Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery 3/2017

01-06-2017 | Review Article

Colorectal Cancer: Postoperative Follow-up and Surveillance

Authors: Satyajit Godhi, Ashok Godhi, Ravishankar Bhat, Sundeep Saluja

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Follow-up and surveillance form an important aspect of care in patients with colorectal cancers (CRC). Most recurrences will occur within 2 years of surgery and 90% by 5 years. Follow up protocols have not been well defined in stage I disease and the approach should be individualized. As 40% of patients with stages II and III will develop recurrences, intensive postoperative follow-up strategy is recommended for them. It includes visit to the clinician for clinical examination, serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), computed tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen, colonoscopy, and flexible proctosigmoidoscopy in rectal cancers. Surveillance should be undertaken in those who are medically fit for repeat surgical procedures or for chemoradiotherapy. The concept of intensive post operative surveillance is based on the fact that some of these patients can have resectable/curable recurrence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Goldberg RM, Fleming TR, Tangen CM et al (1998) Surgery for recurrent colon cancer: strategies for identifying resectable recurrence and success rates after resection. Eastern cooperative oncology group, the north central cancer treatment group, and the southwest oncology group. Ann Intern Med 129:27CrossRefPubMed Goldberg RM, Fleming TR, Tangen CM et al (1998) Surgery for recurrent colon cancer: strategies for identifying resectable recurrence and success rates after resection. Eastern cooperative oncology group, the north central cancer treatment group, and the southwest oncology group. Ann Intern Med 129:27CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Quentmeier A, Schlag P, Smok M, Herfarth C (1990) Reoperation for recurrent colorectal cancer: the importance of early diagnosis for resectability and survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 16:319PubMed Quentmeier A, Schlag P, Smok M, Herfarth C (1990) Reoperation for recurrent colorectal cancer: the importance of early diagnosis for resectability and survival. Eur J Surg Oncol 16:319PubMed
3.
go back to reference Ovaska J, Järvinen H, Kujari H et al (1990) Follow up of patients operated on for colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 159:593CrossRefPubMed Ovaska J, Järvinen H, Kujari H et al (1990) Follow up of patients operated on for colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 159:593CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pita Fernández S, AlhayekAí M, GonzálezMartín C et al (2015) Intensive follow-up strategies improve outcomes in nonmetastatic colorectal cancer patients after curative surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 26:644CrossRefPubMed Pita Fernández S, AlhayekAí M, GonzálezMartín C et al (2015) Intensive follow-up strategies improve outcomes in nonmetastatic colorectal cancer patients after curative surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 26:644CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Graham RA, Wang S, Catalano PJ, Haller DG (1998) Postsurgical surveillance of colon cancer: preliminary cost analysis of physician examination, carcinoembryonic antigen testing, chest xray, and colonoscopy. Ann Surg 228:59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Graham RA, Wang S, Catalano PJ, Haller DG (1998) Postsurgical surveillance of colon cancer: preliminary cost analysis of physician examination, carcinoembryonic antigen testing, chest xray, and colonoscopy. Ann Surg 228:59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Ohlsson B, Breland U, Ekberg H et al (1995) Follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Randomized comparison with no follow-up. Dis Colon rectum 38:619 Ohlsson B, Breland U, Ekberg H et al (1995) Follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Randomized comparison with no follow-up. Dis Colon rectum 38:619
7.
go back to reference Mäkelä JT, Laitinen SO, Kairaluoma MI (1995) Five year follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 130:1062CrossRefPubMed Mäkelä JT, Laitinen SO, Kairaluoma MI (1995) Five year follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg 130:1062CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kjeldsen BJ, Kronborg O, Fenger C, Jørgensen OD (1997) A prospective randomized study of followup after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 84:666CrossRefPubMed Kjeldsen BJ, Kronborg O, Fenger C, Jørgensen OD (1997) A prospective randomized study of followup after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 84:666CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Schoemaker D, Black R, Giles L, Toouli J (1998) Yearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography do not influence 5year survival of colorectal cancer patients. Gastroenterology 114:7CrossRefPubMed Schoemaker D, Black R, Giles L, Toouli J (1998) Yearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography do not influence 5year survival of colorectal cancer patients. Gastroenterology 114:7CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference RodríguezMoranta F, Saló J, Arcusa A et al (2006) Postoperative surveillance in patients with colorectal cancer who have undergone curative resection: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 24:386CrossRef RodríguezMoranta F, Saló J, Arcusa A et al (2006) Postoperative surveillance in patients with colorectal cancer who have undergone curative resection: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 24:386CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wang T, Cui Y, Huang WS et al (2009) The role of postoperative colonoscopic