Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pathology & Oncology Research 4/2020

01-10-2020 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

Power Doppler Sonography (PDS) and Modified TRUS Systematic Biopsies – Can this Combination Adequately Replace Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mp-MRI) in Candidates for Re Biopsies Who cannot Undergo mp-MRI

Authors: Sergey Kravchick, Eugenia Cherniavsky, Ronit Peled, Shmuel Cytron, Guy Verhovsky

Published in: Pathology & Oncology Research | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

The MRI targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx) may increase the detection rate of clinically significant cancer (csPCa) in candidates for re-biopsy. However, there will be several patients in whom MRI is contraindicated. In this retrospective study we assessed the ability of combination of PDS guided biopsies (PDS-TBx) and modified SBx to substitute MRI-TBx. 154 men with persistently elevated PSA were referred for re-biopsy. Our protocol included a combination of MRI-TBx, DPS-TBx and modified SBx with additional biopsies from anterior lateral horns and anterior aspects of apex. MRI findings were defined as suspicious lesions (MRI-SL) and highly suspicious lesions (MRI-HL), based on PIRADS scale. In 40 patients csPCa was detected. While, MRI diagnosed csPCa in 36 patients (23%, n-36/154): 25% and 92% of biopsies targeted to the MRI- SL and MRI-HSL confirmed csPCa. Thirty-eight PDS hypervascular areas were found, while csPCa was diagnosed in 84% of these lesions, or in 28 patients (18%, n-28/154). SBx detected csPCa in 34 cores or in 21 patients (13%, n – 21/154). SBx missed cancers in the in the anterior aspect of middle gland. Combination of PDS-TBx + SBx detected csPCa in 35 (88% of csPCa) patients. Strongest predictors for the csPCa presence were MRI-HSL, PDS’ lesions and biopsies from anterior aspect that included apex, mid gland and anterior lateral horns (p < 0.001 and p-0.008, respectively). The combination of PDS-TBx + SBx may miss 15% of csPCa detected by MRI. However, it can detect additional 10% of csPCa that were missed by MRI. To improve the accuracy of this combination, the anterior aspect of middle gland should be also included in the modified SBx. These changes in combination can make it helpful in candidates for re-biopsy who cannot undergo MRI.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Welch HG, Fisher ES, Gottlieb DJ, Barry MJ (2007) Detection of prostate cancer via biopsy in the Medicare–SEER population during the PSA era. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1395–1400CrossRef Welch HG, Fisher ES, Gottlieb DJ, Barry MJ (2007) Detection of prostate cancer via biopsy in the Medicare–SEER population during the PSA era. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1395–1400CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Moore CM, Robertson NL, Arsanious N, Middleton T, Villers A, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Emberton M (2013) Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review. Eur Urol 63:125–140CrossRef Moore CM, Robertson NL, Arsanious N, Middleton T, Villers A, Klotz L, Taneja SS, Emberton M (2013) Image-guided prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance imaging-derived targets: a systematic review. Eur Urol 63:125–140CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sonn GA, Chang E, Natarajan S et al (2014) Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol 65:809–815CrossRef Sonn GA, Chang E, Natarajan S et al (2014) Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol 65:809–815CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wysock JS, Rosenkrantz AB, Huang WC et al (2013) A prospective, blinded comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-ultrasound fusion and visual estimation in the performance of MR-targeted prostate biopsy: the PROFUS trial. Eur Urol 66:343–351CrossRef Wysock JS, Rosenkrantz AB, Huang WC et al (2013) A prospective, blinded comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-ultrasound fusion and visual estimation in the performance of MR-targeted prostate biopsy: the PROFUS trial. Eur Urol 66:343–351CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Salami SS, Ben-Levi E, Yaskiv O, Ryniker L, Turkbey B, Kavoussi LR, Villani R, Rastinehad AR (2015) In patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy and a suspicious lesion on magnetic resonance imaging, is a 12-core biopsy still necessary in addition to a targeted biopsy? BJU Int 115:562–570CrossRef Salami SS, Ben-Levi E, Yaskiv O, Ryniker L, Turkbey B, Kavoussi LR, Villani R, Rastinehad AR (2015) In patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy and a suspicious lesion on magnetic resonance imaging, is a 12-core biopsy still necessary in addition to a targeted biopsy? BJU Int 115:562–570CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schoots IG, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Chris H, Bangma CH, Steyerberg EW, Hunink MG (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 68:438–450CrossRef Schoots IG, Roobol MJ, Nieboer D, Chris H, Bangma CH, Steyerberg EW, Hunink MG (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 68:438–450CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Le JD, Stephenson S, Brugger M et al (2014) MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy for prediction of final prostate pathology. J Urol 192:1367–1373CrossRef Le JD, Stephenson S, Brugger M et al (2014) MRI-ultrasound fusion biopsy for prediction of final prostate pathology. J Urol 192:1367–1373CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mathur S, O'Malley ME, Ghai S, Jhaveri K, Sreeharsha B, Margolis M, Zhong L, Maan H, Toi A (2019) Correlation of 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) version 2 with biopsy as reference standard. Abdom Radiol (NY) 44(1):252–258CrossRef Mathur S, O'Malley ME, Ghai S, Jhaveri K, Sreeharsha B, Margolis M, Zhong L, Maan H, Toi A (2019) Correlation of 3T multiparametric prostate MRI using prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) version 2 with biopsy as reference standard. Abdom Radiol (NY) 44(1):252–258CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Puech P, Rouviere O, Renard-Penna R et al (2013) Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy-prospective multicenter study. Radiology 268:461–469CrossRef Puech P, Rouviere O, Renard-Penna R et al (2013) Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy-prospective multicenter study. Radiology 268:461–469CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dewey M, Schink T, Dewey CF (2007) Frequency of referral of patients with safety-related contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 63(1):124–127CrossRef Dewey M, Schink T, Dewey CF (2007) Frequency of referral of patients with safety-related contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 63(1):124–127CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chow GV, Nazarian S (2014) MRI for patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices. Cardiol Clin 32:299–304CrossRef Chow GV, Nazarian S (2014) MRI for patients with cardiac implantable electrical devices. Cardiol Clin 32:299–304CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bastide C, Lechevallier E, Eghazarian C, Ortega JC, Coulange C (2003) Tolerance of pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: risk factors. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 6:239–241CrossRef Bastide C, Lechevallier E, Eghazarian C, Ortega JC, Coulange C (2003) Tolerance of pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: risk factors. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 6:239–241CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kravchick S, Yoffe B, Cytron S (2007) Modified perianal/pericapsular anesthesia for transrectal biopsy of prostate in patients with anal rectal problems. Urology 69(1):139–141CrossRef Kravchick S, Yoffe B, Cytron S (2007) Modified perianal/pericapsular anesthesia for transrectal biopsy of prostate in patients with anal rectal problems. Urology 69(1):139–141CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gold SA, Hale GR, Bloom JB, Smith CP, Rayn KN, Valera V, Wood BJ, Choyke PL, Turkbey B, Pinto PA (2019) Follow-up of negative MRI-targeted prostate biopsies: when are we missing cancer? World J Urol 37(2):235–241CrossRef Gold SA, Hale GR, Bloom JB, Smith CP, Rayn KN, Valera V, Wood BJ, Choyke PL, Turkbey B, Pinto PA (2019) Follow-up of negative MRI-targeted prostate biopsies: when are we missing cancer? World J Urol 37(2):235–241CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Takahashi S, Yamada Y, Homma Y, Horie S, Hosaka Y, Kitamura T (2002) Power Doppler ultrasonography-directed prostate biopsy in men with elevated serum PSA levels: an evaluation of the clinical utility and limitations. Urology. 60(2):248–252CrossRef Takahashi S, Yamada Y, Homma Y, Horie S, Hosaka Y, Kitamura T (2002) Power Doppler ultrasonography-directed prostate biopsy in men with elevated serum PSA levels: an evaluation of the clinical utility and limitations. Urology. 60(2):248–252CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Eisenberg ML, Cowan JE, Carroll PR, Shinohara K (2010) The adjunctive use of power Doppler imaging in the preoperative assessment of prostate cancer. BJU Int 105:1237–1241CrossRef Eisenberg ML, Cowan JE, Carroll PR, Shinohara K (2010) The adjunctive use of power Doppler imaging in the preoperative assessment of prostate cancer. BJU Int 105:1237–1241CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Remzi M, Dobrovits M, Reissigl A, Ravery V, Waldert M, Wiunig C, Fong YK, Djavan B, European Society for Oncological Urology (ESOU) (2004) Can power Doppler enhanced transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection on first and repeat prostate biopsy? Eur Urol 46(4):451–456CrossRef Remzi M, Dobrovits M, Reissigl A, Ravery V, Waldert M, Wiunig C, Fong YK, Djavan B, European Society for Oncological Urology (ESOU) (2004) Can power Doppler enhanced transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection on first and repeat prostate biopsy? Eur Urol 46(4):451–456CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wright JL, Ellis WJ (2006) Improved prostate cancer detection with anterior apical prostate biopsies. Urol Oncol 24:492–495CrossRef Wright JL, Ellis WJ (2006) Improved prostate cancer detection with anterior apical prostate biopsies. Urol Oncol 24:492–495CrossRef
19.
go back to reference DjavanB ZAR, Remzi M, Ghawidel K, Basharkhah A, Schulman CC et al (2000) Optimal predictors of prostate cancer in repeat prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 1051 men. J Urol 163:1144–1148CrossRef DjavanB ZAR, Remzi M, Ghawidel K, Basharkhah A, Schulman CC et al (2000) Optimal predictors of prostate cancer in repeat prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 1051 men. J Urol 163:1144–1148CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kim M, Choi SK, Park M, Shim M, Song C, Jeong IG, Hong JH, Kim CS, Ahn H (2016) Characteristics of anterior located prostate cancer and usefulness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis. J Urol 196(2):367–373CrossRef Kim M, Choi SK, Park M, Shim M, Song C, Jeong IG, Hong JH, Kim CS, Ahn H (2016) Characteristics of anterior located prostate cancer and usefulness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis. J Urol 196(2):367–373CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Takashima R, Egawa S, Kuwao S, Baba S (2002) Anterior distribution of Stage T1c nonpalpable tumors in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 59(5):692–697CrossRef Takashima R, Egawa S, Kuwao S, Baba S (2002) Anterior distribution of Stage T1c nonpalpable tumors in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology 59(5):692–697CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Power Doppler Sonography (PDS) and Modified TRUS Systematic Biopsies – Can this Combination Adequately Replace Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mp-MRI) in Candidates for Re Biopsies Who cannot Undergo mp-MRI
Authors
Sergey Kravchick
Eugenia Cherniavsky
Ronit Peled
Shmuel Cytron
Guy Verhovsky
Publication date
01-10-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Pathology & Oncology Research / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 1219-4956
Electronic ISSN: 1532-2807
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-020-00824-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Pathology & Oncology Research 4/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine