Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer 1/2012

01-01-2012 | Original Article

A role for elastography in the diagnosis of breast lesions by measuring the maximum fat lesion ratio (max-FLR) by tissue Doppler imaging

Authors: Katsumi Ikeda, Yoshinari Ogawa, Mamiko Takii, Kenji Sugano, Tetsuro Ikeya, Shinya Tokunaga, Yukio Nishiguchi, Teruyuki Ikehara

Published in: Breast Cancer | Issue 1/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The role of elastography for breast tumors is still ambiguous. The purpose of this study was to inquire how effectively elastography can be used in the diagnosis of breast tumors.

Methods

The fat lesion ratio (FLR) of 244 lesions (99 malignant and 145 benign lesions) was calculated using tissue Doppler imaging with elastography. The pathological confirmations were performed by core needle or excisional biopsy. Conventional ultrasonography (US) findings were classified according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. We tried to set the region of interest (ROI) at the hardest area of the target and measured the maximum FLR (max-FLR) of the target with elastography, whereas the control ROI was placed in the subcutaneous adipose tissue. The diagnostic potential of the max-FLR combined with the US category was evaluated.

Results

The mean max-FLR of malignant lesions was significantly greater than that of benign lesions, at 11.0 and 4.4, respectively (p < 0.01). The max-FLR showed a wide overlap range between benign and malignant lesions, but there were no malignant lesions showing a less than 2.0 max-FLR. Ninety-six percent of the lesions interpreted as category 3 were benign, and the negative predictive value measuring the max-FLR was kept at 98% as long as the max-FLR was less than 4.0. Measuring the max-FLR may reduce unnecessary biopsies by 57.5% in the category 3 group.

Conclusions

Combining conventional US categories and measuring max-FLR with elastography may be helpful in reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies in category 3 lesions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS, Cha JH, Jang M, Seong MH. Nonpalpable breast masses evaluation by elastography. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9(2):111–8.PubMedCrossRef Cho N, Moon WK, Park JS, Cha JH, Jang M, Seong MH. Nonpalpable breast masses evaluation by elastography. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9(2):111–8.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, et al. Clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239(2):341–50.PubMedCrossRef Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, Kamma H, Takahashi H, Shiina T, et al. Clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239(2):341–50.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Fleury EFC, Fleury JCV, Piato S, Jr Roveda D, et al. New elastographic classification of breast lesions during and after compression. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2009;15:96–103.PubMed Fleury EFC, Fleury JCV, Piato S, Jr Roveda D, et al. New elastographic classification of breast lesions during and after compression. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2009;15:96–103.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Kumm TR, Szabunio MM. Elastography for the characterization of breast lesions: initial clinical experience. Cancer Control. 2010;17(3):56–61. Kumm TR, Szabunio MM. Elastography for the characterization of breast lesions: initial clinical experience. Cancer Control. 2010;17(3):56–61.
5.
go back to reference American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), ultrasound. 4th ed. Reston : American College of Radiology; 2003. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), ultrasound. 4th ed. Reston : American College of Radiology; 2003.
6.
go back to reference Moon WK, Huang CS, Shen WC, Takada E, Chang RF, Joe J, et al. Analysis of elatographic features at sonoelastography for breast tumor classification. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009; 35(11):1794–802. Moon WK, Huang CS, Shen WC, Takada E, Chang RF, Joe J, et al. Analysis of elatographic features at sonoelastography for breast tumor classification. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009; 35(11):1794–802.
7.
go back to reference Raza S, Odulate A, Ong EMW, Ong EMW, Chikarmane S. Using real-time tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:551–63.PubMed Raza S, Odulate A, Ong EMW, Ong EMW, Chikarmane S. Using real-time tissue elastography for breast lesion evaluation. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:551–63.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Schaefer FK, Heer I, Schaefer PJ, Mundhenke C, Osterholz S, Order BM, et al. Breast ultrasound elastography—results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol. 2009; doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.08.026. Schaefer FK, Heer I, Schaefer PJ, Mundhenke C, Osterholz S, Order BM, et al. Breast ultrasound elastography—results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol. 2009; doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejrad.​2009.​08.​026.
9.
go back to reference Sohn YM, Kim MJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Moon HJ, Kim SJ. Sonographic elastography combined with conventional sonography. How much is it helpful for diagnostic performance? J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:413–20.PubMed Sohn YM, Kim MJ, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Moon HJ, Kim SJ. Sonographic elastography combined with conventional sonography. How much is it helpful for diagnostic performance? J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:413–20.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Cho N, Moon WK, Kim HY, Chang JM, Park SH, Lyou CY. Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:1–7.PubMed Cho N, Moon WK, Kim HY, Chang JM, Park SH, Lyou CY. Sonoelastographic strain index for differentiation of benign and malignant nonpalpable breast masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:1–7.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Thomas A, Degenhardt F, Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Slowinski T, Fisher T. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:558–63.PubMedCrossRef Thomas A, Degenhardt F, Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Slowinski T, Fisher T. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: calculation of strain ratio in breast sonoelastography. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:558–63.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Degenhardt F. Diagnostic value of strain ratio measurement in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions (in French with English abstract). Ultraschall Med. 2010. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245335 accessed 10 Aug 2010. Farrokh A, Wojcinski S, Degenhardt F. Diagnostic value of strain ratio measurement in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions (in French with English abstract). Ultraschall Med. 2010. doi: 10.​1055/​s-0029-1245335 accessed 10 Aug 2010.
14.
go back to reference Tardvion A, EI Khoury C, Thibault F, Wyler A, Barreau B, Neuenschwander S, et al. Elastography of the breast: a prospective study of 122 lesions (in French with English abstract). J Radiol. 2007;88(5 Pt 1):657–62.CrossRef Tardvion A, EI Khoury C, Thibault F, Wyler A, Barreau B, Neuenschwander S, et al. Elastography of the breast: a prospective study of 122 lesions (in French with English abstract). J Radiol. 2007;88(5 Pt 1):657–62.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
A role for elastography in the diagnosis of breast lesions by measuring the maximum fat lesion ratio (max-FLR) by tissue Doppler imaging
Authors
Katsumi Ikeda
Yoshinari Ogawa
Mamiko Takii
Kenji Sugano
Tetsuro Ikeya
Shinya Tokunaga
Yukio Nishiguchi
Teruyuki Ikehara
Publication date
01-01-2012
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Breast Cancer / Issue 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Electronic ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-011-0274-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2012

Breast Cancer 1/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine