Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology 2/2020

Open Access 01-02-2020 | Cervical Cancer | Clinical Guides in Oncology

SEOM clinical guidelines for cervical cancer (2019)

Authors: A. de Juan, A. Redondo, M. J. Rubio, Y. García, J. Cueva, L. Gaba, A. Yubero, J. Alarcón, C. Maximiano, A. Oaknin

Published in: Clinical and Translational Oncology | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide, strongly linked to high-risk human papilloma virus infection. In high-income countries, the screening programs have dramatically decreased the incidence of CC; however, the lack of accessibility to them in developing countries makes CC an important cause of mortality. Clinical stage is the most relevant prognostic factor in CC. The new FIGO staging system published in 2018 is more accurate than the previous one since it takes into account the lymph node status. In early stages, the primary treatment is surgery—with some concerns recently raised regarding minimally invasive surgery because it might decrease survival—or radiotherapy, whereas concomitant chemo-radiotherapy is the conventional approach in locally advanced stages. For recurrent or metastatic CC, the combination of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab is the preferred therapy. Immunotherapy approach based on checkpoint inhibitors is evolving as the election therapy following failure to platinum therapy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L. Cervical cancer. Lancet (London). 2019;393(10167):169–82.CrossRef Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L. Cervical cancer. Lancet (London). 2019;393(10167):169–82.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.CrossRef Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, Tunesi S, Snijders PJ, Arbyn M. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2014;383(9916):524–32.CrossRef Ronco G, Dillner J, Elfström KM, Tunesi S, Snijders PJ, Arbyn M. Efficacy of HPV-based screening for prevention of invasive cervical cancer: follow-up of four European randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2014;383(9916):524–32.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Marth C, Landoni F, Mahner S, McCormack M, Gonzalez-Martin A, Colombo N; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(Suppl 4):iv262. Marth C, Landoni F, Mahner S, McCormack M, Gonzalez-Martin A, Colombo N; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Cervical cancer: ESMO Clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(Suppl 4):iv262.
5.
go back to reference Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, Denny LA, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, et al. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):129–35.CrossRef Bhatla N, Berek JS, Cuello Fredes M, Denny LA, Grenman S, Karunaratne K, et al. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019;145(1):129–35.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Matchar DB, Myers ER. FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97(1):183–91.CrossRef Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Matchar DB, Myers ER. FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97(1):183–91.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brockbank E, Kokka F, Bryant A, Pomel C, Reynolds K. Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;28(3):CD008217. Brockbank E, Kokka F, Bryant A, Pomel C, Reynolds K. Pre-treatment surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment in locally advanced cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;28(3):CD008217.
8.
go back to reference Tax C, Rovers MM, De Graaf C, Zusterzeel PLM, Bekkers RLM. The sentinel node procedure in early stage cervical cancer, taking the next step; a diagnostic review. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;139:559–67.CrossRef Tax C, Rovers MM, De Graaf C, Zusterzeel PLM, Bekkers RLM. The sentinel node procedure in early stage cervical cancer, taking the next step; a diagnostic review. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;139:559–67.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1895–904.CrossRef Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1895–904.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L, Keating NL, Del Carmen MG, Yang J, et al. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2019;74(2):84–5.CrossRef Melamed A, Margul DJ, Chen L, Keating NL, Del Carmen MG, Yang J, et al. Survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2019;74(2):84–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Margul DJ, Yang J, Seagle BL, Kocherginsky M, Shahabi S. Outcomes and costs of open, robotic, and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 2018;36(15_suppl):5502.CrossRef Margul DJ, Yang J, Seagle BL, Kocherginsky M, Shahabi S. Outcomes and costs of open, robotic, and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol 2018;36(15_suppl):5502.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Rotman M, Sedlis A, Piedmonte MR, Bundy B, Lentz SS, Muderspach LI, et al. A phase III randomized trial of postoperative pelvic irradiation in Stage IB cervical carcinoma with poor prognostic features: follow-up of a gynecologic oncology group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65(1):169–76.CrossRef Rotman M, Sedlis A, Piedmonte MR, Bundy B, Lentz SS, Muderspach LI, et al. A phase III randomized trial of postoperative pelvic irradiation in Stage IB cervical carcinoma with poor prognostic features: follow-up of a gynecologic oncology group study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65(1):169–76.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Peters WA 3rd, Liu PY, Barrett RJ 2nd, Stock RJ, Monk BJ, Berek JS, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(8):1606–13.CrossRef Peters WA 3rd, Liu PY, Barrett RJ 2nd, Stock RJ, Monk BJ, Berek JS, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and pelvic radiation therapy compared with pelvic radiation therapy alone as adjuvant therapy after radical surgery in high-risk early-stage cancer of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(8):1606–13.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (CCCMAC). Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: individual patient data meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;1:CD008285. Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration (CCCMAC). Reducing uncertainties about the effects of chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: individual patient data meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;1:CD008285.
