Top

Published in:

01-12-2008 | Original Article

Comparison of Two School-Based Smoking Prevention Programs among South African High School Students: Results of a Randomized Trial

Authors: Ken Resnicow, Ph.D., Sasiragha Priscilla Reddy, Ph.D., Shamagonam James, Ph.D., Riyadh Gabebodeen Omardien, Nilen Sunder Kambaran, Heinrich George Langner, Roger D. Vaughan, Ph.D., Donna Cross, Ed.D., Greg Hamilton, Ph.D., Tracy Nichols, Ph.D.

Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Issue 3/2008

Abstract

Background

Smoking rates are projected to increase substantially in developing countries such as South Africa.

Purpose

The aim of this study was to test the efficacy of two contrasting approaches to school-based smoking prevention in South African youth compared to the standard health education program. One experimental program was based on a skills training/peer resistance model and the other on a harm minimization model.

Method

Thirty-six public schools from two South African provinces, KwaZulu-Natal and the Western Cape, were stratified by socioeconomic status and randomized to one of three groups. Group 1 (comparison) schools (n = 12) received usual tobacco use education. Group 2 schools (n = 12) received a harm minimization curriculum in grades 8 and 9. Group 3 schools (n = 12) received a life skills training curriculum in grades 8 and 9. The primary outcome was past month use of cigarettes based on a self-reported questionnaire.

Result

Five thousand two hundred sixty-six students completed the baseline survey. Of these, 4,684 (89%) completed at least one follow-up assessment. The net change in 30-day smoking from baseline to 2-year follow-up in the control group was 6% compared to 3% in both harm minimization (HM) and life skills training (LST) schools. These differences were not statistically significant. Intervention response was significantly moderated by both gender and race. The HM intervention was more effective for males, whereas the life skills intervention was more effective for females. For black African students, the strongest effect was evident for the HM intervention, whereas the strongest intervention effect for “colored” students was evident for the LST group.

Conclusion

The two experimental curricula both produced similar overall reductions in smoking prevalence that were not significantly different from each other or the control group. However, the impact differed by gender and race, suggesting a need to tailor tobacco and drug use prevention programs. More intensive intervention, in the classroom and beyond, may be needed to further impact smoking behavior.

^ = Design Effect is 1 + ρ (m − 1) where m = average number of subjects per school and ρ is the computed intracluster correlation coefficient.

Centers for Disease Control and P. Cigarette use among high school students—United States, 1991–2005. MMWR–Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2006; 55: 724–726.

White V, Hill D, Siahpush M, Bobevski I. How has the prevalence of cigarette smoking changed among Australian adults? Trends in smoking prevalence between 1980 and 2001. Tob Control. 2003; 12(Suppl 2): ii67–ii74.PubMed

Hill D, White V, Effendi Y. Changes in the use of tobacco among Australian secondary students: Results of the 1999 prevalence study and comparisons with earlier years. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002; 26: 156–163.PubMedCrossRef

Health Canada. Youth smoking in Canada. CTUMS (Canadian Tobacco Use Monitoring Survey), February–December 2000. 2004.

World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2002.

Lando HA, Borrelli B, Klein LC, et al. The landscape in global tobacco control research: A guide to gaining a foothold. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95: 939–945.PubMedCrossRef

Warren CW, Riley L, Asma S, et al. Tobacco use by youth: A surveillance report from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey project. Bull WHO. 2000; 78: 868–876.PubMed

Swart D, Reddy P, Ruiter RA, de Vries H. Cigarette use among male and female grade 8–10 students of different ethnicity in South African schools. Tob Control. 2003; 12: E1.PubMedCrossRef

Reddy P, Resnicow K, Omardien R, Kambaran N. Prevalence and correlates of substance use among high school students in South Africa and the United States. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97: 1859–1864.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Guidelines for school health programs to prevent tobacco use and addiction. J Sch Health. 1994; 64: 353–360.

11.

Glynn TJ. School based smoking prevention trials at the U.S. National Cancer Institute: Results and recommendations. Tobacco and Health 1990 The Global War. Perth, WA; 1990.

12.

