Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine 1/2008

01-08-2008 | Rapid Communication

Does the Relationship Between Physical Activity and Quality of Life Differ Based on Generic Versus Disease-Targeted Instruments?

Authors: Robert W. Motl, Ph.D., Edward McAuley, Erin M. Snook, Rachael C. Gliottoni

Published in: Annals of Behavioral Medicine | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There has been an increased interest in the study of physical activity and its relationship with quality of life (QOL) and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in chronic disease conditions. The investigations have used either generic or disease-targeted instruments for measuring QOL and HRQL, but have not examined differences in the associations as a function of the types of instruments.

Purpose

The present study examined the associations among physical activity, QOL, and HRQL using generic and disease-targeted instruments in persons with multiple sclerosis (MS).

Methods

Participants were 292 individuals with MS who wore an accelerometer for 7 days and then completed the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ), Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29), Leeds Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Scale (LMSQOL), Short Form-12 Health Survey (SF-12), and Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS).

Results

Accelerometer counts and GLTEQ scores had similarly sized correlations with scores from generic (SF-12) and the disease-specific (MSIS-29) measures of HRQL and generic (SWLS) and the disease-specific (LMSQOL) measures of QOL. Path analysis indicated a similar pattern of directional relationships between accelerometer counts and GLTEQ scores with physical and mental HRQL and, in turn, physical and mental HRQL with QOL using generic and disease-targeted instruments.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that in cross-sectional analysis, physical activity is similarly related with QOL and HRQL using generic and disease-targeted instruments in persons with MS.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psycholo Assess.. 1993; 5: 164–172.CrossRef Pavot W, Diener E. Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psycholo Assess.. 1993; 5: 164–172.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen J, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess.. 1985; 49: 71–75.PubMedCrossRef Diener E, Emmons R, Larsen J, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess.. 1985; 49: 71–75.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ware JF. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute; 1993. Ware JF. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute; 1993.
4.
go back to reference Ware J, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36 item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med Care.. 1992; 36: 473–483.CrossRef Ware J, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36 item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med Care.. 1992; 36: 473–483.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference McAuley E, Konopack JF, Motl RW, et al. Physical activity and quality of life in older adults: Influence of health status and self-efficacy. Ann Behav Med.. 2006; 31: 99–103.PubMedCrossRef McAuley E, Konopack JF, Motl RW, et al. Physical activity and quality of life in older adults: Influence of health status and self-efficacy. Ann Behav Med.. 2006; 31: 99–103.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stewart AL, King AC. Evaluating the efficacy of physical activity for influencing quality-of-life outcomes in older adults. Ann Behav Med.. 1991; 13: 108–116. Stewart AL, King AC. Evaluating the efficacy of physical activity for influencing quality-of-life outcomes in older adults. Ann Behav Med.. 1991; 13: 108–116.
7.
go back to reference Elavsky S, McAuley E, Motl RW, et al. Physical activity enhances long-term quality of life in older adults: efficacy, esteem, and affective influences. Ann Behav Med.. 2005; 30: 138–145.PubMedCrossRef Elavsky S, McAuley E, Motl RW, et al. Physical activity enhances long-term quality of life in older adults: efficacy, esteem, and affective influences. Ann Behav Med.. 2005; 30: 138–145.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hays RD. Generic versus disease-targeted instruments. In: Fayers P, Hays R, eds. Assessing quality of life in clinical trials. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Publishers; 2005: 3–8. Hays RD. Generic versus disease-targeted instruments. In: Fayers P, Hays R, eds. Assessing quality of life in clinical trials. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Publishers; 2005: 3–8.
9.
go back to reference Motl RW, Gosney JL. Effect of exercise training on quality of life in multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis. Mult Scler.. 2008; 14: 129–135.PubMedCrossRef Motl RW, Gosney JL. Effect of exercise training on quality of life in multiple sclerosis: A meta-analysis. Mult Scler.. 2008; 14: 129–135.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci.. 1985; 10: 141–146.PubMed Godin G, Shephard RJ. A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci.. 1985; 10: 141–146.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Gosney JL, Scott JA, Snook EM, Motl RW. Physical activity and multiple sclerosis: Validity of self-report and objective measures. Fam Commun Health.. 2007; 30: 144–150. Gosney JL, Scott JA, Snook EM, Motl RW. Physical activity and multiple sclerosis: Validity of self-report and objective measures. Fam Commun Health.. 2007; 30: 144–150.
12.
go back to reference Motl RW, McAuley E, Snook EM, Scott JA. Validity of physical activity measures in ambulatory individuals with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil.. 2006; 28: 1151–1156.PubMedCrossRef Motl RW, McAuley E, Snook EM, Scott JA. Validity of physical activity measures in ambulatory individuals with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil.. 2006; 28: 1151–1156.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Motl RW, Zhu W, Park Y, et al. Reliability of scores from physical activity monitors in adults with multiple sclerosis. Adapt Phys Activ Q.. 2007; 24: 245–253.PubMed Motl RW, Zhu W, Park Y, et al. Reliability of scores from physical activity monitors in adults with multiple sclerosis. Adapt Phys Activ Q.. 2007; 24: 245–253.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Mâsse LC, Fuemmeler BF, Anderson CB, et al. Accelerometer data reduction: A comparison of four reduction algorithms on selected outcome variables. Med Sci Sports Exerc.. 2005; 11: S544–S554.CrossRef Mâsse LC, Fuemmeler BF, Anderson CB, et al. Accelerometer data reduction: A comparison of four reduction algorithms on selected outcome variables. Med Sci Sports Exerc.. 2005; 11: S544–S554.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ford HL, Gerry E, Tennant A, et al. Developing a disease-specific quality of life measure for people with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil.. 2001; 15: 247–258.PubMedCrossRef Ford HL, Gerry E, Tennant A, et al. Developing a disease-specific quality of life measure for people with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil.. 2001; 15: 247–258.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hobart J, Lamping D, Fitzpatrick R, et al. The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): A new patient-based outcome measure. Brain.. 2001; 124: 962–973.PubMedCrossRef Hobart J, Lamping D, Fitzpatrick R, et al. The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): A new patient-based outcome measure. Brain.. 2001; 124: 962–973.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Riazi A, Hobart JC, Lamping DL, et al. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): Reliability and validity in hospital based samples. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.. 2002; 73: 701–704.PubMedCrossRef Riazi A, Hobart JC, Lamping DL, et al. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): Reliability and validity in hospital based samples. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.. 2002; 73: 701–704.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care.. 1996; 34: 220–233.PubMedCrossRef Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care.. 1996; 34: 220–233.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nortvedt MW, Riise T, Myhr K-M, Nyland HI. Performance of the SF-36, SF-12, and RAND-36 summary scales in a multiple sclerosis population. Med Care.. 2000; 38: 1022–1028.PubMedCrossRef Nortvedt MW, Riise T, Myhr K-M, Nyland HI. Performance of the SF-36, SF-12, and RAND-36 summary scales in a multiple sclerosis population. Med Care.. 2000; 38: 1022–1028.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus. Los Angeles: Author; 1998. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus. Los Angeles: Author; 1998.
21.
go back to reference Enders CK, Bandalos DL. The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Struct Equat Model.. 2001; 8: 430–457.CrossRef Enders CK, Bandalos DL. The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Struct Equat Model.. 2001; 8: 430–457.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equat Model. 1999; 6: 1–55.CrossRef Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equat Model. 1999; 6: 1–55.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Multiple sclerosis information sourcebook. New York, NY: Information Resource Center and Library of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society; 2005. National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Multiple sclerosis information sourcebook. New York, NY: Information Resource Center and Library of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society; 2005.
Metadata
Title
Does the Relationship Between Physical Activity and Quality of Life Differ Based on Generic Versus Disease-Targeted Instruments?
Authors
Robert W. Motl, Ph.D.
Edward McAuley
Erin M. Snook
Rachael C. Gliottoni
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Annals of Behavioral Medicine / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 0883-6612
Electronic ISSN: 1532-4796
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9049-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Annals of Behavioral Medicine 1/2008 Go to the issue