15.
go back to reference Dueñas-Gonzalez A, Zarba JJ, Patel F, Alcedo JC, Beslija S, Casanova L, et al. Phase III, open-label, randomized study comparing concurrent gemcitabine plus cisplatin and radiation followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation in patients with stage IIB to IVA carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(13):1678–85.CrossRef Dueñas-Gonzalez A, Zarba JJ, Patel F, Alcedo JC, Beslija S, Casanova L, et al. Phase III, open-label, randomized study comparing concurrent gemcitabine plus cisplatin and radiation followed by adjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation in patients with stage IIB to IVA carcinoma of the cervix. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(13):1678–85.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gupta S, Maheshwari A, Parab P, Mahantshetty U, Hawaldar R, Sastri Chopra S, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with stage IB2, IIA, or IIB squamous cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(16):1548–55.CrossRef Gupta S, Maheshwari A, Parab P, Mahantshetty U, Hawaldar R, Sastri Chopra S, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with stage IB2, IIA, or IIB squamous cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(16):1548–55.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kenter G, Greggi S, Vergote I, Katsaros D, Kobierski J, Massuger L, et al. Results from neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery compared to chemoradiation for stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer EORTC CGC 55994. J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 5503).CrossRef Kenter G, Greggi S, Vergote I, Katsaros D, Kobierski J, Massuger L, et al. Results from neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery compared to chemoradiation for stage Ib2-IIb cervical cancer EORTC CGC 55994. J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl; abstr 5503).CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chu Y, Zheng A, Wang F, Lin W, Yang X, Han L, et al. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET or PET-CT in recurrent cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun. 2014;35(2):144–50.CrossRef Chu Y, Zheng A, Wang F, Lin W, Yang X, Han L, et al. Diagnostic value of 18F-FDG-PET or PET-CT in recurrent cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nucl Med Commun. 2014;35(2):144–50.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lee YS, Kim YS, Kim JH, Ahn SD, Lee SW, Shin SS, et al. Feasibility and outcome of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for recurrent cervical carcinoma after initial surgery. Tumori. 2010;96:553–9.CrossRef Lee YS, Kim YS, Kim JH, Ahn SD, Lee SW, Shin SS, et al. Feasibility and outcome of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for recurrent cervical carcinoma after initial surgery. Tumori. 2010;96:553–9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sardain H, Lavoue V, Redpath M, Bertheuil N, Foucher F, Levêque J. Curative pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical carcinoma in the era of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41(8): 975–85.CrossRef Sardain H, Lavoue V, Redpath M, Bertheuil N, Foucher F, Levêque J. Curative pelvic exenteration for recurrent cervical carcinoma in the era of concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy. A systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41(8): 975–85.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Liontos M, Kyriazoglou A, Dimitriadis I, Dimopoulos MA, Bamias A. Systemic therapy in cervical cancer: 30 years in review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019;137:9–17.CrossRef Liontos M, Kyriazoglou A, Dimitriadis I, Dimopoulos MA, Bamias A. Systemic therapy in cervical cancer: 30 years in review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019;137:9–17.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kitagawa R, Katsumata N, Shibata T, Kamura T, Kasamatsu T, Nakanishi T, et al. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus cisplatin in metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer: the open-label randomized phase III trial JCOG0505. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(19):2129–35.CrossRef Kitagawa R, Katsumata N, Shibata T, Kamura T, Kasamatsu T, Nakanishi T, et al. Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus cisplatin in metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer: the open-label randomized phase III trial JCOG0505. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(19):2129–35.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tewari KS, Sill MW, Penson RT, Huang H, Ramondetta LM, Landrum LM, et al. Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial (Gynecologic Oncology Group 240). Lancet. 2017;390(10103):1654–63.CrossRef Tewari KS, Sill MW, Penson RT, Huang H, Ramondetta LM, Landrum LM, et al. Bevacizumab for advanced cervical cancer: final overall survival and adverse event analysis of a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial (Gynecologic Oncology Group 240). Lancet. 2017;390(10103):1654–63.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Redondo A, Colombo N, Dreosti L, McCormack M, Nogueira Rodriguez A, Scambia G, et al. Primary results from CECILIA, a global single-arm phase 2 study evaluating bevacizumab (BEV), carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) for advanced cervical cancer (aCC). ESMO Congress 2019, abstract #3284. Redondo A, Colombo N, Dreosti L, McCormack M, Nogueira Rodriguez A, Scambia G, et al. Primary results from CECILIA, a global single-arm phase 2 study evaluating bevacizumab (BEV), carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) for advanced cervical cancer (aCC). ESMO Congress 2019, abstract #3284.
