loss among construction workers in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. J Occup Environ Med. 2000;42(1):57–63.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Hong O. Hearing loss among operating engineers in American construction industry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005;78(7):565–74.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Hong O, Ronis DL, Lusk SL, Kee GS. Efficacy of a computer-based hearing test and tailored hearing protection intervention. Int J Behav Med. 2006;13(4):304–14.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Kerr MJ, Savik K, Monsen KA, Lusk SL. Effectiveness of computer-based tailoring versus targeting to promote use of hearing protection. Can J Nurs Res. 2007;39(1):80–97.PubMed
14.
Neitzel R, Seixas N. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005;2(4):227–38.PubMedCrossRef
15.
National Fire Protection Association. 2003 national fire experience survey. Quincy: National Fire Protection Association; 2005.
16.
Tubbs RL. Occupational noise exposure and hearing loss in fire fighters assigned to airport fire stations. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1991;52(9):372–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Tubbs RL. Evaluation risk of noise induced hearing loss for fire fighters in a metropolitan area (Publication No. HETA 88-0290-2460). Cincinnati: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 1994.
18.
Tubbs RL. Evaluation risk of noise induced hearing loss for fire fighters (Publication No. 89-0026-2495). Cincinnati: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 1995.
19.
Tubbs RL. Health hazard evaluation (HHE) of Hamilton fire department, Hamilton, Ohio (Publication No. HETA 89-0026-2495). Cincinnati: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; 1995.
20.
Hong O, Samo D, Hulea R, Eakin B. Perception and attitudes of firefighters on noise exposure and hearing loss. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2008;5(3):210–5.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Ewigman BG, Kivlahan CH, Hosokawa MC, Horman D. Efficacy of an intervention to promote use of hearing protection devices by firefighters. Public Health Rep. 1990;105(1):53–9.PubMed
22.
Hong O, Samo DG. Hazardous decibels: hearing health of firefighters. AAOHN J. 2007;55(8):313–9.PubMed
23.
Kales SN, Freyman RL, Hill JM, Polyhronopoulos GN, Aldrich JM, Christiani DC. Firefighters’ hearing: a comparison with population databases from the International Standards Organization. J Occup Environ Med. 2001;43(7):650–6.PubMedCrossRef
24.
McCullagh M, Lusk SL, Ronis DL. Factors influencing use of hearing protection among farmers: a test of the pender health promotion model. Nurs Res. 2002;51(1):33–9.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Hong O, Lusk SL, Ronis DL. Ethnic differences in predictors of hearing protection behavior between Black and White workers. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2005;19(1):63–76.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Lusk SL, Ronis DL, Kazanis AS, Eakin BL, Hong O, Raymond DM. Effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase factory workers’ use of hearing protection. Nurs Res. 2003;52(5):289–95.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Raymond 3rd DM, Hong O, Lusk SL, Ronis DL. Predictors of hearing protection use for Hispanic and non-Hispanic White factory workers. Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2006;20(2):127–40.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Ronis DL, Hong O, Lusk SL. Comparison of the original and revised structures of the Health Promotion Model in predicting construction workers’ use of hearing protection. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(1):3–17.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Pender NJ, Murdaugh CL, Parsons M. Health promotion in nursing practice. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson-Prentice Hall; 2011.
30.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997.
31.
Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM. Health behavior and health education. Theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Wiley; 2002.
32.
Lusk SL, Ronis DL, Hogan MM. Test of the health promotion model as a causal model of construction workers’ use of hearing protection. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(3):183–94.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Kerr MJ, Lusk SL, Ronis DL. Explaining Mexican American workers’ hearing protection use with the health promotion model. Nurs Res. 2002;51(2):100–9.PubMedCrossRef
34.
American National Standards Institute. American national standard: determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise-induced hearing impairment. New York: American National Standards Institute, Inc; 1996.
35.
Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
36.
Alwin DF. Measurement and the scaling of coefficients in structural equation models. In: Long JS, editor. Common problems in quantitative social research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications; 1988. p. 15–45.
37.
Wong TY, Seet B. A behavioral analysis of eye protection use by soldiers. Mil Med. 1997;162(11):744–8.PubMed
38.
Ronis DL. Conditional health threats: health beliefs, decisions, and behaviors among adults. Health Psychol. 1992;11(2):127–34.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predictors of Hearing Protection Behavior Among Firefighters in the United States
Authors
OiSaeng Hong
Dal Lae Chin
David L. Ronis
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 1070-5503
Electronic ISSN: 1532-7558
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-011-9207-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 1/2013 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Disagreement in Doctor's and Patient's Rating About Medically Unexplained Symptoms and Health Care Use

Short Communication

Testing the Effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing as a Weight Reduction Strategy for Obese Cardiac Patients: A Pilot Study

OriginalPaper

Intimate Partner Violence and Mental Health Effects: A Population-Based Study among Married Women in Karachi, Pakistan

OriginalPaper

Sense of Control and Self-Reported Health in a Population-Based Sample of Older Americans: Assessment of Potential Confounding by Affect, Personality, and Social Support

OriginalPaper

Pain and Functional Impairment as Mediators of the Link between Medical Symptoms and Depression in Type 2 Diabetes

OriginalPaper

Subjective Social Status: Construct Validity and Associations with Psychosocial Vulnerability and Self-Rated Health