Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine 1/2013

01-08-2013 | Brief Report

Characteristics of Breast Cancer Survivors That Predict Partners' Participation in Research

Authors: Kysa M. Christie, Ph.D., Beth E. Meyerowitz, Ph.D., Annette L. Stanton, Ph.D., Julia H. Rowland, Ph.D., Patricia A. Ganz, M.D.

Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Psycho-oncology couples' research frequently includes fewer than 50 % of those eligible.

Purpose

This research examined individual and relationship characteristics associated with recruitment and retention of breast cancer survivors' partners.

Methods

Investigators asked survivors from the Moving Beyond Cancer trial for permission to invite their partners to a parallel, longitudinal study.

Results

Of 384 survivors with male partners, 280 survivors provided consent to contact partners, and 164 partners completed both assessments. Backward stepwise regression indicated that greater family income and support from a partner and helpful other increased the likelihood of survivor consent to contact her partner. Greater family income, better survivor physical and emotional quality of life, and white ethnicity increased the likelihood of partner participation.

Conclusions

Breast cancer patients who are ethnic minorities, have lower socioeconomic status, or have poorer physical and mental quality of life appear less likely to participate in psycho-oncology couples' research, whereas women with supportive partners might be overrepresented.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Manne S, Badr H. Intimacy and relationship processes in couples' psychosocial adaptation to cancer. Cancer. 2008;112:2541-2555.PubMedCrossRef Manne S, Badr H. Intimacy and relationship processes in couples' psychosocial adaptation to cancer. Cancer. 2008;112:2541-2555.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Badr H, Carmack CL, Kashy DA, Cristofanilli M, Revenson TA. Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2010;29:169-180.PubMedCrossRef Badr H, Carmack CL, Kashy DA, Cristofanilli M, Revenson TA. Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2010;29:169-180.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bolks HN, Tuinstra J, Coyne JC. Distress in couples coping with cancer: A meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychol Bull. 2008;134:1-30.PubMedCrossRef Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bolks HN, Tuinstra J, Coyne JC. Distress in couples coping with cancer: A meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychol Bull. 2008;134:1-30.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bolger N, Foster M, Vinokur AD, Ng R. Close relationships and adjustment to a life crisis: The case of breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70:283-294.PubMedCrossRef Bolger N, Foster M, Vinokur AD, Ng R. Close relationships and adjustment to a life crisis: The case of breast cancer. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70:283-294.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sears SR, Stanton AL, Kwan L, et al. Recruitment and retention challenges in breast cancer survivorship research: Results from a multisite, randomized intervention trial in women with early stage breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:1087-1090.PubMed Sears SR, Stanton AL, Kwan L, et al. Recruitment and retention challenges in breast cancer survivorship research: Results from a multisite, randomized intervention trial in women with early stage breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:1087-1090.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Norton TR, Manne SL. Support concordance among couples coping with cancer: Relationship, individual, and situational factors. J Soc Pers Relat. 2007;24:675-692.CrossRef Norton TR, Manne SL. Support concordance among couples coping with cancer: Relationship, individual, and situational factors. J Soc Pers Relat. 2007;24:675-692.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mellon S, Kershaw TS, Northouse LL, Freeman-Gibb L. A family-based model to predict fear of recurrence for cancer survivors and their caregivers. Psycho-Oncology. 2007;16:214-223.PubMedCrossRef Mellon S, Kershaw TS, Northouse LL, Freeman-Gibb L. A family-based model to predict fear of recurrence for cancer survivors and their caregivers. Psycho-Oncology. 2007;16:214-223.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ganz PA, Kwan L, Stanton AL, et al. Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: First results from the Moving Beyond Cancer randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:376-387.PubMedCrossRef Ganz PA, Kwan L, Stanton AL, et al. Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: First results from the Moving Beyond Cancer randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96:376-387.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kraemer L, Stanton AL, Meyerowitz BE, Rowland JH, Ganz PA. A longitudinal examination of couples' coping strategies as predictors of adjustment to breast cancer. J Fam Psychol. 2011;25:963-972.PubMedCrossRef Kraemer L, Stanton AL, Meyerowitz BE, Rowland JH, Ganz PA. A longitudinal examination of couples' coping strategies as predictors of adjustment to breast cancer. J Fam Psychol. 2011;25:963-972.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stanton AL, Ganz PA, Kwan L, et al. Outcomes from the Moving Beyond Cancer psychoeducational, randomized, controlled trial with breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6009-6018.PubMedCrossRef Stanton AL, Ganz PA, Kwan L, et al. Outcomes from the Moving Beyond Cancer psychoeducational, randomized, controlled trial with breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:6009-6018.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Busby DM, Crane DR, Larson JH, Christensen C. A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. J Marital Fam Ther. 1995;21:289-308.CrossRef Busby DM, Crane DR, Larson JH, Christensen C. A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. J Marital Fam Ther. 1995;21:289-308.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.PubMedCrossRef Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063-1070.PubMedCrossRef Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063-1070.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2006. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2006.
16.
go back to reference Fredman SJ, Baucom DH, Gremore TM, et al. Quantifying the recruitment challenges with couple-based interventions for cancer: Applications to early-stage breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2009;18:667-673.PubMedCrossRef Fredman SJ, Baucom DH, Gremore TM, et al. Quantifying the recruitment challenges with couple-based interventions for cancer: Applications to early-stage breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2009;18:667-673.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gross CP, Filardo G, Mayne ST, Krumholz HM. The impact of socioeconomic status and race on trial participation for older women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2005;103:483-491.PubMedCrossRef Gross CP, Filardo G, Mayne ST, Krumholz HM. The impact of socioeconomic status and race on trial participation for older women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2005;103:483-491.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials. JAMA. 2004;291:2720-2726.PubMedCrossRef Murthy VH, Krumholz HM, Gross CP. Participation in cancer clinical trials. JAMA. 2004;291:2720-2726.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yancey AK, Ortega AN, Kumanyika SK. Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:1-26.PubMedCrossRef Yancey AK, Ortega AN, Kumanyika SK. Effective recruitment and retention of minority research participants. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:1-26.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Regan TW, Lambert SD, Girgis A, Kelly B, Kayser K, Turner J. Do couple-based interventions make a difference for couples affected by cancer? A systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:279-292.PubMedCrossRef Regan TW, Lambert SD, Girgis A, Kelly B, Kayser K, Turner J. Do couple-based interventions make a difference for couples affected by cancer? A systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:279-292.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Characteristics of Breast Cancer Survivors That Predict Partners' Participation in Research
Authors
Kysa M. Christie, Ph.D.
Beth E. Meyerowitz, Ph.D.
Annette L. Stanton, Ph.D.
Julia H. Rowland, Ph.D.
Patricia A. Ganz, M.D.
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Electronic ISSN: 1532-4796
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9477-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Annals of Behavioral Medicine 1/2013 Go to the issue