Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 7/2013

01-08-2013 | Original Article

Estimation of the total effective dose from low-dose CT scans and radiopharmaceutical administrations delivered to patients undergoing SPECT/CT explorations

Authors: Carlos Montes, Pilar Tamayo, Jorge Hernandez, Felipe Gomez-Caminero, Sofia García, Carlos Martín, Angela Rosero

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 7/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Hybrid imaging, such as SPECT/CT, is used in routine clinical practice, allowing coregistered images of the functional and structural information provided by the two imaging modalities. However, this multimodality imaging may mean that patients are exposed to a higher radiation dose than those receiving SPECT alone.

Objectives

The study aimed to determine the radiation exposure of patients who had undergone SPECT/CT examinations and to relate this to the Background Equivalent Radiation Time (BERT).

Methods

145 SPECT/CT studies were used to estimate the total effective dose to patients due to both radiopharmaceutical administrations and low-dose CT scans. The CT contribution was estimated by the Dose-Length Product method. Specific conversion coefficients were calculated for SPECT explorations.

Results

The radiation dose from low-dose CTs ranged between 0.6 mSv for head and neck CT and 2.6 mSv for whole body CT scan, representing a maximum of 1 year of background radiation exposure. These values represent a decrease of 80–85 % with respect to the radiation dose from diagnostic CT. The radiation exposure from radiopharmaceutical administration varied from 2.1 mSv for stress myocardial perfusion SPECT to 26 mSv for gallium SPECT in patients with lymphoma. The BERT ranged from 1 to 11 years.

