Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 10/2011

01-12-2011 | Original article

Additional value of FDG-PET to contrast enhanced-computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer: a Japanese multicenter clinical study

Authors: Kazuo Kubota, Koji Murakami, Tomio Inoue, Harumi Itoh, Tsuneo Saga, Susumu Shiomi, Jun Hatazawa

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 10/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

This study was a controlled multicenter clinical study to verify the diagnostic effects of additional FDG-PET to contrast-enhanced CT for mediastinal lymph node metastasis in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

NSCLC patients with enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes (short diameter, 7–20 mm), confirmed using contrast-enhanced CT, were examined using FDG-PET to detect metastases prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was the accuracy for concomitantly used CT and FDG-PET showing the additional effects of FDG, compared with CT alone. The secondary endpoints were the clinical impact of FDG-PET on therapeutic decisions and adverse reaction from FDG administration. The images were interpreted by investigators at each institution. Moreover, blinded readings were performed by an image interpretation committee independent of the institutions. The gold standard was the pathological diagnosis determined by surgery or biopsy after PET, and patients in whom a pathological diagnosis was not obtained were excluded from the analysis.

Results

Among 99 subjects, the results for 81 subjects eligible for analysis showed that the accuracy improved from 69.1% (56/81) for CT alone to 75.3% (61/81) for CT + PET (p = 0.404). These findings contributed to treatment decisions in 63.0% (51/81) of the cases, mainly with regard to the selection of the operative procedure. The results of the image interpretation committee showed that the accuracy improved from 64.2% (52/81) (95% CI 52.8–74.6) for CT to 75.3% (61/81) (95% CI 64.5–84.2) for CT + PET. The accuracy for 106 mediastinal lymph nodes improved significantly from 62.3% (66/106) (95% CI 52.3–71.5) for CT to 79.2% (84/106) (95% CI 70.3–86.5) for CT + PET (p < 0.05). We found that no serious adverse drug reactions appeared in any of the 99 patients who received FDG, except for transient mild outliers in the laboratory data for two patients.

