Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal 11/2011

Open Access 01-11-2011 | Original Article

National differences in screening programmes for cardiovascular risks could obstruct understanding of cardiovascular prevention studies in Europe

Authors: S. L. Thio, Th. B. Twickler, M. J. Cramer, P. Giral

Published in: Netherlands Heart Journal | Issue 11/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

In North-West Europe, cardiovascular disease is still a major cause of death and despite several efforts (e.g. European guidelines and conferences) cardiovascular risk factors are still inconsistently diagnosed and treated.

Methods

We evaluated the first consultations of patients in two cardiovascular referral clinics in France and the Netherlands, while evaluating the differences in national guidelines and between the profiles of patients at their first consultation.

Results

Notable differences exist between the two locally used guidelines in their programmes of cardiovascular risk assessment and their definition of LDL-cholesterol target levels. With regard to the LDL-cholesterol levels, more patients are ‘on target’ when using the French guideline than when using the Dutch guideline. Evaluation of the patient’s profile at first presentation showed that the LDL-cholesterol levels were significantly lower in the Dutch patients (n = 77) compared with the French patients (n = 119). Dutch patients used significantly more statins than French patients.

Conclusion

Despite the small study population included in this study, we found that comparison of daily care (as part of a primary prevention programme) is rather difficult due to several national differences in the approach to patients. All these factors combined should be taken into account, when discussing and extrapolating results obtained from analysis of cardiovascular prevention programmes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Allender S, Scarborough P, Peto V, et al. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics. 2008 Allender S, Scarborough P, Peto V, et al. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics. 2008
2.
go back to reference EUROASPIRE. A European Society of Cardiology survey of secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: principal results. EUROASPIRE Study Group. European Action on Secondary Prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events. Eur Heart J. 1997;18(10):1569–82. EUROASPIRE. A European Society of Cardiology survey of secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: principal results. EUROASPIRE Study Group. European Action on Secondary Prevention through Intervention to Reduce Events. Eur Heart J. 1997;18(10):1569–82.
3.
go back to reference Kotseva K, Wood D, De Backer G, et al. EUROASPIRE III: a survey on the lifestyle, risk factors and use of cardioprotective drug therapies in coronary patients from 22 European countries. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009;16(2):121–37.PubMedCrossRef Kotseva K, Wood D, De Backer G, et al. EUROASPIRE III: a survey on the lifestyle, risk factors and use of cardioprotective drug therapies in coronary patients from 22 European countries. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009;16(2):121–37.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies. French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies.
6.
go back to reference CBO Multidisciplinaire richtlijn Cardiovasculair risicomanagement 2006. 2006. Utrecht: Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO. CBO Multidisciplinaire richtlijn Cardiovasculair risicomanagement 2006. 2006. Utrecht: Kwaliteitsinstituut voor de Gezondheidszorg CBO.
7.
go back to reference Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS). Les recommandations 2005 sur la prise en charge des dyslipidémies. Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS). Les recommandations 2005 sur la prise en charge des dyslipidémies.
8.
go back to reference Timmerman MK, Rensing KL, Giral P, et al. Lessons from France: the cardiovascular prevention clinic in the la Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital in Paris. Neth Heart J. 2007;15(1):22–6.PubMed Timmerman MK, Rensing KL, Giral P, et al. Lessons from France: the cardiovascular prevention clinic in the la Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital in Paris. Neth Heart J. 2007;15(1):22–6.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Conroy RM, Pyorala K, Fitzgerald AP, et al. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(11):987–1003.PubMedCrossRef Conroy RM, Pyorala K, Fitzgerald AP, et al. Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(11):987–1003.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fornasini M, Brotons C, Sellares J, et al. Consequences of using different methods to assess cardiovascular risk in primary care. Fam Pract. 2006;23(1):28–33.PubMedCrossRef Fornasini M, Brotons C, Sellares J, et al. Consequences of using different methods to assess cardiovascular risk in primary care. Fam Pract. 2006;23(1):28–33.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lifestyle and risk factor management and use of drug therapies in coronary patients from 15 countries; principal results from EUROASPIRE II Euro Heart Survey Programme. Eur Heart J 2001;22(7):554–72. Lifestyle and risk factor management and use of drug therapies in coronary patients from 15 countries; principal results from EUROASPIRE II Euro Heart Survey Programme. Eur Heart J 2001;22(7):554–72.
12.
go back to reference Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: full text. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007;14 Suppl 2:S1–113.PubMedCrossRef Graham I, Atar D, Borch-Johnsen K, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: full text. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007;14 Suppl 2:S1–113.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
National differences in screening programmes for cardiovascular risks could obstruct understanding of cardiovascular prevention studies in Europe
Authors
S. L. Thio
Th. B. Twickler
M. J. Cramer
P. Giral
Publication date
01-11-2011
Publisher
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Published in
Netherlands Heart Journal / Issue 11/2011
Print ISSN: 1568-5888
Electronic ISSN: 1876-6250
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-011-0183-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2011

Netherlands Heart Journal 11/2011 Go to the issue