Conclusions

The contribution of low-dose CT scans to the total radiation dose to patients undergoing SPECT/CT examinations is relatively low compared with the effective dose from radiopharmaceutical administration. When a CT scan is only acquired for anatomical localization and attenuation correction, low-dose CT scan is justified on the basis of its lower dose.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR. Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(Suppl 1):78S–88S.PubMed Czernin J, Allen-Auerbach M, Schelbert HR. Improvements in cancer staging with PET/CT: literature-based evidence as of September 2006. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(Suppl 1):78S–88S.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC, Hany TF. Integrated PET/CT: current applications and future directions. Radiology. 2006;238:405–22.CrossRef Von Schulthess GK, Steinert HC, Hany TF. Integrated PET/CT: current applications and future directions. Radiology. 2006;238:405–22.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Núñez R, Erwin WD, Wendt RE 3rd, Stachowiak A, Mar M, Stevens D, et al. Acquisition parameters for oncologic imaging with a new SPECT/multislice CT scanner. Mol Imaging Biol. 2010;12:110–38.PubMedCrossRef Núñez R, Erwin WD, Wendt RE 3rd, Stachowiak A, Mar M, Stevens D, et al. Acquisition parameters for oncologic imaging with a new SPECT/multislice CT scanner. Mol Imaging Biol. 2010;12:110–38.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chen J, Caputlu-Wilson SF, Shi H, Galt JR, Faber TL, Garcia EV. Automated quality control of emission–transmission misalignment for attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT-CT systems. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:43–9.PubMedCrossRef Chen J, Caputlu-Wilson SF, Shi H, Galt JR, Faber TL, Garcia EV. Automated quality control of emission–transmission misalignment for attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT-CT systems. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:43–9.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission On Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission On Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP. 2007;37:1–332.
6.
go back to reference International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 26. Ann ICRP 1(3). Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1971. International Commission on Radiological Protection. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 26. Ann ICRP 1(3). Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1971.
7.
go back to reference 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 1991;21:1–201. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 1991;21:1–201.
8.
go back to reference ICRP Publication 106: Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: Addendum 3 to ICRP Publication 53. Ann ICRP. 2008;38:1–197. ICRP Publication 106: Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals: Addendum 3 to ICRP Publication 53. Ann ICRP. 2008;38:1–197.
9.
go back to reference ICRP Publication 80: Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals, Addendum to ICRP Publication 53. Ann ICRP. 1998;28:1–126. ICRP Publication 80: Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals, Addendum to ICRP Publication 53. Ann ICRP. 1998;28:1–126.
10.
go back to reference ICRP Publication 53: Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Ann ICRP. 1987;18:1–377. ICRP Publication 53: Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals. Ann ICRP. 1987;18:1–377.
11.
go back to reference Pujades MC, Martí JF, Olivas C, Bello P, Mateo A. Application of ICRP-103 in the calculation of effective dose associated to nuclear medicine tests. Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2010;29:114–21.CrossRef Pujades MC, Martí JF, Olivas C, Bello P, Mateo A. Application of ICRP-103 in the calculation of effective dose associated to nuclear medicine tests. Rev Esp Med Nucl. 2010;29:114–21.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jessen KA, Panzer W, Shrimpton PC. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 2000: EUR 16262. Jessen KA, Panzer W, Shrimpton PC. European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 2000: EUR 16262.
13.
go back to reference Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Juriket AG. European guidelines for multislice computed tomography. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 2004: FIGM-CT2000-20078-CT-TIP. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Juriket AG. European guidelines for multislice computed tomography. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 2004: FIGM-CT2000-20078-CT-TIP.
14.
go back to reference Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting international commission on radiological protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:881–9.PubMedCrossRef Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting international commission on radiological protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:881–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Deak P, Smal Y, Kalender WA. Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology. 2010;257:158–66.PubMedCrossRef Deak P, Smal Y, Kalender WA. Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology. 2010;257:158–66.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation UNSCEAR 2008 report vol. I sources of ionizing radiation. Vienna: United Nations; 2008. United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation UNSCEAR 2008 report vol. I sources of ionizing radiation. Vienna: United Nations; 2008.
17.
go back to reference Gregory KJ, Bibbo G, Pattison JE. On the uncertainties in effective dose estimates of adult CT head scans. Med Phys. 2008;35:3501–10.PubMedCrossRef Gregory KJ, Bibbo G, Pattison JE. On the uncertainties in effective dose estimates of adult CT head scans. Med Phys. 2008;35:3501–10.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sawyer LJ, Starritt HC, Hiscock SC, Evans MJ. Effective doses to patients from CT acquisitions on the GE Infinia Hawkeye: a comparison of calculation methods. Nucl Med Commun. 2008;29:144–9.PubMedCrossRef Sawyer LJ, Starritt HC, Hiscock SC, Evans MJ. Effective doses to patients from CT acquisitions on the GE Infinia Hawkeye: a comparison of calculation methods. Nucl Med Commun. 2008;29:144–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nagel HD. Radiation exposure in computed tomography. Fundamentals, influencing parameters, dose assessment, optimization, scanner data, terminology. 4th ed. Hamburg: CTB Publications; 2002. Nagel HD. Radiation exposure in computed tomography. Fundamentals, influencing parameters, dose assessment, optimization, scanner data, terminology. 4th ed. Hamburg: CTB Publications; 2002.
20.
go back to reference Kalender WA, Schmidt B, Zankl M, Schmidt M. A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:555–62.PubMedCrossRef Kalender WA, Schmidt B, Zankl M, Schmidt M. A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:555–62.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Myronakis M, Perisinakis K, Tzedakis A, Gourtsoyianni S, Damilakis J. Evaluation of a patient-specific Monte Carlo software for CT dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2009;133:248–55.PubMedCrossRef Myronakis M, Perisinakis K, Tzedakis A, Gourtsoyianni S, Damilakis J. Evaluation of a patient-specific Monte Carlo software for CT dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2009;133:248–55.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Brix G, Lechel U, Glatting G, Ziegler SI, Münzing W, Müller SP, et al. Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:608–13.PubMed Brix G, Lechel U, Glatting G, Ziegler SI, Münzing W, Müller SP, et al. Radiation exposure of patients undergoing whole-body dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:608–13.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248:254–63.PubMedCrossRef Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology. 2008;248:254–63.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Larkin AM, Serulle Y, Wagner S, Noz ME. Friedman K quantifying the increase in radiation exposure associated with SPECT/CT compared to SPECT alone for routine nuclear medicine examinations. Int J Mol Imaging. 2011;2011:897202.PubMed Larkin AM, Serulle Y, Wagner S, Noz ME. Friedman K quantifying the increase in radiation exposure associated with SPECT/CT compared to SPECT alone for routine nuclear medicine examinations. Int J Mol Imaging. 2011;2011:897202.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Khamwan K, Krisanachinda A, Pasawang P. The determination of patient dose from (18)F-FDG PET/CT examination. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010;41:50–5.CrossRef Khamwan K, Krisanachinda A, Pasawang P. The determination of patient dose from (18)F-FDG PET/CT examination. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010;41:50–5.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee. Notes for guidance on the clinical administration of radiopharmaceuticals and use of sealed radioactive sources. London: Health Protection Agency; 2006. Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee. Notes for guidance on the clinical administration of radiopharmaceuticals and use of sealed radioactive sources. London: Health Protection Agency; 2006.
27.
go back to reference Venero CV, Heller GV, Bateman TM, McGhie AI, Ahlberg AW, Katten D, et al. A multicenter evaluation of a new post-processing method with depth-dependent collimator resolution applied to full-time and half-time acquisitions without and with simultaneously acquired attenuation correction. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:714–25.PubMedCrossRef Venero CV, Heller GV, Bateman TM, McGhie AI, Ahlberg AW, Katten D, et al. A multicenter evaluation of a new post-processing method with depth-dependent collimator resolution applied to full-time and half-time acquisitions without and with simultaneously acquired attenuation correction. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:714–25.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kumar S, Pandey AK, Sharma P, Malhotra A, Kumar R. Optimization of the CT acquisition protocol to reduce patient dose without compromising the diagnostic quality for PET-CT: a phantom study. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33:164–70.PubMedCrossRef Kumar S, Pandey AK, Sharma P, Malhotra A, Kumar R. Optimization of the CT acquisition protocol to reduce patient dose without compromising the diagnostic quality for PET-CT: a phantom study. Nucl Med Commun. 2012;33:164–70.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Xia T, Alessio AM, De Man B, Manjeshwar R, Asma E, Kinahan PE. Ultra-low dose CT attenuation correction for PET/CT. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:309–28.PubMedCrossRef Xia T, Alessio AM, De Man B, Manjeshwar R, Asma E, Kinahan PE. Ultra-low dose CT attenuation correction for PET/CT. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57:309–28.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Martin CJ. Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol. 2007;80:639–47.PubMedCrossRef Martin CJ. Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol. 2007;80:639–47.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Estimation of the total effective dose from low-dose CT scans and radiopharmaceutical administrations delivered to patients undergoing SPECT/CT explorations
Authors
Carlos Montes
Pilar Tamayo
Jorge Hernandez
Felipe Gomez-Caminero
Sofia García
Carlos Martín
Angela Rosero
Publication date
01-08-2013
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-013-0724-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2013

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 7/2013 Go to the issue