Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery 6/2012

01-12-2012 | Original Article

Comparative Study between Staplers and Conventional(Hand-Sewn) Anastomosis in Gastrointestinal Surgery

Authors: Himabindu Bangaru, Rama Mohan Rao Veitla, Mythili Pigilam, Girish Kumar Kunwargiri

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Conventional (hand-sewn) technique of intestinal anastomosis has been in vogue for decades. Staplers which were developed to simplify surgery began to have significant impact. To compare staplers versus conventional anastomosis with respect to certain intra operative and post operative parameters. Prospective study from November 2008 to October 2010 in Hyderabad at OSMANIA, GANDHI, MNJ CANCER hospitals. 120 patients were divided into three groups of 40 each, depending on the surgery like posterior gastrojejunostomy, distal gastrectomy and reconstruction (Billroth II) and colorectal anastomosis. Of these 40 patients, 20 were in hand-sewn group and the other 20 in stapler group. Unpaired ‘t’ test was used to find ‘p’ value . ‘p’ value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Total operating time was shortened in stapler group. No significant difference was found in terms of restoration of intestinal function, post-operative hospital stay, post-operative complications like anastomotic leak. Staplers can expedite surgery. They have better access to difficult—to—reach areas. Thus staplers can be beneficial though one should not forget the art of conventional suturing.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Leaper DJ (2008) Basic surgical skills and anastomoses. In: Williams NS, Bulstrode CJ, O’Connell PR, (ed), Bailey and love’s short practice of surgery, 25th ed., Edward Arnold Ltd: Great Britain, p 239, 242–245 Leaper DJ (2008) Basic surgical skills and anastomoses. In: Williams NS, Bulstrode CJ, O’Connell PR, (ed), Bailey and love’s short practice of surgery, 25th ed., Edward Arnold Ltd: Great Britain, p 239, 242–245
2.
go back to reference Brooks DC, Zinner MJ (2000) Surgery of the small and large bowel. In: Zinner MJ, Ellis H, editors, Maingot’s abdominal operations, 10th ed., Applleton and Lange, Connecticut (USA), p 1321–1330 Brooks DC, Zinner MJ (2000) Surgery of the small and large bowel. In: Zinner MJ, Ellis H, editors, Maingot’s abdominal operations, 10th ed., Applleton and Lange, Connecticut (USA), p 1321–1330
3.
go back to reference Farquharson M, Moran B (2005) Farquharson’s textbook of operative general surgery, 9th ed., Edward Arnold Ltd: Great Britain, p 222–229, 234–239 Farquharson M, Moran B (2005) Farquharson’s textbook of operative general surgery, 9th ed., Edward Arnold Ltd: Great Britain, p 222–229, 234–239
4.
go back to reference Kirk RM (2002) Basic surgical techniques, 5th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 43–80 Kirk RM (2002) Basic surgical techniques, 5th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 43–80
5.
go back to reference Damesha N, Lubana PS, Jain DK, Mathur R (2008) A comparative study of sutured and stapled anastomosis in gastrointestinal operations. Internet J Surg 15(2) Damesha N, Lubana PS, Jain DK, Mathur R (2008) A comparative study of sutured and stapled anastomosis in gastrointestinal operations. Internet J Surg 15(2)
6.
go back to reference George WD, West of Scotland and Highland anastomosis study group (1991) Suturing or stapling in gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 78:337–341CrossRef George WD, West of Scotland and Highland anastomosis study group (1991) Suturing or stapling in gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 78:337–341CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hollender LF, Blanchot P, Meyer C, da Silva e Costa JM (1981) Mechanical suturing apparatus in gastrointestinal surgery. Zentralbl Chir 106(2):74–83PubMed Hollender LF, Blanchot P, Meyer C, da Silva e Costa JM (1981) Mechanical suturing apparatus in gastrointestinal surgery. Zentralbl Chir 106(2):74–83PubMed
8.
go back to reference Reiling RB, Reiling WA Jr, Bernie WA, Huffer AB, Perkins NC, Elliott DW (1980) Prospective controlled study of gastrointestinal stapled anastamoses. Am J Surg 139:147–152PubMedCrossRef Reiling RB, Reiling WA Jr, Bernie WA, Huffer AB, Perkins NC, Elliott DW (1980) Prospective controlled study of gastrointestinal stapled anastamoses. Am J Surg 139:147–152PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Scher KS, Scott-Conner C, Jones CW, Leach M (1982) A comparison of stapled and sutured anastamoses in colonic operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 155:489–493PubMed Scher KS, Scott-Conner C, Jones CW, Leach M (1982) A comparison of stapled and sutured anastamoses in colonic operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 155:489–493PubMed
10.
go back to reference Scher KS, Scott-Conner C, Ong WT (1982) A comparison of stapled and sutured anastamoses in gastric operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 154:548–552PubMed Scher KS, Scott-Conner C, Ong WT (1982) A comparison of stapled and sutured anastamoses in gastric operations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 154:548–552PubMed
11.
go back to reference Lustosa SA, Matos D, Atallah AN, Castro AA (2002) Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Sao Paulo Med J/Rev Paul Med 120(5):132–136 Lustosa SA, Matos D, Atallah AN, Castro AA (2002) Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Sao Paulo Med J/Rev Paul Med 120(5):132–136
12.
go back to reference Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, Galloway DJ (1995) Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group. Ann Surg 221:176–184PubMedCrossRef Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, Galloway DJ (1995) Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group. Ann Surg 221:176–184PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nasirkhan MU, Abir F, Longo W, Kozol R (2006) Anastomotic disruption after large bowel resection. World J Gastroenterol 12(16):2497–2504PubMed Nasirkhan MU, Abir F, Longo W, Kozol R (2006) Anastomotic disruption after large bowel resection. World J Gastroenterol 12(16):2497–2504PubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparative Study between Staplers and Conventional(Hand-Sewn) Anastomosis in Gastrointestinal Surgery
Authors
Himabindu Bangaru
Rama Mohan Rao Veitla
Mythili Pigilam
Girish Kumar Kunwargiri
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2012
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Electronic ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-012-0450-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2012

Indian Journal of Surgery 6/2012 Go to the issue

Review Article

Cecal Volvulus

Images in Surgery

Is This Phantom Pain?