Glynn TJ, Anderson DM, Schwarz L. Tobacco-use reduction among high-risk youth: Recommendations of a National Cancer Institute expert advisory panel. Prev Med. 1991; 20: 279–291.PubMedCrossRef

13.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing Tobacco Use: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2000.

14.

de Vries H, Candel M, Engels R, Mercken L. Challenges to the peer influence paradigm: Results for 12–13 year olds from six European countries from the European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach study. Tob Control. 2006; 15: 83–89.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Steptoe A, Wardle J, Cui W, et al. An international comparison of tobacco smoking, beliefs and risk awareness in university students from 23 countries. Addiction. 2002; 97: 1561–1571.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Sly DF, Heald GR, Ray S. The Florida “truth” anti-tobacco media evaluation: Design, first year results, and implications for planning future state media evaluations. Tob Control. 2001; 10: 9–15.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Farrelly MC, Davis KC, Haviland ML, Messeri P, Healton CG. Evidence of a dose–response relationship between “truth” antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95: 425.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Botvin G, Eng A. The efficacy of a multicomponent approach to the prevention of cigarette smoking. Prev Med. 1982; 11: 199–211.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Botvin G, Baker E, Renick N, Filazzola A, Botvin E. A cognitive–behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention. Addict Behav. 1984; 9: 137–147.PubMedCrossRef

20.

Botvin G, Dusenbury L, Baker E, James-Ortiz S, Kerner J. A skills training approach to smoking prevention among Hispanic youth. J Behav Med. 1989; 12: 279–295.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dunsenbury L, Tortu S, Botvin E. Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal congintive–behavioral approach: Results of a three year study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990; 58: 437–446.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Botvin G, Baker E, Dusenbury L, Botvin E, Diaz T. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug use prevention trial in a white middle-class population. JAMA. 1995; 273: 1106–1112.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Botvin G, Epstein J, Schinke S, Diaz T. Predictors of cigarette smoking among inner-city minority youth. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1994; 15: 67–73.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Botvin G, Dusenbury L. Smoking prevention among urban minority youth: Assessing effects on outcome and mediating variables. Health Psychol. 1992; 11: 290–299.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Botvin GJ, Schinke SP, Epstein JA, Diaz T, Botvin EM. Effectiveness of culturally focused and generic skills training approaches to alcohol and drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: Two-year follow-up results. Psychol Addict Behav. 1995; 9: 183–194.CrossRef

26.

Botvin GJ, Schinke SP, Epstein JA, Diaz T. Effectiveness of culturally focused and generic skills training approaches to alcohol and drug abuse prevention among minority youths. Psychol Addict Behav. 1994; 8: 116–127.CrossRef

27.

Botvin GJ, Griffin KW, Diaz T, Miller N, Ifill-Williams M. Smoking initiation and escalation in early adolescent girls: One-year follow-up of a school-based prevention intervention for minority youth. J Am Med Women’s Assoc. 1999; 54: 139–143. 152.

28.

Botvin GJ, Griffin KW, Diaz T, et al. Preventing illicit drug use in adolescents: Long-term follow-up data from a randomized control trial of a school population. Addict Behav. 2000; 25: 769–774.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Botvin GJ. Preventing drug abuse in schools: Social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors. Addict Behav. 2000; 25: 887–897.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Resnicow K, Botvin G. On the effects of school health education programs: Why do they decay? Prev Med. 1993; 22: 484–490.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Wiehe SE, Garrison MM, Christakis DA, Ebel BE, Rivara FP. A systematic review of school-based smoking prevention trials with long-term follow-up. J Adolesc Health. 2005; 36: 162–169.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Skara S, Sussman S. A review of 25 long-term adolescent tobacco and other drug use prevention program evaluations. Prev Med. 2003; 37: 451–474.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Spoth R, Randalla G, Trudeaua L, Shina C, Redmond C. Substance use outcomes 51/2 years past baseline for partnership-based, family-school preventive interventions. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008; 96: 57–68.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Flay B. The Long-term promise of effective school-based smoking prevention programs: Appendix D. In: Bonnie R, Stratton K, Wallace R, eds. Ending the Tobacco Problem: A Blueprint for the Nation. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 2007: 449–477.

35.

