Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 3/2015

01-09-2015 | Original Article

Qualitative Assessment of Speech Perception Performance of Early and Late Cochlear Implantees

Authors: Anjali R. Kant, Sonal Pathak

Published in: Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The present study aims to provide a qualitative description and comparison of speech perception performance using model based tests like multisyllabic lexical neighborhood test (MLNT) and lexical neighborhood test (LNT), in early and late implanted (prelingual) hearing impaired children using cochlear implants. The subjects comprised of cochlear implantees; Group I (early implantees)—n = 15, 3–6 years of age; mean age at implantation—3½ years. Group II (late implantees)—n = 15, 7–13 years of age; mean age at implantation—5 years. The tests were presented in a sound treated room at 70 dBSPL. The children were instructed to repeat the words on hearing them. Responses were scored as percentage of words correctly repeated. Their means were computed. The late implantees achieved higher scores for words on MLNT than those on LNT. This may imply that late implantees are making use of length cues in order to aid them in speech perception. The major phonological process used by early implantees was deletion and by the late implantees was substitution. One needs to wait until the child achieves a score of 20 % on LNT before assessing other aspects of his/her speech perception abilities. There appears to be a need to use speech perception tests which are based on theoretical empirical models, in order to enable us to give a descriptive analysis of post implant speech perception performance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tyler R (1993) Speech perception by children. In: Tyler R (ed) Cochlear implants: audiological foundations. Singular Publishing Group Inc, San Diego Tyler R (1993) Speech perception by children. In: Tyler R (ed) Cochlear implants: audiological foundations. Singular Publishing Group Inc, San Diego
2.
go back to reference Erber N, Alencewicz C (1976) Audiological evaluation of deaf children. J Speech Hear Disord 41:256–267CrossRefPubMed Erber N, Alencewicz C (1976) Audiological evaluation of deaf children. J Speech Hear Disord 41:256–267CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Thielemeir MA, Tonokawa LL, Peterson B, Eisenberg LS (1985) Audiological results in children with the cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 6(3):27S–35S Thielemeir MA, Tonokawa LL, Peterson B, Eisenberg LS (1985) Audiological results in children with the cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing 6(3):27S–35S
4.
go back to reference Ross M, Randolph K (1990) A test of auditory perception of alphabet letters for hearing impaired children—the APAL test. Volta Rev 12(5):237–244 Ross M, Randolph K (1990) A test of auditory perception of alphabet letters for hearing impaired children—the APAL test. Volta Rev 12(5):237–244
5.
go back to reference Moog J, Geers A (1990) Early speech perception test for profoundly hearing impaired children. Central Institute for the deaf, St. Louis Moog J, Geers A (1990) Early speech perception test for profoundly hearing impaired children. Central Institute for the deaf, St. Louis
8.
go back to reference Kim CS (2003) Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4 year time period. Acta Otolaryngol 123(2):148–153CrossRefPubMed Kim CS (2003) Speech perception after cochlear implantation over a 4 year time period. Acta Otolaryngol 123(2):148–153CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tyler R, Teagle H, Kelsay D, Gantz B, Woodworth G, Parkinson A (2002) Speech perception by prelingually deaf children after 6 years of cochlear implant use: effects of age at implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (suppl) 185:82–84 Tyler R, Teagle H, Kelsay D, Gantz B, Woodworth G, Parkinson A (2002) Speech perception by prelingually deaf children after 6 years of cochlear implant use: effects of age at implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (suppl) 185:82–84
10.
go back to reference Wu J, Lin C, Yang H, Lin Y (2006) Effect of age at cochlear implantation on open-set word recognition in Mandarin speaking deaf children. Int J Pediatr Otol Rhinol Laryngol 70(2):207–211 Wu J, Lin C, Yang H, Lin Y (2006) Effect of age at cochlear implantation on open-set word recognition in Mandarin speaking deaf children. Int J Pediatr Otol Rhinol Laryngol 70(2):207–211
11.
go back to reference Mecham MJ (1970) Screening speech articulation test. Communication Research associates, Inc, Utah Mecham MJ (1970) Screening speech articulation test. Communication Research associates, Inc, Utah
12.
go back to reference Kirk K (1999) Assessing speech perception in listeners with cochlear implants. The development of lexical neighborhood tests. Volta Rev 100(2):63–65 Kirk K (1999) Assessing speech perception in listeners with cochlear implants. The development of lexical neighborhood tests. Volta Rev 100(2):63–65
13.
go back to reference Pisoni DB (2005) Speech perception in deaf children with cochlear implants. In: Pisoni DB, Remez RE (eds) Handbook of speech perception. Blackwell Publishers, MaldenCrossRef Pisoni DB (2005) Speech perception in deaf children with cochlear implants. In: Pisoni DB, Remez RE (eds) Handbook of speech perception. Blackwell Publishers, MaldenCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Luce P (1986) A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition. Percept Psychophys 39:155–158CrossRefPubMed Luce P (1986) A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition. Percept Psychophys 39:155–158CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Chin S, Meyer T, McCutcheon G, Wright M, Pisoni D (1998) The structure of the mental lexicons of pediatric cochlear implant users: a preliminary report. Res Spok Lang Proces 22:279–290 Chin S, Meyer T, McCutcheon G, Wright M, Pisoni D (1998) The structure of the mental lexicons of pediatric cochlear implant users: a preliminary report. Res Spok Lang Proces 22:279–290
Metadata
Title
Qualitative Assessment of Speech Perception Performance of Early and Late Cochlear Implantees
Authors
Anjali R. Kant
Sonal Pathak
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 2231-3796
Electronic ISSN: 0973-7707
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-015-0881-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 3/2015 Go to the issue