surveillance after radical surgery for colorectal cancer: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Gastrointest Endosc 69:609CrossRefPubMed Wang T, Cui Y, Huang WS et al (2009) The role of postoperative colonoscopic surveillance after radical surgery for colorectal cancer: a prospective, randomized clinical study. Gastrointest Endosc 69:609CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Pietra N, Sarli L, Costi R et al (1998) Role of follow-up in management of local recurrences of colorectal cancer: a prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon rectum 41:1127CrossRefPubMed Pietra N, Sarli L, Costi R et al (1998) Role of follow-up in management of local recurrences of colorectal cancer: a prospective, randomized study. Dis Colon rectum 41:1127CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Secco GB, Fardelli R, Gianquinto D et al (2002) Efficacy and cost of risk adapted follow-up in patients after colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 28:418CrossRefPubMed Secco GB, Fardelli R, Gianquinto D et al (2002) Efficacy and cost of risk adapted follow-up in patients after colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 28:418CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Grossmann EM, Johnson FE, Virgo KS et al (2004) Follow-up of colorectal cancer patients after resection with curative intention the GILDA trial. Surg Oncol 13:119CrossRefPubMed Grossmann EM, Johnson FE, Virgo KS et al (2004) Follow-up of colorectal cancer patients after resection with curative intention the GILDA trial. Surg Oncol 13:119CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Primrose JN, Perera R, Gray A et al (2014) Effect of 3 to 5 years of scheduled CEA and CT followup to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer: the FACS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 311:263CrossRefPubMed Primrose JN, Perera R, Gray A et al (2014) Effect of 3 to 5 years of scheduled CEA and CT followup to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer: the FACS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 311:263CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wattchow DA, Weller DP, Esterman A et al (2006) General practice vs surgical-based follow-up for patients with colon cancer: randomised controlled trial. Br J Cancer 94:1116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wattchow DA, Weller DP, Esterman A et al (2006) General practice vs surgical-based follow-up for patients with colon cancer: randomised controlled trial. Br J Cancer 94:1116CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP, O'Dwyer ST (2002) Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and metaanalysis of randomised trials. BMJ 324:813CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP, O'Dwyer ST (2002) Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and metaanalysis of randomised trials. BMJ 324:813CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
19.
go back to reference Jeffery M, Hickey BE, Hider PN (2007) Followup strategies for patients treated for nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; :CD002200 Jeffery M, Hickey BE, Hider PN (2007) Followup strategies for patients treated for nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev; :CD002200
20.
go back to reference Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2007) Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon rectum 50:1783 Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2007) Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon rectum 50:1783
21.
go back to reference Choe EK, Park KJ, Chung SJ, Moon SH, Ryoo SB, Oh HK (2015) Colonoscopic surveillance after colorectal cancer resection: who needs more intensive follow-up? Digestion 91(2):142–149CrossRefPubMed Choe EK, Park KJ, Chung SJ, Moon SH, Ryoo SB, Oh HK (2015) Colonoscopic surveillance after colorectal cancer resection: who needs more intensive follow-up? Digestion 91(2):142–149CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Zeng Z, Cohen AM, Urmacher C (1993) Usefulness of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring despite normal preoperative values in node-positive colon cancer patients. Dis Colon rectum 36(11):1063–1068CrossRefPubMed Zeng Z, Cohen AM, Urmacher C (1993) Usefulness of carcinoembryonic antigen monitoring despite normal preoperative values in node-positive colon cancer patients. Dis Colon rectum 36(11):1063–1068CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference McCall JL, Black RB, Rich CA et al (1994) The value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in predicting recurrent disease following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon rectum 37:875CrossRefPubMed McCall JL, Black RB, Rich CA et al (1994) The value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in predicting recurrent disease following curative resection of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon rectum 37:875CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Litvak A, Cercek A, Segal N et al (2014) False-positive elevations of carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with a history of resected colorectal cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 12:907CrossRef Litvak A, Cercek A, Segal N et al (2014) False-positive elevations of carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with a history of resected colorectal cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 12:907CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Colorectal Cancer: Postoperative Follow-up and Surveillance
Authors
Satyajit Godhi
Ashok Godhi
Ravishankar Bhat
Sundeep Saluja
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Electronic ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-017-1610-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Indian Journal of Surgery 3/2017 Go to the issue