Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer 3/2008

01-07-2008 | Original Article

Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI

Authors: Naomi Sakamoto, Mitsuhiro Tozaki, Kuniki Higa, Yuko Tsunoda, Tomoko Ogawa, Satoko Abe, Shinji Ozaki, Masaaki Sakamoto, Tomoko Tsuruhara, Naoko Kawano, Takako Suzuki, Norie Yamashiro, Eisuke Fukuma

Published in: Breast Cancer | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Breast MR imaging has emerged as a highly sensitive modality for the imaging of breast tumors. However, a standardized method of interpretation of lesions showing non-mass-like enhancement does not exist. The purpose of this study was to analyze the features of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI, and to establish a standardized method of interpretation to allow categorization of these lesions.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed for 102 consecutive nonpalpable mammographically occult, non-mass-like lesions detected by MRI that had undergone ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy. MR imaging was performed on a 1.5-Tesla system. The distribution patterns were classified into three categories as follows: single quadrant/solitary lesion (linear), single quadrant/grouped lesion (focal, regional, segmental), and multiquadrant lesion (multiple regions, diffuse). The presence of a ductal pattern was assessed in the enhancing lesions after the tumor distribution had been decided. In addition to the BI-RADS-MRI descriptors, the presence of clustered ring enhancement was also assessed in heterogeneous enhancing lesions. We divided non-mass-like lesions into those with a small (category 3a), moderate (category 3b), or substantial (category 4) likelihood of malignancy.

Results

The features with the highest positive predictive value (PPV) for cancer were clustered ring enhancement (67%) (P = 0.004), a branching-ductal pattern (38%) (P = 0.003), and clumped architecture (20%). The PPV for cancer of a linear-ductal pattern was 11% (1/9). All lesions showing multiquadrant distribution, linear-nonspecific lesion, non-branching pattern with homogeneous and stippled internal architectures, and heterogeneous lesion without clustered ring enhancement were diagnosed as benign.

Conclusion

Non-mass-like breast lesions detected on MRI showing a clustered ring enhancement, a branching-ductal pattern, and clumped architecture should be evaluated further by biopsy (category 4), while lesions not showing these characteristics may be observed without unnecessary intervention (category 3a). Lesions showing a linear-ductal pattern may be followed carefully or evaluated by biopsy as needed (category 3b).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology. 1989;171:95–103.PubMed Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology. 1989;171:95–103.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology. 1989;170:681–6.PubMed Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology. 1989;170:681–6.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, Meiches MD, Jensen RA, Evans WP, Savino DA, Wells RV. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1993;187:493–501.PubMed Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, Meiches MD, Jensen RA, Evans WP, Savino DA, Wells RV. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1993;187:493–501.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1994;190:485–93.PubMed Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1994;190:485–93.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, van der Sluis RF, van Erning LJ, Hendriks JH, Holland R, Ruys SH. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology. 1994;193:777–81.PubMed Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, van der Sluis RF, van Erning LJ, Hendriks JH, Holland R, Ruys SH. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology. 1994;193:777–81.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, Schild HH. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999;211:101–10.PubMed Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, Schild HH. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999;211:101–10.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881–8.PubMed Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881–8.PubMed
8.
go back to reference American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting, data system (BI-RADS), 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting, data system (BI-RADS), 4th ed. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2003.
9.
go back to reference Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, Kaplan JB, LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Abramson AF, Dashnaw SM, Ballon DJ, Dershaw DD. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:171–78.PubMed Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, Kaplan JB, LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Abramson AF, Dashnaw SM, Ballon DJ, Dershaw DD. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:171–78.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Morakkabati-Spitz N, Leutner C, Schild H, Traeber F, Kuhl C. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:2010–7.PubMedCrossRef Morakkabati-Spitz N, Leutner C, Schild H, Traeber F, Kuhl C. Diagnostic usefulness of segmental and linear enhancement in dynamic breast MRI. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:2010–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tozaki M, Fukuda K. High-Spatial-Resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:330–7.PubMedCrossRef Tozaki M, Fukuda K. High-Spatial-Resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:330–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:313–21.PubMedCrossRef Tozaki M, Igarashi T, Fukuda K. Breast MRI using the VIBE sequence: clustered ring enhancement in the differential diagnosis of lesions showing non-masslike enhancement. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:313–21.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, et al. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology. 2006;239:385–91.PubMedCrossRef Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, et al. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology. 2006;239:385–91.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schnall MD, Ikeda DM. Lesion diagnosis working group on breast MR. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:982–90.PubMedCrossRef Schnall MD, Ikeda DM. Lesion diagnosis working group on breast MR. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:982–90.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, Hochman MG, Kuhl CK, Kaiser WA, Weinreb JC, Smazal SF, Degani H, Viehweg P, Barclay J, Schnall MD. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:889–95.PubMedCrossRef Ikeda DM, Hylton NM, Kinkel K, Hochman MG, Kuhl CK, Kaiser WA, Weinreb JC, Smazal SF, Degani H, Viehweg P, Barclay J, Schnall MD. Development, standardization, and testing of a lexicon for reporting contrast-enhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:889–95.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:519–25.PubMed Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, Abramson AF, Tan LK. Ductal enhancement on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:519–25.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. MR imaging-guided large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology. 2001;220:31–9.PubMed Kuhl CK, Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. MR imaging-guided large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology. 2001;220:31–9.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Sittek H, Casselman J, Anderson I, Taourel P. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer. 2006;106:982–90.PubMedCrossRef Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Sittek H, Casselman J, Anderson I, Taourel P. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer. 2006;106:982–90.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI
Authors
Naomi Sakamoto
Mitsuhiro Tozaki
Kuniki Higa
Yuko Tsunoda
Tomoko Ogawa
Satoko Abe
Shinji Ozaki
Masaaki Sakamoto
Tomoko Tsuruhara
Naoko Kawano
Takako Suzuki
Norie Yamashiro
Eisuke Fukuma
Publication date
01-07-2008
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Breast Cancer / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Electronic ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-007-0028-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Breast Cancer 3/2008 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine