Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer 1/2022

Open Access 01-01-2022 | Breast Cancer | Original Article

Breast cancer patient-reported outcome of factors influencing cosmetic satisfaction after breast-conserving therapy

Authors: A. T. P. M. Brands-Appeldoorn, A. J. G. Maaskant-Braat, L. Janssen, L. A. D. M. van Osch, V. C. G. Tjan-Heijnen, R. M. H. Roumen

Published in: Breast Cancer | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to investigate which factors patients considered to be important for determining the degree of cosmetic satisfaction with regards to perceived body image after previous breast-conserving therapy (BCT).

Methods

Outcomes considered relevant by the patients were first identified using interviews. A questionnaire based on this group input was then devised and added to the physician-based Sneeuw questionnaire. Next, a quantitative study using this questionnaire was conducted in Dutch patients treated at least 6 months earlier for (non-) invasive breast cancer by BCT. Exclusion criteria were: previous mastectomy or BCT of the contralateral breast, BCT with nipple resection, metastatic disease, local recurrence or (previous) plastic breast surgery. Descriptive statistics were used throughout.

Results

A total of 149 patients (aged 36–87 years) completed the questionnaire. From this focus group input, the top three factors in overall importance (important or very important) for satisfaction were: ‘wearability of bra’ (67%), ‘breast sensitivity’ (59%) and ‘asymmetry’ (51%). Younger patients (< 55 years) considered ‘breast size’ to be most important, whereas ‘wearability of bra’ was most frequently reported by older patients (> 55 years). Time since BCT did not significantly influence the rating of relevant factors.