Seal N. Preventing tobacco and drug use among Thai high school students through life skills training. Nursing and Health Sciences. 2006; 8: 164–168.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Peterson AV Jr., Kealey KA, Mann SL, Marek PM, Sarason IG. Hutchinson smoking prevention project: Long-term randomized trial in school-based tobacco use prevention—results on smoking. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92: 1979–1991.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Thomas R. School-based programmes for preventing smoking [update in Cochrane Database Syst Rev.;3:CD001293; PMID: 16855966]. 2006:CD001293, 002002.

38.

Bell R, Ellickson P, Harrison E. Do drug prevention effects persist into high school? How project alert did with ninth graders. Prev Med. 1993; 22: 463–483.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Perry C, Kelder S, Murray D, Klepp K. Communitywide smoking prevention: Long-term outcomes of the Minnesota Heart Health Program of the Class of 1989 study. Am J Public Health. 1992; 82: 1210–1216.PubMedCrossRef

40.

Elder J, Wildey M, de Moor C, et al. The long-term prevention of tobacco use among junior high school students: Classroom and telephone interventions. Am J Public Health. 1993; 83: 1239–1244.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Wiehe SE, Garrison MM, Christakis DA, Ebel BE, Rivara FP. A systematic review of school-based smoking prevention trials with long-term follow-up. J Adolesc Health. 2005; 36(3): 162–169.PubMedCrossRef

42.

Hansen W, Graham J. Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: Peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Prev Med. 1991; 20: 414–430.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Donaldson S, Graham J, Piccinin A, Hansen W. Resistance-skills training and onset of alcohol use: Evidence for beneficial and potentially harmful effects in public schools and in private Catholic schools. Health Psychol. 1995; 14: 291–300.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Sussman S, Dent C, Stacy A, et al. Project towards no tobacco use, 1-year behavior outcomes. Am J Public Health. 1993; 83: 1245–1250.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Donaldson SI, Graham JW, Hansen WB. Testing the generalizability of intervening mechanism theories: Understanding the effects of adolescent drug use prevention interventions. J Behav Med. 1994; 17: 195–216.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Donaldson SI, Sussman S, MacKinnon DP, et al. Drug abuse prevention programming: Do we know what content works? Am Behav Sci. 1996; 39: 868–883.CrossRef

47.

Palinkas LA, Atkins CJ, Miller C, Ferreira D. Social skills training for drug prevention in high-risk female adolescents. Prev Med. 1996; 25: 692–701.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Elder J, Sallis J, Woodruff S, Wildey M. Tobacco-refusal skills and tobacco use among high risk adolescents. J Behav Med. 1993; 16: 629–642.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Resnicow K, Smith M, Harrison L, Drucker E. Correlates of occasional tobacco and marijuana use: Are teens harm reducing? Addict Behav. 1999; 24: 251–266.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Hamilton G, Cross D, Resnicow K. Occasional cigarette smokers: Cue for harm reduction smoking education. Addict Res. 2000; 8: 419–437.CrossRef

51.

Des Jarlais D, Friedman S, Ward T. Harm reduction: A public health response to the AIDS epidemic among injecting drug users. Annu Rev Public Health. 1993; 14: 413–450.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Drucker E. Harm reduction: A public health strategy. Curr Issues Public Health. 1995; 1: 64–70.

53.

Duncan DF, Nicholson T, Clifford P, Hawkins W, Petosa R. Harm reduction: An emerging new paradigm for drug education. J Drug Educ. 1994; 24: 281–290.PubMed

54.

Resnicow K, Drucker E. Reducing the harm of a failed drug control policy. Am Psychol. 1999; 54: 842–843.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Borland R, Scollo M. Opportunities for harm minimisation in tobacco control. Drug Alochol Rev. 1999; 18: 345–353.CrossRef

56.

West R. Smoking: Its influence on survival and cause of death. Journal of Royal College of Physicians of London. 1992; 26: 357–36654.

57.

