Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 1/2019

01-02-2019 | Editorial

Meta-analysis for diagnostic tests

Authors: Anastasia M. Hartzes, MPH, Charity J. Morgan, PhD

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Excerpt

Meta-analysis is a statistical method for pooling and analyzing the results from multiple studies.1 A typical meta-analysis will focus on a single outcome measure, such as a treatment effect or rate of an adverse event. However, applying meta-analysis to studies of diagnostic test’s accuracy is not straightforward. The accuracy of a diagnostic test is most often summarized with two outcomes, sensitivity and specificity, which cannot be expected to be independent and therefore must be analyzed together.2 Thus, meta-analytic methods specific to diagnostic tests are needed. The paper by Lee et al., which reports the results of a meta-analysis of F-18 FDG PET for detection of disease activity, published in this issue demonstrates the use of some of these methods.3
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kalra R, Arora P, Morgan C, Hage FG, Iskandrian AE, Bajaj NS. Conducting and interpreting high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24:471–81.CrossRefPubMed Kalra R, Arora P, Morgan C, Hage FG, Iskandrian AE, Bajaj NS. Conducting and interpreting high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. J Nucl Cardiol. 2017;24:471–81.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Liu Z, Yao Z, Li C, Liu X, Chen H, Gao C. A step-by-step guide to the systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic prognostic test accuracy evaluations. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:2299–303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu Z, Yao Z, Li C, Liu X, Chen H, Gao C. A step-by-step guide to the systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic prognostic test accuracy evaluations. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:2299–303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole; 2011. Rosner B. Fundamentals of biostatistics. Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole; 2011.
5.
go back to reference van Belle G, Fisher LD, Heagerty PJ, Lumley T. Biostatistics: A methodology for the health sciences. Hoboken: Wiley; 2004.CrossRef van Belle G, Fisher LD, Heagerty PJ, Lumley T. Biostatistics: A methodology for the health sciences. Hoboken: Wiley; 2004.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PMM. The diagnostic odds ratio: A single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1129–35.CrossRef Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PMM. The diagnostic odds ratio: A single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1129–35.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:982–90.CrossRefPubMed Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:982–90.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Leeflang MMG. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;20:105–13.CrossRef Leeflang MMG. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;20:105–13.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee J, Kim KW, Choi SH, Huh J, Park SH. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: A practical review for clinical researchers-part ii. Statistical methods of meta-analysis. Korean J Radiol. 2015;16:1188–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee J, Kim KW, Choi SH, Huh J, Park SH. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating diagnostic test accuracy: A practical review for clinical researchers-part ii. Statistical methods of meta-analysis. Korean J Radiol. 2015;16:1188–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med. 2001;20:2865–84.CrossRefPubMed Rutter CM, Gatsonis CA. A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Stat Med. 2001;20:2865–84.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Meta-analysis for diagnostic tests
Authors
Anastasia M. Hartzes, MPH
Charity J. Morgan, PhD
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-01485-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 1/2019 Go to the issue