Conclusions

The addition of FDG-PET to contrast-enhanced CT imaging for the staging of NSCLC improved the diagnostic accuracy for mediastinal lymph node metastasis. FDG-PET improved the precision of the staging of NSCLC and contributed to the surgical decisions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McLoud TC, Bourgouin PM, Greenberg RW, Kosiuk JP, Templeton PA, Shepard JA, et al. Bronchogenic carcinoma: analysis of staging in the mediastinum with CT by correlative lymph node mapping and sampling. Radiology. 1992;182:319–23.PubMed McLoud TC, Bourgouin PM, Greenberg RW, Kosiuk JP, Templeton PA, Shepard JA, et al. Bronchogenic carcinoma: analysis of staging in the mediastinum with CT by correlative lymph node mapping and sampling. Radiology. 1992;182:319–23.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Dales RE, Stark RM, Raman S. Computed tomography to stage lung cancer. Approaching a controversy using meta-analysis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141:1096–101.PubMed Dales RE, Stark RM, Raman S. Computed tomography to stage lung cancer. Approaching a controversy using meta-analysis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141:1096–101.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Bogot NR, Shaham D. Semi-invasive and invasive procedures for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. II. Bronchoscopic and surgical procedures. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38:535–44.PubMedCrossRef Bogot NR, Shaham D. Semi-invasive and invasive procedures for the diagnosis and staging of lung cancer. II. Bronchoscopic and surgical procedures. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000;38:535–44.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference The American Thoracic Society and The European Respiratory Society. Pretreatment evaluation of non-small-cell lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156:320–32. The American Thoracic Society and The European Respiratory Society. Pretreatment evaluation of non-small-cell lung cancer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;156:320–32.
5.
go back to reference Chin R Jr, Ward R, Keyes JW, Choplin RH, Reed JC, Wallenhaupt S, et al. Mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with positron emission tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:2090–6.PubMed Chin R Jr, Ward R, Keyes JW, Choplin RH, Reed JC, Wallenhaupt S, et al. Mediastinal staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with positron emission tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;152:2090–6.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Patz EF Jr, Lowe VJ, Goodman PC, Herndon J. Thoracic nodal staging with PET imaging with 18FDG in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma. Chest. 1995;108:1617–21.PubMedCrossRef Patz EF Jr, Lowe VJ, Goodman PC, Herndon J. Thoracic nodal staging with PET imaging with 18FDG in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma. Chest. 1995;108:1617–21.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Scott WJ, Gobar LS, Terry JD, Dewan NA, Sunderland JJ. Mediastinal lymph node staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective comparison of computed tomography and positron emission tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;111:642–8.PubMedCrossRef Scott WJ, Gobar LS, Terry JD, Dewan NA, Sunderland JJ. Mediastinal lymph node staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective comparison of computed tomography and positron emission tomography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;111:642–8.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Steinert HC, Hauser M, Allemann F, Engel H, Berthold T, von Schulthess GK, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: nodal staging with FDG PET versus CT with correlative lymph node mapping and sampling. Radiology. 1997;202:441–6.PubMed Steinert HC, Hauser M, Allemann F, Engel H, Berthold T, von Schulthess GK, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: nodal staging with FDG PET versus CT with correlative lymph node mapping and sampling. Radiology. 1997;202:441–6.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Vansteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG, De Leyn PR, Dupont PJ, Verschakelen JA, Nackaerts KL, et al. Mediastinal lymph node staging with FDG-PET scan in patients with potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective analysis of 50 cases. Leuven Lung Cancer Group. Chest. 1997;112:1480–6.PubMedCrossRef Vansteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG, De Leyn PR, Dupont PJ, Verschakelen JA, Nackaerts KL, et al. Mediastinal lymph node staging with FDG-PET scan in patients with potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective analysis of 50 cases. Leuven Lung Cancer Group. Chest. 1997;112:1480–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Guhlmann A, Storck M, Kotzerke J, Moog F, Sunder-Plassmann L, Reske SN. Lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer: evaluation by [18F]FDG positron emission tomography (PET). Thorax. 1997;52:438–41.PubMedCrossRef Guhlmann A, Storck M, Kotzerke J, Moog F, Sunder-Plassmann L, Reske SN. Lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer: evaluation by [18F]FDG positron emission tomography (PET). Thorax. 1997;52:438–41.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Albes JM, Lietzenmayer R, Schott U, Schülen E, Wehrmann M, Ziemer G. Improvement of non-small-cell lung cancer staging by means of positron emission tomography. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;47:42–7.PubMedCrossRef Albes JM, Lietzenmayer R, Schott U, Schülen E, Wehrmann M, Ziemer G. Improvement of non-small-cell lung cancer staging by means of positron emission tomography. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;47:42–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gupta NC, Graeber GM, Rogers JS 2nd, Bishop HA. Comparative efficacy of positron emission tomography with FDG and computed tomographic scanning in preoperative staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Surg. 1999;229:286–91.PubMedCrossRef Gupta NC, Graeber GM, Rogers JS 2nd, Bishop HA. Comparative efficacy of positron emission tomography with FDG and computed tomographic scanning in preoperative staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Surg. 1999;229:286–91.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Weng E, Tran L, Rege S, Safa A, Sadeghi A, Juillard G, et al. Accuracy and clinical impact of mediastinal lymph node staging with FDG-PET imaging in potentially resectable lung cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2000;23:47–52.PubMedCrossRef Weng E, Tran L, Rege S, Safa A, Sadeghi A, Juillard G, et al. Accuracy and clinical impact of mediastinal lymph node staging with FDG-PET imaging in potentially resectable lung cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2000;23:47–52.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Standard of compounds labeled with positron nuclides approved as established techniques for medical use (by Subcommittee on Medical Application of Cyclotron-Produced Radionuclides), 1999 revision. Radioisotopes. 1999;48(12):i-xxvi Standard of compounds labeled with positron nuclides approved as established techniques for medical use (by Subcommittee on Medical Application of Cyclotron-Produced Radionuclides), 1999 revision. Radioisotopes. 1999;48(12):i-xxvi
15.