Zang E, Wynder E. Cumulative tar exposure. A new index for estimating lung cancer risk among cigarette smokers. Cancer. 1992; 70: 69–76.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Kondo K, Tsuzuki H, Sasa M, et al. A dose -response relationship between the frequency of p53 mutations and tobacco consumption in lung cancer patients. J Surg Oncol. 1996; 61: 20–26.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Menhiratta S, Wig N, Verma S. Some psychological correlates of long-term heavy cannabis users. Br J Psychiatry. 1978; 132: 482–486.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Torabi M, Bailey W, Majd-Jabbari M. Cigarette smoking as a predictor of alcohol and other drug use by children and adolescents: Evidence of the “gateway drug effect”. J Sch Health. 1993; 63: 302–306.PubMed

61.

Kandel D, Yamaguchi K, Chen K. Stages of progression in drug involvement from adolescence to adulthood: Further evidence for the gateway theory. J Stud Alcohol. 1992; 53: 447–457.PubMed

62.

Kouri E, Pope HG Jr., Yurgelun-Todd D, Gruber S. Attributes of heavy vs. occasional marijuana smokers in a college population. Biol Psychiatry. 1995; 38: 475–481.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Willard J, Schoenborn C. Relationship between cigarette smoking and other unhealthy behaviours among our nation’s youth: United States 1992 No. 264: National Center for Health Statistics, CDC; 1995.

64.

Klonoff H, Clark C. Drug patterns in the chronic marijuana user. Int J Addict. 1976; 11: 71–80.PubMed

65.

Kimlicka TM. A comparison of chronic versus casual marijuana users on personal values and behavioral orientations. Int J Addict. 1978; 13: 1145–1156.PubMed

66.

McWhorter WP, Boyd GM, Mattson ME. Predictors of quitting smoking: The NHANES I follow-up experience. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990; 43: 1399–1405.PubMedCrossRef

67.

Shiffman S. Tobacco “chippers”—individual differences in tobacco dependence. Psychopharmacology. 1989; 97: 539–547.PubMedCrossRef

68.

Owen N, Kent P, Wakefield M, Roberts L. Low-rate smokers. Prev Med. 1995; 24: 80–84.PubMedCrossRef

69.

Wilson D, Wakefield M, Owen N, Roberts L. Characteristics of heavy smokers. Prev Med. 1992; 21: 311–319.PubMedCrossRef

70.

Shedler J, Block J. Adolescent drug use and psychological health. A longitudinal inquiry. Am Psychol. 1990; 45: 612–630.PubMedCrossRef

71.

Hamilton G, Cross D, Resnicow K, Hall M. A school-based harm minimization smoking intervention trial: Outcome results. Addiction. 2005; 100: 689–700.PubMedCrossRef

72.

Hamilton G, Cross D, Resnicow K, Shaw T. Does harm minimisation lead to greater experimentation? Results from a school smoking intervention trial. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007; 26: 605–613.PubMedCrossRef

73.

Reddy S, Panday S, Swart D, et al. Umthenthe Uhlaba Usamila—The South African Youth Risk Behaviour Survey 2002. Capetown, South Africa: South African Medical Research Council; 2003.

74.

Killip S, Mahfoud Z, Pearce K. What is an intracluster correlation coefficient? Crucial concepts for primary care researchers. Annals of Family Medicine. 2004; 2: 204–208.PubMedCrossRef

75.

Crossett LS, Everett SA, Brener ND, Fishman JA, Pechacek TF. Adherence to the CDC guidelines for school health programs to prevent tobacco use and addiction. J Health Educ. 1999; 30: S4–S11.

76.

Dijkstra M, Mesters I, De Vries H, van Breukelen G, Parcel G. Effectiveness of a social influence approach and boosters to smoking prevention. Health Educ Res. 1999; 14: 791–802.PubMedCrossRef

77.

Flay BR. Approaches to substance use prevention utilising school curriculum plus social environment change. Addict Behav. 2000; 25: 861–885.PubMedCrossRef

78.

Lantz PM, Jacobson PD, Warner KE, et al. Investing in youth tobacco control: A review of smoking prevention and control strategies. Tob Control. 2000; 9: 47–63.PubMedCrossRef

79.

Pentz M, Dwyer J, MacKinnon D, et al. A multicommunity trial for primary prevention of adolescent drug abuse. Effects on drug use prevalence. JAMA. 1989; 261: 3259–3266.PubMedCrossRef

80.