Conclusion

Patients consider ‘wearability of bra’, ‘breast sensitivity’ and ‘asymmetry’ as the most important factors when assessing their satisfaction with regards to cosmetic outcome and body image. These factors should be addressed in routine clinical practice during (pre) counseling.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Litière S, Werutsky G, Fentiman IS, Rutgers E, Christiaans MR, van Limbergen E, Baaijens MH, Bogaerts J, Bartelink H. Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I-II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(4):412–9.CrossRef Litière S, Werutsky G, Fentiman IS, Rutgers E, Christiaans MR, van Limbergen E, Baaijens MH, Bogaerts J, Bartelink H. Breast conserving therapy versus mastectomy for stage I-II breast cancer: 20 year follow-up of the EORTC 10801 phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(4):412–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference van Maaren MC, de Munck L, de Bock GH, Jobsen JJ, van Dalen T, Linn SC, Poortmans P, Strobbe LJA, Siesling S. 10 year survival after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in early breast cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):1158–70.CrossRef van Maaren MC, de Munck L, de Bock GH, Jobsen JJ, van Dalen T, Linn SC, Poortmans P, Strobbe LJA, Siesling S. 10 year survival after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in early breast cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):1158–70.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Negenborn VL, Volders JH, Krekel NMA, et al. Breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer: cosmetic results and options for delayed reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70:1336–44.CrossRef Negenborn VL, Volders JH, Krekel NMA, et al. Breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer: cosmetic results and options for delayed reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70:1336–44.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ojala K, Meretoja TJ, Leidenius MHK. Aesthetic and functional outcome after breast conserving surgery–comparison between conventional and oncoplastic resection. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;43:658–64.CrossRef Ojala K, Meretoja TJ, Leidenius MHK. Aesthetic and functional outcome after breast conserving surgery–comparison between conventional and oncoplastic resection. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016;43:658–64.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ozmen T, Polat AV, Polat AK, Bonaventura M, Johnson R, Soran A. Factors affecting cosmesis after breast conserving surgery without oncoplastic techniques in an experienced comprehensive breast center. The Surgeon. 2014;13:139–44.CrossRef Ozmen T, Polat AV, Polat AK, Bonaventura M, Johnson R, Soran A. Factors affecting cosmesis after breast conserving surgery without oncoplastic techniques in an experienced comprehensive breast center. The Surgeon. 2014;13:139–44.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Volders JH, Negenborn VL, Haloua MH, Krekel NMA, Jóźwiak K, Meijer S, Van den Tol PM. Breast-specific factors determine cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after breast-conserving therapy: results from the randomized COBALT study. J Surg Oncol. 2018;117:1001–8.CrossRef Volders JH, Negenborn VL, Haloua MH, Krekel NMA, Jóźwiak K, Meijer S, Van den Tol PM. Breast-specific factors determine cosmetic outcome and patient satisfaction after breast-conserving therapy: results from the randomized COBALT study. J Surg Oncol. 2018;117:1001–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brouwers PJAM, Van Werkhoven E, Bartelink H, et al. Predictors for poor cosmetic outcome in patients with early stage breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy: results of the Young Boost Trial. Radiother Oncol. 2018;128:434–41.CrossRef Brouwers PJAM, Van Werkhoven E, Bartelink H, et al. Predictors for poor cosmetic outcome in patients with early stage breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy: results of the Young Boost Trial. Radiother Oncol. 2018;128:434–41.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Foersterling E, Golatta M, Hennigs A, et al. Predictors of early poor aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery in patients with breast cancer: initial results of a prospective cohort study at a single institution. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:801–6.CrossRef Foersterling E, Golatta M, Hennigs A, et al. Predictors of early poor aesthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery in patients with breast cancer: initial results of a prospective cohort study at a single institution. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:801–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(20):3331–7.CrossRef Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(20):3331–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Heil J, et al. Change of aesthetic and functional outcome over time and their relationship to quality of life after breast conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:116.CrossRef Heil J, et al. Change of aesthetic and functional outcome over time and their relationship to quality of life after breast conserving therapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37:116.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yu T, Eom KY, Jang NY, et al. Objective measurement of cosmetic outcomes of breast conserving therapy using BCCT core. J Cancer Res Treatment. 2016;48(2):491–8.CrossRef Yu T, Eom KY, Jang NY, et al. Objective measurement of cosmetic outcomes of breast conserving therapy using BCCT core. J Cancer Res Treatment. 2016;48(2):491–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Cardoso M, Cardoso J, Oliveira H, Gouveia P. The breast cancer conservative treatment. Cosmetic results – BCCT.core- Software for objective assessment of esthetic outcome in breast cancer conservative treatment: a narrative review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016;126:154–9.CrossRef Cardoso M, Cardoso J, Oliveira H, Gouveia P. The breast cancer conservative treatment. Cosmetic results – BCCT.core- Software for objective assessment of esthetic outcome in breast cancer conservative treatment: a narrative review. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2016;126:154–9.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Harris J, Levene M, Svensson G, Hellman S. Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979;5(2):257–61.CrossRef Harris J, Levene M, Svensson G, Hellman S. Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979;5(2):257–61.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sneeuw K, Aaronson N, Yarnold J, Broderick M, Regan J, Ross G, Goddard A. Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 1. Comparison of patients’ ratings, observers’ ratings and objective assessments. Radiother Oncol. 1992;25:153–9.CrossRef Sneeuw K, Aaronson N, Yarnold J, Broderick M, Regan J, Ross G, Goddard A. Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 1. Comparison of patients’ ratings, observers’ ratings and objective assessments. Radiother Oncol. 1992;25:153–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for medical research involving human subjects. Clin Rev Education. 2013;310(20):2191–4. World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical Principles for medical research involving human subjects. Clin Rev Education. 2013;310(20):2191–4.
17.
go back to reference Liljegren G, Holmberg L, Westman G, Uppsala-Orebro Breast Cancer Study Group. The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with sector resection with or without radiotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(15):2083–9.CrossRef Liljegren G, Holmberg L, Westman G, Uppsala-Orebro Breast Cancer Study Group. The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with sector resection with or without radiotherapy. Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(15):2083–9.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Danoff B, Goodman R, Glick J, Haller D, Pajak T. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on cosmesis and complications in patients with breast cancer treated by definitive irradiation. Int J Radiat Ther Biol Phys. 1983;9:1625–30.CrossRef Danoff B, Goodman R, Glick J, Haller D, Pajak T. The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on cosmesis and complications in patients with breast cancer treated by definitive irradiation. Int J Radiat Ther Biol Phys. 1983;9:1625–30.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rose MA, Olivotto I, Cody B. Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer- long term cosmetic results. Arch Surg. 1989;124:153–7.CrossRef Rose MA, Olivotto I, Cody B. Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer- long term cosmetic results. Arch Surg. 1989;124:153–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Amichetti M, Busana L, Caffo O. Long-term cosmetic outcome and toxicity in patients treated with quadrantectomy and radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer. Oncology. 1995;52:177–81.CrossRef Amichetti M, Busana L, Caffo O. Long-term cosmetic outcome and toxicity in patients treated with quadrantectomy and radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancer. Oncology. 1995;52:177–81.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Olfatbakhsh A, Mehrdad N, Ebrahimi M, et al. Evaluation of factors impacting cosmetic outcome of breast conservative surgery–a study in Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(6):2203–7.CrossRef Olfatbakhsh A, Mehrdad N, Ebrahimi M, et al. Evaluation of factors impacting cosmetic outcome of breast conservative surgery–a study in Iran. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(6):2203–7.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Cardoso MJ, Cardoso J, Santos AC, et al. Factors determining esthetic outcome after breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast J. 2007;13(2):140–6.CrossRef Cardoso MJ, Cardoso J, Santos AC, et al. Factors determining esthetic outcome after breast cancer conservative treatment. Breast J. 2007;13(2):140–6.CrossRef
23.
24.
go back to reference Kołodziejczyk A, Pawłowski T. Negative body image in breast cancer patients. Adv Clinical Exp Med. 2019;28(8):1137–42.CrossRef Kołodziejczyk A, Pawłowski T. Negative body image in breast cancer patients. Adv Clinical Exp Med. 2019;28(8):1137–42.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Rhondali W, Chisholm GB, Filbet M, et al. Screening for body image dissatisfaction in patients with advanced cancer: a pilot study. J Palliat Med. 2015;18(2):153–6.CrossRef Rhondali W, Chisholm GB, Filbet M, et al. Screening for body image dissatisfaction in patients with advanced cancer: a pilot study. J Palliat Med. 2015;18(2):153–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Chang O, Choi EK, Kim IR, et al. Association between socioeconomic status and altered appearance distress, body image and quality of life among breast cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(20):8607–12.CrossRef Chang O, Choi EK, Kim IR, et al. Association between socioeconomic status and altered appearance distress, body image and quality of life among breast cancer patients. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(20):8607–12.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Janz NK, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, et al. Population-based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(6):1467–79.CrossRef Janz NK, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, et al. Population-based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(6):1467–79.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Paterson C, Lengacher CA, Donovan KA, Kip KE, Tofthagen CS. Body image in younger breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs. 2016;39(1):39–58.CrossRef Paterson C, Lengacher CA, Donovan KA, Kip KE, Tofthagen CS. Body image in younger breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. Cancer Nurs. 2016;39(1):39–58.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Miller SJ, Schnur JB, Weinberger-Litman SL, Montgomery GH. The relationship between body image, age and distress in women facing breast cancer surgery. Palliat Support Care. 2014;12(5):363–7.CrossRef Miller SJ, Schnur JB, Weinberger-Litman SL, Montgomery GH. The relationship between body image, age and distress in women facing breast cancer surgery. Palliat Support Care. 2014;12(5):363–7.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Lemieux J, Mausell E, Provencher L. Chemotherapy-induced alopecia and effects on quality of life among women with breast cancer: a literature review. Psychooncology. 2008;17(4):317–28.CrossRef Lemieux J, Mausell E, Provencher L. Chemotherapy-induced alopecia and effects on quality of life among women with breast cancer: a literature review. Psychooncology. 2008;17(4):317–28.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Breast cancer patient-reported outcome of factors influencing cosmetic satisfaction after breast-conserving therapy
Authors
A. T. P. M. Brands-Appeldoorn
A. J. G. Maaskant-Braat
L. Janssen
L. A. D. M. van Osch
V. C. G. Tjan-Heijnen
R. M. H. Roumen
Publication date
01-01-2022
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Breast Cancer / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Electronic ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-021-01287-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Breast Cancer 1/2022 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine