Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Hematology 5/2009

01-06-2009 | Original Article

Phase II and pharmacokinetic study of thalidomide in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Authors: Hirokazu Murakami, Kazuyuki Shimizu, Morio Sawamura, Kenshi Suzuki, Isamu Sugiura, Hiroshi Kosugi, Chihiro Shimazaki, Masafumi Taniwaki, Masahiro Abe, Toshiyuki Takagi

Published in: International Journal of Hematology | Issue 5/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

To obtain approval from the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan, a phase II study was conducted to assess the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of thalidomide along with its efficacy and safety in Japanese patients with multiple myeloma. Between 2005 and 2006, 42 patients were enrolled, and 37 patients met eligibility criteria. Of the 37 patients, 3 were excluded from efficacy analysis because of short duration of thalidomide administration (<4 weeks). The overall response rate was 35.3% (12/34), including partial response of 14.7% (5/34) and minimal response of 20.6% (7/34). The adverse events observed in high frequency (>40%) were leukopenia, neutropenia, drowsiness, dry mouth, and constipation. Grade 3 neutropenia was observed in nine cases. Peripheral neuropathy and eruption were observed in about one-quarter of the patients. Deep vein thrombosis was not observed. At a single oral dose of thalidomide (100 mg), the C max was 1.68 ± 0.41 μg/ml, T max was 4.54 ± 1.71 h, T 1/2 was 4.86 ± 0.44 h, and AUC was 15.87 ± 3.05 μg h/ml. Low-dose thalidomide was an effective and tolerable treatment for Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. Leukopenia and neutropenia were the most serious adverse events. The pharmacokinetics was similar to those observed in Caucasian patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Attal M, Harousseau J-L, Facon T, Guilhot F, Doyen C, Fuzibet J-G, et al. Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2495–502.PubMedCrossRef Attal M, Harousseau J-L, Facon T, Guilhot F, Doyen C, Fuzibet J-G, et al. Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2495–502.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lenz W. Thalidomide embryopathy in Germany, 1959–1961. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1985;163C:77–83.PubMed Lenz W. Thalidomide embryopathy in Germany, 1959–1961. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1985;163C:77–83.PubMed
4.
go back to reference D’Amato RJ, Loughnan MS, Flynn E, Folkman J. Thalidomide is an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:4082–5.PubMedCrossRef D’Amato RJ, Loughnan MS, Flynn E, Folkman J. Thalidomide is an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91:4082–5.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Singha S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Roberson P, Eddlemon P, et al. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl H Med. 1999;341:1565–71.CrossRef Singha S, Mehta J, Desikan R, Ayers D, Roberson P, Eddlemon P, et al. Antitumor activity of thalidomide in refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl H Med. 1999;341:1565–71.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Figg WD, Raje S, Bauer KS, Tompkins A, Venzon D, Bergan R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of thalidomide in an elderly prostate cancer population. J Pharm Sci. 1999;88:121–5.PubMedCrossRef Figg WD, Raje S, Bauer KS, Tompkins A, Venzon D, Bergan R, et al. Pharmacokinetics of thalidomide in an elderly prostate cancer population. J Pharm Sci. 1999;88:121–5.PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Barlogie B, Zangari M, Spencer T, Fassas A, Anaissie E, Badros A, et al. Thalidomide in the management of multiple myeloma. Semin Haematol. 2001;38:250–9.CrossRef Barlogie B, Zangari M, Spencer T, Fassas A, Anaissie E, Badros A, et al. Thalidomide in the management of multiple myeloma. Semin Haematol. 2001;38:250–9.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Durie BGM. Low-dose thalidomide in myeloma: efficacy and biologic significance. Semin Oncol. 2002;29 Suppl 17:34–8.PubMedCrossRef Durie BGM. Low-dose thalidomide in myeloma: efficacy and biologic significance. Semin Oncol. 2002;29 Suppl 17:34–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Johnston RE, Abdalla SH. Thalidomide in low doses in effective for the treatment of resistant or relapsed multiple myeloma and for plasma cell leukaemia. Leukemia Lymphoma. 2002;43:351–4.PubMedCrossRef Johnston RE, Abdalla SH. Thalidomide in low doses in effective for the treatment of resistant or relapsed multiple myeloma and for plasma cell leukaemia. Leukemia Lymphoma. 2002;43:351–4.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Murakami H, Handa H, Abe M, Iida S, Ishii A, Ishikawa T, et al. Low-dose thalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone therapy in patients with refractory multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol. 2007;79:234–9.PubMedCrossRef Murakami H, Handa H, Abe M, Iida S, Ishii A, Ishikawa T, et al. Low-dose thalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone therapy in patients with refractory multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol. 2007;79:234–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hattori Y, Okamoto S, Shimada N, Kakimoto T, Morita K, Tanigawara Y, et al. Single-institute phase 2 study of thalidomide treatment for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma: prognostic factors and unique toxicity profile. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:1243–50.PubMedCrossRef Hattori Y, Okamoto S, Shimada N, Kakimoto T, Morita K, Tanigawara Y, et al. Single-institute phase 2 study of thalidomide treatment for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma: prognostic factors and unique toxicity profile. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:1243–50.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Matthews SJ, McCoy C. Thalidomide: a review of approved and investigational uses. Clin Therap. 2003;25:356–61.CrossRef Matthews SJ, McCoy C. Thalidomide: a review of approved and investigational uses. Clin Therap. 2003;25:356–61.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rajkumar SV, Rosiñol L, Hussein M, Catalano J, Jedrzejczak W, Lucy L, et al. Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2171–7.PubMedCrossRef Rajkumar SV, Rosiñol L, Hussein M, Catalano J, Jedrzejczak W, Lucy L, et al. Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:2171–7.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Noormohamed FH, Youle MS, Higgs CJ, Kook KA, Hawkins DA, Lant AF, et al. Pharmacokinetics and hemodynamic effects of single oral doses of thalidomide in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects. AIDS Res Human Retroviruses. 1999;15:1047–52.CrossRef Noormohamed FH, Youle MS, Higgs CJ, Kook KA, Hawkins DA, Lant AF, et al. Pharmacokinetics and hemodynamic effects of single oral doses of thalidomide in asymptomatic human immunodeficiency virus-infected subjects. AIDS Res Human Retroviruses. 1999;15:1047–52.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Phase II and pharmacokinetic study of thalidomide in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma
Authors
Hirokazu Murakami
Kazuyuki Shimizu
Morio Sawamura
Kenshi Suzuki
Isamu Sugiura
Hiroshi Kosugi
Chihiro Shimazaki
Masafumi Taniwaki
Masahiro Abe
Toshiyuki Takagi
Publication date
01-06-2009
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Hematology / Issue 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0925-5710
Electronic ISSN: 1865-3774
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12185-009-0314-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2009

International Journal of Hematology 5/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine