Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 9/2013

01-11-2013 | Original Article

Evaluation of noise equivalent count parameters as indicators of adult whole-body FDG-PET image quality

Authors: Garry M. McDermott, Fahmid U. Chowdhury, Andrew F. Scarsbrook

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 9/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess variation of qualitative and quantitative PET/CT image quality parameters with acquisition time, injection activity and body mass for a representative group of adults undergoing whole-body PET/CT imaging.

Methods

PET scan data from sixty patients were reconstructed with a scan time of 1, 2 and 3 min/bed position. These images were visually scored and three quantitative parameters were calculated: noise equivalent counts per axial length (NECpatient), noise equivalent count density (NECdensity) and liver signal to noise ratio (liver SNR). The ability of the three quantitative parameters to discriminate qualitative image quality was assessed using ROC analysis.

Results

The quantitative parameters were shown to discriminate images of good/excellent quality from those of poorer image quality with a high degree of accuracy (ROC area >0.9); further, NECpatient had significantly higher discrimination than either NECdensity or liver SNR (ROC area = 0.97).

Conclusions

NECpatient, NECdensity and liver SNR all have high discrimination for qualitatively assessed PET image quality. NECpatient in particular is an effective objective indicator of patient image quality, which will help to assess and standardise scan protocols for purposes such as multi-centre research trials.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:11S–20S.CrossRefPubMed Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:11S–20S.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Buckler AJ, Boellaard R. Standardization of quantitative imaging: the time is right, and 18F-FDG PET/CT is a good place to start. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:171–2.CrossRefPubMed Buckler AJ, Boellaard R. Standardization of quantitative imaging: the time is right, and 18F-FDG PET/CT is a good place to start. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:171–2.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau MJ, Brown ML, Royal HD, Siegel BA, et al. Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:885–95.PubMed Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau MJ, Brown ML, Royal HD, Siegel BA, et al. Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:885–95.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber W, Mottaghy FM, Lonsdale MN, Stroobants SG, et al. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:181–200.CrossRefPubMed Boellaard R, O’Doherty MJ, Weber W, Mottaghy FM, Lonsdale MN, Stroobants SG, et al. FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:181–200.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fukukita H, Senda M, Terauchi T, Suzuki K, Daisaki H, Matsumoto K, et al. Japanese guideline for the oncology FDG-PET/CT data acquisition protocol: synopsis of Version 1.0. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24:325–34.CrossRefPubMed Fukukita H, Senda M, Terauchi T, Suzuki K, Daisaki H, Matsumoto K, et al. Japanese guideline for the oncology FDG-PET/CT data acquisition protocol: synopsis of Version 1.0. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24:325–34.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Brown C, Dempsey MF, Gillen G, Elliot AT. Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET image quality versus acquisition time. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31:254–9.CrossRefPubMed Brown C, Dempsey MF, Gillen G, Elliot AT. Investigation of 18F-FDG 3D mode PET image quality versus acquisition time. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31:254–9.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Masuda Y, Kondo C, Matsuo Y, Uetani M, Kusakabe K. Comparison of imaging protocols 18F-FDG PET/CT in overweight patients: optimizing scan duration versus administered dose. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:844–8.CrossRefPubMed Masuda Y, Kondo C, Matsuo Y, Uetani M, Kusakabe K. Comparison of imaging protocols 18F-FDG PET/CT in overweight patients: optimizing scan duration versus administered dose. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:844–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mizuta T, Senda M, Okamura T, Kitamura K, Inaoka Y, Takahashi M, et al. NEC density and Liver ROI S/N ratio for image quality control of whole body FDG-PET scans: comparison with visual assessment. Mol Imaging Biol. 2009;11:480–6.CrossRefPubMed Mizuta T, Senda M, Okamura T, Kitamura K, Inaoka Y, Takahashi M, et al. NEC density and Liver ROI S/N ratio for image quality control of whole body FDG-PET scans: comparison with visual assessment. Mol Imaging Biol. 2009;11:480–6.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Watson CC, Casey ME, Bendiem B, Carney JP, Townsend DW, Eberl S, et al. Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modelling the count rate response functions specific to individual patient scans. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1825–34.PubMed Watson CC, Casey ME, Bendiem B, Carney JP, Townsend DW, Eberl S, et al. Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modelling the count rate response functions specific to individual patient scans. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1825–34.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Accorsi R, Karp JS, Surti S. Improved dose regimen in pediatric PET. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:293–300.CrossRefPubMed Accorsi R, Karp JS, Surti S. Improved dose regimen in pediatric PET. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:293–300.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Chang T, Chang G, Kohlmeyer S, Clark JW, Rohren E, Mawlawi OR. Effects of injection dose, BMI and scanner type on NECR and image noise in PET imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:5275–85.CrossRefPubMed Chang T, Chang G, Kohlmeyer S, Clark JW, Rohren E, Mawlawi OR. Effects of injection dose, BMI and scanner type on NECR and image noise in PET imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56:5275–85.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chang T, Chang G, Clark JW, Diab RH, Rohren E, Mawlawi OR. Reliability of predicting image signal-to-noise ratio using noise equivalent count rate in PET imaging. Med Phys. 2012;39:5891–900.CrossRefPubMed Chang T, Chang G, Clark JW, Diab RH, Rohren E, Mawlawi OR. Reliability of predicting image signal-to-noise ratio using noise equivalent count rate in PET imaging. Med Phys. 2012;39:5891–900.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Perkins A, Stearns C, Chapman J, Kolthammer J, Williams JJ, Casey M. NEMA Standards Publication NU 2-2007: Performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. Rosslyn USA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA);2007. Perkins A, Stearns C, Chapman J, Kolthammer J, Williams JJ, Casey M. NEMA Standards Publication NU 2-2007: Performance measurements of positron emission tomographs. Rosslyn USA: National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA);2007.
14.
go back to reference Lois C, Jakoby BW, Long MJ, Hubner KF, Barker DW, Casey ME, et al. An assessment of the impact of incorporating time-of-flight information into clinical PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:237–45.CrossRefPubMed Lois C, Jakoby BW, Long MJ, Hubner KF, Barker DW, Casey ME, et al. An assessment of the impact of incorporating time-of-flight information into clinical PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med. 2010;51:237–45.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kamimura K, Nagamachi S, Wakamatsu H, Higashi R, Ogita M, Ueno S, et al. Associations between liver (18)F fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose accumulation and various clinical parameters in a Japanese population: influence of the metabolic syndrome. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24:157–61.CrossRefPubMed Kamimura K, Nagamachi S, Wakamatsu H, Higashi R, Ogita M, Ueno S, et al. Associations between liver (18)F fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose accumulation and various clinical parameters in a Japanese population: influence of the metabolic syndrome. Ann Nucl Med. 2010;24:157–61.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Bettinardi V, Presotto L, Rapisarda E, Picchio M, Gianolli L, Gilardi MC. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET/CT Discovery 690. Med Phys. 2011;38:5394–411.CrossRefPubMed Bettinardi V, Presotto L, Rapisarda E, Picchio M, Gianolli L, Gilardi MC. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET/CT Discovery 690. Med Phys. 2011;38:5394–411.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of noise equivalent count parameters as indicators of adult whole-body FDG-PET image quality
Authors
Garry M. McDermott
Fahmid U. Chowdhury
Andrew F. Scarsbrook
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 9/2013
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-013-0760-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2013

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 9/2013 Go to the issue