25.
go back to reference Menderes G, Black J, Schwab CL, Santin AD. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy for cervical cancer: an update. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016;16(1):83–98.CrossRef Menderes G, Black J, Schwab CL, Santin AD. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy for cervical cancer: an update. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016;16(1):83–98.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Chung HC, Ros W, Delord JP, Perets R, Italiano A, Shapira-Frommer R, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced cervical cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(17):1470–8.CrossRef Chung HC, Ros W, Delord JP, Perets R, Italiano A, Shapira-Frommer R, et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in previously treated advanced cervical cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(17):1470–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Naumann RW, Hollebecque A, Meyer T, Devlin MJ, Oaknin A, Kerger J. Safety and efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy in recurrent or metastatic cervical, vaginal, or vulvar carcinoma: results from the phase I/II CheckMate 358 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(31):2825–34.CrossRef Naumann RW, Hollebecque A, Meyer T, Devlin MJ, Oaknin A, Kerger J. Safety and efficacy of nivolumab monotherapy in recurrent or metastatic cervical, vaginal, or vulvar carcinoma: results from the phase I/II CheckMate 358 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(31):2825–34.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Oaknin A, Gladieff L, Colombo N, Villacampa G, Mirza MR, de Giorgi U, et al. A randomized, open label, phase III study of cisplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy with bevacizumab (CTx plus B) with or without atezolizumab (Atz) as first-line treatment for metastatic, persistent or recurrent (m/r) carcinoma of the cérvix. J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 15; abstr TPS5594). Oaknin A, Gladieff L, Colombo N, Villacampa G, Mirza MR, de Giorgi U, et al. A randomized, open label, phase III study of cisplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy with bevacizumab (CTx plus B) with or without atezolizumab (Atz) as first-line treatment for metastatic, persistent or recurrent (m/r) carcinoma of the cérvix. J Clin Oncol 37, 2019 (suppl 15; abstr TPS5594).
29.
go back to reference Salani R, Khanna N, Frimer M, Bristow R4, Chen L. An update on post-treatment surveillance and diagnosis of recurrence in women with gynecologic malignancies: Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) recommendations. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;146(1):3–10.CrossRef Salani R, Khanna N, Frimer M, Bristow R4, Chen L. An update on post-treatment surveillance and diagnosis of recurrence in women with gynecologic malignancies: Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) recommendations. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;146(1):3–10.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Elit L, Kennedy EB, Fyles A, Metser U. Follow-up for cervical cancer: a program in evidence-based care systematic review and clinical practice guideline update. Curr Oncol. 2016;23(2):109–18.CrossRef Elit L, Kennedy EB, Fyles A, Metser U. Follow-up for cervical cancer: a program in evidence-based care systematic review and clinical practice guideline update. Curr Oncol. 2016;23(2):109–18.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
SEOM clinical guidelines for cervical cancer (2019)
Authors
A. de Juan
A. Redondo
M. J. Rubio
Y. García
J. Cueva
L. Gaba
A. Yubero
J. Alarcón
C. Maximiano
A. Oaknin
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1699-048X
Electronic ISSN: 1699-3055
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-019-02271-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Clinical and Translational Oncology 2/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine