Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2/2022

28-03-2021 | Lacrimal Duct Stenosis | Original Article

Lacrimal Sac Anterior Border-Maxillary Line Distance: Effect on Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) Surgery Results and NLDO-SS Questionnaire

Authors: Ejder Ciğer, Akif İşlek

Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Special Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of the maxillary line (ML)-lacrimal sac anterior border (LSA) distance on the results of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) operation. The study was designed retrospectively. The distance between LSA and ML was measured from preoperative paranasal sinus computed tomography (PNSCT) images. Nasolacrimal duct obstruction symptom score (NLDO-SS) was calculated before and after surgery. The endoscopically proven of the transition of the 2% fluorescein drop instilled into the eye to the nasal passage accepted as a surgical success. 47 patients included in the study and eight of them underwent bilateral EDCR. The average age of the patients was 50.3 ± 14.8. The LSA-ML distance was 4.2 ± 1.0 mm in all patients. The duration of surgery was found as 38.1 ± 6.1 min for each side. The preoperative NLDO-SS mean was 54.9 ± 11.7 and 22.2 ± 12.1 postoperatively (p = 0.000, CI = 28.9–36.2). Six patients (11%) required revision surgery. A statistically significant high positive correlation was found between duration of surgery and LSA-ML distance (p = 0.000, r = 0.840). There was a significant negative correlation between the duration of surgery and postoperative NLDO-SS (p = 0.041, r = −0.276). The LSA-ML distance calculated in this study was found to be significantly associated with the decrease in the duration of surgery and the NLDO-SS score obtained after surgery. However, more valid results can be obtained if similar studies are carried out in larger samples containing a sufficient number of revision cases.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chastain JB, Cooper MH, Sindwani R (2005) The maxillary line: Anatomic characterization and clinical utility of an important surgical landmark. Laryngoscope 115(6):990–992CrossRefPubMed Chastain JB, Cooper MH, Sindwani R (2005) The maxillary line: Anatomic characterization and clinical utility of an important surgical landmark. Laryngoscope 115(6):990–992CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Calhoun KH, Rotzler WH, Stiernberg CM (1990) Surgical anatomy of the lateral nasal wall. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 102(2):156–160CrossRefPubMed Calhoun KH, Rotzler WH, Stiernberg CM (1990) Surgical anatomy of the lateral nasal wall. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 102(2):156–160CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wang X, Chen X, Zheng M, Liu C, Wang C, Zhang L (2019) The relationships between the nasolacrimal duct and the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. Laryngoscope 129(5):1030–1034CrossRefPubMed Wang X, Chen X, Zheng M, Liu C, Wang C, Zhang L (2019) The relationships between the nasolacrimal duct and the anterior wall of the maxillary sinus. Laryngoscope 129(5):1030–1034CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lin GC, Brook CD, Hatton MP, Metson R (2017) Causes of dacryocystorhinostomy failure: external versus endoscopic approach. Am J Rhinol Allergy 31(3):181–185CrossRefPubMed Lin GC, Brook CD, Hatton MP, Metson R (2017) Causes of dacryocystorhinostomy failure: external versus endoscopic approach. Am J Rhinol Allergy 31(3):181–185CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Orhan M, Saylam CY, Midilli R (2009) Intranasal localization of the lacrimal sac. Arch Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 135(8):764–770CrossRefPubMed Orhan M, Saylam CY, Midilli R (2009) Intranasal localization of the lacrimal sac. Arch Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 135(8):764–770CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lee H, Ha S, Lee Y, Park M, Baek S (2012) Anatomical and morphometric study of the bony nasolacrimal canal using computed tomography. Ophthalmologica 227(3):153–159CrossRefPubMed Lee H, Ha S, Lee Y, Park M, Baek S (2012) Anatomical and morphometric study of the bony nasolacrimal canal using computed tomography. Ophthalmologica 227(3):153–159CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Smirnov G, Tuomilehto H, Kokki H, Kemppainen T, Kiviniemi V, Nuutinen J et al (2010) Symptom score questionnaire for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults-a novel tool to assess the outcome after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Rhinology 48(4):446–451CrossRefPubMed Smirnov G, Tuomilehto H, Kokki H, Kemppainen T, Kiviniemi V, Nuutinen J et al (2010) Symptom score questionnaire for nasolacrimal duct obstruction in adults-a novel tool to assess the outcome after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Rhinology 48(4):446–451CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jawaheer L, MacEwn C, Anijeet D (2017) Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (Review ). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:007097 Jawaheer L, MacEwn C, Anijeet D (2017) Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (Review ). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:007097
10.
go back to reference Shams PN, Wormald PJ, Selva D (2015) Anatomical landmarks of the lateral nasal wall: implications for endonasal lacrimal surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 26(5):408–415CrossRefPubMed Shams PN, Wormald PJ, Selva D (2015) Anatomical landmarks of the lateral nasal wall: implications for endonasal lacrimal surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 26(5):408–415CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Simmen D, Veerasigamani N, Briner HR, Jones N, Schuknecht B (2017) Anterior maxillary wall and lacrimal duct relationship-CT analysis for prelacrimal access to the maxillary sinus. Rhinology 6:170–174CrossRef Simmen D, Veerasigamani N, Briner HR, Jones N, Schuknecht B (2017) Anterior maxillary wall and lacrimal duct relationship-CT analysis for prelacrimal access to the maxillary sinus. Rhinology 6:170–174CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Herzallah IR, Marglani OA, Muathen SH, Obaid AA (2019) Endoscopic and radiologic findings in failed dacryocystorhinostomy: teaching pearls for success. Am J Rhinol Allergy 33(3):247–255CrossRefPubMed Herzallah IR, Marglani OA, Muathen SH, Obaid AA (2019) Endoscopic and radiologic findings in failed dacryocystorhinostomy: teaching pearls for success. Am J Rhinol Allergy 33(3):247–255CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ciğer E, Balci MK, Arslanoğlu S, Eren E (2018) Endoscopic-powered dacryocystorhinostomy without stenting: long-term outcomes of 120 procedures. Am J Rhinol Allergy 32(4):303–309CrossRefPubMed Ciğer E, Balci MK, Arslanoğlu S, Eren E (2018) Endoscopic-powered dacryocystorhinostomy without stenting: long-term outcomes of 120 procedures. Am J Rhinol Allergy 32(4):303–309CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hodgson N, Bratton E, Whipple K, Priel A, Oh SR, Fante RG et al (2014) Outcomes of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy without mucosal flap preservation. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 30(1):24–27CrossRefPubMed Hodgson N, Bratton E, Whipple K, Priel A, Oh SR, Fante RG et al (2014) Outcomes of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy without mucosal flap preservation. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 30(1):24–27CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Maliborski A, Rózycki R (2014) Diagnostic imaging of the nasolacrimal drainage system. Part I. Radiological anatomy of lacrimal pathways. Physiology of tear secretion and tear outflow. Med Sci Monit 20:628–638CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Maliborski A, Rózycki R (2014) Diagnostic imaging of the nasolacrimal drainage system. Part I. Radiological anatomy of lacrimal pathways. Physiology of tear secretion and tear outflow. Med Sci Monit 20:628–638CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Lacrimal Sac Anterior Border-Maxillary Line Distance: Effect on Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy (EDCR) Surgery Results and NLDO-SS Questionnaire
Authors
Ejder Ciğer
Akif İşlek
Publication date
28-03-2021
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Issue Special Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02524-w

Other articles of this Special Issue 2/2022

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 2/2022 Go to the issue