Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Cerebellum 3/2013

01-06-2013 | Original Paper

Inventory of Non-Ataxia Signs (INAS): Validation of a New Clinical Assessment Instrument

Authors: H. Jacobi, M. Rakowicz, R. Rola, R. Fancellu, C. Mariotti, P. Charles, A. Dürr, M. Küper, D. Timmann, C. Linnemann, L. Schöls, O. Kaut, C. Schaub, A. Filla, L. Baliko, B. Melegh, J.-S. Kang, P. Giunti, B. P. C. van de Warrenburg, R. Fimmers, T. Klockgether

Published in: The Cerebellum | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Although ataxia is by definition the prominent symptom of ataxia disorders, there are various neurological signs that may accompany ataxia in affected patients. Reliable and quantitative assessment of these signs is important because they contribute to disability, but may also interfere with ataxia. Therefore we devised the Inventory of Non-Ataxia Signs (INAS), a list of neurological signs that allows determining the presence and severity of non-ataxia signs in a standardized way. INAS underwent a rigorous validation procedure that involved a trial of 140 patients with spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) for testing of inter-rater reliability and another trial of 28 SCA patients to assess short-term intra-rater reliability. In addition, data of the ongoing EUROSCA natural history study were used to determine the reproducibility, responsiveness and validity of INAS. Inter-rater reliability and short-term test–retest reliability was high, both for the total count and for most of the items. However, measures of responsiveness, such as the smallest detectable change and the clinically important change were not satisfactory. In addition, INAS did not differentiate between subjects that were subjectively stable and those that worsened in the 2-year observation period. In summary, INAS and INAS count showed good reproducibility, but unsatisfactory responsiveness. The present analysis and published data from the EUROSCA natural history study suggest that INAS is a valid measure of extracerebellar involvement in progressive ataxia disorders. As such, it is useful as a supplement to the measures of ataxia, but not as a primary outcome measure in future interventional trials.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Trouillas P, Takayanagi T, Hallett M, et al. International cooperative ataxia rating scale for pharmacological assessment of the cerebellar syndrome. J Neurol Sci. 1997;145:205–11.PubMedCrossRef Trouillas P, Takayanagi T, Hallett M, et al. International cooperative ataxia rating scale for pharmacological assessment of the cerebellar syndrome. J Neurol Sci. 1997;145:205–11.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Schmitz-Hubsch T, du Montcel ST, Baliko L, et al. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale. Neurology. 2006;66:1717–20.PubMedCrossRef Schmitz-Hubsch T, du Montcel ST, Baliko L, et al. Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia: development of a new clinical scale. Neurology. 2006;66:1717–20.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schmitz-Hubsch T, Fimmers R, Rakowicz M, et al. Responsiveness of different rating instruments in spinocerebellar ataxia patients. Neurology. 2010;74:678–84.PubMedCrossRef Schmitz-Hubsch T, Fimmers R, Rakowicz M, et al. Responsiveness of different rating instruments in spinocerebellar ataxia patients. Neurology. 2010;74:678–84.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Subramony SH, May W, Lynch D, et al. Measuring Friedreich ataxia: interrater reliability of a neurologic rating scale. Neurology. 2005;64:1261–2.PubMedCrossRef Subramony SH, May W, Lynch D, et al. Measuring Friedreich ataxia: interrater reliability of a neurologic rating scale. Neurology. 2005;64:1261–2.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Schmitz-Hubsch T, Coudert M, Bauer P, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6: disease severity and nonataxia symptoms. Neurology. 2008;71:982–9.PubMedCrossRef Schmitz-Hubsch T, Coudert M, Bauer P, et al. Spinocerebellar ataxia types 1, 2, 3, and 6: disease severity and nonataxia symptoms. Neurology. 2008;71:982–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.PubMedCrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–92.PubMed Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41:582–92.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.PubMedCrossRef Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27:S178–89.PubMedCrossRef Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27:S178–89.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39:897–906.PubMedCrossRef Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39:897–906.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jacobi H, Bauer P, Giunti P, et al. The natural history of spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, 2, 3, and 6: a 2-year follow-up study. Neurology. 2011;77:1035–41.PubMedCrossRef Jacobi H, Bauer P, Giunti P, et al. The natural history of spinocerebellar ataxia type 1, 2, 3, and 6: a 2-year follow-up study. Neurology. 2011;77:1035–41.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schmitz-Hubsch T, Coudert M, Giunti P, et al. Self-rated health status in spinocerebellar ataxia—results from a European multicenter study. Mov Disord. 2010;25:587–95.PubMedCrossRef Schmitz-Hubsch T, Coudert M, Giunti P, et al. Self-rated health status in spinocerebellar ataxia—results from a European multicenter study. Mov Disord. 2010;25:587–95.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference van de Warrenburg BP, Notermans NC, Schelhaas HJ, et al. Peripheral nerve involvement in spinocerebellar ataxias. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:257–61.PubMedCrossRef van de Warrenburg BP, Notermans NC, Schelhaas HJ, et al. Peripheral nerve involvement in spinocerebellar ataxias. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:257–61.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Harding AE. The clinical features and classification of the late onset autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias. A study of 11 families including descendants of ‘the Drew family of Walworth’. Brain. 1982;105:1–28.PubMedCrossRef Harding AE. The clinical features and classification of the late onset autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias. A study of 11 families including descendants of ‘the Drew family of Walworth’. Brain. 1982;105:1–28.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schmitz-Hubsch T, Giunti P, Stephenson DA, et al. SCA Functional Index: a useful compound performance measure for spinocerebellar ataxia. Neurology. 2008;71:486–92.PubMedCrossRef Schmitz-Hubsch T, Giunti P, Stephenson DA, et al. SCA Functional Index: a useful compound performance measure for spinocerebellar ataxia. Neurology. 2008;71:486–92.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference du Montcel ST, Charles P, Ribai P, et al. Composite cerebellar functional severity score: validation of a quantitative score of cerebellar impairment. Brain. 2008;131:1352–61.PubMedCrossRef du Montcel ST, Charles P, Ribai P, et al. Composite cerebellar functional severity score: validation of a quantitative score of cerebellar impairment. Brain. 2008;131:1352–61.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Inventory of Non-Ataxia Signs (INAS): Validation of a New Clinical Assessment Instrument
Authors
H. Jacobi
M. Rakowicz
R. Rola
R. Fancellu
C. Mariotti
P. Charles
A. Dürr
M. Küper
D. Timmann
C. Linnemann
L. Schöls
O. Kaut
C. Schaub
A. Filla
L. Baliko
B. Melegh
J.-S. Kang
P. Giunti
B. P. C. van de Warrenburg
R. Fimmers
T. Klockgether
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
The Cerebellum / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1473-4222
Electronic ISSN: 1473-4230
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-012-0421-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

The Cerebellum 3/2013 Go to the issue