go back to reference Pieterman RM, van Putten JW, Meuzelaar JJ, Mooyaart EL, Vaalburg W, Koëter GH, et al. Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with positron-emission tomography. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:254–61.PubMedCrossRef Pieterman RM, van Putten JW, Meuzelaar JJ, Mooyaart EL, Vaalburg W, Koëter GH, et al. Preoperative staging of non-small-cell lung cancer with positron-emission tomography. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:254–61.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gould MK, Kuschner WG, Rydzak CE, Maclean CC, Demas AN, Shigemitsu H, et al. Test performance of positron emission tomography and computed tomography for mediastinal staging in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:879–92.PubMed Gould MK, Kuschner WG, Rydzak CE, Maclean CC, Demas AN, Shigemitsu H, et al. Test performance of positron emission tomography and computed tomography for mediastinal staging in patients with non–small-cell lung cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139:879–92.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Alongi F, Ragusa P, Montemaggi P, Bona CM. Combining independent studies of diagnostic fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography and computed tomography in mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small cell lung cancer. Tumori. 2006;92:327–33.PubMed Alongi F, Ragusa P, Montemaggi P, Bona CM. Combining independent studies of diagnostic fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography and computed tomography in mediastinal lymph node staging for non-small cell lung cancer. Tumori. 2006;92:327–33.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Yang W, Fu Z, Yu J, Yuan S, Zhang B, Li D, et al. Value of PET/CT versus enhanced CT for locoregional lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2008;61:35–43.PubMedCrossRef Yang W, Fu Z, Yu J, Yuan S, Zhang B, Li D, et al. Value of PET/CT versus enhanced CT for locoregional lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2008;61:35–43.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tasci E, Tezel C, Orki A, Akin O, Falay O, Kutlu CA. The role of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the assessment of nodal spread in cases with non-small cell lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:200–3.PubMedCrossRef Tasci E, Tezel C, Orki A, Akin O, Falay O, Kutlu CA. The role of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the assessment of nodal spread in cases with non-small cell lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:200–3.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference van Baardwijk A, Bosmans G, Boersma L, Buijsen J, Wanders S, Hochstenbag M, et al. PET–CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:771–8.PubMedCrossRef van Baardwijk A, Bosmans G, Boersma L, Buijsen J, Wanders S, Hochstenbag M, et al. PET–CT-based auto-contouring in non-small-cell lung cancer correlates with pathology and reduces interobserver variability in the delineation of the primary tumor and involved nodal volumes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:771–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hofman MS, Smeeton NC, Rankin SC, Nunan T, O’Doherty MJ. Observer variation in FDG PET–CT for staging of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:194–9.PubMedCrossRef Hofman MS, Smeeton NC, Rankin SC, Nunan T, O’Doherty MJ. Observer variation in FDG PET–CT for staging of non-small-cell lung carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:194–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference FDA guidance for industry developing medical imaging drugs and biological products. Part 3: design, analysis, and interpretation of clinical studies. 2004. FDA guidance for industry developing medical imaging drugs and biological products. Part 3: design, analysis, and interpretation of clinical studies. 2004.
23.
go back to reference Guidelines on clinical evaluation of radioactive diagnostics. Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2005. Guidelines on clinical evaluation of radioactive diagnostics. Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2005.
24.
go back to reference Reed CE, Harpole DH, Posther KE, Woolson SL, Downey RJ, Meyers BF, et al. Results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0050 trial: the utility of positron emission tomography in staging potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:1943–51.PubMedCrossRef Reed CE, Harpole DH, Posther KE, Woolson SL, Downey RJ, Meyers BF, et al. Results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0050 trial: the utility of positron emission tomography in staging potentially operable non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:1943–51.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Herder GJ, Kramer H, Hoekstra OS, Smit EF, Pruim J, van Tinteren H, et al. Traditional versus up-front [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: a Dutch cooperative randomized study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;20:1800–6.CrossRef Herder GJ, Kramer H, Hoekstra OS, Smit EF, Pruim J, van Tinteren H, et al. Traditional versus up-front [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography staging of non-small-cell lung cancer: a Dutch cooperative randomized study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;20:1800–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bernasconi M, Chhajed PN, Gambazzi F, Bubendorf L, Rasch H, Kneifel S, et al. Combined transbronchial needle aspiration and positron emission tomography for mediastinal staging of NSCLC. Eur Respir J. 2006;27:889–94.PubMed Bernasconi M, Chhajed PN, Gambazzi F, Bubendorf L, Rasch H, Kneifel S, et al. Combined transbronchial needle aspiration and positron emission tomography for mediastinal staging of NSCLC. Eur Respir J. 2006;27:889–94.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Subedi N, Scarsbrook A, Darby M, Korde K, Mc Shane P, Muers MF. The clinical impact of integrated FDG PET–CT on management decisions in patients with lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2009;64:301–7.PubMedCrossRef Subedi N, Scarsbrook A, Darby M, Korde K, Mc Shane P, Muers MF. The clinical impact of integrated FDG PET–CT on management decisions in patients with lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2009;64:301–7.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Maziak DE, Darling GE, Inculet RI, Gulenchyn KY, Driedger AA, Ung YC, et al. Positron emission tomography in staging early lung cancer. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:221–8.PubMed Maziak DE, Darling GE, Inculet RI, Gulenchyn KY, Driedger AA, Ung YC, et al. Positron emission tomography in staging early lung cancer. A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:221–8.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Fischer B, Lassen U, Mortensen J, Larsen S, Loft A, Bertelsen A, et al. Preoperative staging of lung cancer with combined PET–CT. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:32–9.PubMedCrossRef Fischer B, Lassen U, Mortensen J, Larsen S, Loft A, Bertelsen A, et al. Preoperative staging of lung cancer with combined PET–CT. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:32–9.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Additional value of FDG-PET to contrast enhanced-computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer: a Japanese multicenter clinical study
Authors
Kazuo Kubota
Koji Murakami
Tomio Inoue
Harumi Itoh
Tsuneo Saga
Susumu Shiomi
Jun Hatazawa
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 10/2011
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-011-0529-4

Other articles of this Issue 10/2011

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 10/2011 Go to the issue