Pentz MA, MacKinnon DP, Dwyer JH, et al. Longitudinal effects of the Midwestern Prevention Project on regular and experimental smoking in adolescents. Prev Med. 1989; 18: 304–321.PubMedCrossRef

81.

Wakefield M, Flay B, Nichter M, Giovino G. Role of the media in influencing trajectories of youth smoking. Addiction. 2003; 98(Suppl 1): 79–103.PubMedCrossRef

82.

Skara S, Sussman S. A review of 25 long-term adolescent tobacco and other drug use prevention program evaluations. Prev Med. 2003; 37: 451–474.PubMedCrossRef

83.

Waldron I, Lye D, Brandon A. Gender differences in teenage smoking. Women Health. 1991; 17: 65–90.PubMedCrossRef

84.

Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Lynskey MT. The comorbidities of adolescent problem behaviors: A latent class model. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1994; 22: 339–354.PubMedCrossRef

85.

Fernander AF, Flisher AJ, King G, et al. Gender differences in depression and smoking among youth in Cape Town, South Africa. Ethn Dis. 2006; 16: 41–50.PubMed

86.

Blitstein JL, Robinson LA, Murray DM, Klesges RC, Zbikowski SM. Rapid progression to regular cigarette smoking among nonsmoking adolescents: Interactions with gender and ethnicity. Prev Med. 2003; 36: 455–463.PubMedCrossRef

87.

Guthrie BJ, Young AM, Boyd CJ, Kintner EK. Dealing with daily hassles: Smoking and African-American adolescent girls. J Adolesc Health. 2001; 29: 109–115.PubMedCrossRef

88.

van Roosmalen EH, McDaniel SA. Adolescent smoking intentions: Gender differences in peer context. Adolescence. 1992; 27: 87–105.PubMed

89.

Michell L, Amos A. Girls, pecking order and smoking. Soc Sci Med. 1997; 44: 1861–1869.PubMedCrossRef

90.

Luke D, Allen P, Arian G, et al. Teens’ images of smoking and smokers. Public Health Rep. 2001; 116(Suppl 1): 194–202.PubMedCrossRef

91.

Clayton S. Gender differences in psychosocial determinants of adolescent smoking. J Sch Health. 1991; 61: 115–120.PubMedCrossRef

92.

Botvin G, Baker E, Filazzola A, Botvin E. A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: One-year follow-up. Addict Behav. 1990; 15: 47–63.PubMedCrossRef

93.

Biko S. I Write What I Like. Johannesburg, South Africa: Heinemann; 1978.

94.

Ramose MB. The philosophy of ubuntu and ubuntu as a philosophy. In: Coetzee P, Roux A, eds. The African Philosophy Reader. New York: Routledge; 2003: 230–238.

Title: Comparison of Two School-Based Smoking Prevention Programs among South African High School Students: Results of a Randomized Trial
Authors: Ken Resnicow, Ph.D.
Sasiragha Priscilla Reddy, Ph.D.
Shamagonam James, Ph.D.
Riyadh Gabebodeen Omardien
Nilen Sunder Kambaran
Heinrich George Langner
Roger D. Vaughan, Ph.D.
Donna Cross, Ed.D.
Greg Hamilton, Ph.D.
Tracy Nichols, Ph.D.
Publication date: 01-12-2008
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Electronic ISSN: 1532-4796
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9072-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Comparison of Two School-Based Smoking Prevention Programs among South African High School Students: Results of a Randomized Trial

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Method

Result

Conclusion

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Purpose

Method

Result

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Predicting the Physical Activity Intention–Behavior Profiles of Adopters and Maintainers Using Three Social Cognition Models

Can Psychological Factors Account for a Lack of Nocturnal Blood Pressure Dipping?

Psychological Factors Influencing Self-Assessments of Health: Toward an Understanding of the Mechanisms Underlying How People Rate Their Own Health

Dispositional Optimism and Thoughts of Well-Being Determine Sensitivity to an Experimental Pain Task

Smoking is Associated with Worse Mood on Stressful Days: Results from a National Diary Study

Emergency Department Initiated Treatments for Tobacco (EDITT): A Pilot Study